ML20133K752: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML20133K752
| number = ML20133K752
| issue date = 10/16/1985
| issue date = 10/16/1985
| title = Ack Receipt of 850129 Ltr Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-445/84-34 & 50-446/84-13.Addl Info Required for Item B.1 Re Falsification of Records & Corrective Measures Taken
| title = Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-445/84-34 & 50-446/84-13.Addl Info Required for Item B.1 Re Falsification of Records & Corrective Measures Taken
| author name = Denise R
| author name = Denise R
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Line 11: Line 11:
| contact person =  
| contact person =  
| document report number = NUDOCS 8510220286
| document report number = NUDOCS 8510220286
| title reference date = 01-29-1985
| package number = ML20133K755
| package number = ML20133K755
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE

Latest revision as of 23:59, 9 August 2022

Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-445/84-34 & 50-446/84-13.Addl Info Required for Item B.1 Re Falsification of Records & Corrective Measures Taken
ML20133K752
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 10/16/1985
From: Denise R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Counsil W
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
Shared Package
ML20133K755 List:
References
NUDOCS 8510220286
Download: ML20133K752 (2)


See also: IR 05000445/1984034

Text

'

.

In Reply Refer To:

Dockets: 50-445/84-34

50-446/84-13 00T 161985

Texas Utilities Generating Company-

ATTN: Mr. W. G. Counsil

Executive Vice President

I

400 North Olive, L.B. 81

Dallas, Texas 75201  !

Gentlemen:

We have reviewed your letter of January 29, 1985, in response to our letter and

Notice of Violation dated December 31, 1984. Your reply adequately addressed l

the specific concerns raised regarding-Item A. We have reviewed the procedure

changes delineated in your response and the requirements for sway strut and

snubber installation and find them acceptable. The generic aspects of the '

findings were not adequately addressed in your response to our Notice of

Violation Item A, as required by 10 CFR 2.201; however, we understand that the

generic' aspects of sway strut and snubber installation will be addressed by the

Comanche Peak Response Team (CPRT) Program Plan.

With respect to Item B, we find that you have taken adequate corrective action

to assure reporting items to the NRC as required by 10 CFR 50.55(e). We will

review the implementation of your corrective actions for Item B during a-

future inspection to determine that full compliance has been achieved. and will

be maintained.

However, with regard to Item B.-1, specifically, additional information is

required because at the time the Notice of Violation was written, the associated 1

nonconformance report (NCR) had been closed without reference made to action

being taken to determine how the apparent falsification of records had occurred -

and to determine if this apparent falsification was an isolated occurrence.

Your additional response should discuss the following matters:

Basis' for the statement that the apparent falsification was determined to

be an isolated instance

l

basis for the statement that the inspection had, in fact, been performed  ;

by another inspector; [

i

basis for the statement that corrective measures were taken to prevent j

recurrence; and j

!

RPB2/ RPB^ DRS

DMHu rnc :gb DRHu er RPDe i VNoonan I

1/t,/85 4/th85 10Ab /85 NRRg , 3p/a

0 / 4 /85 fi/" h . M

l

1

8510220286 851016

PDR ADOCK 05000445

G PDR 8

,

'

.

Texas Utilities Generating Station 2

measures completed or planned to ensure this apparent falsification was

not an attempt to deliberately mislead.

Please provide the additional information requested regarding the apparent

falsification of records within 30 days of the date of this letter.

Further, with regard to your response to the Notice of Violation, Item B.2,

the fact the design oversight (revision to instrument ranges and setpoints)

would likely be detected during subsequent testing or operations, does not

alter the reporting requirements of 10 CFR 50.55(e).

Sincerely,

.gs-grd signed Br.

D. R. KUNIEII'*

R. P. Denise, Director

Division of Reactor Safety

ar.d Projects

cc:

Texas Utilities Electric Company

ATTN: J. W. Beck, Manage ,

Licensing

Skyway Tower

400 Nort? Olive Street

Lock Box 81

Dallas, Texas 75201

Texas Radiation Control Program Director

bcc to DMB (IE01)

bec distrib. by RIV:

  • RPB * MIS System
  • RRI-0PS *RSTS Operator
  • RRI-CONST *R&SPB
  • T. F. Westerman, CPTG R. Denise, D/DRSP

V. Noonan, NRR R. Martin, RA

S. Treby, ELD Juanita Ellis, Pres.- CASE

  • RIV File Renea Hicks, A/ Atty General, EP Div.-TX
  • D. Weiss, LFMB (AR-2015)

RSB