IR 05000369/1989019

Insp Repts 50-369/89-19 & 50-370/89-19 on 890710-14.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected: Inservice Insp Program & Unit 2 Insp Plan for Outage,Nde procedures,in-progress NDE Exams & NDE Equipment Calibr

ML20247K602
Person / Time
Site:	McGuire, Mcguire
Issue date:	07/19/1989
From:	Blake J, Economos N, Newsome R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20247K596	List: IR 05000369/1989019 ML20247K590
References
50-369-89-19, 50-370-89-19, NUDOCS 8908010007
Download: ML20247K602 (10)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:f 'f h- w'h '_ * N : y,, ' l i': < IN

     '
    '  l-
-

5 G UNIT ED STATES ( fMM j py}ot' %

            ,
    > >
      ;MUCLEAR RECULATORY cOMMisslON "    2 I
, ,

g'{ l .

   . .

I REGIOM il - '+

            .j
- 1"
'
 ,
 '
 '

S ~?e {{

   .
      :

_ .101 MARIETTA STREET. ." ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323 j m, ,

q

 -

11

  %4ag,+
   ,..,
 }
 'i'
  .
   '

  .
- ,          ,
  .
    ,
 ,  RepoktNos~: . 50,369/89-19'and'50-370/89-19?

            ;

1 ' : , Licensee: ' Duke Power Company ? 422 South Church Stree '

 <   Charlotte, NC 28242
  ' Docket Nos.:L 50-369.and 50-370     ' License Nos.: NPF-9 and NPF-17'
,

. 37 .

'

lc 't' m . Facility Name: .McGuire 1:and 2 l k

       '
  -Inspection ConductedE July 10 - July 14 -1989 n

Inspectors: a AM, - _ N--//-Bf R. W. Newsome . . Date Signed: .,

        "
           .
. g. .

N' nn om "- xn~ A.br p6te Mg ed :; Approved by: ~- 8 v - 9 87 . aKE, Chief 1 D~ ate Signeo ; M e als:and Processes Section > i ng'neering Branch' j ivision of Reactor Safety' 'x- " ~

        ,  , .g  -
            ;

s

        <

v  ! l SUMMARY *

          :
       <
            ,;

Scope: . ,

       ,
         ,
           ;  j ~
 ,

This routine, announced inspection was conducted on'-sit'e in the arhas of Inservice . Inspection (ISI).i . Th'e.. inspection : included a review:bf the ISI

  : program: and the Unit 2 inspection plan for thisl outage; reviews; of non-     :

P destructive examination (NDE) procedures; observations ~ of in-progress NDE j examinations;. independent examination verifications;ireviews of NDE personnel 1 qualifications; reviews of NDE equipment calibration and material certification  !

  : documentation;-and, a review of completed NDE examination ~ dat ]
            ;

Results: - ]

>

1 .-In;the areas inspected, violations or deviations'were not identifie j i .. ^ All : areas inspected . indicated adequate control and implementation of the

 .

Jinservice inspection progra PDR ADOCK 05000369 Q PDC

  '
   .

     . _ .

_ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _

.
..
. .
.

REPORT DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

 *J. Boyle, Superintendent, Integrated Scheduling
 *J. Day, Compliance, Associate Engineer
 * Goodman, Quality Assurance (QA) Technical Support Supervisor P. Helton, QA, ISI
 *S. LeRay, Regulatory Compliance
 *T. Mathews, Design Site Office
 *T. McConnell, Station Manager
 *G. Underwood, QA, ISI Other licensee employees contacted during this inspection included craftsmen, engineers, technicians, and administrative personne Other Organizations Babcock and Wilcox (B&W)

R. Patterson, ISI Supervisor NRC Resident Inspector

 *K. Van Doorn, Senior Resident Inspector
 * Attended exit interview Acronyms and initialisms used throughout this report are listed in the last paragrap .- Inservice Inspection The inspectors reviewed documents and records and observed activities, as indicated below, to determine whether ISI was being conducted in accordance with applicable procedures, regulatory requirements, and   l licensee commitments. The applicable code for ISI is the American Society  J of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel (ASME B&PV) Code,   i

