Letter Sequence Other |
---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance
- Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement
Results
Other: ML052690388, ML052850300, ML060200084, ML060320211, ML060370508, ML060410649, ML060600122, ML060660177, ML060690026, ML060690130, ML060830564, ML060830567, ML060870126, ML060870147, ML060890080, ML060930255, ML060940146, ML060950408, ML060960563, ML060960568, ML060960602, ML061010639, ML061010644, ML061010646, ML061020614, ML061020616, ML061020638, ML061030419, ML061070304, ML061070306, ML061070307, ML061070309, ML061070310, ML061070319, ML061070321, ML061070329, ML061070395, ML061070398, ML061070399, ML061070403, ML061070429, ML061070430, ML061070432, ML061150320, ML061150330, ML061160161, ML061380647, ML061420086, ML061420088, ML061420089... further results
|
MONTHYEARML0726804681954-12-31031 December 1954 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Parks and Forestry, State Forest Service, New Jersey'S Big Trees Project stage: Other ML0726705561963-01-31031 January 1963 Us Fish and Wildlife Service, 1963. Distribution of Shellfish Resources in Relation to the New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway -- Manasquan Inlet to Little Egg Harbor. Boston, Ma. January Project stage: Other ML0726405941972-11-17017 November 1972 Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Environmental Report, Amendment 2 Project stage: Other ML0726406651978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration Project stage: Other ML0726703621978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Initial Progress Report, December 1966, Through Third Progress Report, January 1968 Project stage: Other ML0726703651978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Fourth Progress Report 1968 Through Sixth Progress Report 1970, Concluding Remarks Project stage: Other ML0726703681978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Seventh Progress Report, June 25, 1971, Through Eighth Progress Report, August 18, 1972 Project stage: Other ML0726703741978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Zooplankton of Barnegat Bay: the Effect of Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant Through Literature Cited Project stage: Other ML0726704911978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Appendix E Through Appendix F, Figure 10 Project stage: Other ML0726705501978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Appendix a Through Appendix C1, Figure C1-1 Project stage: Other ML0726801491978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Addendum to Appendix C1 Through Addendum to Appendix D1 Project stage: Other ML0726801691978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Preface Through Table 6.2-2 Project stage: Other ML0726801741978-12-31031 December 1978 Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Appendix C Continued Page C2-1 Through Page C6-51 Project stage: Other ML0726802291979-10-22022 October 1979 Letter from David N. Kinsey (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection) Dated October 22, 1979 to Ivan R. Finfrock (Jersey Central Power & Light Company), NPDES Permit Renewal Application No. NJ0005550 Project stage: Other ML0726405991982-05-14014 May 1982 Jersey Central Power & Light Co. Boundary Map of Former Finninger Farm Project stage: Other ML0726705601986-12-12012 December 1986 Inventory of New Jersey'S Estuarine Shellfish Resources, Joseph, J. W., Us Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, December 12, 1986 Project stage: Other ML0726801891987-12-0909 December 1987 Joseph, J. W. 1987, Inventory of New Jersey'S Estuarine Shellfish Resources, Us Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service. Project No. 3-405-R Project stage: Other ML0726703911989-12-31031 December 1989 Lacey Township, Ocean County, New Jersey. 1989. Ocean County Water Quality Management Plan, Wastewater Management Plan Project stage: Other ML0726704221989-12-31031 December 1989 Usda. 1989. Soil Survey of Ocean County, New Jersey. Sheet Number 45 Project stage: Other ML0610206381990-11-26026 November 1990 Drywell Containment, Attachment 1 to Letter Dated 04/07/2006 Project stage: Other ML0610206141991-03-0404 March 1991 Letter Forwarding, an ASME Section Viii Evaluation of Oyster Greek Drywell for Without Sand Case Part 1 Stress Analysis, Attachment 2 to Letter Dated 04/07/06 Project stage: Other ML0610206161992-01-16016 January 1992 Letter Forwarding, ASME Section Viii Evaluation of the Oyster Creek Drywell, Part 2, Stability Analysis, Attachment 3 to Letter Dated 04/07/2006 Project stage: Other ML0702906681992-04-24024 April 1992 Evaluation Report on Structural Integrity of the Oyster Creek Drywell with Brookhaven National Laboratory Technical Evaluation Report - Attached Project stage: Other ML0726801841997-02-0404 February 1997 State of New Jersey Permit No. 1512-93-0052.3, .4, and .5, Permit to Dredge Project stage: Other ML0726804281997-09-30030 September 1997 Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Permit Number CENAP-OP-R-199701765-39 Project stage: Other