|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| {{Adams | | {{Adams |
| | number = ML20206T196 | | | number = ML20210K981 |
| | issue date = 06/30/1986 | | | issue date = 04/08/1986 |
| | title = Ack Receipt of 860521 & 23 Ltrs Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-382/86-04. Reply to Violation Fails to Establish Adequate Basis to Support Contention That Violation Did Not Occur | | | title = Insp Rept 50-382/86-04 on 860210-14.Violation Noted: Personnel Assigned to Emergency Organization Inadequately Trained |
| | author name = Gagliardo J | | | author name = Baird J, Terc N, Yandell L |
| | author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) | | | author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| | addressee name = Myench G | | | addressee name = |
| | addressee affiliation = LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. | | | addressee affiliation = |
| | docket = 05000382 | | | docket = 05000382 |
| | license number = | | | license number = |
| | contact person = | | | contact person = |
| | document report number = NUDOCS 8607080041 | | | document report number = 50-382-86-04, 50-382-86-4, NUDOCS 8604290134 |
| | package number = ML20206T201 | | | package number = ML20210K956 |
| | document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | | | document type = INSPECTION REPORT, NRC-GENERATED, INSPECTION REPORT, UTILITY, TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS |
| | page count = 2 | | | page count = 10 |
| }} | | }} |
|
| |
|
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
| |
|
| =Text= | | =Text= |
| {{#Wiki_filter:r , | | {{#Wiki_filter:_ |
| ? | | , |
| JUN 301986 In Reply Refer To:
| | . |
| Docket: 50-382/86-04 Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN: G. W. Muench, Director Nuclear Operations 317 Baronne Street P.O. Box 60340 New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 Gentlemen:
| | L l |
| Thank you for your letters of May 21 and 23,1986, in response to our letter and Notice of Violation dated April 21, 1986. We have reviewed your reply and find it addresses the concerns raised in our Notice of Violatio However, our review finds that your reply fails ~to establish an adequate basis to support your contention that the violation identified did not occur. We will review the implementation of your corrective actions during a future inspection to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be maintaine i
| | ! |
| | APPENDIX B U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION |
| | , |
|
| |
|
| Sincerely,
| | ==REGION IV== |
| @wi S6rW byi ll-J. E. Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch cc:
| | ! |
| Louisiana Power & Light Company | | NRC Inspection Report: 50-382/86-04 License: NPF-38 l |
| . ATTN: G. E. Wuller, Onsite Licensing Coordinator P. O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066 Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN: R. P.'Barkhurst, Plant Manager P. O. Box B Killona, Louisiana 70066 (cc continued next page)
| | Docket: 50-382 Licensee: Louisiana Power & Light Company 317 Baronne Street P. O. Box 60340 New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 o |
| RI$$kSPS JBB' a i rd/jt 4r C,j%'
| | Facility Name: Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station (SES) |
| $PS Yan dell 0:D h R}.B h art ChPC GLWnstable C:RPB JEGaolthdo (, //6 /86 ( //7/86 @/p/86 (,/t.7/86 $/1.{/p6 $[ | | , Inspection At: Waterford 3 SES site near Killona, Louisiana Inspection Conducted: February 10-14, 1986 Inspectors: n ,,)d h '5/2c/PZ J.7. Baird, Emergency reparedness Analyst 06te ' |
| 2 -
| | TM.'W a n 't Terc, Emergency r paredness Analyst ght |
| $$0 $O0$k $
| | [ fate Approved: e 023 4/9 fl, l L. A. Yandell, Chief. Emergency Preparedness Difte' |
| G
| | ' |
| | and Safeguards Programs Section Inspection Summary |
| | ' |
| | Inspection Conducted February 10-14 1986 (Report 50-382/86-04) |
| | Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced emergency preparedness inspection in the l areas of emergency detection and classification, protective action decision-( making, dose calculation and assessment, and audits. |
|
| |
|
| | ! |
| | ! |
| l | | l |
| ..
| | ! .. |
| Louisiana Power and Light Company -2-Middle South Services ATTN: Mr. R. T. Lally P. O. Box 61000 New Orleans, Louisiana 70161 Louisiana Power & Light Company ATTN: K. W. Cook, Nuclear Support and Licensing Manager 317 Baronne Street P.O. Box 60340 New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 Louisiana Radiation Control Program Director bcc to DMB (IE35)
| | cK O p G |
| bec distrib. by RIV:
| | _ |
| RP8 D. Weiss, LFMB (AR-2015)
| | |
| Resident Inspector R. D. Martin, RA Section Chief (RPB/C) DRSP R&SPB RSB MIS SYSTEM R. L. Bangart RSTS Operator L. A. Yandell RIV File J. B. Baird t ,
| | _ - - - - _ - - _ - - - - |
| | .. .. . . . . . - |
| | , |
| | . |
| | 2-Results: Within the emergency response areas inspected, one violation was identified (personnel assigned to the emergency organization not adequately trained paragraph 3). |
| | |
| | l l |
| | l i |
| | < |
| | |
| | .- - |
| | - |
| | . |
| | ~ |
| | -3- |
| | ' |
| | DETAILS |
| | - Persons Contacted Louisiana Power & Light |
| | *S. Alleman, Assistant Plant Manager, Plant Technical Services |
| | "R. Azzarello, Emergency Planning Manager |
| | *P. Backes, Operations Quality Assurance Manager R. Bennett, Operations Support Quality Assurance Supervisor K.'Brewster, Onsite Licensing Thomas Brown, Shift Supervisor Terry Brown, Shift Supervisor |
| | *N. Carns, Assistant Plant Manager, Operations and Maintenance |
| | *F. Englebracht, Manager, Plant Administrative Services J. Hoffpauir, Shift Supervisor H. Herring, Senior Health Physics Technician M. Jones, Shif t Supervisor P. Kelly, Senior Health Physics Technician |
| | *R. Kenning, Radiation Protection Superintendent |
| | *M. Langan, General Training Supervisor H. Leason, Engineer Technical, Nuclear |
| | *J. Lewis, Onsite Emergency Planning Coordinator W. Linares, Senior Health Physics Technician A. Lockhart, Site Quality Manager |
| | *J. Messina, Operations Quality Assurance Representative G. Morrison, Licensing Engineer |
| | *J. O'Hearn, Technical Support Training Superintendent |
| | *D. Packer, Training Manager J. Ray, Senior Health Physics Technician A. Wemett, Control Room Supervisor J. Woods, Quality Control Manager State of Louicis **D. Zaloudek, Louisiana Nuclear Energy Division NRC |
| | *J. Leuhman, Senior Resident Inspector |
| | * Denotes those present at the exit intervie **Telephnne. contac . |
| | - |
| | |
| | . |
| | . |
| | -4-2. Emergency Detection and Classification The NRC inspectors reviewed a sample of the Emergency Action Levels (EALs) |
| | found in the Emergency Plan and in Emergency Implementing Procedure (EIP) EP-01-001, " Recognition and Classification of Emergency Conditions," |
| | and verified that they were consistent with the initiating events of NUREG 0654, Appendix In addition, the NRC inspectors noted that although the format used in the Emergency Plan differed from that used in the implementing procedure, EALs found in the plan were basically consistent with those in the implementing procedures. Moreover, the NRC inspectors determined through discussions and interviews with various members of the licensee's emergency organization that only EALs found in the implementing procedure (EP-01-001) would be used during emergency conditions at Waterford The NRC inspectors not?d that EALs appeared to be in agreement with NRC guidance and requirements. In addition, the NRC inspectors noted that Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) postulated accident conditions were incorporated in the Emergency Plan and the EALs contained provisions for detecting and classifying such incident The NRC inspectors interviewed four shift supervisors and two Assistant Plant Managers who would be Emergency Coordinators during an accident, and determined that they understood the relationships between post-TMI (Three Mile Island) core damage indicators (e.g., containment dome monitors, post-accident primary coolant, containment atmosphere analyses) and core statu No violations or deviations were identifie . Protective Action Decisionmaking and Radiation Protection Response The NRC inspectors reviewed emergency plan implementing procedure EP-2-052, Revision 4, " Protective Action Guidelines," and found that in general the procedure was adequate and that it contained decisonmaking |
| | , |
| | guidelines necessary to aid Emergency Coordinators in making protective action recommendations (PARS) according to NRC guidance and criteria. The NRC inspectors found, however, that the procedure forced the user to ascertain road conditions, and other undefined criteria prior to making protective action recommendations. In addition, the inspectors noted that Attachment 7.3 " Evaluation Time Estimate," was not designed in a manner that would facilitate timely decision During the interviews with six Emergency Coordinators, the NRC inspectors posed a simple accident scenario where the containment of the reactor would |
| | ' |
| | be filled with fission products in such concentrations that indicated more than ' gap' activity. The NRC inspectors additionally stated that there was l no reason to suspect an imminent failure of the containment during the l following 6 hours. The NRC inspectors selected this scenario because it l was contained as one of the decision conditions in Attachment 7.5, to l EP-2-052, " Flow Chart for Protective Action Decision Making based on core l conditions." |
| | |
| | l l . _ - . . - . .. |
| | |
| | e . |
| | . |
| | -5-The NRC inspectors also. interviewed four senior health physics technicians qualified for shift duties and gave them two scenarios designed to test their understanding of two basic tasks they would be responsible for during accident conditions. The NRC inspectors described the first scenario as the declaration of an Alert by the control room during the back shift. The first scenario involved abnormally high general area radiation dose rates (1 Rem per hour) in the control room. The NRC inspectors requested that the technician describe his actions. The second scenario required the technicians to describe their actions and technique to determine whether a radioactive plume contained radiolodin Based on these ten interviews, the NRC inspectors made the following findings: |
| | Two of six Emergency Coordinators were able to find Attachment after a couple of minutes, and used it to make adequate protective action recommendation * |
| | One of six Emergency Coordinators stated that he did not remember having seen the decisionmaking flow-chart during training. Another stated that he would try to enforce protective actions, instead of recommending them to offsite authoritie * |
| | One of the Emergency Coordinators told the NRC inspectors that protective action recommendations could not go beyond precautionary shelter at a General Emergency level unless radioactivity could be measured offsite. This individual appeared to be unaware that protective action recommendations could be escalated based on plant conditions alon * |
| | None of the four health physics technicians understood that the protection of control room personnel should be a priority. As a consequence, none of the technicians stated that they would take a radiation su.vey in the control room to determine habitability conditions until prompted by the interviewe * |
| | Two of four technicians stated that their main concern was to establish if there was a radioactive plume release to the environ * |
| | All the technicians indicated that they would prematurely recommend evacuation of the control room when weekly routine administrative radiation dose limits are exceeded. One out of four made reference to exceeding a 500 mR/hr dose rate in the licensee' procedures for the Operational Support Center, but failed to mention stay times associated with it. Another recalled a 500 mR/hr limit, but stated that he would evacuate the control room if weekly limits were exceede * |
| | Three of four technicians indicated that they either had no training on habitability criteria or failed to understand the material |
| | , presented. |
| | |
| | I |
| | |
| | . |
| | . |
| | -6- |
| | * |
| | None of the technicians were able to direct themselves to written procedures that would provide them with guidance on actions and priorities expected of them during emergencies as senior health physics representatives during back shifts. All of them lacket initiative in taking immediate action for protecting personnel i her than personnel in rMiologically controlled area * |
| | All four technicians erroneously misinterpreted negative radiolodine results as either faulty equipment or concluding that the plume had no radioiodine. Three out of four were unable to describe proper techniques to ascertain whether they were immersed in the plume when they took the air sample. Three out of four were not aware of the need to determine whether they were in fact sampling the radioactive plum The above examples of insufficient training are an apparent violation against the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15), which states that |
| | " Radiological Emergency Response Training is provided to those who may be called on to assist in an emergency." (382/8604-01). |
| | |
