ML20202J662

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 1 to Procedure CPP-013, Collective Evaluation of Quality of Const
ML20202J662
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 01/22/1986
From: Ross G
EVALUATION RESEARCH CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20202J051 List: ... further results
References
CPP-013, CPP-13, NUDOCS 8607170122
Download: ML20202J662 (10)
v • d • e


Text

. - -

Pcg3 1 cf 6 N3

% ~{

t 3

..ww.o,3 yc. - 1

/' Vs^} 'dA $is4.4 4

'N' nt$2 EVALUATION RESEARCH CORPORATION

' ;;-4g C0n011 D C0?Y CONTROL NO. M'oD/ -

COMANCHE PEAK RESPONSE TEAM

~

PROJECT PROCEDURE FOR QA/QC ISSUE-SPECIFIC ACTION PLANS PROCEDURE NO. CPP-013 I

REVISION: 1 EFFECTIVE DATE: 01/22/86 6

y COLLECTIVE EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY OF CONSTRUCTION f

i l

Prepared by: Mm me Date: / //// f(d Approved by: dk pF' Dater /-/ '/ 'lT8 On-Site QA Representative Approved by: / [G Date: /!-) ) tf(3 QAMC Review Team Leader / /

0607170122 060711 5 PDR ADOCK 0500 L

a .

3 CPP-013

' f.

REY. 1 [I s-

[

5 1.0 M_SE . ,' .'i v

) . . . . .

wa x.

Ttde procedure describes the methodology QA/QC Review Team ' .

psiisonnel will employ in the Collective Evaluationlof the Quality I of Construction at CPSES.

2.0 APPLICABILITY

, The scope of this procedure is the performance of a collective I esaluation of the overall Quality of Construction at CPSES based upon the results of the CPRT Issue Specific Action Plans and input from'the CPRT Design Adequacy Program and other applicable external sources. The evaluation will determine the adequacy of installed hardware and will provide recommendations to resolve deficiencies which would detract from the ability of hardware to perform '

intended safety functions.

3.0 REFERENCES

3.1 CPRT " Program Plan and Issue Specific Action Plans" (especially I

Appendix B, entitled " Quality of Construction and QA/QC Adequacy Plan".)

e 3.2 CPP-004, " Project Working Files."

O i

4.0 CENERAL l

4.1 Responsibilities

! 4.1.1 The Review Team Leader (RTL) has overall responsibility i for the collective evaluation of the Quality of i Construction, interfacing with other team leaders, and approval of final report.

4.1.2 The Programmatic ISAP Supervisor is responsible for the i completion of evaluation activities described in this 1 procedure. He will be assisted by the QA/QC Hardware Collective Evaluation Engineer and support engineers as required.

4 4.2 Policy 4.2.1 Personnel Qualification Requirements Personnel participating in the implementation of this procedure shall be qualified in accordance with paragraph III.H of the CPRT Program Plan.

2 r

~'

a '3 3 p

CPP-013 4 REV. 1 3 , 4.0 . GENERAL.(Cont'd)

J ,

'* y_3;g 4tQPolicy(Cont'd) 4.2.2 Procedures Development and implementation of this procedure shall be conducted in accordance with Reference 3.1 and the ERC Management Plan.

4.2.3 Work Files g Work files shall be maintained during the collective evaluation process in accordance with Reference 3.2.

4.3 Procedure Overview .

I 4.3.1 The collective evaluation of the Quality of Construction is an integral part of the " Quality of Construction and QA/QC Adequacy Plan" as described in reference 3.1 and will take into account input from ,

s evaluation reports of the following plans and programs:

a. Category 1 QA'/QC ISAPs These are the Plans for specific construction issues identified by external sources and address O- both QA/QC and hardware issues.
b. Category 2 QA/QC ISAP This is the plan for self-initiated evaluation of

\

all construction work activities employed in the construction of safety-significant aspects of CPSES 3 and addresses both hardware reinspections and hardware documentation reviews.

c. Other CPRT ISAPs/DSAPs These are action plans which address additional construction issues identified by external sources.
d. Other Investigative Programs s

This includes other TUGC0 investigatory programs applicable to the CPRT effort.

t O

3

CPP-013

'4 REY. 1 4.0 GERERAL (Cont'd) 4.3N Procedure Overview (Cont'd) 4.3.2 Reviews and evaluations of the reports of the plans and programs of paragrsph 4.3.1 will be conducted to determine the fol"owing:

a. External source issues reghrding the quality of construction are resolved.
b. The quality of installed h'ardware and ability to perform intended safety function (s) are addressed.
c. Root causes and generic implications of construction deficiencies and adverse deviation trends are identified.
d. Improvements related to future CPSES construction ,

activities and plant operations are identified.

