IR 05000445/1990037
| ML20217A397 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 11/08/1990 |
| From: | Collins S NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | William Cahill TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9011210047 | |
| Download: ML20217A397 (3) | |
Text
o g
-
,
.
c NOV - 81990
}
Docket Nos. 50-445/90-37 50-446/90 37
-
License Nos. NPF-87
--
CPPR-127
TV Electric ATTH:
W. J. Cahill, Jr., Executive Vice President, Nuclear
_.
Skyway Tower 40r North Olive Street, L.B. 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter of October 22, 1990, in response to our letter
_
and Notice of Violation dated September 21, 1990. We have reviewed your reply and find it responsive to the concerns raised in our Notice of Violetion. We i
will review the implementation of your corrective actions during a future y
inspection to determine that full cen'pliance has been achieved and will be
_
maintained.
Sincerely
.
Orig!nal signed By.
Thomar, P. Gwynn Samuel J. Collins, Director
-
Division of Reactor Projects cc:
TU Electric
-
ATTN:
Roger D. Walker, Manager, Nuclear Licensing Skyway Tower 400 North Olive Street, L.B. 81 Dallas, Texas 75201 Juanita Ellis President - CASE
-
1426 South Polk Street Dallas, Texas 75224
- RIV:RI:MQPS
- C:MQPS D:DR A
- DRP BMcNeill/cjg IBarnes LJCa Wan SJC 11 ins Qq/90
//
/90
/ /90
/ /90
- Previously concurred 9011210047 90110e PDR ADOCK 05000445 16 Ol O
PNU U(
y..
,
..
..
-TU El'ectric-
-2-q
"
GDS Associates, Inc.
Suite 720 1850 Parkway Place Marietta, Georgia _ 30067-8237
'
- Billie.Pirner Ga H e, E
- q.
Robinson,- Rr'oinson, et. al.
103 East College Ave"0
- Appleton,)lisconsin 54911 TU Electric:
Bethesda Licensing
~3 Metro Center, Suite 610'
Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Heron, Burchette, Ruckert, & Rothwell ATTN:- William A. Burchette, Esq.
Counsel-for Tex-La Electric Cooperative;of Texas-.
1025 Thomas Jefferson St., N.W.
Washington.D.CL 20007 E. F. Ottney P.O. Box 1777
,
Glen Rose, Texas.76043
.Newman & Holtzinger, P.C..
ATTH:: Jack R. Newman, Esq.
1615 L. Street, N.W.-
'
. Suite 1000 Washington,_D.C. '20036
. Texas Department:of Labor & Standards-ATTN:
G. R'. _ Bynog, Program Manager /
Chief Inspector
,
Boiler' Division P.O. Box 12157, Capitol _ Station L Austin, Texas 78711.
Honorable George. Crump
- County Judge Glen Rose, Texas 176043
. Texas Radiation Control Program Director 1100 West 49th Street Austin,. Texas 78756 bec-to DMB-(IE01)
bec distrib by RIV:
.,g,-
.._,.-
,
e t
-< g
,,
.-
,
i LTU Electric'
-3-
,
'R. D. Martin-Residentinspector(2)
-
SectionChief(DRP/B)
ProjectEngineer(DRP/B)
. DRSS-FRPS Lisa Shea, RH/ALF MIS System RSTS Operator RIV Files-1.:Darnes-B.~McNeill
,
.
.
I'
>
s
'
.
t u
'
t l=
'
.-,
'
l
!
.
.
_ _ _
_-
o.HpV "9 '90'16:01; FROM StTE-LICENSING.
PAGE.002
+..,.... -
e 4y
.-
.
Log # TXX 90585 S.
File # 10130 C
C
.
IR 90 37 WELECTRIC Ref. # 10CFRt.201
-
OctoberSt.1990 7 cm, smem m ver m
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
Document Control Desk
Washington. DC 20658
!
SUBJECT: C0MANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)
DOCKET NOS.80-446 Aho 50 446 NRC. INSPECTION REPORT NOS. 60 445/90 37: 60-446/90 37
)
,
RESPONSE TO NOTICE GP V!0LATION
Gentlemen:
!
TU Electric'has reviewed the NRC's letter ~ dated September 21, 1990 cancerning the inspection conducted by the NRC staff during the period August '.7 throughtl August 31 '1990. This inspection covered activities authorized br NRC facility Operating License NPF 87 and NRC Construction Permit CPPR*187 fer CPSE5 Un
- and 2. respectively. Attached to the September 21.'1990 1sttee was a Notice of
- Vi ol a ti on.-.
