ML20126K903: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 24: Line 24:
==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
SAFETY EVALUATI0fi, GEllERIC LETTER 83-28 ITEM 1.1 (POST TRIP REVIEW)-
SAFETY EVALUATI0fi, GEllERIC LETTER 83-28 ITEM 1.1 (POST TRIP REVIEW)-
LA SALLE COUf4TY STATI0ft, UNITS 1 & 2 By letter dated April 22, 1985, we provided a draft Safety Evaluation (SE) based on your fiovember 5,1983 submittal. We indicated in our draft SE that you had not defined the criteria for the need of independent assessment of the event following a trip or described a systematic safety assessuent program to assess unscheduled reactor trips. By letter dated June 5,1985, you provided a response to our concerns.
LA SALLE COUf4TY STATI0ft, UNITS 1 & 2 By {{letter dated|date=April 22, 1985|text=letter dated April 22, 1985}}, we provided a draft Safety Evaluation (SE) based on your fiovember 5,1983 submittal. We indicated in our draft SE that you had not defined the criteria for the need of independent assessment of the event following a trip or described a systematic safety assessuent program to assess unscheduled reactor trips. By {{letter dated|date=June 5, 1985|text=letter dated June 5,1985}}, you provided a response to our concerns.
We have reviewed your response and have concluded, besed on our review, that your item 1.1, " Post-Trip Review Program", for La Salle County Station, Units 1 & T., is acceptable. Our revised SE which provides the details of our eval-uation is enclosed.
We have reviewed your response and have concluded, besed on our review, that your item 1.1, " Post-Trip Review Program", for La Salle County Station, Units 1 & T., is acceptable. Our revised SE which provides the details of our eval-uation is enclosed.
Sincerely, llalter R. Butler, Chief Licensing Branch llo. 2 Division of Licensing
Sincerely, llalter R. Butler, Chief Licensing Branch llo. 2 Division of Licensing
Line 42: Line 42:


SUGJECT: SAFETY EVAll!ATION, CENERIC LETTER 83-26 ITEli 1.1 (POST TRIP REVIEW) "
SUGJECT: SAFETY EVAll!ATION, CENERIC LETTER 83-26 ITEli 1.1 (POST TRIP REVIEW) "
LA SALLE C0VilTY STAT!Cft, Uf;ITS 1 & 2 By letter cated April 22, 1985, we provided a draft Safety Evaluation (SE) based on your November 5,1903 subraittal. We indicated in our draft SE that you had not defined the criteria for the need of independent assessment of the event following a trip or described a systonatic safety assessment program to assess unscheduled reactor trips. By letter dated June 5, 1985, you provided a response to our concerns.
LA SALLE C0VilTY STAT!Cft, Uf;ITS 1 & 2 By letter cated April 22, 1985, we provided a draft Safety Evaluation (SE) based on your November 5,1903 subraittal. We indicated in our draft SE that you had not defined the criteria for the need of independent assessment of the event following a trip or described a systonatic safety assessment program to assess unscheduled reactor trips. By {{letter dated|date=June 5, 1985|text=letter dated June 5, 1985}}, you provided a response to our concerns.
We have reviewed your response and have concluded, based on our review, that your Item 1.1, " Post-Trip Review Program", for La Salle County Station, Units 1 & 2, is acceptabic. Our revised SE which provides the details of our eval-Udticn is enclosed.
We have reviewed your response and have concluded, based on our review, that your Item 1.1, " Post-Trip Review Program", for La Salle County Station, Units 1 & 2, is acceptabic. Our revised SE which provides the details of our eval-Udticn is enclosed.
Sincerely.
Sincerely.

Latest revision as of 09:17, 22 August 2022

Notifies That Util 831105 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28, Item 1.1,Post-Trip Review Program, Acceptable.Revised SER Encl
ML20126K903
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/12/1985
From: Butler W
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Farrar D
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20126K906 List:
References
GL-83-28, NUDOCS 8507300512
Download: ML20126K903 (3)


Text

.

