ML20203A376

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 0 to Procedure CPP-025, QC Inspector Qualification Evaluation
ML20203A376
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 03/31/1986
From: Bajada E
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20202J051 List: ... further results
References
CPP-025, CPP-25, NUDOCS 8607170225
Download: ML20203A376 (5)
v • d • e


Text

__ - __ ---_

t ,

, Pogs 1 of 4 EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION

  • CONTR0rlD CO?Y CONTROL h0 oe-onL COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS
PROCEDURE NO
CPP-025 REVISION: 0 ISSUE DATE: 03/31/86 QC INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION EVALUATION Prepared by: Date: M O[N Approved by: . C. Cad Date: Id//85 On-Site QA Represe ative Approved by: { Date: hb!86 QA/QCReviewTeamLeagr / /

h A

A -

_ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ __. _ . - . . , . _ _ _ _ _ . . . . _ . _ . . _ ~ . . _ _ _ - _ _ _ . . . _ . . -

. ~ _ - - - _- , _ _ __ _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ -

CPP-025 Revision: 0 4

1.0 PURPOSE This procedure establishes measures to ensure that appropriate deviations are evaluated in accordance with Issue-Specific Action Plan (ISAP) I.d.1 and any further reinspections conducted. ,

l 2.0 APPLICABILITY l

This procedure is applicable to deviations concerning ASME and/or non-ASME inspector certification reported as a result of ISAP VII.c

  • reinspection / documentation reviews and evaluated by the ISAP 1.d.1 Issue Coordinator. ,.

3.0 REFERENCES

3.1 CPP-010. " Preparation of Deviation Reports."

3.2 ISAP I.d.1, "QC Inspector Qualifications."

3.3 QI-005, " Evaluation of Inspector Performance" t 4.0 GENERAL Deviation Reports (DRs) which document apparent deviations  :

concerning QC inspector certifications are forwarded to the ISAP l I.d.1 Issue Coordinator in accordance with Reference 3.1.  :

Consequently, the ISAP I.d.1 Issue Coordinator verifies that the i reported condition is a departure from the established requirements and, as required, makes a determination relative to the qualification of uncertified inspectors. Finally, samples of the work performed by any unqualified QC inspectors are reinspected and evaluated in accordance with Reference 3.2.

4.1 Responsibilities l i I j 4.1.1 ISAP I.d.I' Coordinator l The ISAP I.d.1 Coordinator validates DRs associated

with QC inspector certification and, as required, makes determinations relative to the appropriateness and scope of any reinspections. ,

3 4.1.2 QA/QC Review Team Leader and ISAP VII.c Issue  !

I Coordinator l

l As required, the QA/QC Review Team Leader and the ISAP VII.c Issue Coordinator concur in decisions (not) to i

implement Phase III of Reference 3.2.

2 i

0---- , . - , _ , . , - - - - _ , - - - - - - - - - . . , - , . _ _ - _ _ , _ _ - , _ , , . _ , , , , - , _ , _ . _

, - . - - - . - .- . . . . . _. 2- - - - - -. . . - -

CPP-025 Rsvision: 0 l

4.2 Policy l

Activities performed under this procedure shall conform to the policies contained in the latest Comanche Peak Response Team Program Plan, and the applicable ISAP.

Should an activity be designated as the responsibility of a Coordinator, or higher, it may be delegated by that individual

to an individual under his or her supervision.

l 4.3 Conflicts In the case of a conflict between this procedure and the documents referenced in Section 4.2, the latter shall govern.

4.4 Definitions None.

5.0 PROCEDURE 5.1 Certification verification Upon their receipt, the ISAP I d.1 Issue Coordinator determines the validity of DRs that document apparent deviations relative to QC inspector certification. Should the Coordinator verify that documentation relative to the inspector's certification is unavailable, the DR is denoted as valid, then signed and dated by the Coordinator.

NOTE: Invalid DRs require reasonable justification and the signature concurrence of the first reviewers and the originator.

DRs determined to be (in) valid are transmitted to, then subsequently distributed and controlled by, the QA/QC Records Administrator in accordance with Reference 3.1. Valid DRs are also evaluated in accordance with Section 5.2.

5.2 Qualification Determination The Coordinator conducts reviews to determine whether any uncertified QC inspectors were able to conduct inspections despite any apparent weaknesses in their qualification documentation. The Coordinator documents the results of the '

reviews on Inspector Certification Evaluation Summary forms and forwards them to the responsible QA/QC Lead Engineers for use in their collective evaluations.

3

_ _ _ _ . - - .._ _ -___ _ _ _ . = _ _ _ - - -

CPP-025 Ravinien: 0 g Should it be evident that an individual was unqualified to ,

conduct inspections, the ISAP 1.d.1 Issue Coordinator, the .

ISAP VII.c Coordinator, and the responsible QA/QC engineer (s) determine whether to reinspe.ct any work. It may be unnecessary, for example, to reinspect work when any additional data can be expected to have a negligible affect on the conclusions already formed.

The Coordinator ensures the preparation of a memorandum which provides reasonable justification for (not) implementing Phase III of Reference 3.2. The memorandum, addressed to (the ISAP VII.c) file, shall indicate the concurrence of the individuals l involved in the decision concerning the implementation of 1 Phase III of Reference 3.2 and the QA/QC Review Team Leader.

The Coordinator distributes copies of the memorandum to the:

CPRT Program Director for information.

CPSES QC Coordinator for information.

Responsible QA/QC Lead Engineer for use in the collective evaluation.

The ISAP I.d.1 Coordinator ensures reinspections of any work performed by unqualified QC inspectors are accomplished and documented in accordance with Reference 3.3.

6.0 ATTACBENTS l

6.1 QC Inspector Qualification Flow Diagram, i

I

\ .

1

.i P

I 4

a l

, Attechmant 6.1 CPP-025 Revisions: 0 Page 1 of 1 l

QC INSPECTOR QUALIFICATION FLOW DIAGRAM OR PE:

INSPECTOR IS!GNED BY THE FIRST REVIEWER CERTIFICAT!0N1 A'tD THE QA/QC LEAD ENGINEER.

w I I I.d.1 ISSUE COORDINATOR INSPECTOR YES DR CERTIFIED INVALID 2 7

NO IINCLUDES JUSTIFICATION RE: INVALIDATION.

CC: 0A/QC LEAD ENGINEER -

DR FOR COLLECTIVE EVAL. VALID AND TUGC0 FOR NCR EVAL.

y 3 !NCLUDES THE BA515 FOR CC: TDGC0 5 ACTION. FOR CORRECTIVE k- SHEET 3 THE DETERMINATION.

I I

I MSP. QUAL.

YES SMRI DEMONSTRATED SHEET

? ACCEPTA8LE NO V

SIMMRY QC LEAD ENGINEER SHEET -

FOR UNACCEPTA8LE COLLECTIVE EVALUATION 1

CC: CPRT PROGRAM DIR.,

M RE-PHASEli! 41NCLUDES JUSTIFICATION FOR i TUGCO.

LEAD AND ENGINEER. THE QA/QC k- (NOT) IMPLEMENTING PHASE III.

IMPLEMENTATION 4 )

  1. l

_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20203A376&oldid=3070367"