IR 05000344/1978019

Forwards Rev Page 7 Correcting Typographical Error in Inspec Rept 50-344/78-19

ML20148U645
Person / Time
Site:	Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date:	12/01/1978
From:	Crews J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V)
To:	Goodwin C PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
References
NUDOCS 7812070126
Download: ML20148U645 (2)

Text

. . . - - _ _ . - - - - - - - _ . . _ - . _

.

. .

..

.arn,

'" -

t,, UNIT ED ST AT E9

.t , t NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION V ', - .

i

$, *(4 ,!!) [ SUITC 202, W ALNUT CREEK PLAZA

';,,

-

'

go 1990 N. C ALIFO R NI A BOULEV A RD

• • • e* W ALNUT C REEK, CALIFOR NI A 94S96 DEC 1IE Docket No. 50-344 Portland General Electric Company 121 S. W. Salmon Street Portland, Oregon 97204 Attention: Mr. Charles Goodwin, J Assistant Vice President Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: TROJAN PLANT INSPECTION REPORT No. 50-344/78-19 .

Please replace Page 7 of the subject report with the attached page which corrects a typographical error in the first paragraph (1979 instead of 1978).

Sinegrely, ,,

,

^t

'

(

. ef l,eac or Operations and Nuclear .

Support Branch u

Enclosure:

Corrected Page 7 to IE ,

Inspection Report 50-344/78-19  ;

I

-.,

Y r

'l812070 NE Q

. s

,

l (  !

-7-

'

l o

environment, possible submergence of components, qualification of design life, and requirements for cumulative testing of component Licensee representatives stated that these conditions / situations would be included in the review program and subsequent evaluations. Licensee representatives also

stated that (1) the evaluations would be completed by the middle of liarch,1979; (2) spot checks of electrical com- '

ponents in containment would be completed during the current outage (and possibly the next refueling outage) to verify that installed electrical equipment of concern meets design re-quirements; and (3) that corrective measures would be on a case-by-case basis if deficiencies are identified with appro-priate schedules developed for remedial action. This circular will remain open pending completion of the licensee's review program. This was discussed at the exit interview. (0 pen)

No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie . Safety Injection Reset / Block Switch The inspector examined the licensee's procedures which require a reset / block of safety injection (SI) after an initial safety injection occurs. After reviewing the licensee's electrical drawings and discussing the reset / block function with members of the licensee's staff, the inspector determined that an automatic SI would be blocked following actuation of the SI reset / block switch.

,

l I This could occur after a spurious SI, and in any case, after the 70 second time delay had taken place thereby allowing the operator to actuate the SI reset / block. The licensee's procedures did not

,

l caution the operator to manually actuate SI equipment if a sub-sequent SI actuation signal should occur. This was discussed at the exit intervie No items of noncompliance or deviations were identifie ,

' 1 Exit Interview The inspectors met with licensee representatives on September 13, ,

1978 at the corporate headquarters, and again at the plant site at the conclusion of the inspection on September 14, 1978. During the exit interviews, the inspectors summarized the scope and findings of the inspection, including the items discussed in Paragraphs 4, 5, 7, 8 and The licensee representatives made the following comments or com-mitments in response to the items discussed by the inspectors: