IR 05000369/1988015
| ML20150B539 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 06/30/1988 |
| From: | Blake J, Newsome R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20150B533 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-369-88-15, 50-370-88-15, NUDOCS 8807120062 | |
| Download: ML20150B539 (12) | |
Text
', r,., jg
, > >,
' *
g ;W
-
'
.
.,
, t g4 8Uo/-.
m UNITED STATES
8'
'
-1
' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'
,.4
-
, -Q'
- '
REGloN il
>
.o y
,7 j.
101 MARIETTA STREET,N.W.
't
- -
t ATLANTA, GEORGI A 30323 hy*..../
Report Nos.:
50-369/88-15 and 50-370/88-15
'
Licensee: Deke; Power' Company 422 South Church Street Charlotte, NC 28242 Docket Nos.:
50-369 and 50-370 License Nos.*
NPF-9 and NPF-17 Facility.Name: McGuire 1 and 2
'Inspectio-o du ted-June 13-17, 1988 4./
d
Inspecto :
'-
L me Dhte S'igned
.
To
&-
Appr e b.
v J. J lake, Chief Date Signed
.
a ials and Processes Section Di ision of Reactor Safety SUMMARY.
i-Scope:
This routine, unannounced inspection. was conducted on site in the areas of inservice inspection (ISI) Unit 2, including review of inspection plan for this outage, Nondestructive Examination (NDE.)
procedures review Units 1 and 2, observation and review of inprocess o
l NDE examinations, and review of ISI examination data.
Results:
In the areas inspect 3d, violations or deviations were not identified.
!
l l
.,
!
.
8807120062 880701
,
ADOCK 05000369 PDR PNU
'
O
'
,
'p
-
,
.. ~
.
.
..
-
.
-
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
REPORT DETAILS 1.
' Persons Contacted Licensee Employees
- N. Atherton,. Compliance Production. Specialist
- L. Bost, Engineering Department
- J. Day, Licensing, Associate Engineer
- W. Goodman, Quality Assurance (QA) Technical Support Supervisor
- B. Hamilton, Superintendent, Technical Services
- S. LeRoy, Licensing
- R. Sharpe, Compliance Engineer
- G. Underwood, QA, ISI, Operations Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included craf tsmen, engineers, mechanics, security force members, technicians, and administrative personnel.
Other. Organization Babcock & Wilcox R. Patterson, ISI Supervisor NRC Resident Inspector
- W. Orders, Senior Resident Inspector
- Attended exit interview 2.
Inservice Inspection (ISI)
The inspector examined documents, activities, and records as indicated below to determine-whether ISI was being conducted in accordance with applicable procedures, regulatory requirements and licensee commitments.
The applicable code for ISI is American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel (ASME B&PV) Code,Section XI, 1980 edition with addenda through Winter 1980.
Duke Power Company (DCP) nondestructive examination personnel are performing the liquid penetrant (PT), magnetic particle (MT), and visual (VT) examinations while Babcock and Wilcox (B&W)
personnel are performing the ultrasonic (UT) and primary eddy current (EC)
examination evaluation for Duke Power.
Duke Power personnel are being
.used to collect the EC data and are performing a secondary examination data evaluatio.
.
'
.
'
.
.
.
.
.
,
- .
.
,
a.
Inservice Inspection, Programmatic Review Unit 2(73051)
The inspector reviewed the below listed documents relating to the licensee's. (ISI) program (Plan) for the current outage in the areas of:
program approva); QA program. requirements including organiza-tional structure; audit requirements; general QA, requirements-(examination reports, control of deviations from established program,
. quality _ documentation, and identification of components); work and quality inspection procedures; control of processes; corrective action; document contro'; control of examinations and examination-equipment; quality records; inspection scope; inspection intervals; persannel qualifications; and, NDE records including provisions for storage.
Document Title Procedure NDE-C R1 Calibration / Verification of-NDE
.
Equipment Drocedure QCH-3 R1 Weld Preparation for Inservice Inspections Inservice Inspection Plan R10 Unit 2 Outage 4 Ir:pectica Pian Details Procedure QCK-1 R23 Control of Nonconforming items y
<
b.