' Section XI,1980 edition with addenda through Winter 1980. Duke Pcwer Company NDE personnel were performing the liquid penetrant (PT), magnetic j particle (MT), and visual (VT) examinations, while Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) personnel were conducting the majcrity of the ultrasonic (UT) examination ,

    - _ _ __ - _ _ _____

m7g

 -
  .
 .
.
.  ..
  ,

G

a. ISI Program Review, Units I, and 2 (73051) The inspectors reviewed the following documents relating to the ISI program to determine whether the plan had been approved by the licensee and to assure that procedures and plans had been established (written. . reviewed, approved and issued) to control end accomplish the following ~ applicable activities: organizational structure including qualifications, training,. responsibilities, and duties of personnel responsible for ISI; cudits including procedures, frequency, and qualification of personnel; general Quality Assurance requirements including ' examination reports, deviations from previously established program, material certifications, and identification of components to be covered; work and inspection procedures; control of processes including suitably controlled work conditions, special methods, and use of qualified personnel; corrective action; document control; control of examination equipment; quality records including documentation of indications and NDE findings, review of documentation, provisions to assure legibility and. retrievability, and corrective action; scope of the inspection including description of areas to be examined, examination category, method of inspection, extent of examinations, and justifi-cation for any exception; definition of inspection interval and extent of examination; qualification of NDE personnel; and, controls of generation, approval, custody, storage and maintenance of NDE record Inservice Inspection Plan McGuire Nuclear Station Unit 2 Refueling Outage #5

   -

QCL-5 (R9) Control Of Preservice And Inservice Inspection Activities

   -

QA-116 (Rt2) Quality Assurance Records Collection, Storage and petention

   -

QA-101(R6) Quality Assurance Records Storage Area (General Office-Corporate Vault)

   -

QA-513 (R6) Control of Inservice Inspection Plans and Reports

   - QA-51E ,'RI) Administrative Guide For Resolving Differences During The Review Of Eddy Current Data
   -

NDE-A(R9) Nondestructive Examination Program Procedure

   -

NDE-C(R3) Calibration / Verification of NDE Equipment _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .- l

yp . w . ,! 1,1 w

  ,
  - - - - -  - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
:s
. : ~. . .
- 190  _

$ ,

i le r

..

I i

  ,
   , ,  . ..

b.- Review of NDE Procedures, Units 1 and 2 (73052)

  (1) The inspectors reviewed the procedures-listed below to' determine whether these procedures - were consistent = with L regulatory
   . requirements and licensee canmitments. . The procedures were also
   - reviewed cin the. areas of procedure approval, requirements. fo qualification ;of NDE personnel, and compilation of1 required records; ~ and,'if applicable, division of responsibility between
   : the licensee and critractor personnel if contractor. personnel
     .

are involved in the ISI effor '

 ,
   - .
   .ISI-120.(R25) ' Ultrasonic Examination of Pipe and-Vessel Welds Joining Similar and Dissimilar Materials
'
   --

ISI-119-(R7) Ultrasonic. Examination of . Stainless Steel and Nickel Base Alloy. Weld Seams

     '
   -

ISI-240.(R20) Penetrant Examination of Welds and - Base Materials, Including Studs and Nut NDE-35(RIO) Liquid Penetrant Examination Technique (Color Contrast, Solvent Removable Method)

   -

ISI-270(R18) Wet or Dry Methods of Magnetic Particle Examination of Welds, Studs, Bolts, and. Pump Motor Flywheel NDE-25 (R13) Magnetic Particle Examination Procedure and Techniques

   -

QCL-13 (R6) ISI Visual Examination, VT-1

   -

QCI.-14(R9) ISI Visual Examination, VT-3 and VT-4

   -

QCL-16(R6) Procedure for Inspection of ASME Section XI Field Piping Welds

   -

ISI-50(R9) Technical Procedure Describing Surface Requirements of Welds, Adjacent Base Metal, and Components for Nondestructive Examination

   ' All procedures listed above have been reviewed during previous NRC inspections. Only current revisions were reviewed during this inspection.

