ML20207E793: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Adams | |||
| number = ML20207E793 | |||
| issue date = 07/16/1986 | |||
| title = Ack Receipt of 860530 & 0707 Ltrs Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-458/86-16 | |||
| author name = Gagliardo J | |||
| author affiliation = NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) | |||
| addressee name = Cahill W | |||
| addressee affiliation = GULF STATES UTILITIES CO. | |||
| docket = 05000458 | |||
| license number = | |||
| contact person = | |||
| document report number = NUDOCS 8607220425 | |||
| package number = ML20207E797 | |||
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE | |||
| page count = 2 | |||
}} | |||
See also: [[see also::IR 05000458/1986016]] | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:* | |||
,, JUL 1 6M | |||
In' Reply Refer To: | |||
Docket: 50-458/86-16 | |||
Gulf States Utilities | |||
ATTN: William J. Cahill, Jr., | |||
Senior Vice President | |||
River Bend Nuclear Group | |||
P. O. Box 2951 | |||
Beaumont, Texas 77704 | |||
Gentlemen: | |||
Thank you for your letters, dated May 30, 1986, and July 7, 1986, in | |||
response to our letters, dated May 1,1986, and June 13, 1986. We have no | |||
further questions at this time and will review your corrective action during a | |||
future inspection. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
Original signed By | |||
1 E. Gagliardo | |||
J. E. Gagliardo, Chief | |||
Reactor Projects Branch | |||
cc: | |||
Gulf States Utilities | |||
ATTN: J. E. Booker, Manager- | |||
Engineering, Nuclear | |||
^ | |||
> | |||
Fuels & Licensing | |||
P. O. Box 2951 , | |||
Beaumont, Texas 77704 | |||
Louisiana Statt University, | |||
Government Documents Department - | |||
' | |||
Louisiana Radiati ontrol Program Director | |||
- | |||
RPB/A g : B/A C:RPB / | |||
RBennett a don JGagl d | |||
7/p/( | |||
, | |||
7/ //,/86 7/s/86 | |||
i | |||
I 8607220425 860716 | |||
A | |||
ADOCK 05000458 | |||
I | |||
' PDR | |||
Q PDR /[ kg | |||
L | |||
V . | |||
' | |||
~~ | |||
. | |||
, | |||
bec to DMB (IE01) | |||
bec distrib. by RIV: | |||
RPB DRSP | |||
Resident Inspector R. D. Martin, RA | |||
Section Chief (RPB/A) D. Weiss, LFMB (AR-2015) | |||
MIS System RSB | |||
RSTS Operator R. Bennett | |||
R&SPB | |||
RIV File | |||
, | |||
l | |||
. * | |||
GULF STATES UTILITIES COMPANY | |||
} | |||
RIVER BEND STATION POST OFFICE BOX 220 ST FRANCISVILLE. LOUISIANA 70775 | |||
ARE A CODE 504 635 6094 346 8651 | |||
May 30, 1986 | |||
RBG- 23800 | |||
. File Nos. G9.5, G15.4.1 | |||
Mr. Robert D. Martin, Regional Administrator | |||
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
Region IV F - - - | |||
-' ---- , | |||
611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 l[[ ha ij [N b,. 2 | |||
Arlington, TX 76011 'I | |||
Dear Mr. Martin: 'i M - 419f6 | |||
River Bend Station - Unit 1 | |||
Refer to: Region IV ~ | |||
_ | |||
Docket No. 50-458/ Report 86-16 | |||
This letter responds to the Notice of Violation contained in NRC | |||
I&E Inspection Report No. 50-458/86-16. The inspection was | |||
performed by Mr. Michael E. Skow during the period March 31 | |||
through April 4, 1986 of activities authorized by NRC Operating | |||
License NPF-47 for River Bend Station - Unit 1. . | |||
Gulf States Utilities Company's (GSU) response to Notice of | |||
Violation 86-16-01, " Failure to Have Adequate Procedures", | |||
86-16-02, " Failure to Follow Procedures", and 86-16-03, " Failure | |||
to Follow Procedures", are provided in the enclosed attachment. | |||
This completes GSU's response to the Notice of Violation. | |||
Sincerely, | |||
o | |||
W. J. Cahill, Jr. | |||
Senior Vice President | |||
( River Bend Nuclear Group | |||
WJC/ b/DK/ /je | |||
e | |||
Attachments | |||
l | |||
; | |||
. | |||
,o-r w- e m<. LfP/ 1 | |||
I d | |||
[C-ID$ % | |||
. - - . . - - . - -. - . . _ . ._ | |||
" ' | |||
, . | |||
. , | |||
ATTACHMENT 3 | |||
RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION 50-458/8616-02 | |||
: | |||
LEVEL V | |||
e | |||
. | |||
C. FAILURE TO FOLLOW PROCEDURES | |||
, | |||
REASON FOR THE VIOLATION | |||
Station Support Procedure (SSP)-1-004, Revision 0 (Station | |||
Document Control System) states that the IS-217 Report is the | |||
, | |||
primary document for identifying outstanding changes against. Stone | |||
' | |||
