Letter Sequence Supplement |
|---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance...
- Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement
Results
Other: ML052690388, ML052850300, ML053250326, ML053410352, ML053410369, ML053410372, ML053420167, ML053460234, ML053470213, ML053470434, ML053500440, ML053540079, ML060200084, ML060320211, ML060370508, ML060410649, ML060600122, ML060660177, ML060690026, ML060690130, ML060830564, ML060830567, ML060870126, ML060870147, ML060890080, ML060930255, ML060940146, ML060950408, ML060960563, ML060960568, ML060960602, ML061010639, ML061010644, ML061010646, ML061020614, ML061020616, ML061020638, ML061030419, ML061070304, ML061070306, ML061070307, ML061070309, ML061070310, ML061070319, ML061070321, ML061070329, ML061070395, ML061070398, ML061070399, ML061070403... further results
|
MONTHYEARML0726804681954-12-31031 December 1954
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Parks and Forestry, State Forest Service, New Jerseys Big Trees
Project stage: Other
ML0726705561963-01-31031 January 1963
Us Fish and Wildlife Service, 1963. Distribution of Shellfish Resources in Relation to the New Jersey Intracoastal Waterway -- Manasquan Inlet to Little Egg Harbor. Boston, Ma. January
Project stage: Other
ML0726405941972-11-17017 November 1972
Jersey Central Power & Light Company, Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station Environmental Report, Amendment 2
Project stage: Other
ML0726406651978-12-31031 December 1978
Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration
Project stage: Other
ML0726703621978-12-31031 December 1978
Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Initial Progress Report, December 1966, Through Third Progress Report, January 1968
Project stage: Other
ML0726703651978-12-31031 December 1978
Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Fourth Progress Report 1968 Through Sixth Progress Report 1970, Concluding Remarks
Project stage: Other
ML0726703681978-12-31031 December 1978
Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Seventh Progress Report, June 25, 1971, Through Eighth Progress Report, August 18, 1972
Project stage: Other
ML0726703741978-12-31031 December 1978
Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Zooplankton of Barnegat Bay: the Effect of Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant Through Literature Cited
Project stage: Other
ML0726704911978-12-31031 December 1978
Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Appendix E Through Appendix F, Figure 10
Project stage: Other
ML0726705501978-12-31031 December 1978
Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Appendix a Through Appendix C1, Figure C1-1
Project stage: Other
ML0726801491978-12-31031 December 1978
Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Addendum to Appendix C1 Through Addendum to Appendix D1
Project stage: Other
ML0726801691978-12-31031 December 1978
Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Preface Through Table 6.2-2
Project stage: Other
ML0726801741978-12-31031 December 1978
Jersey Central Power & Light Company. 1978. Oyster Creek and Forked River Nuclear Generating Stations 316(a) and (B) Demonstration, Appendix C Continued Page C2-1 Through Page C6-51
Project stage: Other
ML0726802291979-10-22022 October 1979
Letter from David N. Kinsey (New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection) Dated October 22, 1979 to Ivan R. Finfrock (Jersey Central Power & Light Company), NPDES Permit Renewal Application No. NJ0005550
Project stage: Other
ML0726405991982-05-14014 May 1982
Jersey Central Power & Light Co. Boundary Map of Former Finninger Farm
Project stage: Other
ML0726705601986-12-12012 December 1986
Inventory of New Jerseys Estuarine Shellfish Resources, Joseph, J. W., Us Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, December 12, 1986
Project stage: Other
ML0726801891987-12-0909 December 1987
Joseph, J. W. 1987, Inventory of New Jerseys Estuarine Shellfish Resources, Us Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service. Project No. 3-405-R
Project stage: Other
ML0726703911989-12-31031 December 1989
Lacey Township, Ocean County, New Jersey. 1989. Ocean County Water Quality Management Plan, Wastewater Management Plan
Project stage: Other
ML0726704221989-12-31031 December 1989
Usda. 1989. Soil Survey of Ocean County, New Jersey. Sheet Number 45
Project stage: Other
ML0610206381990-11-26026 November 1990
Drywell Containment, Attachment 1 to Letter Dated 04/07/2006
Project stage: Other
ML0610206141991-03-0404 March 1991
Letter Forwarding, an ASME Section Viii Evaluation of Oyster Greek Drywell for Without Sand Case Part 1 Stress Analysis, Attachment 2 to Letter Dated 04/07/06