| | 4. Dose Calculations and Assessment The NRC inspectors toured the emergency response facilities, examined dose assessment equipment and procedures, and held discussions with selected station personnel to determine what provisions the licensee had made for dose calculation and assessment during a radiological emergency. A representative of the state of Louisiana was also contacted to discuss the state capability and compatibility of dose calculation This discussion indicated that the state used essentially the same techniques and no significant compatibility problems had been identified during previous drills and exercise A review of dose assessment procedures showed that toe licensee had provided manual and computerized methods for rapidly performing emergency dose projections. The dose assessment techniques were implemented in EIP's EP-2-050, "Of f-site Dose Assessment (Manual)" and EP-2-51," |
| | "Off-site Dose Assessment (Computerized)." The manual methods ranged from a simple nomograph procedure for control room personnel, through various procedures using inplant and offsite monitoring results, to microcomputers programmed to execute all of the methods in the manual dose assessment procedure. The computerized method used the Computerized Emergency Planning and Data Acquisition System (CEPADAS) which operates on real-time data from meteorologicel and radiat';n monitoring instrumentation. In reviewing these procedures, the NRC inspectors noted that the licensee had not provided a method of projecting potential offsite do e based on readings from the containment high range radiation monitors. This deficiency was brought to the licensee's attention and a revision to EP-2-050 incorporating use of these monitors was written and approved prior to the end of the inspection. |
| | |
| | l l |
| | l |
| | |
| | , |
| | , |
| | |
| | , |
| | -7-r The NRC inspectors observed demonstration of the nomograph technique of |
| | - |
| | dose' assessment in the control room, and use of CEPADAS and the manual methods of assessment with the microcomputer in the Emergency Operations Facilit It was determined that each of the dose assessment techniques could be accomplished in a timely fashion. |
| | |
| | t The NRC inspector also discussed the documentation of models and |
| | ! verification of factors and data in the dose-assessment procedures with l licensee repre untatives and determined that this was in progress with |
| | ! |
| | about two-thisds of the manual assessment procedure completed at the time I of the. inspection. In addition, 3 licensee representative stated that a thorough review of the CEPADAS would be initiated in the near future with an evaluation of the capabilities of the system in meeting current and future needs. This area will be reviewed again in a future NRC emergency preparedness inspectio The following is an observation the NRC inspectors called to the licensee's attention. This observation is neither a violation nor an i unresolved item. This item was recommended for licensee consideration for improvement, but it has no specific regulatory requirement. |
| | |
| | l o The nomogram procedure in EP-2-050 should identify the current i |
| | effective nomogram revision number to facilitate identification and l |
| | i use of the current revision. |
| | |
| | l No violations or deviations were identified. |
| | |
| | l S. ),.icensee Audits l Tre NRC inspector determined that the Operations Quality Assurance (QA) |
| | i staff had conducted an independent review (audit) of the emergency preparedness program within a 12-month period in accordance with internal procedures and 10 CFR 50.54(t) requirements. A review of the QA audit report dated August 15, 1985, showed that the audit of the emergency |
| | , |
| | ' |
| | program during the period May 29 through June 28, 1985, included an evaluation of licensee drills, exercises, capabilities, procedures and the adequacy of interfaces with state and local governments. The audit also reviewed the licensee's program for identifying and correcting emergency l ~ preparedness deficiencies and weaknesse A review of the audit documentation showed that the audit report and findings were transmitted to appropriate levels of management and the Safety Review Committee Audits Subcommittee for review. It was also noted that responses to the findings were requested from the responsible l organization and the responses were received and evaluated in a timely An abbrulated version of the report involving evaluation of the |
| | ' |
| | manne adequacy of licensee interfaces with state and local governments was transmitted to these agencies also. |
| | |
| | l The Operations QA Manager stated that expertise in emergency preparedness |
| | ! |
| | for the audit team had been through training of the auditor This will L |
| | |
| | V '. |
| | . |
| | l -8- |
| | ! |
| | l be enhanced in future reviews by a cooperative arrangement with other utilities which will provide a team member who has expertise equivalent to that of an emergency preparedness coordinato During a review of the audit report, the NRC inspector noted that at least two items identified by the auditors were potential violations or deficiencies and were not so identified. One of the items was difficulty in contacting St. John the Baptist Parish officials within 15 minutes during an unusual event, and the other was a comment that 4 letters of agreement with offsite agencies were overdue for the annual updatin This was brought to the Operations QA Manager's attention and subsequent review of this area by the NRC inspectors prior to the end of the inspection indicated that both of these items had been satisfactorily addresse The NRC inspectors also reviewed the licensee's open action item tracking system and discussed the system with Station personnel to determine if a l |
| | program had been implemented to identify deficiencies and weaknesses discovered during exercises, and to track the items for corrective actions in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) and Appendix E to Part 50, Paragraph IV.F.5. It was noted that all emergency preparedness deficiencies and iteme for improvement were entered into the tracking system, including deficiencies and weaknesses identified during postexercise critique The NRC inspectors also determined that corrective actions for items in the tracking system were being taken in an appropriate time frame. This included corrective actions for weaknesses and deficiencies identified during the critique following the previous emergency exercis The following is an observation the NRC inspectors called to the licensee's attention. This observation is neither a violation nor an unresolved ite This item was recommended for licensee consideration for improvement, but it has no specific vegulatory requirement, o Review audit reports for findings which are potential violations, deviations, or deficiencies and identify them as such so that an appropriate level of attention and priority for corrective action can be provided in parallel with the routine QA audit finding corrective action syste No violations or deviations were identifie . Exit Interview The NRC inspectors and NRC senior resident inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on February 14, 1986. The NRC inspectors summarized the purpose and scope of the inspection, and reported the findings which included an apparent violation of requirements to provide adequate trainin . |
| | . |
| | eenc rOaw ms U S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PamceAt mSetCfontsew ese age omraweatw j- b* |
| | INSPECTOR *S REPORT .g h Office of Inspection and Enforcement [ , A , % ,,,lg (f nSPECroas . |
| | 0 G l o-d- . _T , |
| | * |
| | & c ,./I/.r TRANSA 70% g y,g LICthSEIMN00m |
| | ~o .. v ,.cooC T, i,, ,,,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, |
| | L a u o u o ., a Po w ~L Le a ,}- |
| | ' |
| | * *-~''" - - < > - ,w gg , |
| | hM <'d 1 _ |
| | " - * * " o r 8, , . s r g s C y j |
| | _ |
| | O - DELEft g n - htPLACE D 1 3 le 15 18 PERCO Of fewiSviGATC% iNSPtCfiON 8%SPtCTC% Plasongs o e v OHGANJAfiON (CCE (* mtOsose/wQ CONDUCT-18eG ACfivity (See #f 4A1 OSJO ' wergresor Regiert-snow to afGCN Ai OFFict S T AF8 _,,,,y n, g, |
| | , |
| | ]OfwtR wo DAT v4 wo DAY ve 3 - 4tSCENf feSPtCT04 ,_ 0"h |
| | [ Di$aA I#AMM dd ll0 M d2 )@ d6 3 - Pf"70*WANCE A'emarSAL 78av |
| | $ l 3 l |
| | ) N N 31l M $3 } Se 35 atGa0*iatACTCg ivPt os Acf:vif v CONovcfIaicama one nos evve V' 02 - SAstiv _ |
| | 06 - WGwi visit _ |
| | 10 - PLANT SGC _ |
| | 14 - e40usay 1 - hec FOAw let 03 - meCIOtti Of - SPtCIAL 11-INyt%f via 4 - sevtSfiGAfC4 |
| | / 3 AEGC4AL OFFICE Littim 04 - th80AClut47 as-vthoca 13 - guiput%f,inPont 05- WCwtAUDt 00- wAtACCf 13. #pon? |
| | ' |
| | N 31 5 |
| | .ngrtc14% .%.L a r, GAT 4% FJes%QS yge gg ,,., ggg gg |
| | <**'***'****'** ggggggg gggi gggg g gg g(g #t PU# T CON T Ai% 2 M (gTYge 08 #f ro47 T844Sw'f f AL DAf t OF WCLAfCNS A40 ptLD A50*wAfo9 A Mf D Ofv'Ata0%$ |
| | einc tones tet steoeflegt 1 - CLAAA on ala 70 wo tca Lt tig n iS M O Actio% |
| | y 1 VOLA T100e Dtvia tiO4 A e C 0 AIS C 0 A e C 0 aso DAv in wo car vm g VIOLAfiO8e & OfVIAfiCN d,f , , , f f - vil 8 - vt$ gk[ gd l l l |
| | . m, , |
| | .. .: 4 = w a woovte **osw Afions wcom:wecewa*nw p,co woova , m og g woouu .to ,ouowu, ;tt wooua ~uweiaa$. on y woua ato ,ono* i s |
| | - |
| | Is {K 5 ge c._ . 3 e ,e ;- 1 "- |
| | - |
| | E= 5 s r |
| | * Q5 h |
| | h I2 2- 0 |
| | " |
| | - ka isl I!!!!!g: sc d , c_.rgo fl _sg |
| | - |
| | Il |
| | - - |
| | y a . . 2 . . . t |
| | - . - . |
| | ! 1 i ii ! al i!!!! l-l= ! 3 e ! >g! if I i >! !! |
| | |
| | e -6 |
| | |
| | II i e i S 8 o17i 0,3l ^ |
| | i iA >h( 0,,iliil= i F 812% liol ^ |
| | ' |
| | 'al_17 lio n o C i liil |
| | - |
| | i liil |
| | - |
| | , , i i i i i i i Iiil e |
| | i Iiil liil |
| | ' |
| | s i i n i i i i i i Iiil o o s i i , e i i i i Iiil e i f g,2,l2,ipl @ ,Ja 1, . , o c- , l,i , , l,,l A |
| | , i i , i liil |
| | - |
| | i liil - |
| | in i n , , i , i liil c |
| | i s i , i la l i |
| | < |
| | i n i , i liil i i e , , |
| | l.,1 i , , , i la il |
| | . i s ral.m ial > |
| | . ti, fi,.. c i iiil , |
| | i i liil |
| | * |
| | , i i i i lii1 |
| | - |
| | c |
| | .i . i i liil F |
| | i i i i _ i l i i i liil liil |
| | ' |
| | ii i i i i i i i o |
| | i liil liil |
| | ' |
| | ii , i i i i i i |
| | ^ |
| | i li ? /ioi o ( |
| | ' |
| | e i 5 fi.2lJ ai s 71 i l i l- i i Ii1 l* i i i i i l,a il |
| | - - |
| | ,, i n i liil , , i n i liil c |
| | i i n i i liil < |
| | ii i i i liiI o e,.ca ttoutvi a, i i vioutfioss on op viA fing o g g g g g l g g l g g g g g ll g l il> >l. I . . 3 o is . . . , . . m ..- , , Inl . I . . . o ,, . .- 4 i n ,, ,, ,e |
| | |
| | peRC Foau M A naa f t 8 Docaa t eso is e+isi on uctNst eso (ST paoovCfitt 3 ettei mLt Nget a , |
| | too stQ p. ju j [ l l INSPECTOR'S REPORT v de*9427 ~ |
| | 76 o'4 * |
| | "l' '9 " " * "_2" **/ * ,,M,3 |
| | ' |
| | (Continuation) O i C UO 3 3 / * i i . , e f ac Office of Inspection and Enforcement C "' |
| | g |
| | . |
| | $, . |
| | v os anos on otva ro, ow a m a.co enauw w oun nem n e m.e e.com mm. n.a oe mumm e sano~ue one me o sa anaw,,un , |
| | t |
| | , Inadeouate Trainino of Personnel |
| | , |
| | * |
| | 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) requires that radiological emergency a response training be provided to those who may be called on to assist in an emergenc e |
| | ,. The Emergency Plan for Waterford 3 states in Section |
| | * |
| | 8.1," Training" that a training prngram has been established in order to mainatain a high degree of preparedness at all e levels of the Waterford 3 emergency organizatio _ |
| | '' |
| | Contrary to the above, the NRC inspectors found that t emergency response training had not been adequately provided |
| | ,, |
| | as evidenced by the following: |
| | 's During the period February 11-13, 1986, NRC inspectors |
| | ,, conducted interviews with six licensee personnel who could have functioned as Emergency Coordinators during an is accident, and four senior health physics technicians who |
| | ,, could have been assigned radiation protection responsibil6 ties during an acciden Three of the Emergency |
| | "- Coordinators failed to demonstrate adequate knowledge of the |
| | ,, protective action decisionmaking procedures and al1 of the health physics technicians failed to demonstrate adequate |
| | 'e knowledge of fundamental radiation protection techniques in |
| | , determining habitability of emergency response facilities and offsite surveys to characterize a radioactive plume o released in an acciden n This is a violation of the same basic requirement for which n a violation (382/0523-01) was identified in NRC Inspection ~~ |
| | y Report 50-382/85-2 n M |
| | |
| | " |
| | ' i n 1 |
| | ,, |
| | |
| | U |
| | |
| | 11 1e |
| | |
| | - a - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . a |
| }} | | }} |
|
---|
Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000382/19990201999-10-21021 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-20 on 990815-0925.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990141999-10-19019 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-14 on 990913-17 & 1004-08.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operator Requalification Training Program IR 05000382/19990181999-09-29029 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-18 on 990830-0902.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of NRC-approved Fire Protection Program IR 05000382/19990191999-09-27027 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-19 on 990830-0903.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000382/19990151999-09-14014 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-15 on 990719-23 with in Ofc Insp Until 0819.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Assessment of 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluation Program & Review of Previous Insp Findings Involving Tornado Missile Protection IR 05000382/19990071999-09-0808 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-07 on 990601-11.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Operations IR 05000382/19990161999-09-0101 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-16 on 990704-0814.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19990101999-08-11011 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-10 on 990719-23.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Solid Radioactive Waste Mgt & Radioactive Matl Transportation Programs IR 05000382/19990131999-07-15015 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-13 on 990523-0703.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990121999-06-21021 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-12 on 990524-27.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Licensee Emergency Preparedness Program IR 05000382/19990111999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-11 on 990524-28.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Liquid & Gaseous Radwaste Effluent Mgt Program,Status of Effluent Radiation Monitors & Counting Room Instruments IR 05000382/19990091999-06-0303 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-09 on 990411-0522.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19990061999-05-18018 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-06 on 990405-09.Non-cited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Issue Previously Identified During Architect Engineering Insp Which Documented NRC Insp Rept 50-382/98-201 IR 05000382/19990051999-05-10010 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-05 on 990228-0410.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support ML20206F4801999-05-0303 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-08 on 990405-07.One Apparent Violation Noted & Being Considered for Escalated Eas.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Including Licensee Access Authorization Program IR 05000382/19990041999-04-0909 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-04 on 990301-19.One Violation Occurred & Being Treated as Noncited Violation.Major Areas Inspected: Review of Licensee Implementation of Facility ISI Program & Followup Review of Reactor Trip Breaker Performance IR 05000382/19990021999-04-0505 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-02 on 990117-0227.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990031999-03-26026 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-03 on 990308-12.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program Focusing on RF09 Refueling Outage Activities IR 05000382/19990011999-03-0303 March 1999 Partially Deleted Insp Rept 50-382/99-01 on 990125-29 & 0208-12 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000382/19980181998-12-21021 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-18 on 981018-1128.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19980151998-11-24024 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-15 on 980906-1017.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19980131998-11-17017 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-13 on 980831-0901 & 981005-08.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint Using Guidance of Temp Instruction 2515/137, Insp of Medium-Voltage & Low-Voltage Power Circuit Breakers ML20155D0561998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-17 on 981005-08.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Routine Review of Radiation Protection Program Activities ML20155D5111998-10-27027 October 1998 Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-382/98-16 on 980914-18. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program.Portions Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20154L1281998-10-0909 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-14 on 980726-0905.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19980121998-08-21021 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-12 on 980614-0725.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19992011998-07-27027 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/99-201 on 990511-0619.No Violations Noted Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000382/19980101998-07-20020 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-10 on 980622-26.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program Including Access Authorization,Alarm Stations,Protected Area Access Control of Personnel & Packages & Vehicles IR 05000382/19980091998-07-10010 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-09 on 980503-0613.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support Activities.Fire Door in Reactor Auxiliary Bldg Was Observed to Be Open W/No Controls in Place IR 05000382/19980081998-05-29029 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-08 on 980322-0502.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20217B6981998-04-21021 April 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-06 on 980201-0321.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000382/19980021998-03-20020 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-02 on 980202-20.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Current Performance & Effectiveness of Corrective Action Program Including Audits & Assessments, Operations & Engineering ML20216E1461998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-07 on 980302-06.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20216E5991998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-05 on 980202-12.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program ML20216E7621998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-25 on 971201-980205.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Maint & Engineering IR 05000382/19980031998-03-10010 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-03 on 980216-20.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Emergency Preparedness Program ML20203L2171998-03-0303 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-04 on 980202-06.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program Including External Exposure Controls,Training Qualifications, Facilities & Equipment & Procedures & Documentation IR 05000382/19970281998-02-11011 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-28 on 971214-980131.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19980011998-01-29029 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-01 on 980112-15.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Solid Radwaste Mgt & Radwaste/Matls Transportation Program.Quality Assurance Oversight,Training & Procedural Guidance Were Also Reviewed ML20198M2801998-01-12012 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-24 on 971102-1213.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20198C8871998-01-0505 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-26 on 971117-1205.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operator Activities Re Failure to Return Valve ACC-126A,auxiliary Component CWS Flow Control Valve,To Automatic Operation When Restoring CWS ML20198C4561998-01-0202 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-27 on 971117-1205.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Licensee Identification That Plant Ventilation Sys Could Adversely Affect Level Indication for Refueling Water Storage Pool IR 05000382/19970181997-12-0505 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-18 on 971104-07.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance & Capabilities During full-scale,biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures Performed IR 05000382/19970211997-12-0202 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-21 on 970922-26 & 1006-10.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering,Maintenance & Mgt Meetings IR 05000382/19970221997-11-19019 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-22 on 970921-0001.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19970231997-11-0404 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-23 on 971006-10.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Liquid & Gaseous Radioactive Effluent Waste Mgt Program Including Organization & Mgt Controls & Radioactive Effluent Monitoring IR 05000382/19970191997-10-24024 October 1997 Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-382/97-19 on 970922-26 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected: Plant Support Re Land Vehicle Control Measures & Security Program IR 05000382/19970171997-10-23023 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-17 on 970929-1003.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Operator Requalification Program Following Guidelines in Insp Procedure 71001, Licensed Operator Requalification Program Evaluation IR 05000382/19970161997-10-17017 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-16 on 970810-0920.Violations Noted: Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19970201997-10-0909 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-20 on 970922-26.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:External & Internal Exposure Control Programs,Surveys,Monitoring & Control of Radioactive Matl & Quality Assurance 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:NRC-GENERATED
MONTHYEARIR 05000382/19990201999-10-21021 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-20 on 990815-0925.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990141999-10-19019 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-14 on 990913-17 & 1004-08.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operator Requalification Training Program IR 05000382/19990181999-09-29029 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-18 on 990830-0902.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of NRC-approved Fire Protection Program IR 05000382/19990191999-09-27027 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-19 on 990830-0903.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000382/19990151999-09-14014 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-15 on 990719-23 with in Ofc Insp Until 0819.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Assessment of 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluation Program & Review of Previous Insp Findings Involving Tornado Missile Protection IR 05000382/19990071999-09-0808 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-07 on 990601-11.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Operations IR 05000382/19990161999-09-0101 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-16 on 990704-0814.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19990101999-08-11011 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-10 on 990719-23.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Solid Radioactive Waste Mgt & Radioactive Matl Transportation Programs IR 05000382/19990131999-07-15015 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-13 on 990523-0703.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990121999-06-21021 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-12 on 990524-27.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Licensee Emergency Preparedness Program IR 05000382/19990111999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-11 on 990524-28.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Liquid & Gaseous Radwaste Effluent Mgt Program,Status of Effluent Radiation Monitors & Counting Room Instruments IR 05000382/19990091999-06-0303 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-09 on 990411-0522.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19990061999-05-18018 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-06 on 990405-09.Non-cited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Issue Previously Identified During Architect Engineering Insp Which Documented NRC Insp Rept 50-382/98-201 IR 05000382/19990051999-05-10010 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-05 on 990228-0410.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support ML20206F4801999-05-0303 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-08 on 990405-07.One Apparent Violation Noted & Being Considered for Escalated Eas.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Including Licensee Access Authorization Program IR 05000382/19990041999-04-0909 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-04 on 990301-19.One Violation Occurred & Being Treated as Noncited Violation.Major Areas Inspected: Review of Licensee Implementation of Facility ISI Program & Followup Review of Reactor Trip Breaker Performance IR 05000382/19990021999-04-0505 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-02 on 990117-0227.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990031999-03-26026 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-03 on 990308-12.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program Focusing on RF09 Refueling Outage Activities IR 05000382/19990011999-03-0303 March 1999 Partially Deleted Insp Rept 50-382/99-01 on 990125-29 & 0208-12 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000382/19980181998-12-21021 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-18 on 981018-1128.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19980151998-11-24024 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-15 on 980906-1017.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19980131998-11-17017 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-13 on 980831-0901 & 981005-08.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint Using Guidance of Temp Instruction 2515/137, Insp of Medium-Voltage & Low-Voltage Power Circuit Breakers ML20155D0561998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-17 on 981005-08.