ML0726704171997-10-31031 October 1997 State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. the Management and Regulation of Dredging Activities and Dredged Material Disposal in New Jersey'S Tidal Waters. October 1997 Project stage: Other ML0726703842000-04-25025 April 2000 Levin, S. 2000. Letter, Levin (Gpu Nuclear Inc.) to New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Application for Transfer of Ownership and of a Permit Project stage: Request ML0726804482002-05-15015 May 2002 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 2002. List of State Flood Hazard Area Delineations. May 15 Project stage: Other ML0726803802003-05-15015 May 2003 Shellfish Stock Assessment of Little Egg Harbor Bay (Dsrt Proposal #2001011), Celestino, M. P., New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 15 May 2003 Project stage: Other ML0726803592003-12-31031 December 2003 Private Property and the Common Good, Anonymous, 2003, Powerpoint Presentation Project stage: Other ML0726704012004-01-31031 January 2004 Energy Information Administration. 2004. State Energy Profiles 2002. January. (Excerpt). Us Department of Energy Project stage: Other ML0726802382004-02-28028 February 2004 Clean, Safe, Reliable, the Economic Benefits of Oyster Creek Generating Station, February 2004 Project stage: Other ML0726804052004-07-0707 July 2004 Ecolsciences, Inc., 2004, Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Impact Assessment for Oyster Greek Generation Station National Security Upgrades; Township of Lacey; Ocean County, New Jersey, Prepared for Amergen Energy Co., LLC Project stage: Other ML0726704042004-12-31031 December 2004 Energy Information Administration. 2004. State Energy Data 2002: Consumption. Table 7 Energy Consumption Estimates by Source, Selected Years, 160-2002, New Jersey. Us Department of Energy Project stage: Other ML0726705522004-12-31031 December 2004 New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2004 Cafra Boundary Line Project stage: Other ML0726804182004-12-31031 December 2004 Energy Information Administration, 2004, Existing Generating Units in the United States by State, Company, and Plant, 2004, Us Department of Energy Project stage: Other ML0726703942005-07-19019 July 2005 Tompkins, H.B. 2005. Letter Tompkins (State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection) to Brown (Amergen). Draft Surface Water Renewal Permit Action. Includes Public Notice, Fact Sheet, and Draft NJPDES Permit Project stage: Draft Other ML0726808302005-07-19019 July 2005 Ocean County Soil Conservation District, 2005, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Certification; Upland Dredge Site, Scd #1302 Project stage: Other ML0726802022005-07-25025 July 2005 FEMA Floodzone Map for Lacey Township, Ocean County, Nj, Provided by Birdsall Engineering, Inc Project stage: Other ML0526903882005-09-23023 September 2005 Audit and Review Plan for Plant Aging Management Reviews and Programs at the Oyster Creek Generating Station Project stage: Other ML0528503002005-10-0505 October 2005 Audit and Review Plan for Plant Aging Management Reviews and Programs at the Oyster Creek Generating Station (Tac No. MC7624) Project stage: Other ML0610703042005-10-21021 October 2005 Email: Pictures? (PA) Project stage: Other ML0531201572005-11-0101 November 2005 Position Paper on Oyster Creek Ngs Cooling Water System Project stage: Request ML0610703062005-11-0404 November 2005 Email: Emailing: Example NPDES Report.Pdf (PA) Project stage: Other ML0610703072005-11-0909 November 2005 Email: Emailing: Example NPDES Report.Pdf (PA) Project stage: Other ML0610703092005-11-0909 November 2005 Email: Emailing: Example NPDES Report.Pdf (PA) Project stage: Other ML0610704292005-11-22022 November 2005 Email: Confirmation of Site Audit Information (Ing) Project stage: Other ML0610704322005-11-22022 November 2005 Email: Archaeological Sites in the Vicinity of Oyster Creek Generating Station (Ing) Project stage: Other ML0726704252005-11-30030 November 2005 Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (Asmfc). 2005. Atlantic Croaker Stock Assessment and Peer Review Reports Project stage: Other ML0610703102005-12-0505 December 2005 Email: Status of Requested Documents (PA) Project stage: Other 2002-05-15
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARML23286A1552023-10-13013 October 2023 Defueled Safety Analysis Report (DSAR) ML23025A0112023-01-24024 January 2023 LLRW Late Shipment Investigation Report Per 10 CFR 20, Appendix G ML22130A6882022-05-10010 May 2022 Late LLRW Shipment Investigation Report Pursuant to 10 CFR 20, Appendix G ML21036A1692021-01-29029 January 2021 ISFSI Only Security Plan, Training Qualification Plan, Safeguards Contingency Plan Supplemental Information ML20153A2282020-05-29029 May 2020 Biological Opinion for Oyster Creek Shutdown and Decommissioning ML19214A0452019-08-0202 August 2019 NRC to NMFS, Revised Proposed Action for Oyster Creek Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation ML19029B3332019-01-29029 January 2019 Security Inspection Plan for Oyster Creek Station - 2019 RA-18-084, Secondary Containment Capability Test2018-09-14014 September 2018 Secondary Containment Capability Test ML18033B7442018-02-21021 February 2018 Staff Assessment of the Response to 10 CFR 50.54(F) Information Request Flood-Causing Mechanism Reevaluation RA-17-032, Submittal of Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 1 O CFR 72.48 Change Summary Reports - January 1, 2015 Through December 31, 20162017-05-16016 May 2017 Submittal of Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 1 O CFR 72.48 Change Summary Reports - January 1, 2015 Through December 31, 2016 ML15350A3532016-02-17017 February 2016 Staff Assessment of Information Provided Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f) Seismic Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendation 2.1 of the Near Term Task Force... RA-15-042, Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 Change Summary Reports - January 1, 2013 Through December 31, 20142015-05-26026 May 2015 Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 Change Summary Reports - January 1, 2013 Through December 31, 2014 ML15093A2842015-02-23023 February 2015 Enclosure 2: Flood Hazard Reevaluation Report for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Rev. 1 RA-14-078, Secondary Containment Capability Test2014-10-24024 October 2014 Secondary Containment Capability Test RS-14-277, Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 12014-09-24024 September 2014 Proposed Alternative to Utilize Code Case N-513-4, Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Flaws in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Piping Section XI, Division 1 RA-14-068, Sea Turtle Incidental Take Report 2014-32014-08-0101 August 2014 Sea Turtle Incidental Take Report 2014-3 ML14176A9612014-06-24024 June 2014 Submittal of Non-Proprietary BWROG Technical Product, BWROGTP-11-006 - ECCS Containment Walkdown Procedure, Rev 1 (January 2011), as Formally Requested During the Public Meeting Held on April 30, 2014 ML14065A2322014-06-16016 June 2014 Staff Assessment of Response to Enclosure 4 of the March 12, 2012, 10 CFR 50.54(F) Information Request - Flooding Walkdowns ML14030A5132014-02-19019 February 2014 Interim Staff Evaluation Relating to Overall Integrated Plan in Response to Order EA-12-049 (Mitigation Strategies) ML14038A1112014-02-11011 February 2014 Mega-Tech Services, LLC Technical Evaluation Report Regarding the Overall Integrated Plan for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, TAC No.: MF0824 NEI 99-04, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Commitment Change Summary Report - 20122013-12-23023 December 2013 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Commitment Change Summary Report - 2012 RA-13-127, Commitment Change Summary Report - 20122013-12-23023 December 2013 Commitment Change Summary Report - 2012 RA-13-088, Sea Turtle Incidental Take Report 2013-52013-09-0909 September 2013 Sea Turtle Incidental Take Report 2013-5 RA-13-074, Sea Turtle Incidental Take Reports 2013-1 and 2013-22013-08-0909 August 2013 Sea Turtle Incidental Take Reports 2013-1 and 2013-2 ML15093A2832013-07-0303 July 2013 Enclosure 1: Local Intense Precipitation Evaluation Report for Oyster Creek, Rev. 6 RS-12-177, E Plan for Future Seismic Walkdown of Inaccessible Equipment2013-04-26026 April 2013 E Plan for Future Seismic Walkdown of Inaccessible Equipment ML13120A1862013-04-0909 April 2013 Enclosure 1, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Updated Transmittal # 1 for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Correspondence No. RS- ML13098A2092013-04-0505 April 2013 2.206 Petition by New Jersey Environmental Federation (Et.Al.) for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Exelon Generation Company, LLC IR 05000272/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000456/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee ML13008A2192013-01-31031 January 2013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000454/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000461/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000237/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000373/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000289/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000254/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000277/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000219/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000352/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee ML12355A1422012-12-31031 December 2012 2012 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Emergency Planning Zone Evacuation Time Estimates Analysis. Part 1 of 2 RS-12-217, 2012 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Emergency Planning Zone Evacuation Time Estimates Analysis. Part 2 of 22012-12-31031 December 2012 2012 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Emergency Planning Zone Evacuation Time Estimates Analysis. Part 2 of 2 RS-12-217, 2012 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Emergency Planning Zone Evacuation Time Estimates Analysis. Part 1 of 22012-12-31031 December 2012 2012 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Emergency Planning Zone Evacuation Time Estimates Analysis. Part 1 of 2 RA-12-117, Company, Llc'S 180-Day Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Flooding Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident2012-11-19019 November 2012 Company, Llc'S 180-Day Response to NRC Request for Information Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) Regarding the Flooding Aspects of Recommendation 2.3 of the Near-Term Task Force Review of Insights from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Accident ML12359A0082012-11-0606 November 2012 Rev. 1 to Report 12Q0108.80-R-001,Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Unit 1. Part 1 of 4 ML12359A0062012-11-0606 November 2012 Rev. 1 to Report 12Q0108.80-R-001,Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Unit 1. Part 3 of 4 ML12359A0052012-11-0606 November 2012 Rev. 1 to Report 12Q0108.80-R-001,Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Re Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic for the Oyster Creek Generating Station Unit 1. Part 2 of 4 RS-13-065, Core Spray/Auto Depress'N System Relay Logic Panel2012-10-10010 October 2012 Core Spray/Auto Depress'N System Relay Logic Panel RA-13-022, D Area Walk-By Checklists (Awcs)2012-10-10010 October 2012 D Area Walk-By Checklists (Awcs) ML12178A2152012-08-0202 August 2012 Closeout of Bulletin 2011-01 Migrating Strategies. 2023-10-13
[Table view] Category:Miscellaneous
MONTHYEARML23025A0112023-01-24024 January 2023 LLRW Late Shipment Investigation Report Per 10 CFR 20, Appendix G ML19029B3332019-01-29029 January 2019 Security Inspection Plan for Oyster Creek Station - 2019 ML18033B7442018-02-21021 February 2018 Staff Assessment of the Response to 10 CFR 50.54(F) Information Request Flood-Causing Mechanism Reevaluation RA-17-032, Submittal of Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 1 O CFR 72.48 Change Summary Reports - January 1, 2015 Through December 31, 20162017-05-16016 May 2017 Submittal of Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 1 O CFR 72.48 Change Summary Reports - January 1, 2015 Through December 31, 2016 ML15350A3532016-02-17017 February 2016 Staff Assessment of Information Provided Pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f) Seismic Hazard Reevaluations for Recommendation 2.1 of the Near Term Task Force... RA-15-042, Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 Change Summary Reports - January 1, 2013 Through December 31, 20142015-05-26026 May 2015 Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 Change Summary Reports - January 1, 2013 Through December 31, 2014 RA-14-068, Sea Turtle Incidental Take Report 2014-32014-08-0101 August 2014 Sea Turtle Incidental Take Report 2014-3 ML14065A2322014-06-16016 June 2014 Staff Assessment of Response to Enclosure 4 of the March 12, 2012, 10 CFR 50.54(F) Information Request - Flooding Walkdowns NEI 99-04, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Commitment Change Summary Report - 20122013-12-23023 December 2013 Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, Commitment Change Summary Report - 2012 RA-13-127, Commitment Change Summary Report - 20122013-12-23023 December 2013 Commitment Change Summary Report - 2012 RA-13-088, Sea Turtle Incidental Take Report 2013-52013-09-0909 September 2013 Sea Turtle Incidental Take Report 2013-5 RA-13-074, Sea Turtle Incidental Take Reports 2013-1 and 2013-22013-08-0909 August 2013 Sea Turtle Incidental Take Reports 2013-1 and 2013-2 ML13098A2092013-04-0505 April 2013 2.206 Petition by New Jersey Environmental Federation (Et.Al.) for Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Exelon Generation Company, LLC IR 05000454/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000456/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee ML13008A2192013-01-31031 January 2013 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000461/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000289/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000272/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000254/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000277/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000219/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000352/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000373/20132012013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee IR 05000237/20132022013-01-31031 January 2013 Exelon Generation Co., LLC, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Investigations (01) Investigation; Summary of 01 Report No. 3-2010-034; NRC Inspection Report Conference Letter - Licensee ML12178A2152012-08-0202 August 2012 Closeout of Bulletin 2011-01 Migrating Strategies. ML12166A5042012-07-0505 July 2012 Operating Station Review of Committment Submittal for License Renewal Regarding Thermal Aging Irradiation Embrittlement of Cast Austenitic Stainless Steel ML1127000692011-09-26026 September 2011 Enclosure 2, Mfn 10-245 R4, Description of the Evaluation and Surveillance Recommendations for BWR/2-5 Plants RA-11-031, Oyster Creek - Submittal of Commitment Change Summary Report - 20102011-08-12012 August 2011 Oyster Creek - Submittal of Commitment Change Summary Report - 2010 NEI 99-04, Oyster Creek - Submittal of Commitment Change Summary Report - 20102011-08-12012 August 2011 Oyster Creek - Submittal of Commitment Change Summary Report - 2010 RA-11-005, Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 Change Summary Reports - January 1, 2009 Though December 31, 20102011-06-24024 June 2011 Biennial 10 CFR 50.59 and 10 CFR 72.48 Change Summary Reports - January 1, 2009 Though December 31, 2010 RA-10-023, Submittal of Commitment Change Summary Report - 20092010-08-0606 August 2010 Submittal of Commitment Change Summary Report - 2009 NEI 99-04, Oyster Creek, Submittal of Commitment Change Summary Report - 20092010-08-0606 August 2010 Oyster Creek, Submittal of Commitment Change Summary Report - 2009 ML1012704392010-05-0505 May 2010 Y020100187 - List of Historical Leaks and Spills at U.S. Commercial Nuclear Power Plants ML1007402512009-08-0707 August 2009 AR 00916938 Report ML0934208122009-06-29029 June 2009 Root Cause Evaluation Report: Tritium Identified in Emergency Service Water (ESW) Vault ML1020203712009-06-25025 June 2009 Assignment Report #00907846 ML1007402602009-06-24024 June 2009 Issue - Statement of Confirmation ML1007402612009-06-24024 June 2009 AR 00934636 Report ML1020203682009-06-23023 June 2009 Assignment Report #009128267 ML1007402592009-06-21021 June 2009 Stable Standard-Fixed Target Hot Lab ML1007402192009-06-14014 June 2009 AR 00931098 Report ML1007402562009-06-0505 June 2009 AR 00928211 Report ML1020203672009-06-0404 June 2009 Assignment Report #00928211 ML1020203662009-06-0303 June 2009 Assignment Report #00927310 ML1007402572009-06-0101 June 2009 AR 00926251 Report ML1020203652009-05-26026 May 2009 Assignment Report #00907846 ML1007402162009-05-22022 May 2009 AR 00922841 Report ML1007402552009-05-22022 May 2009 AR 00922841 Report ML1020203302009-05-14014 May 2009 Assignment Report #00919392 2023-01-24
[Table view] |
Text
AmnExrlon Company Oyster Creek Generating Station Clean, Safe, Reliable Executive Summary
[February 2004]
The Economic Benefits of Oyster Creek Generating Station The Oyster Creek Generating Station is an integral part of the Ocean County, N.J.,
economic environment. The plant provides jobs and makes purchases that stimulate the local economy directly and indirectly. Benefits to the area include jobs, tax revenues, economic output, labor income and contributions to the local community. There are other intangible benefits, such as clean air, environmental stewardship and low, stable electricity prices. Oyster Creek's economic impact reaches beyond the local community to the state and even to the national level.
In addition to the economic benefits provided by Oyster Creek, the plant generated 5 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity in 2003, approximately 9 percent of New Jersey's electricity needs. This safe, low-cost electricity helped keep energy prices in the region down, and did so in an environmentally safe manner.
??. Oyster Creek generated more than $52 million in direct and indirect labor income in Ocean County in 2003 and increased the county's economic output by $33 million, not including the value of electricity it produces ($201 million in 2003). Oyster Creek's economic impact on the entire New Jersey economy for the same period was $46.5 million.
?? The Oyster Creek plant employs 451 people, of which 78 percent live in Ocean County. 294 full-time employees live in Forked River, Barnegat, Toms River, Lanoka Harbor, Manahawkin, Waretown, Bayville, and Beachwood. These numbers do not include security officers who are employees of a specialized contractor. Oyster Creek's security employment is captured as part of overall security-related purchases.
?? Oyster Creek creates approximately one additional job in Ocean County for every job at the plant. In addition to the plant's 451 employees, the economic activity generated by Oyster Creek creates another 563 jobs in the county. Given the combination of employees at the plant and secondary jobs created by Oyster Creek's economic activity, the plant is responsible for 915 jobs in Ocean County and 1,034 jobs across New Jersey.
?? Oyster Creek jobs are high-paying jobs. On average, Oyster Creek pays 11 percent higher wages than the average in Ocean County.
.1
An ~ExjQIo Cý,rnparvy
?? Together, direct and indirect compensation from the plant accounts for $53.0 million in labor income in the county and an additional $16.3 million in other areas of New Jersey. The primary expenditure of the Oyster Creek plant in Ocean County is employee compensation. Oyster Creek paid $38.2 million in compensation to employees living in Ocean County and an additional $10.6 million to employees elsewhere in New Jersey. Additionally, the economic activity created by the Oyster Creek plant accounted for $14.8 million in employee compensation in Ocean County and an additional $5.8 million in other areas of the state.