Docket Nos: 50-373/374 JUL 121985 Mr. Dennis L. Farrar Director of Licensing Corrionwealth Edison Ccapany P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690

Dear fir. Farrar:

SUBJECT:

SAFETY EVALUATI0fi, GEllERIC LETTER 83-28 ITEM 1.1 (POST TRIP REVIEW)-

LA SALLE COUf4TY STATI0ft, UNITS 1 & 2 By letter dated April 22, 1985, we provided a draft Safety Evaluation (SE) based on your fiovember 5,1983 submittal. We indicated in our draft SE that you had not defined the criteria for the need of independent assessment of the event following a trip or described a systematic safety assessuent program to assess unscheduled reactor trips. By letter dated June 5,1985, you provided a response to our concerns.

We have reviewed your response and have concluded, besed on our review, that your item 1.1, " Post-Trip Review Program", for La Salle County Station, Units 1 & T., is acceptable. Our revised SE which provides the details of our eval-uation is enclosed.

Sincerely, llalter R. Butler, Chief Licensing Branch llo. 2 Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/ enclosure: See next page Distribution Docket Files flRC PDR Local PDR PRC Systcm NSIC LB#2 Reading EHylton ABournia OELD Woodhead Whum

)L LB#2/DL/FM LB#2/DL/B h

LB92/DL/LA ABournia:mk KButler EHylton 7/ // /85 7/g/85 7/1/85 1

%[$$ock P

/ 0, UNITED STATES

{

' ;g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5 .j WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555

%*****/ JUL 121985 Docket lios: 50-373/374 Mr. Dennis L. Ferrar Director of Licensing Cctraonwealth Edison Company P.O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690

Dear Iir. Farrar:

SUGJECT: SAFETY EVAll!ATION, CENERIC LETTER 83-26 ITEli 1.1 (POST TRIP REVIEW) "

LA SALLE C0VilTY STAT!Cft, Uf;ITS 1 & 2 By letter cated April 22, 1985, we provided a draft Safety Evaluation (SE) based on your November 5,1903 subraittal. We indicated in our draft SE that you had not defined the criteria for the need of independent assessment of the event following a trip or described a systonatic safety assessment program to assess unscheduled reactor trips. By letter dated June 5, 1985, you provided a response to our concerns.

We have reviewed your response and have concluded, based on our review, that your Item 1.1, " Post-Trip Review Program", for La Salle County Station, Units 1 & 2, is acceptabic. Our revised SE which provides the details of our eval-Udticn is enclosed.

Sincerely.

Walter R. Butler, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/ enclosure: See next page

4 Mr. Dennis L. Farrar La Saile County liuclear Power Sintfor Conn.onweelth Edison Company Units 1 & 2 cc:

Philip P. Steptoe, Es~ quire t'chr W. McCaffrey Suite 4200 Chief, Public btilities Division Onc First National Plaza 160 florth La Salle Street, Room 900

- Chicago, Illinois 60603 Chi ct.00, Illinois 60601

/.ssistant' Attorney General 188 West Randolph Street Suite 2315 Chicasc, Illinois 60601 Resident Inspector /LaSalle, hPS U.S. Nuclear Reguletcr3 Ccrr,>ission Rural Route No.1 Post Office Box 224 harseilles, Illinois 61341 Chairman La Salle County Cotre cf Supervisors La Salle County Courthouse Ottawa, Illinois 610EC Attorney Genertl 500 South 2nd Street Springfield, Illinois 6E701 Chairran Illinois Commerce Comnissich Leland builoing 527 East Capitol Avtr.ue Spririgfield, Illinois 62706 I;r . Gary 14. Kright, lianager

- Nuclear Facility Safety Illinois Depertrc.cnt of I;uclear Safety 1035 Outer Perk Drive, 5th Floor Springfield, Illinois 6E704 Regional Adninistrator, Region 111

- U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Concission 799 Rossevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137