L---__---_=______

 -. - _ _ _ _ _   ._ _  _

1 'O e-j , -- s .1 , p i .4 l\ e (2) The inspectors reviewed the Ultrasonic (UT) procedures to ascertain whether they had been reviewed. and ; approved in

  . accordance with .'the licensee's established QA' procedures. The-s procedures were also - reviewed for technical adequacy and -

conformance with ASME, Section V, Article 5 and other licensee

  ~ commitments / requirements in the following. areas:- type of apparatus used; extent of L coverage of~ weldment; calibration requirements; search units; beam angles; DAC cJrves; reference level for monitoring discontinuities; method for demonstrating penetration; limits for evaluating and recording indications; recording significant-indications;'and, acceptance limit .(3) The inspectors reviewed the liquid penetrant (pT) procedures to ascertain' whether- they had been reviewed and approved in accordance with the' licensee's established QA procedure The procedures were also reviewed for technical adequacy and conformance with ASME, Section V, Article 6, and other licensee -

requirements in the following areas: specified method; penetrant material identification; penetrant materials analyzed for s'.lfur;. penetrant materials analyzed for total halogens; surface temperature; acceptable pre-examination surface conditioning; method used for pre-examination surface cleaning; surface drying ' time prior to penetrant application; method of penetrant application; penetrant. dwell time; method used for excess penetrant removal; surface drying prior to developer application, if applicable; ' type of developer; examination technique; evaluation techniques; and, procedure requalificatio (4) The inspectors ~ reviewed the Magnetic Particle (MT) procedures to ascertain whether they had been reviewed and :ppreved in accordance with the licensee's established QA procedures. The procedures .were reviewed for technical adequacy and for conformance with the ASME Code Section V, Article 7, and other licensee commitments / requirements in the following areas:

  . examination methods; contrast of dry powder particle color with background; surface temperature; suspension medium and surface temperature requirement for wet particles; viewing conditions; examination overlap and directions; pole or prod spacing; current or lifting power (yoke); and, acceptance criteri ,
       !
       '
  (5) The inspectors reviewed the Visual (VT) examination procedures to determine whether they contained sufficient instructions to assure that the following parameters were specified and controlled within the limits permitted by the applicable code, standard, or any other specification requirement: method -

direct visual, rtmote visual or translucent visual; application

   - hydrostatic tes:;ing, fabrication procedure, visual examination of welds, leak testing, etc.; how visual examination is to be performed; type of surface condition available; method or implement used for surface preparation, if any; whether direct

__________ ___ _ . _ _ _

=  . - - _ - -  -- - - _

_ . _ - _

 '

p-g , .. - . L

.
.

ll or remote viewing is used; sequence 'of. performing examination, ' when applicable; - data to be tabulated; if any; . acceptanc criteria is' specified and consistent with the applicable code section or controlling specification; and, report form completio , Observation of Work 'and Work Activities, Unit 2 (73753).

The inspectors observed work cctivities, reviewed calibration records of NDE equipment, certification records of NDE materials, and reviewed ~ NDE personnel qualifications 'for personnel that had been utilized during the required ISI examinations during this outage.

L The observations and reviews . conducted by the inspectors are documented belo (1) The inspectors observed calibration activities and portions.o the in-process ultrasonic examinations being conducted on the , ' l welds indicated below. The observation.s were compared with the applicable procedures and the ASME BlPV Code in the following areas: availability of and compliance with approved .NDE procedures; use of knowledgeable NDE personnel; use. of NDE personnel qualified to the proper level;' type of, apparatus used; calibration requirements; search units; beam angles; DAC curves; reference . level . for monitoring discontinuities; method of.