?? The Oyster Creek plant makes substantial purchases in Ocean County. In 2003, the plant bought $7.7 million worth of goods and services in Ocean County and $13.4 million in New Jersey,
?? The Oyster Creek plant pays an estimated $9.2 million in state and local taxes annually. The economic activity generated by Oyster Creek contributes another $3.1 million in state and local taxes, through increased property, sales and income taxes.
By combining direct and indirect taxes, the Oyster Creek plant accounts for $12.3 million in state and local tax payments.
2
An Exeron Compn iy Oyster Creek Generating Station Clean, Safe, Reliable Issues Summary February 2004
- CLEAN - In 2002, Oyster Creek avoided approximately 1.1 million metric tons of carbon dioxide that would have been produced in Coastal New Jersey by a replacement fossil plant.
- SAFE - The plant continually upgrades and modernizes equipment to enhance safety, security and efficiency. Safety drives operating decisions
- RELIABLE - Oyster Creek has consistently performed above average over the life of the plant, and for the last three years has placed in the industry's top quartile.
License Renewal AmerGen, the owner and operator of the Oyster Creek Generating Station, expects to apply for a 20-year operating license renewal for the plant. The Company believes this decision is important to Ocean County and New Jersey, particularly to the approximately 450 men and women who work at the plant, the coastal environment and the economies of both the county and the state.
Public Support In an independent public opinion survey, 80 percent of residents in Oyster Creek's 10-mile Emergency Preparedness Zone said they would support a decision to seek license renewal, as long as the plant continues to meet federal safety standards. The margin of error was 6 percent.
Age of the Plant
- Oyster Creek has been continually upgraded and its equipment modernized to enhance safety, security and efficiency. Oyster Creek:spends approximately $10 million annually in capital improvements.,
" Radioactive material at Oyster Creek is separated from the environment by multiple layers of engineered barriers and protections and redundant safety systems. These barriers, protections and systems are continually inspected and monitored and are upgraded when newer, more efficient technology becomes available. Oyster Creek uses advanced techniques to predict in advance when components might fail and to 1
Ani Exelon Cm pii~y perform preventive maintenance or replacement to maintain a high level of condition on all equipment, especially safety-related equipment.
- Oyster Creek's containment structure meets or exceeds all safety standards. In the 1980s, modifications were made to the Mark 1 containment design to improve its safety. The containment structure is inspected regularly to ensure its integrity.
Security Physical security is one of the cornerstones of the nuclear regulatory process.
AmerGen fully complies with all requirements designed to enhance plant safety and security. Nuclear power plants are the most secure and robust industrial facilities in the nation. Oyster Creek's security program maintains continuous coordination with federal, state and local law enforcement.
Oyster Creek and other nuclear plants in the United States are built specifically to withstand impacts from earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, aircraft, and terrorist assaults.
Emergency Preparedness
" AmerGen takes its responsibility to protect the health and safety of the public very seriously. The emergency plan is part of the plant's safety-in-depth program. Plant operators and other personnel are trained and drilled continually in emergency preparedness and response.
" Emergency response planning activities, training and exercises conducted as part of Oyster Creek's Emergency Preparedness Plan are integrated with Ocean County's all-hazard Emergency Operations Plan. Because of this, Ocean County's plan has been used by the New Jersey Office of Emergency Management as a model for other counties in the state.
" AmerGen supports the New Jersey Office of Emergency Management's all-hazard Emergency Response Plan. This state-developed plan includes the protection of populations affected by natural or man-made events. This includes evacuation if necessary.
" Approximately 3,000 people (state, local and county government, plant personnel, hospital and emergency medical responders, law enforcement, firefighters and others) receive emergency preparedness training annually in coordination with state, county and local governments.
Used Fuel Storage
- Dry storage of used fuel, is a proven, time-tested method of safely and securely storing used uranium fuel assemblies. At Oyster Creek, the storage method starts with 2
An Exelon Comparny a very strong, leak-tight stainless steel canister that holds used fuel assemblies. The canisters are then placed into two-foot.thick concrete storage vaults. The storage facility is in a protected area on plant property and is monitored on a 24-hour basis.
Public Health Concerns Nuclear power plants, including Oyster Creek, are a miniscule source of environmental radiation because of their design and containment structures. A person living next door to a nuclear power plant receives less radiation exposure in a year than a person receives from a round-trip flight between New York and Los Angeles. A 1990 National Cancer Institute study, the broadest ever conducted, found no evidence of any increase in cancer mortality - including childhood leukemia - among people living in 107 counties that host or are adjacent to 62 major nuclear facilities in the United States.
