ML20151T367

Forwards Insp Repts 50-445/85-07 & 50-446/85-05 on 850401-0621 & Notice of Violation.Since B&R Procedure 35-1195-CCP-10 Revised to Document Insp of Truck Mixer Blades,No Reply to Violation 2.c Required

ML20151T367
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	02/03/1986
From:	Johnson E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Counsil W TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
Shared Package
ML20151T370	List: IR 05000401/2006021 ML20151T367 ML20151T374 ML20151T382
References
NUDOCS 8602100241
Download: ML20151T367 (2)

See also: IR 05000401/2006021

Text

s

,5

6

l

--

In Reply Refer To:

Dockets: 50-445/85-07 MB 0 3 W

50-446/85-05

= Texas Utilities Electric Company

ATTN: W. G. Counsil

Skyway Tower

400 North Olive Street

!

Lock Box 81

Dallas, Texas 75201

Gentlemen:

This refers to the inspection conducted under the Resident Inspection Program

by Messrs. J. E. Cununins and H. S. Phillips and others during the period

f' April 1, 1985, through June 21, 1985, of activities authorized by NRC Construc-

tion Permits CPPR-125 and CPPR-126 of the Comanche Peak facility, Units 1 and 2,

p and to the discussion of our findings with Mr. J. T. Merritt, and other members of

your staff at the conclusion of the inspection.

Areas examined during the inspection included plant status, action on previous

NRC inspection findings, action on applicant identified design construction

deficiencies (10 CFR Part 50.55(e) reports) and plant tours. Within thesc

i.

areas, the inspection consisted of selective examination of procedures and

representative records, interviews with personnel, and cbservations by the

inspectors. These findings are documented in the enclosed inspection report.

During this inspection, it was found that certain of your activities were in

violation of NRC requirements. Consequently, you are required to respond to

this violation, in writing, in accordance with the provision of Section 2.201

of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal

Regulations. Your response should be based on the specifics contained in the

Notice of Violation enclosed with this letter. Since B3R Procedure 35-1195-CCP-10

has been revised to provide documented inspection of truck mixer blades, there

was no abnormal blade wear identified as a result of blade inspection, and there

have been consistent concrete strength and uniformity tests, no reply to

violation 2.c is required.

,-

,

RSB [^ RSB

h

HSPhillips/dc DMHunnicutt

CPT G

TFWesterman

DRSP

EHJohnson

NRR

VNoonan ', ' -

4

I/w/86 l /p4/86 / /)i/86 l /g/g j /w /86

@

0602100241 G60203 /

PDR ADOCK 05000445 .//

G PDR

%

- .

-

_--

_ . , . .

-

Texas Utilities Electric Company . 2

~

Should you~ have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased

to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

06 o

E. H. Johnson, Acting Director

Division of Reactor Safety and

Projects

'

Enclosures:

1. Appendix A - Notice of Violation '

.

2. Appendix B - NRC Inspection Report

50-445/85-07

50-446/85-05

cc w/ enclosure:

Texas utilities Electric Company

ATTN: J. W.-Beck, Manager,

Licensing

Skyway Tower

400 North Olive Street-

Lock Box'81 '

.

Dallas, Texas 75201

Juanita Ellis

President - CASE

1426 South Polk Street

Dallas, Texas 75224

Renea Hicks

Assistant Attorney General

Environmental Protection Division

P. 0l Box 12548

Austin, Texas 76711'

Texas Radiation Control' Program Director

bec;toDMB(IE01)

bcc distrib. by RIV:

• RPB * MIS System

• RRI-0PS *RSTS Operator

• RRI-CONST *R&SPB

• T. F. Westerman, CPTG DRSP

V. Noonan, NRR R. Martin, RA

S. Treby, ELD *R58

• RIV File J. Taylor, IE

• D. Weiss, LFMB (AR-2015) R. Heishman, IE

• w/766

.