Review of Procedures Units 1 and 2 (73052)
The inspector reviewed the procedures indicated below to determine whether the procedures were consistent with regulatory requirements and licensee commitments. The procedures were also reviewed in. the i
'
areas of procedure approval, requirements for qualification of NDE t
personnel, and compilation of required records; and if applicable, I
division of responsibility between the ifcensee and contractor i
' ~
~ personnel if contractor personnal are involved in the ISI effort.
Procedure ID Title NDE-25 R12 Magentic Particle Examination Procedure
"
and Techni' ques NDE-35 R10 Liquid Penetrant Examination
?
ISI-130 R24 Ultrasonic Examination of Vessel Welds
'
and Nozzle Inside Radius Sections r
151-424 R11 Multifrequency Eddy Current Examination of.750-inch OD x.044-inch Wall RSG Tubing for Detection of Tube Wear at Support Plate t
,
. - _ - _ _ _ _ _
_ _ _ _ _ _
_---
,
,
_,
.
y
- y
,
o
.
-
.
,
>
All procedures listed above had been reviewed tj NRC during previous outages.
During the current inspection, only changes to these documents were reviewed.
(1) The inspector reviewed ultrasonic procedure ISI-130.to ascertain whether it had been reviewed and approved in accordance with the licensee's established QA procedures.
The procedure = was
-
reviewed = for technical adequacy and conformance with ASME -
Section V Article 5 arid other license commitments / requirements in the below following areas: type of apparatus used; extent of coverage of wekment; - calibration requirements; search units; beam angles; DAC curves; reference level for monitoring discontinuities; method for demonstrating penetration; -limits for. evaluating and recording indications; recording significant indications; and, acceptance limits.
(2)- The inspector reviewed EC procedure ISI-424 'or technical content relative to:
multichannel examination unit, multi-channel examination indication equipment is specified, examination sensitivity, material permeability, method of examination, method of calibration and calibration sequence, and acceptance criteria.
(3) The inspector reviewed PT procedure NDE-35 to ascertain whether
'it ~ had been raviewed and approved in accordance' with the-licensee's established QA procedures..The procedure was
'
reviewed for technical adequacy and conformance with ASME, Section '/, Article 6,
and other licensee commitments /
requirements in the following listed areas:
specified method; penetrant material identification; penetrant materials analyzed for sulfur; penetrant materials analyzed for total halogens; acceptable pre-examination surface; drying tire; method of penetrant application; surface tuperature; solvent removal; surface drying prior to developing; type of developer; examination technique; evaluation techniques; and, procedure requai1.ication.
(4) The inspector reviewed MT procedure HDE-25 to ascertain whether
"
it had been reviewed and approved in acct.,rdance with the
>
licensee's established QA procedures.
The procedure was reviewed for technical acequacy "-d for ton, mance with ASME Section V, Article 7,
-d other licensee commitments / require-liste6 areas:
examination methods; ments in the followins contrast of dry powder particle color witn background; surface tamperature; viewing conditions; examination overlap and directions; pole or prod spacing; current or lifting power (yoke); and, acceptance criteria.
I
_
_
.--
-
--
-
,
-
,
.
.
.
-
..
4'
c.
0bservation of York and Work Activities Unit 2(73753)
'The inspector observed work activities and reviewed certification records of equipment, materia'3, and NDE personnel which had been and will be utilized.during the required ISI examinations during this outage. The observations and reviews conducted by the inspector are documented below.
,
(1) Ultrasonic (UT) Examination (a) The inspector observed calibration activities and the in process ultrasonic-examinations being conducted on the welds indicated below. The observations were compared with the applicable procedures and the Code in the following areas:
availability of ~ and compliance with approved NDE procedure; use of knowledgeable NDE personnel; use of NDE personnel qualified to the proper level; t' pe of apparatus y
used; extent of coverage of weldment; calibration requirements; search units; beam angles; DAC curves; reference level for monitoring discontinuities; method of demonstration; recording significant indications; and, acceptance limits.
