ML17326A452: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORY OHMATIONDISTRIBUTION SYM(RIOS)ACCESSION NBRt8001070351 DOC~DATEt79/12/20NOTAHIZEDtNOPACILt50316Donald0~CookNuclearPowerPlantrOnitZiIndiana8AOIHeNAMEAUVHOAAFFILIATION SHACCERiD,V, InGianaLHichiganPowerCo~AEGIP,NA11E "HEtivIENr aFFIilATIDN DOCKET05000316
{{#Wiki_filter:REGULATORY OHMATION DISTRIBUTION SY M (RIOS)ACCESSION NBR t 8001070351 DOC~DATE t 79/12/20 NOTAH IZED t NO PACILt50 316 Donald 0~Cook Nuclear Power Plantr Onit Zi Indiana 8 AO I H e NAME AUVHOA AFFILIATION SHACCERiD,V, InGiana L Hichigan Power Co~AEGIP,NA11E"HEtivIENr aFFIilATIDN DOCKET 05000316


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Q~791219rduring analysisdescribed inIKnonconformance identified insmallpipingsydiscrepancy betweenpipingdesignLasbuiltbeingimplementedrfollowup reptby800102DISTRIBUTION CQDEtA002SCOPIESRECEIVEDtLTH iENCLTITLE:IncidentHeportsBulletin79lrlistCausedbycondition,Mod o-./aeSIlEtaaeeoaeeeaaee NO>rs~SeesWCuSaCCmanVZwwwww&%%&&olww&gglw
Q~791219rduring anal ysi s described in IK nonconformance identified in small piping sy discrepancy between piping design L as built being implementedrfollowup rept by 800102 DISTRIBUTION CQDEt A002S COPIES RECEIVEDtLTH i ENCL T I TLE: Incident Hepor t s Bulletin 79 lrli st Caused by condition,Mod o-./ae S I l E t aaeeoaeeeaaee NO>rs~Sees W CuS aC C man VZ w wwww&%%&&olww&gglw
~wlow&wtltwwrwtretoksAAa&w4p&ooww'&%I%11~CIApw&~%t%e&w&&SHOIWAI&loswoowoa&
~wlow&wtltwwrwtretoksAAa&w4p&ooww'&%I%11~CIApw&~%t%e&w&&SHOIWAI&loswoowoa&
ACTION:INTERNAL; RKCIPIEN1'D'CODE/NAME 05BCOÃ84/0REGF0914TA/EOOi6FEBi8PE,ANTSYSBH20AUPLAATSY823FNGA'BR"25PARSYSBR27OPERALICBR29AOXSYSBHHANAOERgS, STSCROUPLEADRCOPIESLTTRENC121i1i11111HECIPIKNr COPIESIDCODE/NAME L'rTAENCL02NRCPDR111MPA315NOVAK/KNIEL 1i7ADFURENGR1i9IKCSYSBHHERCSAFfBRi2qKREI'ER26AD/SITEANAL1i28ACDENTAALY81EJORDAN/16 IRELAND3TM1~HSTREETEXTERNALt 03LPOR29ACRSOQNSICIS)980TOTALNUMBEROFCOPIESREQUIRED:
ACTION: INTERNAL;RKC IP I EN 1'D'CODE/NAME 05 BC OÃ84/0 REG F 09 14 TA/EOO i6 FEB i8 PE,ANT SYS BH 20 AU PLAAT SY8 23 FNGA'BR" 25 PAR SYS BR 27 OPERA L IC BR 29 AOX SYS BH HANAOERgS, STS CROUP LEADR COPIES LTTR ENC 1 2 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 HECIPIKNr COPIES ID CODE/NAME L'rTA ENCL 02 NRC PDR 1 11 MPA 3 15 NOVAK/KNIEL 1 i7 AD FUR ENGR 1 i9 IKC SYS BH HERC SAFf BR i 2q KREI'ER 26 AD/SITE ANAL 1 i 28 ACDENT AALY8 1 E JORDAN/16 IRELAND 3 TM1~H STREET EXTERNALt 03 LPOR 29 ACRS OQ NSIC I S)980 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTrR ENCL I I C t II I II,'I N N h Ill I hh 11, yet~INDIA NA&NICIIIGA N PD VER CONPA N Y DONALD C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT P.O.Box 458, Bridgman, Michigan 49106 December 20, 1979 Mr.J.G.Keppler, Regional Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 Operating License DPR-74 Docket No.50-316  
LTrRENCL IICtIIIII,'INNhIllIhh11, yet~INDIANA&NICIIIGANPDVERCONPANYDONALDC.COOKNUCLEARPLANTP.O.Box458,Bridgman, Michigan49106December20,1979Mr.J.G.Keppler,RegionalDirectorOfficeofInspection andEnforcement UnitedStatesNuclearRegulatory Commission RegionIII799Roosevelt RoadGlenEllyn,IL60137Operating LicenseDPR-74DocketNo.50-316