. L

         '

demonstrating penetration; extent of weld / component examination coverage; limits of evaluating and recording indications; recording significant indications; and, acceptance limit Item N Weld ID Description B05.030.005 2SGC-Inlet-SE SG-C, Cold Leg Safe End Weld B05.030.007 2SCD-Inlet-SE SG-D, Cold Leg Safe End Weld C05.021.684 2SY2FW1-7 Main Steam Vent System C05.021.685 2SV2FW2-13 Main Steam Vent System The inspectors conducted an independent ultrasonic verification examination, using Duke Power Company (DPC) equipment, on portions of welds 2SV2FW1-7 and 2SV2FW2-13. These examinations were conducted in order to evaluate the technical adequacy of the ultrasonic examination procedure being used by the licensee and to assess the validity of the iriformation being reported by the ultrasonic examiner The verification ultrasonic examinations conducted by the inspectors indicated that the procedure being used to conduct the examinations is adequate and the verification examination results compared favorably with the information being reported by the ultrasonic examiners.

b 1

- _ _ _ _ _  _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

      ,
'
'
 ..

I n .. . j i i F 1 l 6 I

      !

i i The following listed ultrasonic equipment calibration and materials certification records were reviewed: l Ultrasonic Instruments i l Manufacturer /Model Serial N TK/SM-100 1341 i TK/SM-100 1348 TK/SM-100 1288 TK/SM-100 1346 TK/SM-100 1287 Ultrasonic Couplant Batch Number 8767 The inspectors reviewed spectrum analysis data for the ultrasonic transducers listed below: Serial N Size Frequency J22464 1.0" 1,00MHz(megahertz) J22461 1.0" 1.00 MHz G31489 1.0" 1.00 MHz G31494 1.0" 1.00 MHz 32290 .25" 5.00 MHz 40241 .50" 2.25 MHz (2) The inspectors observed the in-process PT examinations indicated belo The observations were compared with the applicable procedure and the ASME B&PV Code in the following areas: specified method, penetrant materials identified; penetrant materials analyzed for halogens and sul fur; acceptable pre-examination surface; surface temperature; surface drying time prior to penetrant application; method of penetrant application; penetrant dwell time; method used for excess penetrant removal; surface drying prior to developing, if applicable; type of developer; examination technique; evaluation technique; and, reporting of examination result Item N Weld N B09.011.410A 2NI2F-471* C05.011.360 2NI2F-580* C05.021.368A 2NI2F-540 C05.011.359 2NI2F-552 C05.011.373 2RN2F-1502*

  *The NRC inspectors re-evaluated these welds following the PT examiners evaluation of the welds but prior to the developer being removed from the weld surface This
- - _ - _ _ - _ - -

-  . __

W,' l* l . '

      '7 h

L 're-evaluation was : conducted in order - to determine if the evaluations performed by the PT -examiners was in accordance

 ~ '

with the applicable procedure acceptance criteria and to determine if the examination results were being reported as require The re-evaluations' conducted by. the NRC inspectors - indicated' that the proper evaluation was made by the PT , lL 1. examiners and. that the examination results were being reported L H>> as require The inspectors reviewed the below listed liquid penetrant materials certification records to ascertain if the sulfur and , halogen content of the material was within acceptable content limits, I ..: y, Materials- Batch No.

, Liquid Penetrant 88LD51 Cleaner / Remover 88J021 Developer 87F047 (3) The inspectors observed the in-process ' magnetic particle

    - examinations indicated belo The observations were compared with the applicable. procedures and the Code in the following
    , areas: examination methods; contrast of dry powder particle color with background; surface temperature; suspension medium for wet particles, if _ applicable; viewing conditions; examination overlap and directions; pole or prod spacing; current or lifting power (yoke); and acceptance criteri Item N Weld _ID C05.021.684A 2SV2FW1-7 C05.021.685A 2SV2FW2-13 The inspectors conducted an MT verification examination, using DPC equipment, on portions of weld 2SVFW1- The examination was performed in order to evaluate the technical adequacy of the examination procedure being used by the licenses to perform examinations and to assess the validity of the information being reported by the MT examiners. The ir, formation reported by the MT examiners comparod favorably wi th the verification l     examinatio _

,. , The inspectors reviewed documentation indicating that 10 pound lift tests had been performed on magnetic particle alternating , current (AC) yokes MCQA-1 and MCQUA-2608 The certification record for lift test plate MT-1 was reviewed to confirm the weight of the test plate.

_____._____.___ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . .

_ _ _ _ - _ . __

.
. *,
.