-2NI2F-529 B09.011.415 2NI2F-531 B09.011.416 2NI2F-532 B09.011.417
,
While observing the examination of the above listed welds,
'
the NRC inspector became ' concerned with the examinations because the geometric reflectors, that had been reported during the previous UT examination in October 1979, were not being observed during this examination of weld 2NI2F-529 and the geometric reflectors that had been reported on weld 2NI2F-531 were not clearly discernable nor at an amplitude that would warrant there being recorded.
i Also, in both cases, the UT signal from these areas had a very high noise level signal, however, this is not particularly unusual for stainless steel material.
l Following completion of these examinations, the NRC l:
inspector expressed his concern to the ISI supervisor. The
'
ISI supervisor indicated that there had been a similar l
problem on an additional weld and that the resson for the L
differences in the UT examinations had not yet been resolved.
The NRC inspertor requested that two sets of UT equipment
!
be calibrated. One set was to utilize the transducer used l
for the above examinations on a alffer-T.c UT instrument and l'
_
m
._-.__
,
-
.
.
.
.
-
.
-3 the other set was to utili7e a different transducer on the UT instrument. that sas used during the examinations.
Following these calibrations, weld 2NI2F-529 was to be re-examined to deteroine if the examination differences could be attributed to a faulty transducer or possible a UT instrument problem.
-During the UT equipment calibrations mentioned above, the UT examiner discovered that he had inadvertently been using a 5.0 MHz transduce; instead of a 2.25 MHz transducer for his examinations which could account for the differences because the 1979 examinations had been made using a. 25
MHz transducer. The use of 5.0 MHz transducer is permitted by procedure and code for these examinations, however, the 2.25 MHz transducer has superior penetration power and is used almost exclusively when examining stainless steel material. Discussions with the UT examiner indicated that he had been unaware of his error and had intended to use a 2.25 MHz transducer f ar these examinations in an effort to match the equioment used during the 1979 examinations.
Following the calibration of two sets of equipment with one set utilizing the 5.0 MH7 transducer used during the current examinations and the other set utilizing a 2.25 MHz transducer, the NRC inspector observed portions of the re-exsmination of weld 2NI2F-529.
The re-examination indicated no change with the 5.0 MHz transducer, however, with the 2.25 MHz transducer the geometric :sflectors that hau been reported during the 1979 examination were very evident and correlated very closely with the 1979 examination reported results.
The NRC inspector discussed the above findings with the ISI supervisor and requested that all of the welds that had been examined with a 5.0 MHz transducer be re-examined.
These re-examinations were accomplished during this inspection and the NRC inspector reviewed the re-L examination results.
The current examination utilizing a 2.25 MHz transducer and the reported 1979 UT results were compared and there did not appear to be any significant discrepancies between the two examinations.
(b) The NRC inspector conducted an ultrasonic verification examination, using B&W equipment, or, portions of the below listed welds. The examinations were performed in order to
!
evaluate the technical adequacy af the ultrasonic
!
examination procedure being used the licensee's
,
contractor to perform ultrasonic examinations and to assess i
the validity of the information being reported by the l
ultrasonic examiners.
l l~
'
'
- <
,
.4
..
.
-
.
,
g
-
a
'
Weld ID
.ISI Item No.
2NI2F-531 BC3.011.416 2NI2F-532 809.011.417 c
The verification ultrasonic examinations : conducted by Lthe-inspector ~ indicated that. the procedure being used te conduct - the examinations is adequate.
.The. information being reported by the ultrasonic ' examiners compared favorably with the verification examinations.
(c) The following listed ultrasonic equipment and materials certification records were reviewed:
Ultrasonic Instruments Manufacturer /Model Serial No.
<
.T/K-SM100 1343 T/K-SM100 1288 T/K-SM100 1344 The inspector reviewed. spectrum analysis data for ultrasonic transducers with serial rumbers 40241 and
'
K86083.
Ultrasonic Couplant Batch No, 8767, Sonotrace 40 Ultrasonic Calibration Block 50249
,
(2) Magnetic Particle (MT) Examination l
(a) The inspector cbserved the magnetic particle examinations indicted below.