4.3.3 A repore documenting the scope of the evaluation and conclusions reached regarding the adequacy of installed hardware vill be issued to complete the requirements of ,

this procedure.

5.0 PROCEDUR_E_ ,

5.1 General ON This procedure will be implemented in two phases. Phase I activities consist of (1) reviewing external documents (Attachment 6.1) for hardware concerns, (2) reviewing Iscue-Specific Action Plans (ISAPs) (Attachment 6.2) for secpe, and (3) comparing hardware concerns to Populations and ISAPs using a matrix. The objective of this comparison is to

! assure complete coverage of all concerns by ISAPs.

Phase II consists of the collection, review and evaluation of all ISAP Result Reports, and reports of other applicable investigatory programs, to ensure resolution of issues identified in Phase I and to determine the overall adequacy of

, installed hardware. Additional program or hardware aspects i which are identified as areas of concern shall be further evaluated and the results of these evaluations included in the final conclusione.

5.2 Phase I - Development and Evaluation of Matrix Information 5.2.1 Review each external source document of Attachment 6.1 and identify hardware issues.

5.2.2 Identify Populations and ISAPs that address hardware issucs identified in 5.2.1.

4

CPP-013 e REV. I 5.0 PROCEDURE (Cont'd) f'PhaseI-DevelopmentandEvaluationofMatrixInformation

.s: = (Cont'd) 5.2.3 Prepare a matrix showing hardware issues versus Population and ISAP coverage.

5.2.4 Identify hardware issues that are not addressed, or are only partially addressed, by ISAPs.

NOTE: In certain cases during this evaluation process there may not be a clear distinction between hardware and program findings. In these cases, the findings shall be included in both the QA/QC and hardware evaluation processes.

5.2.5 Review issues that are not covered by ISAPs, or are only partially covered, and determine the necessity for further evaluation. If no further evaluation is required, justification for the decision shall be documented. The primary reason further evaluation would not be required is that information is available which clearly shows the issue to be invalid. If further evaluation is required, appropriate n recommendations for expanding the scope of Populations O and ISAPs shall be developed.

5.2.6 Advise the QA/QC RTL of issues not covered by ISAPs, or only partially covered, and recommendations for further evaluation.

5.2.7 Update matrix prepared in 5.2.3 through completion of Phase II with new inputs or requirements.

5.3 Phase II - Review / Evaluation of Issue Specific Action Plan Results and other Investigative Program Results 5.3.1 Obtain results of Issue Specific Action Plans as they are issued.

5.3.2 Review these results to determine that:

Specific issues covered by the plans and programs listed on the Phase I Matrix have been addressed.

Construction deficiencies and adverse deviation trends are identified.

i

  • Root causes and generic implications of construction deficiencics and adverse deviation h

a trends are identified, 5

CPP-013 4 REV. 1 5.0;.PEGGEDURE (Cont'd)

, +y#n cu.~ v fqSy3g* Phase II - Review / Evaluation of Issue Specific Action Plan ,

'.; ,.;,Results and other Investigative Program Results (Cont'd)

Corrective actions to resolve deficiencies and adverse deviation trends and prevent recurrence are identified.

l Appropriate recommendations will be made to the QA/QC RTL if additional information is needed to clarify reports or resolve potential problems.

5.3.3 Evaluate inter-relationships of these results to ',

identify additional adverse deviation trends. If clarifications are required, appropriate ~ '

recommendations will be made to the QA/QC RTL.

5.3.4 When all pertinent information is available, collectively evaluate construction deficiencies, adverse deviation trends, root causes, and generic 1

implications as to the quality of construction.

5.3.5 Prepare a final collective evaluation report on the adequacy of construction which and addresses the 6.

particulars of paragraph 5.3.4.

O 6.0 ATTACNMENTS 6.1 External Source Document List 6.2 CPRT Action Plan Review List l

v l

l 1O 6

s

- . . = ._ . _ - ..