A review of the magnetic particle material certification records for batch numbers 84H046 and 87H033 indicated the particles met the applicable specifications requirements for particle sensitivit (4) The inspectors reviewed the qualification documentation for the below listed examiners in the following areas: employer's name; person certified; activity qualified to perform; effective period of certification; signature of employer's designated representative; basis used for certification; and, annual visual acuity, color vision examination, and periodic decertificatio Company Examiner Method-Level DPC GCR VT-3/4 II DPC JLR VT-3/4 II DPC KMW VT-3/4 II DPC KC MT II/PT II DPC CS UT II/MT II/PT II DPC TC PT II DPC RLM PT II DPC DJ UT II/PT II DPC MTW PT II DPC RLG PT II DPC LA MT II B&W LM UT II B&W JW UT II d. Data Review and Evaluation, Unit 2(73755)

 (1) Records of completed nondestructive examinations were selected and reviewed to ascertain whether: the metnods(s), technique, and extent of the examination complied with the ISI plan and applicable NDE procedures; findings were properly recorded and evaluated by qualified personnel; programmatic deviations were recorded as required; personnel, instruments, calibration blocks, and NDE materials (penetrants, couplants) were designated. Records selected for this review are listed belo Item N Weld / Component ID NDE Method l  F1.0?.353 2MCA-SV-006 VT-3/4 F1.02.956 2MCA-SM-203 VT-3/4 F1.02.957 2MCA-SM-204 VT-3/4  ;

2SGD-Inlet-SE

      -

B05.030.007A DT B05.050.014B 2NC2 F-4-2 PT B05.050.010B 2NC2F-3-2 PT B05.030.005A 2SGC-Inlet-SE PT C05.011.374 23N2F-1513 MT l C05.011.375 2RN2F-1515 MT l

1 '

! l . I

 , ---  _    _ _ _ _  _ , _ _ _

$. -

+-

p j n v.-( , > 9-I

L'  : C05.011.229 2ND2F-135 PT C05.011.234L '2ND2F-153 PT C05.011.238- 2ND2F-288 PT-

  .C05.012.216A"    2ND2F-196L' PT-C05.011.239-    2ND2F-165 PT C05.021.685A    2SV2FW2-13- MT L    C05.021.684A    2SV2FW1-7 MT
   ~ C05.021.684    2SV2FW1-7 UT
   .C05.021.685    2SV2FW2-13- UT F1.02.364    .2MCA-SA-5162 VT-3/4
   'F1.02.354    2MCA-SV-008 VT-3/4 F1.02.35 MCA-SV-009 -VT-3/4

F1.02.363~ 2MCA-SA-5088- VT-3/4-F1.02.954' 2MCA-SM-185 VT-3/4 F1.02.958' 2MCA-SM-205 VT-3/4

  .F1;02.220    2MCA-CF-205 VT-3/4 F1.02.219    2MCA-CF-204 VT-3/4
   'F1,02.955    2MCA-SM-202 VT-3/4-The inspectors compared randomly selected current examination results with historical examination results. No significant discrepancies were
,  note n  In the areas inspected, violations or deviations were not identifie ' Exit Interview
  <The: inspection scope. and results were summarized on July. 14, 1989, with-1  those' persons indicated in paragraph 1. The inspectors described the areas - inspected - and discussed in detail the inspection result Dissenting comments were not received from the license . Acronyms and Initialisms A Alternating Current ASME - American Society of Mechanical Engineere B&PV - Boiler and Pressure Vessel B&W -

Babcock and Wilcox DAC - Distance Amplitude Curve DPC - Duke Power Company ID - Identification ISI - Inservice Inspection MT - Magnetic Particle MHz - Megahertz NDE - Nondestructive Examination N Number NRC - Nuclear Regulatory Commission PT -- Liquid Penetrant QA - Quality Assurance R - Revision S Steam Generator 4 TK -- Tokyo Keiki UT - Ultrasonic VT - Visual

- _ _ . _ _ _ _ _  _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ . _ _ - - _ _ _ - - _ - _ - -  _ _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _

}}