and Webster design documents. However, a modified IS-217 Report | |||
exists that identifies changes in the form of Pipe Support | |||
Revision Notices (PSRNs) to Category II and III large bore pipe | |||
support design drawings (i.e. , BZ/PSDD drawings). The modified | |||
' | |||
IS-237 is not addressed in ESP-1-004. Station Document Control | |||
4 | |||
(SDC) was not aware of the existence of PSRNs or the modified | |||
IS-217. Both documents had been previously distributed by Stone & | |||
' | |||
Webster (S&W) Document System Group prior to this group's | |||
consolidation with GSU Station Document Control in late 1985. | |||
PSRNs were no longer being originated by S&W at the time of | |||
consolidation but some of those previously issued are not | |||
incorporated into their respective drawings, thus, they are still | |||
outstanding changes. | |||
CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH HAVE BEEN-TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED- | |||
l The modified IS-217 is addressed in the Stone and Webster | |||
l Engineering Corporation Plant Services Procedure (PSP)-3.1-0, | |||
; " Applicability of Construction Phase Interim Design Change | |||
Mechanism to Operation", dated August 28, 1985. An approved | |||
change to SSP-1-004 has been implemented which addresses the | |||
modified IS-217 Report and references PSP-3.1-0. SSP-1-004 also | |||
discusses the need for using both the IS-217 and the modified | |||
IS-217 to ensure a BZ/PSDD is current. | |||
4 | |||
CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS | |||
l | |||
The modified IS-217 will be distributed on a as-needed basis to | |||
document satellite stations. Since the IS-217 Report and the | |||
modified IS-217 Report are the only documents available for | |||
identifying outstanding changes against Stone and Webster design | |||
documents, this is determined to be an isolated case. | |||
DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED | |||
l Full compliance has been achieved. | |||
l | |||
l | |||
l | |||
___ ___ ___ _ - _ - ___ __ _ _ | |||
. _. - ._ - - _ - - . -- . -. | |||
. . | |||
, ATTACHMENT 2 | |||
RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION 50-458/8616-03 | |||
. LEVEL V | |||
B. FAILURE TO FOLLOW PROCEDURES | |||
REASON FOR THE VIOLATION | |||
, | |||
Procedure ADM-0005, Revision 4 (Station Document Control) requires | |||
that documents transmitted to satellite stations- offsite be -" | |||
incorporated into manuals, etc. and the transmittal signed and | |||
returned within 10 working days of the date on the transmittal. | |||
Contrary to this requirement, 17 document transmittals older than | |||
10 working days had not been incorporated into manuals located in | |||
' | |||
the Emergency Operating Facility (EOF). Emergency Response | |||
i Personnel were not updating EOF documents as required by ADM-0005. | |||
, Also, Station Document . Control (SDC) had not sent Delinquent | |||
s Notices to the satellite station as also required by ADM-0005. | |||
Root cause of the problem appears to be a change in F.OF personnel | |||
resulting in responsibility for updating documents not being | |||
, carried over and. leniency on the part of SDC because of the new | |||
l personnel in EOF. | |||
CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH HAVE BEEN TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED | |||
I All documents were incorporated into their respective manuals on | |||
the day that the discrepancy was discovered by the NRC Inspector. | |||
The transmittals were then signed and returned to SDC. The EOF | |||
Satellite Station is now in compliance with ADM-0005 requirements. | |||
* | |||
CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER VIOILATIONS | |||
The new EOF personnel were given training by the SDC Supervisor to | |||
ensure they understood their satellite station custodial | |||
j responsibilities. Documentation is available to support the | |||
training given. Station Document Control personnel have been | |||
i | |||
verbally instructed to comply with ADM-0005 requirements for | |||
; issuing Delinquent Notices. A memorandum has been issued ! | |||
) restating the verbal instructions given to SDC personnel. | |||
. | |||
[ DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED | |||
j Full compliance has been achieved. | |||