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Routine Review of Radiation Protection Program Activities ML20155D5111998-10-27027 October 1998 Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-382/98-16 on 980914-18. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program.Portions Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20154L1281998-10-0909 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-14 on 980726-0905.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19980121998-08-21021 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-12 on 980614-0725.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19992011998-07-27027 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/99-201 on 990511-0619.No Violations Noted Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000382/19980101998-07-20020 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-10 on 980622-26.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program Including Access Authorization,Alarm Stations,Protected Area Access Control of Personnel & Packages & Vehicles IR 05000382/19980091998-07-10010 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-09 on 980503-0613.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support Activities.Fire Door in Reactor Auxiliary Bldg Was Observed to Be Open W/No Controls in Place IR 05000382/19980081998-05-29029 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-08 on 980322-0502.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20217B6981998-04-21021 April 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-06 on 980201-0321.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000382/19980021998-03-20020 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-02 on 980202-20.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Current Performance & Effectiveness of Corrective Action Program Including Audits & Assessments, Operations & Engineering ML20216E1461998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-07 on 980302-06.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20216E5991998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-05 on 980202-12.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program ML20216E7621998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-25 on 971201-980205.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Maint & Engineering IR 05000382/19980031998-03-10010 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-03 on 980216-20.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Emergency Preparedness Program ML20203L2171998-03-0303 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-04 on 980202-06.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program Including External Exposure Controls,Training Qualifications, Facilities & Equipment & Procedures & Documentation IR 05000382/19970281998-02-11011 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-28 on 971214-980131.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19980011998-01-29029 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-01 on 980112-15.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Solid Radwaste Mgt & Radwaste/Matls Transportation Program.Quality Assurance Oversight,Training & Procedural Guidance Were Also Reviewed ML20198M2801998-01-12012 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-24 on 971102-1213.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20198C8871998-01-0505 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-26 on 971117-1205.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operator Activities Re Failure to Return Valve ACC-126A,auxiliary Component CWS Flow Control Valve,To Automatic Operation When Restoring CWS ML20198C4561998-01-0202 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-27 on 971117-1205.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Licensee Identification That Plant Ventilation Sys Could Adversely Affect Level Indication for Refueling Water Storage Pool IR 05000382/19970181997-12-0505 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-18 on 971104-07.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance & Capabilities During full-scale,biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures Performed IR 05000382/19970211997-12-0202 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-21 on 970922-26 & 1006-10.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering,Maintenance & Mgt Meetings IR 05000382/19970221997-11-19019 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-22 on 970921-0001.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19970231997-11-0404 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-23 on 971006-10.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Liquid & Gaseous Radioactive Effluent Waste Mgt Program Including Organization & Mgt Controls & Radioactive Effluent Monitoring IR 05000382/19970191997-10-24024 October 1997 Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-382/97-19 on 970922-26 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected: Plant Support Re Land Vehicle Control Measures & Security Program IR 05000382/19970171997-10-23023 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-17 on 970929-1003.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Operator Requalification Program Following Guidelines in Insp Procedure 71001, Licensed Operator Requalification Program Evaluation IR 05000382/19970161997-10-17017 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-16 on 970810-0920.Violations Noted: Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19970201997-10-0909 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-20 on 970922-26.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:External & Internal Exposure Control Programs,Surveys,Monitoring & Control of Radioactive Matl & Quality Assurance 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:INSPECTION REPORT
MONTHYEARIR 05000382/19990201999-10-21021 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-20 on 990815-0925.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990141999-10-19019 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-14 on 990913-17 & 1004-08.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operator Requalification Training Program IR 05000382/19990181999-09-29029 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-18 on 990830-0902.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of NRC-approved Fire Protection Program IR 05000382/19990191999-09-27027 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-19 on 990830-0903.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000382/19990151999-09-14014 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-15 on 990719-23 with in Ofc Insp Until 0819.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Assessment of 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluation Program & Review of Previous Insp Findings Involving Tornado Missile Protection IR 05000382/19990071999-09-0808 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-07 on 990601-11.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Operations IR 05000382/19990161999-09-0101 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-16 on 990704-0814.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19990101999-08-11011 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-10 on 990719-23.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Solid Radioactive Waste Mgt & Radioactive Matl Transportation Programs IR 05000382/19990131999-07-15015 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-13 on 990523-0703.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990121999-06-21021 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-12 on 990524-27.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Licensee Emergency Preparedness Program IR 05000382/19990111999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-11 on 990524-28.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Liquid & Gaseous Radwaste Effluent Mgt Program,Status of Effluent Radiation Monitors & Counting Room Instruments IR 05000382/19990091999-06-0303 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-09 on 990411-0522.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19990061999-05-18018 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-06 on 990405-09.Non-cited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Issue Previously Identified During Architect Engineering Insp Which Documented NRC Insp Rept 50-382/98-201 IR 05000382/19990051999-05-10010 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-05 on 990228-0410.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support ML20206F4801999-05-0303 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-08 on 990405-07.One Apparent Violation Noted & Being Considered for Escalated Eas.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Including Licensee Access Authorization Program IR 05000382/19990041999-04-0909 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-04 on 990301-19.One Violation Occurred & Being Treated as Noncited Violation.Major Areas Inspected: Review of Licensee Implementation of Facility ISI Program & Followup Review of Reactor Trip Breaker Performance IR 05000382/19990021999-04-0505 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-02 on 990117-0227.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990031999-03-26026 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-03 on 990308-12.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program Focusing on RF09 Refueling Outage Activities IR 05000382/19990011999-03-0303 March 1999 Partially Deleted Insp Rept 50-382/99-01 on 990125-29 & 0208-12 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support IR 05000382/19980181998-12-21021 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-18 on 981018-1128.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19980151998-11-24024 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-15 on 980906-1017.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19980131998-11-17017 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-13 on 980831-0901 & 981005-08.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint Using Guidance of Temp Instruction 2515/137, Insp of Medium-Voltage & Low-Voltage Power Circuit Breakers ML20155D0561998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-17 on 981005-08.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Routine Review of Radiation Protection Program Activities ML20155D5111998-10-27027 October 1998 Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-382/98-16 on 980914-18. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program.Portions Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20154L1281998-10-0909 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-14 on 980726-0905.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19980121998-08-21021 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-12 on 980614-0725.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19992011998-07-27027 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/99-201 on 990511-0619.No Violations Noted Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000382/19980101998-07-20020 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-10 on 980622-26.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program Including Access Authorization,Alarm Stations,Protected Area Access Control of Personnel & Packages & Vehicles IR 05000382/19980091998-07-10010 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-09 on 980503-0613.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support Activities.Fire Door in Reactor Auxiliary Bldg Was Observed to Be Open W/No Controls in Place IR 05000382/19980081998-05-29029 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-08 on 980322-0502.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20217B6981998-04-21021 April 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-06 on 980201-0321.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering IR 05000382/19980021998-03-20020 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-02 on 980202-20.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Current Performance & Effectiveness of Corrective Action Program Including Audits & Assessments, Operations & Engineering ML20216E1461998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-07 on 980302-06.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20216E5991998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-05 on 980202-12.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program ML20216E7621998-03-12012 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-25 on 971201-980205.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Maint & Engineering IR 05000382/19980031998-03-10010 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-03 on 980216-20.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Emergency Preparedness Program ML20203L2171998-03-0303 March 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-04 on 980202-06.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program Including External Exposure Controls,Training Qualifications, Facilities & Equipment & Procedures & Documentation IR 05000382/19970281998-02-11011 February 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-28 on 971214-980131.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19980011998-01-29029 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-01 on 980112-15.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Solid Radwaste Mgt & Radwaste/Matls Transportation Program.Quality Assurance Oversight,Training & Procedural Guidance Were Also Reviewed ML20198M2801998-01-12012 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-24 on 971102-1213.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20198C8871998-01-0505 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-26 on 971117-1205.