Environmental Issues Air Quality
- In 2002, Oyster Creek avoided approximately 1.1 million metric tons of carbon dioxide that would have been produced in Coastal New Jersey by a replacement fossil plant.
- Without nuclear power generation in the United States, almost 134 million automobiles would have to be eliminated to keep the country's emissions from increasing.
- By fuel, a 1,000 megawatt generating plant produces the following amounts of carbon dioxide each year, believed to be a primary contributor to global warming:
Coal 271 metric tons of carbon dioxide Oil 222 metric tons of carbon dioxide Natural Gas 150 metric tons of carbon dioxide Nuclear 0 carbon dioxide Water
- AmerGen and Oyster Creek recognize fully its corporate responsibility regarding stewardship of the Ocean County environment and the plant's impact upon it.
- Oyster Creek has taken steps to eliminate events relating to the discharge of warm water into Oyster Creek, including procedure revisions and employee education
" Oyster Creek has partnered with Drexel University to track sea turtles, which are rescued at the plant. The sea turtles recoup at the Marine Mammal Stranding Center before returning to their habitat.
- Oyster Creek sponsors employees who participate in the World Series of Birding. Last year, money raised went to The Cape May Bird Observatory and Ocean Nature and 3
AmerGen, ATi Exelon Company Conservation Society, both non-profit organizations that work to preserve, save and restore New Jersey fauna and flora.
Energy Supply and Reliability Oyster Creek generated 5 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity in 2003, approximately 9 percent of New Jersey's electricity needs. That is: enough power to'supply 600,000 homes. This low-cost electricity helped keep energy prices in the region down, and did so without producing air pollution typical of other power generation sources.
Economic Impact
- Oyster Creek employs 451 people, not including security forces. Oyster Creek pays
$38 million a year in compensation to employees living in Ocean County and $48 million a year to its New Jersey employees.
- Oyster Creek's economic activity creates one job in the community for each job at the plant.
- That direct and indirect employment resulting from Oyster Creek's operations increases total labor income in Ocean County by $52 million a year and in New Jersey by $69 million a year.
- The average annual wage at Oyster Creek ($69,606) is 11 percent higher than the average annual wage in Ocean County ($61,602)
" Oyster Creek pays $3.9 million a year in local property taxes, $5.3 million a year in state taxes and $2.2 million a year in payroll taxes.
" Oyster Creek has a positive, measurable economic impact on specific industries in Ocean County. For example, the plant increased output from Ocean County hospitals by $1.9 million a year; doctors and dentists, $1.8 million; restaurants, $1.3 million; real estate, $1.5 million; and retail, $1.1 million
- Based on current market prices, Oyster Creek produced electricity valued at more than $200 million in 2003. That amount is captured as a component of the New Jersey and U.S. gross domestic products.
Oyster Creek is a long-time community contributor. It is the largest employee-run United Way campaign in Ocean County and has contributed more than $500,000 over the past five years. The plant has also contributed another $70,000 toward community programs and its employees are active in the community as scout leaders, Little League coaches, volunteers and contributors to American Red Cross blood drives.
4
Untitled Document Page 1 of 2 Ecanamic Benefits Oyster Creek nuclear power plant in Ocean County, NJ, is an integral part of the local economy.
The plant provides jobs and makes purchases that stimulate the local economy directly and indirectly. The benefits to the area include jobs, tax revenues, economic output, labor income and contributions to the local community. And there are other intangible benefits, such as clean air, environmental stewardship and low, stable electricity prices. Oyster Creek's economic impact reaches beyond the local community to the state and even the national level. View the most recent Oyster Creek Economic Benefits Report.
Oyster Creek employs approximately 475 people, not including the plants security force. Oyster Creek creates approximately one additional job in Ocean County for every job at the plant. In addition to the plant's 475 employees, the economic activity generated by Oyster Creek creates another 563 jobs in the county. Given the combination of employees at the plant and secondary jobs created by Oyster Creek's economic activity, the plant is responsible for 915 jobs in Ocean County and 1,034 jobs across New Jersey.
The operation of the Oyster Creek plant increased wages to Ocean County residents by $52.9 million in 2003 and across New Jersey by $69.3 million.
The operation of Oyster Creek and the increased output associated with it accounts for 1,034 jobs in New Jersey and 915 jobs in Ocean County. In addition to earnings to workers, the plant and the economic activity generated by it account for $12.3 million in state and local tax payments.