TU' Electric hereby responds to the Notice of Violation in the attachment to n
this letter.
,
Sincerely
.
.
.
.
T[
y
,. -
'
'
.
William J. Cahill, Jr.
'
gy, 4 [.
-
.
.
Roger f. Walker Manager,of Nuclear Li: m ing'
'JDS/cid
. Attachment
,
,c Mr. R. D. Martin.-Region !V-i Resident' Inspectors. CP5ES (3)
-
ee, 440 % 6 nm.. e.
-
._
- - - - - - -
, ',,s,mjg l/,n PAGE,003-
-
t.3 c.., <
..
,
L-Attechnent to TXX 90555
'
Page l'of I l
!
Notica of Violation j
(448/9037 01)
Misste suavtfLLANet RtourREMENT
!
that inservice testing of ASME Code Class 2 pumps sha accordance with Section XI of the ASME Soiler and Pressure. performed in
.i where specific written relief has been granted by-the Commission Vessel Code, extent when-the test.-esults fall within the alert range.of the Code Sectt0n XI
.
4 0.2. requires that each surveillance requirement shall be performeTechn
.
specified surveillance interval with a maximum alloweble extension no
. within tse exceed 19 percent of the specified surveillance interval.
'
78X RWApRH+01. was placed in the alert status en
- specified surveillance cest frequency increased to oe n per>46 days
, and the the surveillance test was not completed until August ;4. 1999-however.'
permitted by Technical Specification 4.0.2.the specified-surve
. which exceeded on Reasanne to Naties of Vietation-(445/9037 01)
!
TU Electric accepts the violation and the requested information f ll
!
o ows, h
1.
Amanen far the Vietation TScheduling of: routine Technical-- Specification (TS) sur
- is accomplished in part by a Managed Maintenance Ceeputer
-
veillances at CPSESi This progree provides an automatic prompt to schedule upcoming date manually entered into the program. NMCp prin Subsequently; based on a schedul[
.
.i d -
- 0rder (SW0) to' ensure timely performance oflthe specified surve ance Work !
Appearies on~each SWO is the manually: entered scheduled date
'
due date.'and a violation date that reflects the maximum
.
E
. the actual US by the TS.'
n allowei
.When conditions require surveillance performance at incre the Surveillance Test Program procedure directs the responsible.
j i
Surveillance Test Coordinator ($ft) to seke provisions for manuall the case of.the' subject surveillance on Residual
.
y-
'
the method ut111 red by the~0peration's STC to provide fo
._
n
) Pump-
-to manually enter a scheduled date reflecting the increased freq
,
r the test wat (sta11er to routine scheduling but without a prompt b MMCP was not updated to reflect the new due date and ne y MMCP). However.
The SWO subsequently printed by MMCP showed the new (increas w violation date.
scheduled date. but still showed the due date and vio recuency;
)
normal surveillance interval.
e
'
.
l '
N 16:03-FROM' SITE-LICENSING PAGE.00d1 3 % pV S'!90
-
-
- ,.
_
n-
-
%,;
,;-
-
.
Attachment to TXA 90558 Page 2 of 1
.
,
.When testing could not be performed on the new scheduled date, operatorsi checked the unmodified due date to ensure it would not be eissed and.
unknowingly, rescheduled the surveillance to a date that fell outside the new due date plus extension.
The violation is attributable to the eeth rd utilized te manually schedule the increased frequency surveillance.
2.
Carrective Stana Taken and Rasults Achieved
'
'
Discovery of this violation occurred subsequent.to the successful testinl of the pump. Therefore, corrective steps were not necessary to re-establish the required surveillance interval er to verify operability of the pump.
Failure to comply with the increased surveillance frequency w s-promptly documented via. appropriate plant procedures and the cause of thi
. missed surveillance identified.
3.
Catractive Stana Which Will be Taken to Avoid Further Vialations i
A menerendus addressing the violation has been distributed to Surveillance Test Coordinators.- Additionally, the Surve111ence Test progree procedurd will be' reviewed and revised if necessary to ensure that' requirements fon
-
updating the frequency of surveillance intervals, when necessary, are
' clearly specified.
.
4.
W haE' Full C - lianea Will be Achieved-Programmatic review will be completed by October 31, 1990, and changes. 11 necessary, incorporated by November-16, 1990.
I I
!
l f
u
).
l
.-
t
-.
b
t
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..
_
.