ML20136J538: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 22: Line 22:


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LEAK-BEFORE-BREAK EVALUATION FOR TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT By letter dated October 25, 1985, you requested that the NRC staff review the leak-before break evaluation performed for Trojan Nuclear Plant.
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LEAK-BEFORE-BREAK EVALUATION FOR TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT By {{letter dated|date=October 25, 1985|text=letter dated October 25, 1985}}, you requested that the NRC staff review the leak-before break evaluation performed for Trojan Nuclear Plant.
l                                        We have initiated our review of your October 25, 1985 submittal. However, 1                                          your submittal does not address all of the matters necessary for the staff's review. Our request for additional information is enclosed.
l                                        We have initiated our review of your October 25, 1985 submittal. However, 1                                          your submittal does not address all of the matters necessary for the staff's review. Our request for additional information is enclosed.
i The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.
i The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.
Line 45: Line 45:


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LEAK-BEFORE-BREAK EVALUATION FOR TROJAN NUCLEAR PLA ,7 By letter dated October 25, 1985, you requested,that the NRC staff review the leak-before break evaluation performed fo fTrojan Nuclear Plant.
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LEAK-BEFORE-BREAK EVALUATION FOR TROJAN NUCLEAR PLA ,7 By {{letter dated|date=October 25, 1985|text=letter dated October 25, 1985}}, you requested,that the NRC staff review the leak-before break evaluation performed fo fTrojan Nuclear Plant.
We have initiated our review of your Octoben'25,1985 submittal. However, your submittal does not address all of the,6atters necessary to the staff's review. Our request for additional is enc'losed.
We have initiated our review of your Octoben'25,1985 submittal. However, your submittal does not address all of the,6atters necessary to the staff's review. Our request for additional is enc'losed.
                                               /
                                               /

Latest revision as of 22:07, 13 December 2021

Forwards Request for Addl Info for Review of 851025 Submittal Re leak-before-break Evaluation
ML20136J538
Person / Time
Site: Trojan File:Portland General Electric icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/1985
From: Varga S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Withers B
PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.
References
NUDOCS 8601140026
Download: ML20136J538 (4)


Text

_

December 20, 1985 Docket No. 50-344 DISTRIBUTION (Docket _Fjle- > NRC PDR l [ FUR Gray File C. Parrish K. Johnston Mr. Bart D. Withers J. D. Neighbors OELD Vice President Nuclear H. Thompson E. Jordan Portland General Electric Company B. Grimes J. Partlow 121 S.W. Salmon Street ACRS 10 Portland, Oregon 97204

Dear Mr. Withers:

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LEAK-BEFORE-BREAK EVALUATION FOR TROJAN NUCLEAR PLANT By letter dated October 25, 1985, you requested that the NRC staff review the leak-before break evaluation performed for Trojan Nuclear Plant.

l We have initiated our review of your October 25, 1985 submittal. However, 1 your submittal does not address all of the matters necessary for the staff's review. Our request for additional information is enclosed.

i The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.

96-511.

Sincerely,

/s/SVarga Steven A. Varga, Director t

PWR Project Directorate #3 Division of PWR Licensing-A l

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

2 See next page I

i

*SEE PREVIOUS WHITE FOR CONCURRENCE h l PAD-3* PAD-3 g p'-}. D /3 i CParrish KJohnstop;ps ' Netghbors Var a 12/17/85 12/a/85 /j/85 12 85 I

B601140026 851220 PDR ADOCK 05000344 P PDR i

a

, . _ _ , . , . . . , , _ . , . , _..._.,,..m_ _--, , , . . . . _ _ , _ . , , . , , . . ,,,_, , _ . , , . _ . . ,

Docket No. 50-344 DISTRIBUTION Docket File NRC PDR L PDR Gray File C. Parrish K. Johnston Mr. Bart D. Withers J. D. Neighbors OELD Vice President Nuclear H. Thompson E. Jordan Portland General Electric Company B. Grimes J. P rtlow 121 S.W. Salmon Street ACRS 10 Portland, Oregon 97204

Dear Mr. Withers:

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONCERNING THE LEAK-BEFORE-BREAK EVALUATION FOR TROJAN NUCLEAR PLA ,7 By letter dated October 25, 1985, you requested,that the NRC staff review the leak-before break evaluation performed fo fTrojan Nuclear Plant.

We have initiated our review of your Octoben'25,1985 submittal. However, your submittal does not address all of the,6atters necessary to the staff's review. Our request for additional is enc'losed.

/

The reporting and/or recordkeeping requirements of this letter affect fewer than ten respondents; therefore, OMB clearance is not required under P.L.96-511. ,/

Sincerely,

/

/

Steven A. Varga, Director PWR Project Directorate #3

/ Division of PWR Licensing-A

/

Enclosure:

As stated cc:

See next page PAD-3 PAD-3 PAD-3 D/ PAD-3 CParrisn KJohnston;ps JDNeighbors SVarga 12/f785 12/ /85 12/ /85 12/ /85

. Mr. Bart D. Withers Portland General Eletric Company Trojan Nuclear Plant cc:

Senior Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Trojan Nuclear Plant Post Office Box 0 Rainier, Oregon 97048 Robert M. H int, Chairman Board of County Commissioners Columbia County St. Helens, Oregon 97501 William T. Dixon Oregon Department of Energy Labor and Industries Building Room 111 Salem, Oregon 97310 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Executive Director for Operations 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 a

i 1

. . . ,_ , _ , . . , , , _ _ . . _ . _ . . _ _ , . , _ _ _ _ . - . _ , _ _ . , _ _ _, .~,__ , ...m.,,._ ,,, _ _ , _,._ ,,._ .

ENCLOSURE Request for Additional Information Leak-Before-Break (LBB) Evaluation Trojan Nuclear Plant Docket No. 50-344 The NRC staff has initiated its review of the Portland General Electric Company submittal dated October 25, 1985. We have the following request for additional information regarding this submittal:

1. Section 5.0 of NUREG-1061, Volume 3, " Report of the U.S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Piping Review Committee, Evaluation of Potential for Pipe Breaks" contains guidance for the application of the LBB approach for nuclear facility piping and should be used for the Trojan submittal. In particular, the submittal should be revised to address the limitations and follow the general technical guidance in this section.

2. Subsection 5.?(c) of the above reference requires a discussion of materials properties including toughness and tensile data and long-term effects such as thermal aging. Materials parameters such as flow stress and the Ramberg-Osgood constants " alpha", "n", and reference stress applicable to the Trojan piping should be provided. These parameters are necessary for evaluating strain-hardening materials such as stainless steel to get valid J-Integral results.

Note also that cast stainless steel is subject to thermal aging and this matter should be discussed.

As a minimum, the staff requires the above information before it can continue its review of the Trojan LBB submittal.

i l

l

-. _ . . - . . . .- ..