==DearMr.Keppler:==
==Dear Mr.Keppler:==
ThisistoconfirmourverbalreporttoNRCRegionIIIInspector, Mr.R.E.Masse,at1620hoursonDecember19,1979.Atthattimewereportedthataspartoftheinspection andanalysisprocessmandatedbyIEBulletin79-14,asignificant non-conformance wasidentified inasmallpipingsystemofUnit2oftheCookPlant.Thissignificant non-conformance arosebecauseofadiscrepancy betweenthepipingdesignanalysisandthe"as-built" condition.
This is to confirm our verbal report to NRC Region III Inspector, Mr.R.E.Masse, at 1620 hours on December 19, 1979.At that time we reported that as part of the inspection and analysis process mandated by IE Bulletin 79-14, a significant non-conformance was identified in a small piping system of Unit 2 of the Cook Plant.This significant non-conformance arose because of a discrepancy between the piping design analysis and the"as-built" condition.
Thepipinginvolvedisa1.0"diameterline,connected betweentheprimarypipingandtheexcesslet-downheatexchanger.
The piping involved is a 1.0" diameter line, connected between the primary piping and the excess let-down heat exchanger.
Reanalysis indicated thatthe1.0"diameterpipewouldbestressedabovetheyieldlimitintheunlikelyeventthattheDesignBasisEarthquake occurs.Thepipingsystemwasreanalyzed withtwoadditional restraints andallthestresseswerefoundtobewithinthecodeallowable limit.Themodification isbeingimple-mentedintheUnit.Afollowupreportwillbesubmitted byJanuary2,1980,asrequiredbyTechnical Specification Section6.9.1.8.Sincerely, D.V.ShallerPlantManager/bab0,-2,6)s~ecc:J.E.DolanR.S.HunterR.W.Jurgensen R.F.KroegerR.KilburnR.E.MasseRO:IIIR.C.CallenMPSCG.Charnoff, Esq.G.OlsonJ.M.HenniganPNSRCJ.F.StietzelE.L.TownleyDir.,IE(40copies)Dir.,MIPC(4copies)80010ga LP}}
Reanalysis indicated that the 1.0" diameter pipe would be stressed above the yield limit in the unlikely event that the Design Basis Earthquake occurs.The piping system was reanalyzed with two additional restraints and all the stresses were found to be within the code allowable limit.The modification is being imple-mented in the Unit.A followup report will be submitted by January 2, 1980, as required by Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.8.Sincerely, D.V.Shaller Plant Manager/bab 0,-2,6)s~e cc: J.E.Dolan R.S.Hunter R.W.Jurgensen R.F.Kroeger R.Kilburn R.E.Masse RO:III R.C.Callen MPSC G.Charnoff, Esq.G.Olson J.M.Hennigan PNSRC J.F.Stietzel E.L.Townley Dir., IE (40 copies)Dir., MIPC (4 copies)80010ga L P}}

Revision as of 08:14, 6 July 2018

Ro:On 791219,during Analysis Described in IE Bulletin 79-14, Nonconformance Identified in Small Piping Sys.Caused by Discrepancy Between Piping Design & as-built Condition.Mod Being Implemented.Followup Rept Will Be Submitted by 800102
ML17326A452
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/1979
From: SHALLER D V
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO.
To:
References
IEB-79-14, NUDOCS 8001070351
Download: ML17326A452 (4)


Text

REGULATORY OHMATION DISTRIBUTION SY M (RIOS)ACCESSION NBR t 8001070351 DOC~DATE t 79/12/20 NOTAH IZED t NO PACILt50 316 Donald 0~Cook Nuclear Power Plantr Onit Zi Indiana 8 AO I H e NAME AUVHOA AFFILIATION SHACCERiD,V, InGiana L Hichigan Power Co~AEGIP,NA11E"HEtivIENr aFFIilATIDN DOCKET 05000316

SUBJECT:

Q~791219rduring anal ysi s described in IK nonconformance identified in small piping sy discrepancy between piping design L as built being implementedrfollowup rept by 800102 DISTRIBUTION CQDEt A002S COPIES RECEIVEDtLTH i ENCL T I TLE: Incident Hepor t s Bulletin 79 lrli st Caused by condition,Mod o-./ae S I l E t aaeeoaeeeaaee NO>rs~Sees W CuS aC C man VZ w wwww&%%&&olww&gglw

~wlow&wtltwwrwtretoksAAa&w4p&ooww'&%I%11~CIApw&~%t%e&w&&SHOIWAI&loswoowoa&

ACTION: INTERNAL;RKC IP I EN 1'D'CODE/NAME 05 BC OÃ84/0 REG F 09 14 TA/EOO i6 FEB i8 PE,ANT SYS BH 20 AU PLAAT SY8 23 FNGA'BR" 25 PAR SYS BR 27 OPERA L IC BR 29 AOX SYS BH HANAOERgS, STS CROUP LEADR COPIES LTTR ENC 1 2 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 HECIPIKNr COPIES ID CODE/NAME L'rTA ENCL 02 NRC PDR 1 11 MPA 3 15 NOVAK/KNIEL 1 i7 AD FUR ENGR 1 i9 IKC SYS BH HERC SAFf BR i 2q KREI'ER 26 AD/SITE ANAL 1 i 28 ACDENT AALY8 1 E JORDAN/16 IRELAND 3 TM1~H STREET EXTERNALt 03 LPOR 29 ACRS OQ NSIC I S)980 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTrR ENCL I I C t II I II,'I N N h Ill I hh 11, yet~INDIA NA&NICIIIGA N PD VER CONPA N Y DONALD C.COOK NUCLEAR PLANT P.O.Box 458, Bridgman, Michigan 49106 December 20, 1979 Mr.J.G.Keppler, Regional Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 Operating License DPR-74 Docket No.50-316

Dear Mr.Keppler:

This is to confirm our verbal report to NRC Region III Inspector, Mr.R.E.Masse, at 1620 hours0.0188 days <br />0.45 hours <br />0.00268 weeks <br />6.1641e-4 months <br /> on December 19, 1979.At that time we reported that as part of the inspection and analysis process mandated by IE Bulletin 79-14, a significant non-conformance was identified in a small piping system of Unit 2 of the Cook Plant.This significant non-conformance arose because of a discrepancy between the piping design analysis and the"as-built" condition.

The piping involved is a 1.0" diameter line, connected between the primary piping and the excess let-down heat exchanger.

Reanalysis indicated that the 1.0" diameter pipe would be stressed above the yield limit in the unlikely event that the Design Basis Earthquake occurs.The piping system was reanalyzed with two additional restraints and all the stresses were found to be within the code allowable limit.The modification is being imple-mented in the Unit.A followup report will be submitted by January 2, 1980, as required by Technical Specification Section 6.9.1.8.Sincerely, D.V.Shaller Plant Manager/bab 0,-2,6)s~e cc: J.E.Dolan R.S.Hunter R.W.Jurgensen R.F.Kroeger R.Kilburn R.E.Masse RO:III R.C.Callen MPSC G.Charnoff, Esq.G.Olson J.M.Hennigan PNSRC J.F.Stietzel E.L.Townley Dir., IE (40 copies)Dir., MIPC (4 copies)80010ga L P