ML20137E428

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:35, 18 June 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-344/85-38 on 851030-31.Potential Enforcement Findings Re safety-related Procurement & Part 21 Reporting Substantiated.Unresolved Items 344-85-025-05 & 344-85-025-06 Closed
ML20137E428
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 01/15/1986
From: Zech G
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Withers B
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
Shared Package
ML20137E433 List:
References
REF-PT21-86-048-000 PT21-86-048-000, PT21-86-48, TAC-60659, NUDOCS 8601170251
Download: ML20137E428 (2)


See also: IR 05000344/1985038

Text

0

? bm 6'~L C.'05

/ o

~g UNITED STATES

8 n NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

g a WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

%,*****p

January 15, 1986

Docket No. 50-344

Portland General Electric Company

ATTN: Mr. Bart Withers

Vice President, Nuclear

121 S. W. Salmon Street

Portland, Oregon 97204

Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection performed by Mr. E. T. Baker of the Vendor

Program Branch and Mr. D. F. Kirsch of Region V on October 30-31, 1985, at the

Trojan Nuclear Power Station and your offices at Portland, Oregon. The

inspection related to activities authorized by NRC License No. NPF-1. Our

findings were discussed with Mr. A. Olmstead and others of your staff at the

conclusion of the inspection.

The purpose of the inspection was to followup on the August 9 and 12-16, 1985

inspection performed by the Vendor Program Branch and to address concerns

raised in your response (to inspection report 50-344/85-025) dated October 14,

1985. From discussions resulting from the initial inspection report, it was

, apparent that Portland General Electric thought that certain information had

been overlooked during the previous inspection. During this inspection the

inspectors reviewed the additional information and their findings with the plant

staff members identified in Section 1 of the report. The findings substantiated

the Potential Enforcement Findings in the areas of safety related procurement

and Part 21 reporting and closed Unresolved Items 344-85-025-05 and 344-85-025-06.

Unresolved Items 344-85-025-03 and 344-85-025-04 had not been completed by PGE

and therefore were not reviewed during this inspection.

Resolution of the two Potential Enforcement Findings will be handled by the

NRC Region V office. The two remaining Unresolved Items that require

additional information before further action (if any) can be taken, will also

be handled by Region V.

8601170251 860115

PDR ADOCK 05000 PDR 9

0

\\

. . .. . .--- . _ . . .

.- .

.- -.

m

n .c

..

'

Portland. General Electric Company -2-

January 15, 1986-

i

.In accordance with 10 CFR'2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of

.this : letter and the enclosed inspection report will be placed in the NRC's

Public Document Room.

,- Should you have any questions concerning this matter, we will be pleased to

discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

04aml &ced by

Gary G. Zoch

Gary G.' Zech, Chief

Vendor Program Branch

Division of Quality Assurance, Vendor

and Technical Training Center Programs =

Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Enclosure:

Inspection Report No. 50-344-85-038

,

Distribution:

DMB:IE:09

VPB Reading

DQAVT Reading.

I

RVollmer

JStone

' Region V-

EWMerschoff

ETBaker

DFKirsch, RV

RDodds, RV

JMartin, RV

i LLazo, NRR

I Resident Inspector, Trojan

_

i

!

i

l~

.

l

!. *see previous page for concurrence

- -

VPB:DQAVT* P,V* . SC/VPB:DQAVT* -

PB:DQAVT V

ETBaker DFKirsch. EWMerschoff GGZech' BKGr s

. 12/30/85 12/30/85 12/31/85 1/3/86 1//c/86

1

/

i

E