~~

Attcchsent 6.1

'% CFF-013  !

Revision: 1 I Page 1 of 1 O 41s7

-a^ . .:

EXTERNAL SOURCE DOCUMENT LIST  !

c

1. NRC-TRT Evaluation Letters Dated September 18, 1984 Dated November 29, 1984 Dated January 8, 1985
2. NRC Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG 0797) Supp1'ements SSEP 7 SSER 8

.SSER 9 SSER 10 .

SSER 11 6

3. Other Reports / Documents NCR SIT Report - February 15, 1983 NCR CAT Report - April 11, 983 l

NRC Special Review Team Report - April, 1984 NRC Region IV Inspection Reports CYGNA Independent Assessment Program Report Concerns associated with matters in contention before the ASLB j for CPSES Technical Allegations raised.in the NRC HITS Docket Lobbin Report - February 9, 1982 MAC Report - May 17, 1985 l

Teledyne Report - February 21, 1985 O

Attcchment 6.2

~% CPP-013 Revision: 1 -

Page 1 of 3 O CPRT ACTION PLAN REVIEW LIST +I N) -. m a3 q:,g: * .

yg_

1.0 Category i ISAP's Programmatic ISAP's I.d.1 QC Inspector Qualifications I.d.2 Guidelines for Administration of QC Inspector Tests I.d.3 Craft Personnel Training VII.a.1 Material Traceability VII.a.2 Nonconformance and Corrective Action Systems ,

VII.a.3 Document Control VII.a.4 Audit Program and Auditor Qualification VII.a.5 Management Assessment VII.a.6 Exit Interviews 6

f

's VII.a.7 Housekee'ing p and System Cleanliness k-- VII.a.8 Fuel Fool Liner Documentation Hardware ISAP's VII.b.1 On-site Fabrication i

VII.b.2 Valve Disassembly VII.b.3 Pipe Support Inspections VII.b.4 Hilti Anchor Bolts Installation

VII.b.5 Electrical Raceway Support Inspections i

2.0 Category 2 ISAP VII.c Construction Reinspection / Documentation Review Plan 3.0 Other ISAP's/DSAP's 1.a.1 Heat Shrinkable Sleeves l

i I.a.2 Inspection Reports on Butt Splices l

1.a.3 Butt Splice Qualification

e Attechnent 6.2

% CPP-013 Reviefon: 1 3.0 Othe ISAP's/DSAP's (Cont'd)

I.e.4- Drawings / Terminations I.a.5 NCRs on Amp Terminal Lugs I.b.1 Flex / Flex Separation I.b.2 Flex / Cable Separation I.b.3 Conduit / Cable Tray Separation I.b.4 Barrier Removal I.c .

Conduit Supports

z. ,

II.a Reinforcing Steel in Cavity i

II.b Concrete Compressive Strength II.c Air Gap ,

II.d Control Room Ceiling II.e Rebar in Fuel Handling Building b III.a.1 HFT Date Packages III.a.2 JTG Approval of Test Data III.a.3 Tech Specs for Deferred Tests III.a.4 Traceability of Test Instruments III.b Conduct of CILRT III.c Prerequisite Testing III.d Preoperational Testing i

IV.a Surveillance Program for Coatings V.a Skewed Welds in NF Supnorts V.b Shortening of Anchor Bolts V.c Piping Between Buildings V.d Plug Welds V.e Installation of Main Steam Piping 2

e Attcchment 6.2 I CPP-013 Revision: 1 l 3.0 Other_ISAP's/DSAP's (Co ,t'd)

'I4u . .

VIfa .. Insulation / Shield Wall Gap VI.b Polar Crane Shims VIII Civil / Structural Discipline TASK VIII.a Cable Tray / Con Supp/ Critical Parameters TASK VIII.b Cable Tray / Con Supp/ Population Identification TASK VIII.c Cable Tray / Con Supp/ Determination of Gov Loads TASK VIII.d Cable Tray / Conduit Supports / Testing TASK VIII.e Cable Tray / Con Supp/ Comp & Sys Behavior /Modeling TASK VIII.f Cable Tray / Conduit Supports / System Analysis TASK VIII.g Component Design Evaluation .

IX Piping and Supports 6

X Mechanical Systems and Components XI Electrical, Instrumentation & Controls l

l l

l l

l O

I 3 i

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20202J662&oldid=3070679"