ML20127D585

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:36, 10 July 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safeguards Insp Rept 50-346/85-14 on 850429-0502.No Noncompliance Noted
ML20127D585
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 05/28/1985
From: Axelson W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Crouse R
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20127D586 List:
References
NUDOCS 8506240274
Download: ML20127D585 (2)


See also: IR 05000346/1985014

Text

i .'

e> rrou I A r no ~r

Mrnrmr- ~

Giu LU J/inUQ lilV wjhi M

MAY 2 81985

Docket No. 50-346

Toledo. Edison Company

e

ATTN: Mr. Richard P. Crouse

Vice President

Nuclear

Edison Plaza

300 Madison Avenue

Toledo, OH 43652

Gentlemen:

This refers to the routine safeguards inspection conducted by Messrs.

T. J. Madeda, G. L. Pirtle and 8. Drouin of this office on April 29

to May 2, 1985, of activities at the Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station

authorized by NRC Operating License No. NPF-3 and to the discussion of

our findings with Mr. G. Grime and other members of the Toledo Edison

Company at the conclusion of the inspection.

!

The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during

the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective

examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and

,

interviews with personnel.

During this inspection, certain of your activities appeared to be in non-

compliance with NRC requirements, as described in the enclosed Appendix.

The inspection showed that action had been taken to correct the identified

noncompliance and to prevent recurrence. Consequently, no reply to this

noncompliance is required and we have no further questions regarding this

matter at this time.

Commitments made to resolve concerns noted during the inspection are

described in Sections 2 and 3 of the Report Details. Please advise us if

our understanding of your proposed actions is incorrect.

Areas examined during this inspection concern a subject matter which I

is exempt from disclosure according to Section 73.21(c)(2) of the NRC's

" Rules of Practice," Part 73, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations. This

information must be handled and protected in accordance with the provisions

of 10 CFR 73.21. Consequently, the enclosure to this letter and our report

of this inspection will not be placed in the Public Document Room.

Y oL

8506240274 e50528 Enclosure ccM aiUSTW l

f AN 0%N SAFEGUT is

P,[,af3$ccentroucd

\\

SAFEGJADS N?0RMniM

  • - *

, , - ., , , n a n ' g r n n e e U" ' '-

viu c.tU/ MUD al Umu'"'

,

'

MAY 2 8125

Toledo Edison Company 2

We will gladly discuss any questions you have concerning this inspection.

Sincerely,

W. L. Axelson, Chief

Nuclear Materials Safety

and Safeguards Branch

Enclosures:

1. Appendix, Notice

of Violation

2. Inspection Report

No. 50-346/85014(DRSS)

(UNCLASSIFIED SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION)

cc w/encis:

S. Quennoz, Station

Superintendent

IE File

IE/DQASIP/ORPB

IE/ES

NMSS/SGPL

NRR/DL/SSPB

ACRS

cc w/encls, w/o UNCLASSIFIED

SAFEGUARDS INFORMATION:

DMB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)

. Resident Inspector, RIII

Harold W. Kohn, Ohio EPA

James W. Harris, State of Ohio

Robert H. Quillin, Ohio

Department of Health

En 1 ' TIO t

5

-Upon separation t 1

(Arrn 's a rnn e nn ,:,r.. e. y p3ge is Eccentro

vMn t G Jftlk JG dlh t Vitsu s .wj

RIII- RIII RIII II RIII RI

-M n .4vl% 10-/w 'r# c

Maceda/kja- Pirtle Drodin d Axe s >n

05/22/85 S,4