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operator Activities Re Failure to Return Valve ACC-126A,auxiliary Component CWS Flow Control Valve,To Automatic Operation When Restoring CWS ML20198C4561998-01-0202 January 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/97-27 on 971117-1205.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Review of Licensee Identification That Plant Ventilation Sys Could Adversely Affect Level Indication for Refueling Water Storage Pool IR 05000382/19970181997-12-0505 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-18 on 971104-07.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance & Capabilities During full-scale,biennial Exercise of Emergency Plan & Implementing Procedures Performed IR 05000382/19970211997-12-0202 December 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-21 on 970922-26 & 1006-10.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering,Maintenance & Mgt Meetings IR 05000382/19970221997-11-19019 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-22 on 970921-0001.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19970231997-11-0404 November 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-23 on 971006-10.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Liquid & Gaseous Radioactive Effluent Waste Mgt Program Including Organization & Mgt Controls & Radioactive Effluent Monitoring IR 05000382/19970191997-10-24024 October 1997 Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-382/97-19 on 970922-26 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected: Plant Support Re Land Vehicle Control Measures & Security Program IR 05000382/19970171997-10-23023 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-17 on 970929-1003.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensed Operator Requalification Program Following Guidelines in Insp Procedure 71001, Licensed Operator Requalification Program Evaluation IR 05000382/19970161997-10-17017 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-16 on 970810-0920.Violations Noted: Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19970201997-10-0909 October 1997 Insp Rept 50-382/97-20 on 970922-26.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:External & Internal Exposure Control Programs,Surveys,Monitoring & Control of Radioactive Matl & Quality Assurance 1999-09-08
[Table view] Category:UTILITY
MONTHYEARIR 05000382/19900221990-10-23023 October 1990 Insp Rept 50-382/90-22 on 900905-1001.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup of Events,Monthly Maint & Surveillance Observation,Operational Safety Verification, Followup of Previously Identified Items & LER Followup IR 05000382/19900211990-10-12012 October 1990 Insp Rept 50-382/90-21 on 900910-14.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Liquid & Gaseous Radwaste Mgt Program IR 05000382/19902001990-09-10010 September 1990 Interfacing Sys LOCA Insp Rept 50-382/90-200 on 900730-0810. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Design Features,Sys,Equipment, Procedures,Operations Activities & Human Actions That Could Affect Initiation or Progress of Interfacing Sys LOCA IR 05000382/19900171990-08-27027 August 1990 Insp Rept 50-382/90-17 on 900625-29.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Emergency Preparedness Program Including Changes to Emergency Plans & EPIPs & Changes to Emergency Facilities IR 05000382/19900111990-07-29029 July 1990 Insp Rept 50-382/90-11 on 900625-29.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radioactive Matl Transportation Program.Licensee Implemented Effective Program & Personnel Highly Qualified & Motivated IR 05000382/19900141990-07-17017 July 1990 Insp Rept 50-382/90-14 on 900625-29.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Containment Local Leak Rate Testing Data, Surveillance Test & Calibr Program & Followup of Previous Insp Findings IR 05000382/19900101990-07-0505 July 1990 Cancelled Insp Rept 50-382/90-10 IR 05000382/19900091990-06-26026 June 1990 Errata to Insp Rept 50-382/90-09,inserting Page 6a.No Violations or Deviations Noted ML20055C7821990-06-14014 June 1990 Insp Rept 50-382/90-09 on 900501-31.No Violations or Deviations Noted.One Unresolved Item Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Status,Onsite Followup of Events,Monthly Surveillance Observation & Operational Safety Verification IR 05000382/19890231989-09-26026 September 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-23 on 890801-31.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Status,Onsite Followup of Events,Monthly Maint Observation,Monthly Surveillance Observation,Operational Safety Verification IR 05000382/19890251989-09-21021 September 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-25 on 890828-0901.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiological Environ Monitoring Program,Including Organization & Mgt Controls, Qualification & Training & Licensee QA & Contractor Audits IR 05000382/19890161989-09-15015 September 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-16 on 890717-21.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations Procedures IR 05000382/19890221989-08-0909 August 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-22 on 890701-31.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Onsite Followup of Events,Monthly Maint Observation,Monthly Surveillance Observation,Operational Safety Verification & LER Followup IR 05000382/19890201989-07-25025 July 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-20 on 890705.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Svc Failure of Shaft in Chilled Water Pump B IR 05000382/19890171989-07-14014 July 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-17 on 890601-30.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Onsite Followup of Events,Monthly Maint Observation,Monthly Surveillance Observation & Operational Safety Verification IR 05000382/19890181989-07-13013 July 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-18 on 890626-30.Noncited Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Corrective Action Program & Licensee Actions on Previously Identified Findings IR 05000382/19890151989-07-0606 July 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-15 on 890605-09 & 20-21.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Storage of Emergency Diesel Generator Fuel Oil,Containment Bldg Temp Profiles & Action on Previously Identified Insp Findings IR 05000382/19890141989-07-0303 July 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-14 on 890522-26.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radwaste Mgt & Effluent Control Programs & Review of Special & Semiannual Effluents Repts IR 05000382/19890131989-06-14014 June 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-13 on 890522-26.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup to Previous Insp Findings & Licensee Expeditious Actions Re Generic Ltr 88-17, Loss of Dhr ML20244C6951989-06-0808 June 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-12 on 890416-0531.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Monthly Maint Observation,Monthly Surveillance Observation,Onsite Followup of Events & Evaluation of Licensee QA Program Implementation IR 05000382/19890081989-05-16016 May 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-08 on 890301-0415.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Status,Monthly Maint Observation,Event Followup,Esf Walkdown & LER Followup IR 05000382/19890111989-05-0808 May 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-11 on 890327-31.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Engineering & Technical Support Activities & QA Audits of Activities IR 05000382/19890041989-04-18018 April 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-04 Cancelled ML20245C7281989-04-12012 April 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-07 on 890227-0303 & 890313-17.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Previously Identified Findings, Licensee self-assessment Capabilities & Procurement Activities ML20244A7551989-04-0303 April 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-09 on 890308-09.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previous Insp Findings Associated W/Testing,Low Recirculation Flow Condition & Corrective Maint of HPSI Pump B ML20247K3951989-03-25025 March 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-06 on 890201-28.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Status,Monthly Maint Observation, Operational Safety Verification,Onsite Followup of Events, ESF Walkdown & Followup of Previously Identified Items IR 05000382/19890101989-03-15015 March 1989 Cancels Insp Rept 50-382/89-10.No Insp Rept Will Be Issued for Rept Number ML20247A5101989-03-14014 March 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-05 on 890213-17.Violation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previously Identified Violations & Unresolved Items Re Equipment Qualification of Electric Equipment IR 05000382/19890011989-03-14014 March 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-01 on 890117-0210.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint Performance,Overall Plant Performance Re Maint,Mgt Support of Maint & Maint Implementation ML20235Z7771989-03-0303 March 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-02 on 890109-13.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup of Previous Insp Items,Followup of NRC Info Notices & Bulletins Applicable to Procurement & Insp of 10CFR21 Activities ML20235M7561989-02-16016 February 1989 Insp Rept 50-382/89-03 on 890101-31.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Status,Monthly Surveillance Operation, Onsite Followup of Events,Diesel Generator Fuel Oil QA & NRC Bulletin 87-002 & LER Followup IR 05000382/19880271988-11-22022 November 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-27 on 881017-27 & 881101-07.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Actions on Previously Identified Items Re Equipment Documented in NRC Insp Rept 50-382/86-32 on 870416 ML20195J6561988-11-17017 November 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-25 on 880917-1031.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Status,Onsite Followup of Events,Operational Safety Verification,Monthly Maint Observation & Monthly Surveillance Observation IR 05000382/19880261988-11-16016 November 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-26 on 881024-26.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Followup to Previous Insp Findings,Lers,Steam Generator Noise,& Replacement of Valve in Letdown Flow Sys IR 05000382/19880241988-11-0909 November 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-24 on 881011-13.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Eight Deficiencies Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Performance & Capabilities During Annual Exercise of Emergency Plan & Procedures IR 05000382/19880211988-10-12012 October 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-21 on 880801-0916.Violation & Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Status,Onsite Followup of Events,Followup of Previously Identified Items,Operational Safety Verification & Monthly Maint Observation IR 05000382/19880231988-09-27027 September 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-23 on 880822-26 & 0919-23.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Potential Enforcement Findings Identified by Vendor Insp Branch in Insp Rept 50-382/87-19 ML20153D4311988-08-19019 August 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-19 on 880618-0731.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Enforcement Followup on Quality Verification Function Insp,Monthly Maint Observation, Allegation Followup & Operational Safety Verification ML20153C2521988-08-17017 August 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-20 on 880710-15.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Transportation of Radioactive Matls & Low Level Radwaste Mgt IR 05000382/19880181988-08-0909 August 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-18 on 880706-14.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Facility Emergency Operating Procedures,Including Control Room & Plant Walkdown,Simulator & Human factors-related Guidance ML20151E2391988-07-14014 July 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-13 on 880501-0617.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Monthly Maint Observation,Ler Followup, Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test,Plant Status & Followup of Previously Identified Items IR 05000382/19880171988-06-14014 June 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-17 on 880531-0603.One Violation & No Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Startup Testing IR 05000382/19880141988-06-13013 June 1988 Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-382/88-14 on 880523-27 (Ref 10CFR73.21).No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Testing & Maint Program,Facility Lighting,Security Training & Qualification Plan & Safeguards Info Program IR 05000382/19880081988-06-0202 June 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-08 on 880316-0430.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Onsite Followup of Events,Monthly Maint Observation,Monthly Surveillance Observation,Refueling Activity Observation,Esf,Sys Walkdown & Plant Status IR 05000382/19880101988-06-0101 June 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-10 on 880418-22.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Corrective Action Program Effectiveness IR 05000382/19880121988-05-27027 May 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-12 on 880501-06.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Activities During Cycle 2 Refueling Outage ML20154S2301988-05-27027 May 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-16 on 880512-20.Potential Violation & Deviation Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Events Which Occurred & Actions Taken by Util Prior To,During & Subsequent to 880512 Incident Re Possible Loss of Shutdown Cooling IR 05000382/19882001988-05-16016 May 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-200 on 880201-12.Weaknesses Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Quality Verification Organization Ability to Identify,Resolve & Prevent Recurrence of safety-significant Deficiencies in Functional Areas of Plant Operations IR 05000382/19880111988-05-16016 May 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-11 on 880418-22.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previously Identified Insp Findings,Inservice Insp & 10CFR21 ML20153E3091988-04-26026 April 1988 Insp Rept 50-382/88-09 on 880404-08.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Surveillance Procedures & Records & Verification of RCS Leak Rates 1990-09-10
