ML20155D511
| ML20155D511 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 10/27/1998 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20155D429 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-382-98-16, NUDOCS 9811030234 | |
| Download: ML20155D511 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000382/1998016
Text
. . . .
.
. - _ .
.
.
..
. - - . - - . . . . - ~ . -
. _ - _ . . .
. . - = . . . -
.
.
DOCUMENT CONTAINS
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
ENCLOSURE 2
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REG lON IV
Docket No.:
50-382
License No.:
.
l
Report No.:
50-382/98-16
Licensee:
Entergy Operations, Inc.
Facility:
Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3
Location:
Hwy.18
Killona, Louisiana
Dates:
September 14-18,1998
inspector:
A. B. Earnest, Physical Security Specialist
Approved By:
Blaine Murray, Chief, Plant Support Branch
j
Attachment:
SupplementalInformation
l
!
l
!
DOCUMENT CONTAINS
ENCLOSURE (S) CONTAIN(S)
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
LPON SEPARATION THIS
PAGE IS DECONTROLLED
(
9811030234 981027
'
$DR
ADOCK 05000382
i
l
'*"
i
L
j
.
..
..
_ . .
. , - _ _ _ . _
_. _ __
_ _ ._ __ .. _ ..
__
_
l
.
l
.
l
'
-2-
DOCUMENT CONTA!NS
l
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
l
Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3
l
NRC Inspection Report 50-382/98-16
!
l
This routine, announced inspection focused on the licensee physical security program. The
areas inspected included review of records and reports, access control of personnel, packages,
and vehicles, protected area detection, assessment aids, compensatory measures, and
l
protection of safeguards information.
Plant Sucoort
An effective records and reporting system was in place for reporting safeguards events
-
(Section S1.1).
Personnel access to the protected area was adequately controlled. Two metal detectors
-
failed during performance testing. An inspection followup item was identified involving
further testing of the two metal detectors (Section S1.2).
An effective program was in place for searching handcarried packages and material
-
i
(Section S1.3).
The program for searching vehicles was effective (Section S1.4).
-
During performance testing of the protected area detection system, two zones failed to
-
detect the test person. The zone failures are a violation of paragraph 6.1.1 of the
physical security plan (Section S2.1).
The assessment aids system provided minimal assessment of the perimeter detection
-
zones. An inspection followup item was identified involving further review of the closed
circuit television monitors displaying poor assessment qualities (Section S2.2)
The compensatory measures program was adequately implemented. The security
-
officers were well trained on the program requirements (Section S2.3).
An apparent violation was identified for failure to control safeguards information
-
(Section S8.1).
!
I
i
'
DOCUMENT CONTAINS
ENCLOSURE (S) CONTAIN(S)
l
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION
UPON SEPARATION THIS
PAGE IS DECONTROLLED
-
.