Project stage: Other
ML0610206161992-01-16016 January 1992
Letter Forwarding, ASME Section Viii Evaluation of the Oyster Creek Drywell, Part 2, Stability Analysis, Attachment 3 to Letter Dated 04/07/2006
Project stage: Other
ML0702906681992-04-24024 April 1992
Evaluation Report on Structural Integrity of the Oyster Creek Drywell with Brookhaven National Laboratory Technical Evaluation Report - Attached
Project stage: Other
ML0726801841997-02-0404 February 1997
State of New Jersey Permit No. 1512-93-0052.3, .4, and .5, Permit to Dredge
Project stage: Other
ML0726804281997-09-30030 September 1997
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers, Permit Number CENAP-OP-R-199701765-39
Project stage: Other
ML0726704171997-10-31031 October 1997
State of New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. the Management and Regulation of Dredging Activities and Dredged Material Disposal in New Jerseys Tidal Waters. October 1997
Project stage: Other
ML0726703842000-04-25025 April 2000
Levin, S. 2000. Letter, Levin (Gpu Nuclear Inc.) to New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. Application for Transfer of Ownership and of a Permit
Project stage: Request
ML0726804482002-05-15015 May 2002
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. 2002. List of State Flood Hazard Area Delineations. May 15
Project stage: Other
ML0726803802003-05-15015 May 2003
Shellfish Stock Assessment of Little Egg Harbor Bay (Dsrt Proposal 2001011), Celestino, M. P., New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 15 May 2003
Project stage: Other
ML0726803592003-12-31031 December 2003
Private Property and the Common Good, Anonymous, 2003, Powerpoint Presentation
Project stage: Other
ML0726704012004-01-31031 January 2004
Energy Information Administration. 2004. State Energy Profiles 2002. January. (Excerpt). Us Department of Energy
Project stage: Other
ML0726802382004-02-28028 February 2004
Clean, Safe, Reliable, the Economic Benefits of Oyster Creek Generating Station, February 2004
Project stage: Other
ML0726804052004-07-0707 July 2004
Ecolsciences, Inc., 2004, Threatened and Endangered Species Habitat Impact Assessment for Oyster Greek Generation Station National Security Upgrades; Township of Lacey; Ocean County, New Jersey, Prepared for Amergen Energy Co., LLC
Project stage: Other
ML0726704042004-12-31031 December 2004
Energy Information Administration. 2004. State Energy Data 2002: Consumption. Table 7 Energy Consumption Estimates by Source, Selected Years, 160-2002, New Jersey. Us Department of Energy
Project stage: Other
ML0726705522004-12-31031 December 2004
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, 2004 Cafra Boundary Line
Project stage: Other
ML0726804182004-12-31031 December 2004
Energy Information Administration, 2004, Existing Generating Units in the United States by State, Company, and Plant, 2004, Us Department of Energy
Project stage: Other
ML0726703942005-07-19019 July 2005
Tompkins, H.B. 2005. Letter Tompkins (State of New Jersey, Department of Environmental Protection) to Brown (Amergen). Draft Surface Water Renewal Permit Action. Includes Public Notice, Fact Sheet, and Draft NJPDES Permit
Project stage: Draft Other
ML0726808302005-07-19019 July 2005
Ocean County Soil Conservation District, 2005, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Certification; Upland Dredge Site, Scd 1302
Project stage: Other
ML0520800482005-07-22022 July 2005
Application for Renewed Operating License
Project stage: Request
ML0726802022005-07-25025 July 2005
FEMA Floodzone Map for Lacey Township, Ocean County, Nj, Provided by Birdsall Engineering, Inc
Project stage: Other
ML0526903882005-09-23023 September 2005
Audit and Review Plan for Plant Aging Management Reviews and Programs at the Oyster Creek Generating Station
Project stage: Other
ML0527101572005-09-28028 September 2005
Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, License Renewal Application (Tac No. MC7624)
Project stage: RAI
ML0528503002005-10-0505 October 2005
Audit and Review Plan for Plant Aging Management Reviews and Programs at the Oyster Creek Generating Station (Tac No. MC7624)
Project stage: Other
ML0529100912005-10-12012 October 2005
Response to NRC Request for Additional Information (RAI 2.5.1.19-1), Dated September 28, 2005, Related to Oyster Creek Generating Station License Renewal Application (Tac No. MC7624)
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0610703042005-10-21021 October 2005
Email: Pictures? (PA)
Project stage: Other
ML0610703062005-11-0404 November 2005
Email: Emailing: Example NPDES Report.Pdf (PA)
Project stage: Other
ML0610703072005-11-0909 November 2005