[Table view] Category:TEXT-INSPECTION & AUDIT & I&E CIRCULARS
MONTHYEARIR 05000382/19990201999-10-21021 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-20 on 990815-0925.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990141999-10-19019 October 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-14 on 990913-17 & 1004-08.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operator Requalification Training Program PNO-IV-99-038A, on 990929,restart of Waterford 3 Occurred. Cause Identified as Failed Seal Water Heat Exchanger Baffle. New Battle & Seal Assembled Were Installed & Reactor Coolant Pump 2B Was Returned to Svc Satisfactorily1999-10-0101 October 1999 PNO-IV-99-038A:on 990929,restart of Waterford 3 Occurred. Cause Identified as Failed Seal Water Heat Exchanger Baffle. New Battle & Seal Assembled Were Installed & Reactor Coolant Pump 2B Was Returned to Svc Satisfactorily IR 05000382/19990181999-09-29029 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-18 on 990830-0902.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of NRC-approved Fire Protection Program IR 05000382/19990191999-09-27027 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-19 on 990830-0903.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support PNO-IV-99-038, on 990910,operators Manually Tripped Reactor from 100% Power in Response to Indications of Failure of RCP 2B Seal.New Baffle & Seal Assembly Were Installed & Plant Was Returned to Power Operations on 9908101999-09-15015 September 1999 PNO-IV-99-038:on 990910,operators Manually Tripped Reactor from 100% Power in Response to Indications of Failure of RCP 2B Seal.New Baffle & Seal Assembly Were Installed & Plant Was Returned to Power Operations on 990810 IR 05000382/19990151999-09-14014 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-15 on 990719-23 with in Ofc Insp Until 0819.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Assessment of 10CFR50.59 Safety Evaluation Program & Review of Previous Insp Findings Involving Tornado Missile Protection IR 05000382/19990071999-09-0808 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-07 on 990601-11.Noncited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Operations IR 05000382/19990161999-09-0101 September 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-16 on 990704-0814.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support PNO-IV-99-032A, on 990801,Waterford 3 Operators Manually Tripped Reactor from 100% Power in Response to Indications of Failure of RCP 2B Seal.Pump Was Secured Immediately Following Plant Sd.New Baffle & Seal Assembly Was Installed1999-08-12012 August 1999 PNO-IV-99-032A:on 990801,Waterford 3 Operators Manually Tripped Reactor from 100% Power in Response to Indications of Failure of RCP 2B Seal.Pump Was Secured Immediately Following Plant Sd.New Baffle & Seal Assembly Was Installed IR 05000382/19990101999-08-11011 August 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-10 on 990719-23.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Solid Radioactive Waste Mgt & Radioactive Matl Transportation Programs PNO-IV-99-032, on 990801,Waterford 3 Operators Manually Tripped Reactor from 100% Power in Response to Indications of Failure of RCP 2B Seal.Pump Was Secured Immediately Following Plan Shutdown.Resident Inspectors Will Monitor1999-08-0303 August 1999 PNO-IV-99-032:on 990801,Waterford 3 Operators Manually Tripped Reactor from 100% Power in Response to Indications of Failure of RCP 2B Seal.Pump Was Secured Immediately Following Plan Shutdown.Resident Inspectors Will Monitor IR 05000382/19990131999-07-15015 July 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-13 on 990523-0703.Noncited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990121999-06-21021 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-12 on 990524-27.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operational Status of Licensee Emergency Preparedness Program IR 05000382/19990111999-06-18018 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-11 on 990524-28.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Implementation of Liquid & Gaseous Radwaste Effluent Mgt Program,Status of Effluent Radiation Monitors & Counting Room Instruments ML20196C9461999-06-15015 June 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp Completed on 990422.Violation Noted:Licensee Failed to Consider Info Contained During Background Investigation Before Granting Temporary Unescorted Access to Contractor Employee IR 05000382/19990091999-06-0303 June 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-09 on 990411-0522.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support ML20209B8581999-05-25025 May 1999 EN-98-046A:on 990524,staff Withdrew Proposed Civil Penalty in Amount of $110,000 Issued to Licensee.Action Based on Severity Level III Problems Associated with ECCS & Afws IR 05000382/19990061999-05-18018 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-06 on 990405-09.Non-cited Violations Identified.Major Areas Inspected:Issue Previously Identified During Architect Engineering Insp Which Documented NRC Insp Rept 50-382/98-201 IR 05000382/19990051999-05-10010 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-05 on 990228-0410.Non-cited Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance, Engineering & Plant Support ML20206F4801999-05-0303 May 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-08 on 990405-07.One Apparent Violation Noted & Being Considered for Escalated Eas.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support Including Licensee Access Authorization Program IR 05000382/19990041999-04-0909 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-04 on 990301-19.One Violation Occurred & Being Treated as Noncited Violation.Major Areas Inspected: Review of Licensee Implementation of Facility ISI Program & Followup Review of Reactor Trip Breaker Performance IR 05000382/19990021999-04-0505 April 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-02 on 990117-0227.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support Activities IR 05000382/19990031999-03-26026 March 1999 Insp Rept 50-382/99-03 on 990308-12.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Radiation Protection Program Focusing on RF09 Refueling Outage Activities IR 05000382/19990011999-03-0303 March 1999 Partially Deleted Insp Rept 50-382/99-01 on 990125-29 & 0208-12 (Ref 10CFR73.21).Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Plant Support ML20207F1581999-03-0303 March 1999 Notice of Violation from Insp on 990125-29 & 0208-12. Violation Noted:Inspector Determined That Waterford Audits SA-98-025.1 & SA-98-036.1,dtd 980916,were Conducted by Individuals Not Independent of Program Mgt Being Audited IR 05000382/19980181998-12-21021 December 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-18 on 981018-1128.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19980151998-11-24024 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-15 on 980906-1017.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint, Engineering & Plant Support Activities PNO-IV-98-054, on 981117,plant Shutdown Greater than 72 H Due to Unidentified Leak.Investigations by Licensee Verified That Leakage Occurred from RCP 2b Seal Area1998-11-19019 November 1998 PNO-IV-98-054:on 981117,plant Shutdown Greater than 72 H Due to Unidentified Leak.Investigations by Licensee Verified That Leakage Occurred from RCP 2b Seal Area IR 05000382/19980131998-11-17017 November 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-13 on 980831-0901 & 981005-08.No Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Maint Using Guidance of Temp Instruction 2515/137, Insp of Medium-Voltage & Low-Voltage Power Circuit Breakers ML20155D0561998-10-29029 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-17 on 981005-08.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Routine Review of Radiation Protection Program Activities ML20155D0411998-10-29029 October 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 981005-08.Violation Noted: Inspectors Identified That Radiation Surveys to Evaluate Extent of Radiation Levels Had Not Been Performed Prior to Operations Personnel Entering Area ML20155D5111998-10-27027 October 1998 Partially Withheld Insp Rept 50-382/98-16 on 980914-18. Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program.Portions Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20155D5021998-10-27027 October 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980914-18.Violation Noted: Performance Tests of Protected Area Detection Sys Identified That Two Detection Zones Did Not Meet Design Criteria to Detect Test Individuals ML20154L0831998-10-0909 October 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980726-0905.Violation Noted:On 980721,NRC Inspectors Found Door 206,vital Area Portal,Unlocked & Not in Alarm at Central Alarm Station ML20154L1281998-10-0909 October 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-14 on 980726-0905.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support PNO-IV-98-045, on 980926,Unit 3 Declared Unusual Event of Hurricane Warning in St Charles Parish.River Bend Station Continued to Operate at Full Power Since Hurricane Force Winds Were Not Predicted in Vicinity of Site1998-09-28028 September 1998 PNO-IV-98-045:on 980926,Unit 3 Declared Unusual Event of Hurricane Warning in St Charles Parish.River Bend Station Continued to Operate at Full Power Since Hurricane Force Winds Were Not Predicted in Vicinity of Site PNO-IV-98-040, on 980917,licensee Commenced Shutdown of Reactor in Order to Replace Pressurizer Code Safety Valve That Had Been Experiencing Increased Leakage.Licensee Plans to Restart Facility on 9809231998-09-18018 September 1998 PNO-IV-98-040:on 980917,licensee Commenced Shutdown of Reactor in Order to Replace Pressurizer Code Safety Valve That Had Been Experiencing Increased Leakage.Licensee Plans to Restart Facility on 980923 IR 05000382/19980121998-08-21021 August 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-12 on 980614-0725.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support IR 05000382/19992011998-07-27027 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/99-201 on 990511-0619.No Violations Noted Major Areas Inspected:Engineering IR 05000382/19980101998-07-20020 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-10 on 980622-26.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Physical Security Program Including Access Authorization,Alarm Stations,Protected Area Access Control of Personnel & Packages & Vehicles ML20236P2431998-07-10010 July 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980503-0613.Violation Noted:On 980521,AP UNT-005-013 Was Not Implemented in That Impairment to Fire Door D150 Was Not Controlled IR 05000382/19980091998-07-10010 July 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-09 on 980503-0613.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Aspects of Operations,Maint,Engineering & Plant Support Activities.Fire Door in Reactor Auxiliary Bldg Was Observed to Be Open W/No Controls in Place ML20249A9611998-06-16016 June 1998 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $100,000.Violation Noted:Licensee Identified That Calculated Peak Fuel Cladding Temp Would Have Exceeded 2200 F Using Licensing Basis Analysis & HPSI Flow ML20151R9131998-06-0909 June 1998 EN-98-046:on 980616,notice of Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in Amount of $110,000 Issued to Licensee.Action Based on Level III Problem Involving HPSI Flow Issues at Waterford-3 Facility IR 05000382/19980081998-05-29029 May 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-08 on 980322-0502.Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maintenance,Engineering & Plant Support ML20248F6801998-05-29029 May 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980322-0502.Violation Noted:Licensee Failed to Establish Adequate Procedures for Operation of EDG When in No or Low Electrical Loading Condition in That No Specific Guidance Provided IR 05000382/19980991998-04-24024 April 1998 SALP Rept 50-382/98-99 for 961201-980321 ML20217B6731998-04-21021 April 1998 Notice of Violation from Insp on 980201-0321.Violation Noted:On Past Occasions,Engineer Operated Governor Valve on Emergency Feedwater Turbine W/O Direction or Concurrence of Shift Superintendent or Control Room Supervisor ML20217B6981998-04-21021 April 1998 Insp Rept 50-382/98-06 on 980201-0321.Violations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Operations,Maint & Engineering 1999-09-08
[Table view] |
Text
_
,
.
