ML061510245

From kanterella
Revision as of 05:22, 14 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Email: Request to Add to Database
ML061510245
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 04/13/2006
From: Ashley D
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA
To: Hufnagel J
Exelon Corp
References
%dam200606, TAC MC7624
Download: ML061510245 (3)


Text

[D -page Page 1~

I D.Ashley - request to add to database.

From: D. Ashley To: John Hufnagel Date: 04/13/2006 3:32:04 PM

Subject:

request to add to database.

John, George-Attached are the subject questions from the Audit Team Leader.

He requests that you add to the Q&A Database and include in your next update for ADAMS addition.

regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301-415-3191 djal @nrc.gov

Ec:\tEmp\G}0 .TMP Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (443EA734.9DF: 9: 10848)

Subject:

request to add to database.

Creation Date: 04/13/2006 3:32:04 PM From: D. Ashley Created By: DJA1 @nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time exeloncorp.com Transferred 13 April, 2006 3:32:33 PM john.hufnagel (John Hufnagel)

Post Office Delivered Route exeloncorp.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1204 13 April, 2006 3:32:04 PM Flaw EvaluationIf a relevant indication is.wpd 6152 13 April, 2006 2:56:22 PM D. Ashley.vcf 232 13 April, 2006 3:32:07 PM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened

FD. Ashley - Flaw Evaluationlfa relevant indication is.wpd Page 1 1414 D.Ashley Flaw Evaluationif a relevant indication is.wpd Page Flaw Evaluation If a relevant indication is discovered during a Section XI ISI inspection, and the flaw is dispositioned by analysis, a TLAA will be conducted to determine if the flaw will exceed the acceptance criteria during the life of the component.

If the flaw exceeds the acceptance criteria, and the decision is made to embed the flaw using a weld overlay, the embedded flaw, it results in the creation of a new TLAA.

Has Oyster Creek dispositioned any relevant indications by analysis and has Oyster Creek conducted a TLAA for the relevant Indication?

Has Oyster Creek used a weld overlay to embed any relevant Indications and have they conducted a TLAA for this situation?