The total economic impact of the Oyster Creek plant on Ocean County for 2003 was $234.3 million. Oyster Creek's total impact on the New Jersey economy for the same period was $247.7 million and $619.5 million for the U.S. economy.
The Oyster Creek plant makes substantial purchases in Ocean County. In 2003, the-plant made
$133.9 million in purchases, $13.4 million of which was in New Jersey and $7.7 million in Ocean County. Economic activity generated by the Oyster Creek plant also leads to $33 million in increased output in the county and $46.5 million in New Jersey.
The Oyster Creek plant pays an estimated $9.2 million in state and local taxes annually.
Additionally, the economic activity generated by Oyster Creek contributes another $3.1 million in state and local taxes, through increased property, sales, and income taxes. By combining direct and indirect taxes, the Oyster Creek plant accounts for $12.3 million in state and local tax payments.
Oyster Creek has the largest employee-run United Way campaign in Ocean County. In just one year, 2005, Oyster Creek employees raised over $180,000 for the organization.
The plant contributed nearly $200,000 toward community programs in 2005.
Oyster Creek employs 475 people, of which 78 percent live in Ocean County. 294 full-time employees live in Forked River, Barnegat, Toms River, Lanoka Harbor, Manahawkin, Waretown, Bayville, and Beachwood. These numbers do not include security officers who are employees of http://www.oystercreeklr.com/economicbenefits.htm80l 8/10/2006
.Untitled Document Page 2 of 2 a specialized contractor.
Foradditional information, please visit our Ecoqnomic Benefits Fact Sheet.
Oyster Creek Community Impact 475 employees (not including security force)
$9 million in state and local taxes
$3.9 million in property taxes
$13.4 million in goods and services
$650,000 to the United Way (over a six year period) http://www.oystercreeklr.comneconomicbenefits.html 8/10/2006
Untitled Document Page I of 2 Whats New?
To get the facts about Oyster Creek, click here...
Friends and Neighbors, The people of Oyster Creek Generating Station work hard around the clock to provide the region with clean, safe and reliable electricity. We've done this for nearly 37 years and we have asked the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to renew our operating license through 2029.
Oyster Creek has more experience in safe operations than any other nuclear plant in the nation.
Our employees conduct their work with safety as their top priority. This makes perfect sense, considering some simple facts:
o The vast majority of our employees, over 80 percent, live and raise their families in Ocean County. They have a personal stake in insuring that Oyster Creek operates safely.
o Our employees care about their communities and taking an active role as scout leaders, Little League coaches, church leaders, and PTA members.
o If we do not operate safely, we do not operate at all.
Today, more than ever, Oyster Creek is a critical piece of the region's energy mix. I ask you to consider the facts:
o In this time of escalating energy prices, Oyster Creek stands out as an excellent combination of production and efficiency. Oyster Creek generated energy at a cost of $17.38 per megawatt hour in 2005. Today, the average production cost of a coal plant is $35; an oil plant, $90; and a natural gas plant, $245. Without Oyster Creek and other U.S. nuclear plants producing 20% of the nations electricity, prices would be much higher.
- Oyster Creek produces 9 percent of New Jersey's electricity with zero greenhouse gas emissions. Each year it operates, Oyster Creek essentially avoids some 7.5 million metric tons of carbon dioxide that would be produced in coastal New Jersey by a replacement coal-fired plant.
This is critical in helping New Jersey meet its emission reduction goals in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative.
o Oyster Creek is a major economic engine in Ocean County and across New Jersey. Here are the facts based on 2003 data:
- One of the largest employers in Ocean County, with.475 full-time employees, not including security forces.
- Direct and indirect compensation in Ocean County totaled $52.9 million. In New Jersey, the total was $69.3 million.
- Including electrical production value, contributed $234 million to Ocean County's Gross Domestic Product in 2003 and $247 million to the state's GDP.
- Economic activity by the plant in 2003 led to $33 million in increased economic output in Ocean County and $46.5 million more economic output in New Jersey.
Oyster Creek and its employees give a great deal back to the community, supporting community http://www.oystercreeklr.com/home.htm I 8/I10/2006
Untitled Document Page 2 of 2 organizations, projects and events. In 2005, Oyster Creek donated nearly $200,000 to the local community, and this does not include the $180,000 Oyster Creek employees raised for the United Way of Ocean County.
To put it plainly, Oyster Creek is clean, safe and reliable. We have a responsibility to the community to continue to operate safely and event-free. We've kept this promise for almost 37 years, and we will continue to keep this promise to the community for an additional 20 years.
Sincerely, Bud Swenson Oyster Creek Site Vice President http://www.oystercreeklr.com/home.html 8/10/2006