ML20133K275

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:49, 3 July 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safeguards Insp Rept 50-346/85-26 on 850909-12 & Notice of Violation.Rept Details & Notice of Violation Withheld (Ref 10CFR73.21)
ML20133K275
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 10/16/1985
From: Axelson W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Williams J
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20133K277 List:
References
NUDOCS 8510210152
Download: ML20133K275 (2)


See also: IR 05000346/1985026

Text

I

. ,

DNd

S$ur$bb IN rUhlVIA 10N

OCT i 6 i985

Docket No. 50-346

Toledo Edison Company

ATTN: Mr. Joe Williams, Jr.

Vice President

Nuclear

Edison Plaza

300 Madison Avenue

Toledo, OH 43652

Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine safeguards inspection conducted by Messrs. B. Drouin,

T. J. Madeda, and Ms. G. M. Christoffer of this office on September 9-12, 1985,

of activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station authorized by NRC Operating

License No. NPF-3 and to the discussion of our findings with Messrs. G. Grime

and L. Storz at the conclusion of the inspection.

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

interviews with personnel.

During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in non-

compliance with NRC requirements, as specified in the enclosed Appendix.

A written response is required.

Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which

is exempt from disclosure according to Section 73.21(c)(2) of the NRC's

" Rules of Practice," Part 73, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations. This

information must be handled and protected in accordance with the provisions

of 10 CFR 73.21. Consequently, the enclosure to this letter, our report of

this inspection, and your response to the noncompliance identified in the

enclosure to this letter will not be placed in the Public Document Room.

Therefore, your statement of corrective action regarding the noncompliance

identified in the enclosure should be submitted as a separate enclosure to

your transmittal letter in the manner prescribed.

The responses directed by this letter (and the accompanying Notice) are

not subject to the clearance procedures of the Office of Management and

Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

p Ck

0

0510210152 051016

POR

G

ADOCK 05000346

PDR

9)\l

s;elo:sure contair,s

$;5E.GERDS INFOP.MATION

Upon separation this

o,c-~...-m, mrnn,,._,r. pego is Decontrolled

"

"Ul tn UO a n o v . ..... . i io n

F

'

. ,

,,,cn,,.n ,n 4

cirnm 9 W

biti L Q u nt\.J Q ll51 U nih'O ' ^%

  1. I

Toledo Edison Company 2 OCT 161985

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

W. L. Axelson, Chief

Nuclear Materials Safety

and Safeguards Branch

Enclosures:

1. Appendix, Notice

of Violation

2. Inspection Report

No. 50-346/85026(DRSS)

(UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)

cc w/ enclosures:

L. Storz, Plant Manager

IE File

IE/DI/0RPB

IE/ES

NMSS/SGPL

NRR/DL/SSPB

ACRS

cc w/ enclosures, w/o

UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS

IhFORMATION:

OCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Harold W. Kohn, Ohio EPA

James W. Harris, Statt of Ohio

Robert H. Quillin, Ohio

Department of Health

E closure contains

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATIS

RIII RIII RIII RIII RIII RIII L'p n separation this

page is Decontrolled

Drohin/kja M eda Christoffer d Jac w '

elson

10/11/85 #8

p,. ,--.. 7 ,...-_--,..-, -

u isa uU/Ti\Ud liii Unglygtii1

-