The observations were compared with the applicable procedures and the Code in the following areas:
examination methods; contrast of dry powder particle color with backgrouno; surface temperature; viewing conditions; ecamination overlap and directions; pole or prod r, pacing; current or lifting power (yoke); and, acceptance criteria.
ISI Iten No_._
Weld ID C03.044.001 2-MCR-CF-160 i
C05.011.150 2KC2F-2762 l
(b) The inspector reviewed documentation indicating that a 10
.
pound lift test had been performed on maqnetic particle AC l
yokes 26082, 26034. MCQUA 26035, and MCQA-'..
,
,
!
.
'
- -.
.
.
- -. -
-
-
.
.
.
.
.
,
(c) A review of magnetic particle material certification records for batch number 84H046 indicated the sulfur and halogen content of the material was within acceptable content limits.
(3)
Liquid Penetrant (PT) Cxamination (a) The inspector observed the liquid penetrant examination indicated below.
The observations was conpared with the applicable procedure and the Code in the following areas:
specified method, penetrant materials identified; penetrant materials analyzed for halogens and sulfur; acceptable pre-examination surface; drying time; method of penetrant application; penetration time; surface temperature; solvent removal; dry surface prior to developing; type of developer; examination technique; evaluation technique; and reporting of examination results.
ISI Item No.
Weld ID C05.021.362A 2 NIP 131-1 (b) The inspector reviewed the below listed liquid penetrant materials certification records to ascertain if the sulfur and halogen content of the material was within acceptable content limits.
Materials Batch Number Liquid Penetrant 87J022 Cleaner / Remover 87J076 Developer 84M029 (4) Steam Generator Tubing Eddy Current (EC) Examination f
The inspector observed the Eddy Current activities indicated
'
below.
The obserations were compared with the applicable procedures and the Code in the following areas:
rethod for j
maximum sensitive is applied; method of examination has been recorded; e xam i na t.i on equipment has been calibrated in accordance with the applicable perfarmance reference; required coverage of steam generator tubes occurs during tha examination; acceptance crite-ia is specified or referenced and is consistent with the procedure or the ASME Code; and, results are consistent with acceptance criteria.
In process eddy current inspection data evaluation was observed l
for the following steam generato* tubes:
i
.
.-
.
_ _ - --- ----
-- -- --
-
- - - - - - - - - - -.
-
-
-
-- -
- '
-:
..
x+<
,
,
-
.
.
'
Tube ID Tube ID
'
SG-B SG-D Row Column Data Type.
Row-Column Data Type
103 Bobbin Coil
41 Bobbin Coil l'6 110-Bobbin Coil
9 Bobbin Coil-18-
Bobbin'. Coil
61 Bobbin Coil-
103.
Bobbin C011
99 Bobbin Coil
96 Bobbin CoiT
- 5 101 Bobbin Coil
92 Bobbin Coil
102 Bobbin Coil
63 Bobbin Coil
5 360 Coil
9 360' Coi'
16 360 Coil
17
- 360 Coil
18 360 -Coil
20 360 Coil
21 360* Coil
25 360' Coil
26 3E0' Coil
30 360 Coil
,
' (5) Examiner Qualification The inspector reviewed the qualification documentation for the below listed DPC & B&W examiners in the following areas; employer's name; person certified; activity qualified to perform; effective period of certification; signature of employer's designated representative; basis used. for certifi-cation; and, annual visual acuity, color vision examination; and periodic recertification.
Method-Level Company Examiner UT PT MT EC VT II II DP BB
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
II DP DB II II
-
-
DP LG
-
,
II II DP BS
-
-
-
II II DP TC
-
-
-
II DP GF
-
-
-
-
II DP LC
-
-
-
-
DP LA
-
II II
-
-
II II
-
-
DP LM
-
II II DP RS
-
-
-
Il DP LW
-
-
-
-
BW RP II
-
-
-
-
BW JW II
-
-
-
-
.
---
e
=,,,
.-
....