Email: Emailing: Example NPDES Report.Pdf (PA)
Project stage: Other
ML0531400422005-11-0909 November 2005
Request for Additional Information for the Review of the Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station, License Renewal Application (Tac No. MC7624)
Project stage: RAI
ML0610703092005-11-0909 November 2005
Email: Emailing: Example NPDES Report.Pdf (PA)
Project stage: Other
ML0532004752005-11-11011 November 2005
Supplemental Response to NRC Request for Additional Information (RAI 2.5.1.19-1), Dated September 28, 2005, Related to Oyster Creek Generating Station License Renewal Application
Project stage: Supplement
2002-05-15
[Table View] |
Text
AmerGen SM Michael P. GallagheT, PE Vice President License Renewal Projects AmerGen 2oo Exelon Way KSA/2-E Kennett Square. PA 19348 Telephone 610.765.5958 www.exeloncorp.com michaelp.gallagher@exeloncorp.com An Exelon Company 10 CFR 50 10 CFR 51 10 CFR 54 2130-06-20349 June 12, 2006 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 Oyster Creek Generating Station Facility Operating License No. DPR-16 NRC Docket No. 50-219
Subject:
Reference:
Supplement to AmerGen Response to NRC Request for Additional Information RAI 4.3-4, Related to Oyster Creek Generating Station License Renewal Application (TAC No. MC7624)
May 1, 2006 AmerGen Response to NRC Request for Additional Information, dated March 30, 2006, Related to Oyster Creek Generating Station License Renewal Application (TAC No. MC7624)
In the referenced letter, AmerGen responded to NRC Request for Additional Information (RAI) 4.3-4. During the NRC Staff review of this response, it was determined that a clarification to the response was needed. The Enclosure to this letter provides that clarification. Question RAI 4.3-4 along with the original response is repeated. New information included in the response is displayed in bold font for ease of identification. An exception to this convention is that information bolded in Table 4.3.4-1 of the original response remains bolded. No new information has been introduced into that Table.
If you have any questions, please contact Fred Polaski, Manager License Renewal, at 610-765-5935.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Respectfully, Executed on 06o I-l-"oo6 Michael P. Gallagher Vice President, License Renewal AmerGen Energy Company, LLC
Enclosure:
Clarification to RAI 4.3-4 Response PC 114
June 12, 2006 Page 2 of 2 cc:
Regional Administrator, USNRC Region I, w/o Enclosure USNRC Project Manager, NRR - License Renewal, Safety, w/Enclosure USNRC Project Manager, NRR - License Renewal, Environmental, w/o Enclosure USNRC Project Manager, NRR - OCGS, w/o Enclosure USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, OCGS, w/o Enclosure Bureau of Nuclear Engineering, NJDEP, w/Enclosure File No. 05040
ENCLOSURE CLARIFICATION TO RAI 4.3-4 RESPONSE RELATED TO OYSTER CREEK GENERATING STATION LICENSE RENEWAL APPLICATION June 12, 2006 Supplement Page 1 of 4
RAI 4.3-4 Section 4.3.4 of the license renewal application discusses the evaluation of the effects of the reactor coolant environment on the fatigue life of components and piping. Table 4.3.4-1 provides the overall environmental fatigue multipliers for the components analyzed. Provide the calculation of the environmental factors for the RPV inlet and outlet nozzles and the feedwater nozzle. Explain how each parameter used in the calculation was determined.
Response
The environmental fatigue calculations for the recirculation inlet and outlet nozzles and the feedwater nozzle are contained in Structural Integrity Associates Calculation No. OC-05Q-314, Revision 0, "Environmental Fatigue Calculations for RPV Locations" (proprietary). The calculations for all three of these locations are performed in accordance with NUREG/CR-6583 (ANL-97/18), "Effects of LWR Coolant Environments on Fatigue Design Curves of Carbon and Low-Alloy Steels," March 1998, as the limiting locations for all three components are low alloy steel material. All three locations were evaluated in a similar fashion, based on the governing fatigue calculation for each component, with the following specifics:
Recirculation Inlet Nozzle: Bounding Fen multipliers for hydrogen water chemistry (HWC) and normal water chemistry (NWC) were determined based on maximum transient temperature, minimum (saturated) assumed strain rate, and oxygen values estimated for the recirculation system. An overall usage factor was computed considering the NWC Fen value for the time period prior to HWC implementation (41%) and the HWC Fen value for the time period after HWC implementation until the end of the 60-year operating period (59%).