L l
!
APPENDIX B U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMISSION
,
REGION IV
!
NRC Inspection Report: 50-382/86-04 License: NPF-38 l
Docket: 50-382 Licensee: Louisiana Power & Light Company 317 Baronne Street P. O. Box 60340 New Orleans, Louisiana 70160 o
Facility Name: Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station (SES)
, Inspection At: Waterford 3 SES site near Killona, Louisiana Inspection Conducted: February 10-14, 1986 Inspectors: n ,,)d h '5/2c/PZ J.7. Baird, Emergency reparedness Analyst 06te '
TM.'W a n 't Terc, Emergency r paredness Analyst ght
[ fate Approved: e 023 4/9 fl, l L. A. Yandell, Chief. Emergency Preparedness Difte'
'
and Safeguards Programs Section Inspection Summary
'
Inspection Conducted February 10-14 1986 (Report 50-382/86-04)
Areas Inspected: Routine, unannounced emergency preparedness inspection in the l areas of emergency detection and classification, protective action decision-( making, dose calculation and assessment, and audits.
!
!
l
! ..
cK O p G
_
_ - - - - _ - - _ - - - -
.. .. . . . . . -
,
.
2-Results: Within the emergency response areas inspected, one violation was identified (personnel assigned to the emergency organization not adequately trained paragraph 3).
l l
l i
<
.- -
-
.
~
-3-
'
DETAILS
- Persons Contacted Louisiana Power & Light
- S. Alleman, Assistant Plant Manager, Plant Technical Services
"R. Azzarello, Emergency Planning Manager
- P. Backes, Operations Quality Assurance Manager R. Bennett, Operations Support Quality Assurance Supervisor K.'Brewster, Onsite Licensing Thomas Brown, Shift Supervisor Terry Brown, Shift Supervisor
- N. Carns, Assistant Plant Manager, Operations and Maintenance
- F. Englebracht, Manager, Plant Administrative Services J. Hoffpauir, Shift Supervisor H. Herring, Senior Health Physics Technician M. Jones, Shif t Supervisor P. Kelly, Senior Health Physics Technician
- R. Kenning, Radiation Protection Superintendent
- M. Langan, General Training Supervisor H. Leason, Engineer Technical, Nuclear
- J. Lewis, Onsite Emergency Planning Coordinator W. Linares, Senior Health Physics Technician A. Lockhart, Site Quality Manager
- J. Messina, Operations Quality Assurance Representative G. Morrison, Licensing Engineer
- J. O'Hearn, Technical Support Training Superintendent
- D. Packer, Training Manager J. Ray, Senior Health Physics Technician A. Wemett, Control Room Supervisor J. Woods, Quality Control Manager State of Louicis **D. Zaloudek, Louisiana Nuclear Energy Division NRC
- J. Leuhman, Senior Resident Inspector
- Denotes those present at the exit intervie **Telephnne. contac .
-
.
.
-4-2. Emergency Detection and Classification The NRC inspectors reviewed a sample of the Emergency Action Levels (EALs)
found in the Emergency Plan and in Emergency Implementing Procedure (EIP) EP-01-001, " Recognition and Classification of Emergency Conditions,"
and verified that they were consistent with the initiating events of NUREG 0654, Appendix In addition, the NRC inspectors noted that although the format used in the Emergency Plan differed from that used in the implementing procedure, EALs found in the plan were basically consistent with those in the implementing procedures. Moreover, the NRC inspectors determined through discussions and interviews with various members of the licensee's emergency organization that only EALs found in the implementing procedure (EP-01-001) would be used during emergency conditions at Waterford The NRC inspectors not?d that EALs appeared to be in agreement with NRC guidance and requirements. In addition, the NRC inspectors noted that Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) postulated accident conditions were incorporated in the Emergency Plan and the EALs contained provisions for detecting and classifying such incident The NRC inspectors interviewed four shift supervisors and two Assistant Plant Managers who would be Emergency Coordinators during an accident, and determined that they understood the relationships between post-TMI (Three Mile Island) core damage indicators (e.g., containment dome monitors, post-accident primary coolant, containment atmosphere analyses) and core statu No violations or deviations were identifie . Protective Action Decisionmaking and Radiation Protection Response The NRC inspectors reviewed emergency plan implementing procedure EP-2-052, Revision 4, " Protective Action Guidelines," and found that in general the procedure was adequate and that it contained decisonmaking
,
guidelines necessary to aid Emergency Coordinators in making protective action recommendations (PARS) according to NRC guidance and criteria. The NRC inspectors found, however, that the procedure forced the user to ascertain road conditions, and other undefined criteria prior to making protective action recommendations. In addition, the inspectors noted that Attachment 7.3 " Evaluation Time Estimate," was not designed in a manner that would facilitate timely decision During the interviews with six Emergency Coordinators, the NRC inspectors posed a simple accident scenario where the containment of the reactor would
'
be filled with fission products in such concentrations that indicated more than ' gap' activity. The NRC inspectors additionally stated that there was l no reason to suspect an imminent failure of the containment during the l following 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. The NRC inspectors selected this scenario because it l was contained as one of the decision conditions in Attachment 7.5, to l EP-2-052, " Flow Chart for Protective Action Decision Making based on core l conditions."
l l . _ - . . - . ..
e .
.
-5-The NRC inspectors also. interviewed four senior health physics technicians qualified for shift duties and gave them two scenarios designed to test their understanding of two basic tasks they would be responsible for during accident conditions. The NRC inspectors described the first scenario as the declaration of an Alert by the control room during the back shift. The first scenario involved abnormally high general area radiation dose rates (1 Rem per hour) in the control room. The NRC inspectors requested that the technician describe his actions. The second scenario required the technicians to describe their actions and technique to determine whether a radioactive plume contained radiolodin Based on these ten interviews, the NRC inspectors made the following findings:
Two of six Emergency Coordinators were able to find Attachment after a couple of minutes, and used it to make adequate protective action recommendation *
One of six Emergency Coordinators stated that he did not remember having seen the decisionmaking flow-chart during training. Another stated that he would try to enforce protective actions, instead of recommending them to offsite authoritie *
One of the Emergency Coordinators told the NRC inspectors that protective action recommendations could not go beyond precautionary shelter at a General Emergency level unless radioactivity could be measured offsite. This individual appeared to be unaware that protective action recommendations could be escalated based on plant conditions alon *
None of the four health physics technicians understood that the protection of control room personnel should be a priority. As a consequence, none of the technicians stated that they would take a radiation su.vey in the control room to determine habitability conditions until prompted by the interviewe *
Two of four technicians stated that their main concern was to establish if there was a radioactive plume release to the environ *
All the technicians indicated that they would prematurely recommend evacuation of the control room when weekly routine administrative radiation dose limits are exceeded. One out of four made reference to exceeding a 500 mR/hr dose rate in the licensee' procedures for the Operational Support Center, but failed to mention stay times associated with it. Another recalled a 500 mR/hr limit, but stated that he would evacuate the control room if weekly limits were exceede *
Three of four technicians indicated that they either had no training on habitability criteria or failed to understand the material
, presented.
I
.
.
-6-
None of the technicians were able to direct themselves to written procedures that would provide them with guidance on actions and priorities expected of them during emergencies as senior health physics representatives during back shifts. All of them lacket initiative in taking immediate action for protecting personnel i her than personnel in rMiologically controlled area *
All four technicians erroneously misinterpreted negative radiolodine results as either faulty equipment or concluding that the plume had no radioiodine. Three out of four were unable to describe proper techniques to ascertain whether they were immersed in the plume when they took the air sample. Three out of four were not aware of the need to determine whether they were in fact sampling the radioactive plum The above examples of insufficient training are an apparent violation against the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(15), which states that
" Radiological Emergency Response Training is provided to those who may be called on to assist in an emergency." (382/8604-01).
