ML20246C456

From kanterella
Revision as of 03:06, 14 February 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-346/89-16 on 890605-0716 & 24 & Notice of Violation.Violation Noted in Paragraph 7 of Rept Identified by Util Meets Criteria of 10CFR2,App C,Section V.G,Therefore Notice of Violation Will Not Be Issued
ML20246C456
Person / Time
Site: Davis Besse Cleveland Electric icon.png
Issue date: 08/17/1989
From: Knop R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Shelton D
TOLEDO EDISON CO.
Shared Package
ML20246C458 List:
References
NUDOCS 8908240391
Download: ML20246C456 (2)


See also: IR 05000346/1989016

Text

y ~. <

w- y,. -; --

@W

p.. , m

,Y

S

"

.+

.Qtn

(l6.0*

l ,g,

p , g .y

,

, ,

C

. x .y

q ,, .;

-

'

'

,i ,

t- ,

' AUG 1. 7 193g --

, , ,

o . Docket:No. 50-346

l Toledo Edison Company.

-

ATTN: Mr.' Donald Shelton-

Vice President

>

. Nuclear

EdisonLPlaza

?300 Madison Avenue

Toledo, OH..43652

.

Gentlemen:

8 .

.

.

.

This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Messrs. P. M. Byron,

E.f R.q Schweibinz, R. K. Walton, and D. C. Kosloff of this office on June 5-

through July 16 and 24. -1989,- of activities at Davis-Besse Nuclear Power.

' Station' authorized by Facility Operating License No'. NPF-3 and to the

discussion ~of our. findings with Mr.-L. Storz at the. conclusion of the.

. inspection.

'

,

The enclosed copy'of our inspection report 1 identifies areas examined during-

sthel inspection. 'Within thesel areas, the inspection consisted ofta selective-

' examination of procedures and representative records, observations,. and

N . interviews with personnel.

'During'this inspection,-certain of your activities appeared to be.in violation

of-NRC requirements, as.specified in the enclosed Notice. A written. response-

is. required.

Also other activities appeared to be in violation.of NRC-requirements as-

--described.in Paragraph 7 of the enclosed report. The inspection showed'that

actions had been taken to correct the identified violation and to prevent

recurrence. Our understanding ~ of your corrective actions is described in

' Paragraph.7 of the enclosed inspection report. However, this violation was

5 .. identified by you and meets the criteria of 10 CFR 2, . Appendix C,Section V.G

i.-- and therefore, a Notice of Violation will not be issued.

'

In'accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy

of'this letter and the enclosed inspection report'will be placed in the

NRC Public Document Room.

b

f

8908240391 890817 # \-

PDR ADOCK 05000346

O PDC

. _ - - _ _--_ __ _ __-_ _ - _ _ - - _ -

y , ,. -

v ;g

' ~

?9. .. .

> . ,

' ;fh , <"[-

4

p(

. :

R. 2ToledoJEdison' Company:  : 2._'AUG'1 ' 7 igsg .

"

o

It

p t !We-will gladly discuss any: questions youLhave concerning this inspection.

'

>

,

. Sincerely,

3;

OldGINAL SIGNED BY R. W. DeFAYETrg

R. C. Knop, Chief.

Reactor Projects Branch 3 ,

,,

'

Enclosures:

1. ' Notice of. Violation-'

2. -Inspection Report . .

No.'50-346/89016(DRP)-

cc w/ enclosures:

L 'L. Storz, Plant Manager e >

'DCD/DCB.'(RIDS)'

Licensing. Fee Management Branch .

Resident. Inspector,.'RIII

JJames W.' Harris,15 tate of Ohio-

  • Roger. Suppes',. Ohio;

Department,oL Heal.th-

-l A. Grandjean, State of Ohio,

Public Utilities Commission

,

..

i,

i

-.

q

RIII .{

~

^RI R

V. WV

.D- ette/ims e' p

8/f slW 7 17 l

__ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ - - - - _ - - - - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - _ - -_