ML20235F128

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Request for Addl Info as Result of 870616 Audit of Dcrdr for Facility,Including Clarification Whether Dcrdr Control Room Enhancements Based on Any Std to Ensure Consistent Changes
ML20235F128
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/02/1987
From: Joshua Wilson
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Dewease J
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8707130229
Download: ML20235F128 (3)


Text

- _ _ _ _ _ _ .

July 2,1987 Docket No. 50-382 Mr. J. G. Dewease Senior Vice President -

Nuclear Operations Louisiana Power and Light Company 317 Baronne St., Mail Unit 17 New Orleans, Louisiana 70160

Dear Mr. Dewease:

SUBJECT:

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION - WATERFORD 3 DCRDR On June 16, 1987, the NRC staff conducted an on-site audit of LP&L's Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) for the Waterford Steam Electric Station,  !

Unit 3. As a result of discussions during the audit, the staff has identified the need for additional information about the DCRDR.

l l You are requested to provide the information requested in Enclosure 1 by COB i l on July 31, 1987. If you have any questions about this request, please call me at (301) 492-9403.

Sincerely, lSl James H. Wilson, Project Manager l Project Directorate - IV i Division of Reactor Projects - III, IV, V and Special Projects cc: See next page I

DIMIBUTION

\p6cketFile NRC PDR Local PDR PD4 Reading D. Crutchfield F. Schroeder ,

J. Calvo P. Noonan J. Wilson 0GC-Bethesda E. Jordan J. Partlow ACRS (10) PD4 Plant File G. West W. Regan

~

PD4/ .

$V PD /D PD4/L$4 PNoonho JWil sq, : sr JCalvo 7LQ/87 7/ b/87 7/ V/87 8707130229 070702 PDR ADOCK 05000382 P PDR

.~ - - - - _ _ . . = . - - - -

4'

' Waterford 3 Mr. Jerrold G. Dewease Louisiana Power & Light Company I

cc:

W. Malcolm Stevenson, Esq. Regional Administrator, Region IV Monroe & Leman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1432 Whitney Building Office of Executive Director for New Orleans, Louisiana 70103 Operations 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 Mr. E. Blake Arlington, Texas 76011 Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge j Carole H. Burnstein, Esq.

2300 N Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20037 445 Walnut Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70118 Mr. Gary L. Groesch Post Office Box 791169 Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager New Orleans, Louisiana 70179-1169 Washington Nuclear Operations Combustion Engineering, Inc.

Mr. F. J. Drummond 7910 Woodmont Avenue, Suite 1310 Project Manager - Nuclear Bethesda, Maryland 10814 Louisiana Power & Light Company 317 Baronne Street Mr. William H. Spell, Administrator New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 Nuclear Energy Division Office of Environmental Affairs Mr. K. W. Cook Post Office Box 14690 Nuclear Support and Licensing Manager Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70898 Louisiana Power & Light Company 317 Baronne Street President, Policy Jury New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 St. Charles Parris Mahnville, Louisiana 70057 Resident Inspector /Waterford NPS Post Office Box 822 Killona, Louisiana 70066 Mr. Ralph T. Lally Manager of Quality Assurance Middle South Servies, Inc.

Post Office Box 61000 i New Orleans, Louisiana 70161  !

Chairman Louisiana Public Service Commission One American Place, Suite 1630 Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70825-1697

- . - ..n..__.......2._._._ _ . _ . . _ _

j' 1

Enclosure 1 Request for Additional Information Regarding the Waterford Nuclear Power Plant's Detailed Control Room Design Review

1. Have there been any changes in the status of or corrections for human l engineering discrepancies (HEDs) that were not mentioned in the 1 Supplements to the Waterford Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) l Summary Report (SR) dated April 1986 and October 14, 1986? If so, any i changes in HED status or justification for uncorrected HEDs should be provided to the NRC.
2. How many of the 190 tasks identified during the DCRDR task analysis were evaluated to determine (a) the match between task elements and -

availability of control room instrumentation, (b) the identification of 4 HEDs,and(y)thevalidityofthetaskanalysisprocessthatwas-c employed?

, 3. Are DCRDR control room enhancements (e.g., painting, labeling, and taping) based on any standard to ensure consistent changes?

4. The staff requests clarification of the last sentence of the first paragraph on page 17 of the Supplement to the Waterford 3 DCRDR SR dated April 1986. With regard to the reflash capability of annunicators, do )

critical plant functions have independent alarms? '

5. The Supplement to the Waterford DCRDR SR dated April 1986, indicctes

! that HEDs involving control room lighting, control room noise, computer ,

displays, annunciator system, suitability of control room displays, and l radio communications are still the. subject of engineering evaluations.

Louisiana Power and Light Company (LP&L) should provide the NRC with information concerning the proposed corrective actions identified by the engineering studies and approved by LP&L management. LP&L should also confirm that resolutions selected do not introduce new HEDs.

_ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . . - _ _ . . . _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ . . _ _ ____.______________-____m.._-_____..-.--..