4. Dose Calculations and Assessment The NRC inspectors toured the emergency response facilities, examined dose assessment equipment and procedures, and held discussions with selected station personnel to determine what provisions the licensee had made for dose calculation and assessment during a radiological emergency. A representative of the state of Louisiana was also contacted to discuss the state capability and compatibility of dose calculation This discussion indicated that the state used essentially the same techniques and no significant compatibility problems had been identified during previous drills and exercise A review of dose assessment procedures showed that toe licensee had provided manual and computerized methods for rapidly performing emergency dose projections. The dose assessment techniques were implemented in EIP's EP-2-050, "Of f-site Dose Assessment (Manual)" and EP-2-51,"
"Off-site Dose Assessment (Computerized)." The manual methods ranged from a simple nomograph procedure for control room personnel, through various procedures using inplant and offsite monitoring results, to microcomputers programmed to execute all of the methods in the manual dose assessment procedure. The computerized method used the Computerized Emergency Planning and Data Acquisition System (CEPADAS) which operates on real-time data from meteorologicel and radiat';n monitoring instrumentation. In reviewing these procedures, the NRC inspectors noted that the licensee had not provided a method of projecting potential offsite do e based on readings from the containment high range radiation monitors. This deficiency was brought to the licensee's attention and a revision to EP-2-050 incorporating use of these monitors was written and approved prior to the end of the inspection.
l l
l
,
,
,
-7-r The NRC inspectors observed demonstration of the nomograph technique of
-
dose' assessment in the control room, and use of CEPADAS and the manual methods of assessment with the microcomputer in the Emergency Operations Facilit It was determined that each of the dose assessment techniques could be accomplished in a timely fashion.
t The NRC inspector also discussed the documentation of models and
! verification of factors and data in the dose-assessment procedures with l licensee repre untatives and determined that this was in progress with
!
about two-thisds of the manual assessment procedure completed at the time I of the. inspection. In addition, 3 licensee representative stated that a thorough review of the CEPADAS would be initiated in the near future with an evaluation of the capabilities of the system in meeting current and future needs. This area will be reviewed again in a future NRC emergency preparedness inspectio The following is an observation the NRC inspectors called to the licensee's attention. This observation is neither a violation nor an i unresolved item. This item was recommended for licensee consideration for improvement, but it has no specific regulatory requirement.
l o The nomogram procedure in EP-2-050 should identify the current i
effective nomogram revision number to facilitate identification and l
i use of the current revision.
l No violations or deviations were identified.
l S. ),.icensee Audits l Tre NRC inspector determined that the Operations Quality Assurance (QA)
i staff had conducted an independent review (audit) of the emergency preparedness program within a 12-month period in accordance with internal procedures and 10 CFR 50.54(t) requirements. A review of the QA audit report dated August 15, 1985, showed that the audit of the emergency
,
'
program during the period May 29 through June 28, 1985, included an evaluation of licensee drills, exercises, capabilities, procedures and the adequacy of interfaces with state and local governments. The audit also reviewed the licensee's program for identifying and correcting emergency l ~ preparedness deficiencies and weaknesse A review of the audit documentation showed that the audit report and findings were transmitted to appropriate levels of management and the Safety Review Committee Audits Subcommittee for review. It was also noted that responses to the findings were requested from the responsible l organization and the responses were received and evaluated in a timely An abbrulated version of the report involving evaluation of the
'
manne adequacy of licensee interfaces with state and local governments was transmitted to these agencies also.
l The Operations QA Manager stated that expertise in emergency preparedness
!
for the audit team had been through training of the auditor This will L
V '.
.
l -8-
!
l be enhanced in future reviews by a cooperative arrangement with other utilities which will provide a team member who has expertise equivalent to that of an emergency preparedness coordinato During a review of the audit report, the NRC inspector noted that at least two items identified by the auditors were potential violations or deficiencies and were not so identified. One of the items was difficulty in contacting St. John the Baptist Parish officials within 15 minutes during an unusual event, and the other was a comment that 4 letters of agreement with offsite agencies were overdue for the annual updatin This was brought to the Operations QA Manager's attention and subsequent review of this area by the NRC inspectors prior to the end of the inspection indicated that both of these items had been satisfactorily addresse The NRC inspectors also reviewed the licensee's open action item tracking system and discussed the system with Station personnel to determine if a l
program had been implemented to identify deficiencies and weaknesses discovered during exercises, and to track the items for corrective actions in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14) and Appendix E to Part 50, Paragraph IV.F.5. It was noted that all emergency preparedness deficiencies and iteme for improvement were entered into the tracking system, including deficiencies and weaknesses identified during postexercise critique The NRC inspectors also determined that corrective actions for items in the tracking system were being taken in an appropriate time frame. This included corrective actions for weaknesses and deficiencies identified during the critique following the previous emergency exercis The following is an observation the NRC inspectors called to the licensee's attention. This observation is neither a violation nor an unresolved ite This item was recommended for licensee consideration for improvement, but it has no specific vegulatory requirement, o Review audit reports for findings which are potential violations, deviations, or deficiencies and identify them as such so that an appropriate level of attention and priority for corrective action can be provided in parallel with the routine QA audit finding corrective action syste No violations or deviations were identifie . Exit Interview The NRC inspectors and NRC senior resident inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in paragraph 1) at the conclusion of the inspection on February 14, 1986. The NRC inspectors summarized the purpose and scope of the inspection, and reported the findings which included an apparent violation of requirements to provide adequate trainin .
.
eenc rOaw ms U S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION PamceAt mSetCfontsew ese age omraweatw j- b*
INSPECTOR *S REPORT .g h Office of Inspection and Enforcement [ , A , % ,,,lg (f nSPECroas .
0 G l o-d- . _T ,
& c ,./I/.r TRANSA 70% g y,g LICthSEIMN00m
~o .. v ,.cooC T, i,, ,,,,, ,,, ,,, ,,, ,,,
L a u o u o ., a Po w ~L Le a ,}-
'
hM <'d 1 _
" - * * " o r 8, , . s r g s C y j
_
O - DELEft g n - htPLACE D 1 3 le 15 18 PERCO Of fewiSviGATC% iNSPtCfiON 8%SPtCTC% Plasongs o e v OHGANJAfiON (CCE (* mtOsose/wQ CONDUCT-18eG ACfivity (See #f 4A1 OSJO ' wergresor Regiert-snow to afGCN Ai OFFict S T AF8 _,,,,y n, g,
,
]OfwtR wo DAT v4 wo DAY ve 3 - 4tSCENf feSPtCT04 ,_ 0"h
[ Di$aA I#AMM dd ll0 M d2 )@ d6 3 - Pf"70*WANCE A'emarSAL 78av
$ l 3 l
) N N 31l M $3 } Se 35 atGa0*iatACTCg ivPt os Acf:vif v CONovcfIaicama one nos evve V' 02 - SAstiv _
06 - WGwi visit _
10 - PLANT SGC _
14 - e40usay 1 - hec FOAw let 03 - meCIOtti Of - SPtCIAL 11-INyt%f via 4 - sevtSfiGAfC4
/ 3 AEGC4AL OFFICE Littim 04 - th80AClut47 as-vthoca 13 - guiput%f,inPont 05- WCwtAUDt 00- wAtACCf 13. #pon?
'
N 31 5
.ngrtc14% .%.L a r, GAT 4% FJes%QS yge gg ,,., ggg gg
<**'***'****'** ggggggg gggi gggg g gg g(g #t PU# T CON T Ai% 2 M (gTYge 08 #f ro47 T844Sw'f f AL DAf t OF WCLAfCNS A40 ptLD A50*wAfo9 A Mf D Ofv'Ata0%$
einc tones tet steoeflegt 1 - CLAAA on ala 70 wo tca Lt tig n iS M O Actio%
y 1 VOLA T100e Dtvia tiO4 A e C 0 AIS C 0 A e C 0 aso DAv in wo car vm g VIOLAfiO8e & OfVIAfiCN d,f , , , f f - vil 8 - vt$ gk[ gd l l l
. m, ,
.. .: 4 = w a woovte **osw Afions wcom:wecewa*nw p,co woova , m og g woouu .to ,ouowu, ;tt wooua ~uweiaa$. on y woua ato ,ono* i s
-
Is {K 5 ge c._ . 3 e ,e ;- 1 "-
-
E= 5 s r
h I2 2- 0
"
- ka isl I!!!!!g: sc d , c_.rgo fl _sg
-
Il
- -
y a . . 2 . . . t
- . - .
! 1 i ii ! al i!!!! l-l= ! 3 e ! >g! if I i >! !!
e -6
II i e i S 8 o17i 0,3l ^
i iA >h( 0,,iliil= i F 812% liol ^
'
'al_17 lio n o C i liil
-
i liil
-
, , i i i i i i i Iiil e
i Iiil liil
'
s i i n i i i i i i Iiil o o s i i , e i i i i Iiil e i f g,2,l2,ipl @ ,Ja 1, . , o c- , l,i , , l,,l A
, i i , i liil
-
i liil -
in i n , , i , i liil c
i s i , i la l i
<
i n i , i liil i i e , ,
l.,1 i , , , i la il
. i s ral.m ial >
. ti, fi,.. c i iiil ,
i i liil
, i i i i lii1
-
c
.i . i i liil F
i i i i _ i l i i i liil liil
'
ii i i i i i i i o
i liil liil
'
ii , i i i i i i
^
i li ? /ioi o (
'
e i 5 fi.2lJ ai s 71 i l i l- i i Ii1 l* i i i i i l,a il
- -
,, i n i liil , , i n i liil c
i i n i i liil <
ii i i i liiI o e,.ca ttoutvi a, i i vioutfioss on op viA fing o g g g g g l g g l g g g g g ll g l il> >l. I . . 3 o is . . . , . . m ..- , , Inl . I . . . o ,, . .- 4 i n ,, ,, ,e
peRC Foau M A naa f t 8 Docaa t eso is e+isi on uctNst eso (ST paoovCfitt 3 ettei mLt Nget a ,
too stQ p. ju j [ l l INSPECTOR'S REPORT v de*9427 ~
76 o'4 *
"l' '9 " " * "_2" **/ * ,,M,3
'
(Continuation) O i C UO 3 3 / * i i . , e f ac Office of Inspection and Enforcement C "'
g
.
$, .
v os anos on otva ro, ow a m a.co enauw w oun nem n e m.e e.com mm. n.a oe mumm e sano~ue one me o sa anaw,,un ,
t
, Inadeouate Trainino of Personnel
,
10 CFR 50.47(b)(15) requires that radiological emergency a response training be provided to those who may be called on to assist in an emergenc e
,. The Emergency Plan for Waterford 3 states in Section
8.1," Training" that a training prngram has been established in order to mainatain a high degree of preparedness at all e levels of the Waterford 3 emergency organizatio _
Contrary to the above, the NRC inspectors found that t emergency response training had not been adequately provided
,,
as evidenced by the following:
's During the period February 11-13, 1986, NRC inspectors
,, conducted interviews with six licensee personnel who could have functioned as Emergency Coordinators during an is accident, and four senior health physics technicians who
,, could have been assigned radiation protection responsibil6 ties during an acciden Three of the Emergency
"- Coordinators failed to demonstrate adequate knowledge of the
,, protective action decisionmaking procedures and al1 of the health physics technicians failed to demonstrate adequate
'e knowledge of fundamental radiation protection techniques in
, determining habitability of emergency response facilities and offsite surveys to characterize a radioactive plume o released in an acciden n This is a violation of the same basic requirement for which n a violation (382/0523-01) was identified in NRC Inspection ~~
y Report 50-382/85-2 n M
"
' i n 1
,,
U
11 1e
- a - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . a