ML20138R834

Requests Submittal of Revised Application for Amend to License NPF-3,changing Tech Specs to Require Nuclear Review Board Rept to & Advise Senior Vice President,Nuclear

ML20138R834
Person / Time
Site:	Davis Besse
Issue date:	11/04/1985
From:	Stolz J Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Williams J TOLEDO EDISON CO.
References
TAC-59934, TAC-63189, NUDOCS 8511190098
Download: ML20138R834 (2)

Text

.-

NovembG;r 4,1985 Docket No. 50-346 .. DISTRIBUTION

l Docket File - ' ACRS-10 GEdison NRC PDR ~ Ringram ORB #4 Rdg GDick Mr. Joe Williams, Jr. HThompson ADeAgazio Vice President, Nuclear OELD Gray File Toledo Edison Company EJordan EBrach Edison Plaza - Stop 712 JPartlow 40rnstein 300 Madison Avenue BGrimes WPaulson Toledo, Ohio 43652

SUBJECT:

REQUEST TO REVISE PLANT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS TO REQUIRE THAT NUCLEAR REVIEW BOARD REPORT TO AND ADVISE THE SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, NUCLEAR - DAVIS BESSE NUCLEAR POWER STATION By letter dated July 26, 1985 (Serial No. 1170) Toledo Edison Company (TED) requested the subject revision to the Davis-Besse Technical Specifications.

In the Significant Hazard Consideration analysis portion of the application, a No Significant Hazards Determination was made by analogy to one of the examples provided to the NRC staff (48 FR 14870). The examples provide the staff with guidance concerning the application of the standards in 10 CFR 50.92. However, 10 CFR 50.91(a)(i) specifically requires the licensee requesting an amendment to provide an analysis using the three standards in 10 CFR 50.92(c). The basis for the requirement is, that before the proposed amendment is submitted, the licensee has completed the safety evaluation.

The licensee knows, based on the technical evaluation, whether the proposed amendment satisfies the three standards and should be able to present sound reasons to support the determination. The licensee may discuss examples to assist the staff in its analysis, but the discussion does not relieve the licensee of the requirements to address the three standards in 10 CFR 50.92(c).

, Toledo Edison is therefore requested to submit an amended request i incorporating a revised Significant Hazard Consideration analysis, or inform the staff of the desired disposition of the July 26, 1985 amendment request.

Sincerely,

• C:aana:, sum ug du 2. uma,*

John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 14 Division of Licensing cc: See next page 8511190098 851104 ff :DL 0 4:DL ADOCM 0 g6

%DR

cr JSto N

10/y/85 1p/ / / 5

j '

• g Mr. J. Williams Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station r Toledo Edison Company Unit No. I t cc:

j Donald H. Hauser, Esq.

4 Ohio Department of Health i

The Cleveland Electric ATTN: Radiological Health Illuminating Company Program Director

. P. O. Box 5000 P. O. Box 118 Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Columbus, Ohio' 43216

! Mr. Robert F. Peters Attorney General

! Manager, Nuclear Licensing Department of Attorney Toledo Edison Company General Edison Plaza 30 East Broad Street

. 300 Madison Avenue Columbus, Ohio 43215 Toledo, Ohio 43652 i

Mr. James W. Harris, Director

! Gerald Charnoff, Esq. Division of Power Generation Shaw, Pittman, Potts Ohio Department of Industrial Relations and Trowbridge 2323 West 5th Avenue 1800 M Street, N.W. P. O. Box 825 Washington, D.C. 20036 Columbus, Ohio 43216 ,

Paul M. Smart, Esq. Mr. Harold Kohn, Staff Scientist Fuller & Henry Power Siting Commission i 300 Madison Avenue 361 East Broad Street j P. O. Box 2088 Columbus, Ohio 43216 Toledo, Ohio 43603 Mr. Robert B. Porsum President Board of Babcock & Wilcox Ottawa County Nuclear Power Generation Port Clinton, Ohio 43452 Division i Suite 200, 7910 Woodmont Avenue

{ Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 5503 N. State Route 2 Oak Harbor, Ohio 43449 t

! Regional Administrator, Region III l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission i

799 Roosevelt Road j Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 l

i l l

}

i

. - _ _ , . _ . -__ ___ . ._ _____..u____. _ - , _ , _ , - . - . , _ . _ _ . . _ . _