Recirculation Outlet Nozzle: The fatigue usage at the outlet nozzle is greater than at the inlet nozzle, primarily because the outlet nozzle experiences the added thermal transients associated with operation of the Isolation Condenser. As a result, the fatigue usage for the outlet nozzle was calculated using a more detailed approach. Load pair specific Fen multipliers for hydrogen water chemistry (HWC) and normal water chemistry (NWC) were determined based on the maximum load pair temperature, average computed (tensile) strain rate, and oxygen values estimated for the recirculation system. Because load-pair specific Fen multipliers were determined based on load-pair specific strain rates and temperatures, the overall Fen multiplier for the recirculation outlet nozzle was determined to be significantly lower than the bounding value described above for the recirculation inlet nozzle. An overall usage factor was computed considering the NWC Fen value for the time period prior to HWC implementation (41%) and the HWC Fen value for the time period after HWC implementation until the end of the 60-year operating period (59%).
Feedwater Nozzle: A revised CUF of 0.389 was computed for the feedwater nozzle for 60 years of projected cycles. Similar to the recirculation outlet nozzle, load-pair-specific Fen multipliers for hydrogen water chemistry (HWC) and normal water chemistry (NWC) were determined based on the maximum load pair temperature, average computed (tensile) strain rate, and oxygen values estimated for the feedwater system. These Fe. multipliers were determined to be 2.45 for each condition in accordance with NUREG/CR-6583 requirements. An overall usage factor of 0.955 was computed for 60 years of projected cycles (= 2.45 x 0.389). This considered the NWC Fen value for the time period prior to HWC June 12, 2006 Supplement Page 2 of 4
implementation (41%) and the HWC Fen value for the time period after HWC implementation until the end of the 60-year operating period (59%).
The feedwater nozzle was repaired 7 years after plant startup, when the cladding inside the nozzle was removed and replacement thermal sleeves and spargers were installed.
Therefore, the evaluation period for the environmental fatigue analysis was adjusted to 53 years. Based on this, the 53-year usage factor, including environmental effects, was calculated as (53/60) x 0.955 = 0.843. The overall Fen multiplier for the feedwater nozzle is therefore shown in the LRA as 0.843 10.389 = 2.17.
As a result of a recent review of our documents, it was noticed that some of the fatigue usage factors cited in Section 4.3 of the OC LRA do not correspond to the values in our latest fatigue calculations. Some fatigue values changed slightly as a result of incorporation of comments during the finalization of these calculations. As part of the corrective actions for this finding a complete review of all of the values cited in LRA Section 4 was performed to ensure the fidelity of the information provided. The changes are shown in bold face on the new Table 4.3.4-1 (below). The changes are relatively small and do not impact the conclusions discussed in the application.
June 12, 2006 Supplement Page 3 of 4
Table 4.3.4-1 Environmental Fatigue Results for Oyster Creek for NUREGICR-6260 Components 60-Year 60-Year Fatigue Overall Fatigue Usage Factor Environmental NUREG/CR-6260 Equivalent OCGS Material Usage Factor with Fatigue Location Location (1)
Environmental Multiplier Effects (2)
Reactor Vessel (Lower Reactor Vessel (Vessel-Low Alloy Steel 0.0004 0.0042 10.28 Head to Shell Head Junction)
Transition)
Feedwater Nozzle Feedwater Nozzle Low Alloy Steel 0.3889 0.8433 2.17 Recirculation System Isolation Condenser Return (RHR Return Line Tee and the RPV inlet and Line Tee into SDC Line Stainless Steel 0.54-
.495 outlet nozzles) 0.1205 0.43 3.57 RPV inlet nozzle Low Alloy Steel 0.0151 0.1554 10.28 RPV outlet nozzle Low Alloy Steel 0111 0.978 5.34
.1832 Core Spray System Core Spray Nozzle Low Alloy Steel 0.0013 0.0129 10.28 (Nozzle and Safe End)
Core Spray Nozzle Safe End Stainless Steel 0.0006 0.0072 12.48 Residual Heat Bounded by Isolation Stainless Steel N/A N/A N/A Removal Line Condenser Return Line Tee (Tapered Transition)
Location Above Feedwater Line Limiting Class 1 Location in Carbon Steel 0
@1782-(Feedwater/RCIC Tee the Feedwater Line 0.0245 0.0767 3.13 Connection)
Notes:
I.
Revised fatigue usage factors were computed for all of the NUREG/CR-6260 components based on projected cycles for 60 years of plant operation and updated ASME Code fatigue methodology.
- 2.
Environmental fatigue usage was computed using the methodology of NUREG/CR-6583 (for carbon/low alloy steels) and NUREG/CR-5704 (for stainless steels), as appropriate for the material for each location.
June 12, 2006 Supplement Page 4 of 4