-
.-.....--.7--m-
,.,-,-m--,m,_...,y,
-
_ _ -. _ _ _ -.
__. - _ _ _ _
__.
.
.
__
__
__
-_
'
.-...4r
.
.
d
..
BW CS I
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
IIA OP HS
-
IIA DP TG
-
-
-
-
IIA BW JW
-
-
-
-
III BW-
.MG
-
-
-
-
IIA BW CP
-
-
--
-
IIA BW VL
-
-
-
-
I OP TA
-
-
-
-
II
-
DP AG
-
-
-
I DP TT
-
-
-
-
d.
Inservice. Inspection, Data Review and Evaluation, Unit 2 (72755).
"
(1) Records of completed nondestructive examinations -were selected and reviewed to ascertain whether: the method (s) technique and extent of the examination complied with the ISI plan and applicable NDE procedures; findings were properly recorded and evaluated by qualified personnel programmatic deviations were recorded as required; personnel, instruments, calibration blocks and NDE materials (penetrants, couplants) were designated.
Records selected for this review are listed below.
ISI Item No.
Weld No.
NDE Method B09.011.415A 2NI2F-529 PT B09.011.416A 2NI2F-531 PT B09.011.417A 2NI2F-532 PT B09.011.418A 2NI2F-2747 PT B09.011.422A 2NI2F-557 PT B09.011.423A 2NI2F-559 PT B09.011.424A 2NI2F-563 PT F1.02.944 2MC-SM-H148 VT C05.011.313 2ND2FW2
PT C05.011.220 2N02F-71 PT F1.03.071 2MCA-CA-5533 VT C05.011.576 2SM2FW12-27 MT C05.011.577 2SM2FW12-31 MT C05.011.603 2SV2FW2-7 MT C05.011.004 2CA2FW44-1 MT C03.040.016 2-MCA-SM-164 MT C33.040.006 2-MCA-SM-017 MT C03.040.005 2-MCA-SM-015 MT F1.02.479 2-MCA-ND-5615 VT F1.02.953 2-MCA-SM-4184 VT F1.03.066 2-MCA-CA-5527 V1 C05.011.150 2KC2F-2762 MT C03.040.001 2-MCR-CF-160 MT C05.021.365 2NI2F-487 UT C05.021.665 2SM-5A-F UT C05.021.666 2SM-5A-H UT B09.011.061 2NC2Fk53-18 UT
,
.
-
-
- -
.. _ -
-,
. - -..
. _ -
,
-
m-
...
,
.
B09.011.062 2NC2FW53-19 UT C05.021.363 2NI2F-482 UT C05.021.364 2NI2F-484 UT C05.021.366 2NI2F-491 UT B09.011.414 2NI2F-527 UT B09.011.415 2NI2F-529 UT B09.011.416 2NI2F-531 UT B09.011.417 2NI2F-532 UT B09.011.419 2NI2F-543 UT The inspector compared current examination results with rando.mly selected previous examination results.
No significant discrepancies were noted.
(2) Steam Generator Tubing Eddy Current Examination Data Review (a) The inspector reviewed records of the SG-B eddy current examinations indicated belc 4 The reviews were ccmpared with the applicable procedures and the Code in the following areas: the multichannel eddy current examination equipment has been identified; material permeability has been recorded; method of examination has been recorded; and, results are consistent with ecceptance criteria.
Row Column
90
76
9
46
12
13
14
15
20
24
25
41
47
59
76
97
95
62
64
64
6
.
.
.
,.
(b) At the conclusion of the NRC inspection all examinations had not been completed.
The inspector discussed the program and status witn the licensee and the preliminary examination status for steam generators B and D are listed below. Examination of steam generators A and C had not yet started.
SG-B SG-D Tubes Scheduled By Code 579 548 i
Tubes examined 549 548 Tubes with >40% TW indications
3 Violations or defiations were not identified in the areas inspected.
3.
Exit Interview The inspection scope and results were summarized on June 17, 1988, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1.
The inspector described the areas inspected and discussed in detafl the inspection results.
Proprietary information is not contained in this report.
_