: | |||
! | |||
, | |||
e | |||
- | |||
s,-_,---.9 .,w, %.-g.,.,yw----g awe-ev---M--e--wea------'---e-yw ------e -e ,vg--- 4-y-f -rv-y-+ ---,--,---*-vmv.rwwww-www-ww----wwww | |||
. | |||
. | |||
. | |||
, required to be performed in accordance with the | |||
ADM-0029. To ensure compliance with ADM-0029, Memorandum controls of | |||
No. | |||
APM-M-86-59 was issued on April 2, 1986 rescinding th'e new program | |||
described in Memorandum No. PMG-M-86-62, dated March 25, 1986. | |||
CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS | |||
The responsible | |||
requirements Plant Staff Maintenance personnel are aware of the | |||
of ADM-0003. | |||
is presently being developedGeneral Maintenance Procedure, GMP-0092 | |||
as an alternative to the | |||
torque | |||
wrench program described in ADM-0029. The procedure will meet the | |||
intent of the program described in Memorandum No. PMG-M-86-62 and | |||
establish | |||
torque wrenches. | |||
approved instructions for the calibration and control of | |||
The approval of GMP-0092 is presently pending | |||
the receipt | |||
device. | |||
of a newly purchased torque | |||
Torque wrenches will remain | |||
wrench calibration check | |||
under the controls of | |||
approved procedure ADM-0029 until GMP-0092 is approved and issued. | |||
DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED | |||
Full compliance | |||
March | |||
with the requirements of ADM-0029 was achievei on | |||
27, 1986 after the relocation of the torque wrench | |||
calibration check device. | |||
, | |||
. | |||
< | |||
.) | |||
m +-ry w w v- -- ..i.-sy wy,w9- - -.-wr - | |||
m _-w w w y e 9 - - p. - | |||
ww ..- | |||
", , | |||
, ATTACHMENT 1 | |||
RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION 50-458/8616-01 | |||
LEVEL IV | |||
Reference | |||
Notice of Violation - J. E. Gagliardo to W. J. Cahill, Jr. dated May | |||
1, 1986. | |||
A. FAILURE TO HAVE ADEQUATE PROCEDURES | |||
REASON FOR THE VIOLATION | |||
On March 25, 1986, in Memorandum No. PMG-M-86-62, the Plant Staff | |||
Maintenance Department removed torque wrenches from the controls | |||
of Administrative Procedure ADM-0029, " Control of Measuring and | |||
Test Equipment (M&TE)", and provided new instructions for | |||
controlling torque wrenches. These program changes were made to | |||
provide controls for more reliable torque wrench calibrations by | |||
requiring the torque wrenches to have a calibration check before | |||
and after each use on plant equipment. The new program also | |||
expedited the process of issuing torque wrenches to Maintenance | |||
personnel. The M&TE device used to check the torque wrench | |||
calibrations remained under the control of ADM-0029. The new | |||
instructions also continued the use of M&TE Tracking Cards, as | |||
required by ADM-0029. Although the memorandum, issued on March | |||
25, 1986, did cctablich controls for using torque wrenches at | |||
River Bend Station, the failure to implement an approved procedure | |||
in accordance with the requirements of ADM-0003 resulted in an | |||
apparent violation of Technical Specification Section 6.8.1. | |||
CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH HAVE BEEN TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED | |||
The new program, as described in Memorandum No. PMG-M-86-62, was | |||
discontinued on March 27, 1986 when the torque wrench calibration | |||
check device was relocated from the Maintenance Shop to the Site | |||
Standards Laboratory. This change resulted from the device's | |||
calibration having been suspected as out of tolerance. When | |||
returned to the Standards Laboratory, the device's calibration was | |||
confirmed to be out of tolerance by a 1.4 percent error for | |||
readings above 225 ft-lbs when used in the counter clockwise | |||
direction. A review of the M&TE Tracking Cards for the torque | |||
wrenches used during the 3 days of the new program, revealed that | |||
the torque wrenches in question were not used in the counter | |||
clockwise direction or in the ranges found out of tolerance. | |||
Therefore, all torque wrench applications during this period were | |||
acceptable. | |||
As a result of the calibration check device being removed from | |||
service on March 27, 1986, subsequent torque wrenches issued were | |||
_ | |||
- -- -- - . - - . . _ . . | |||
. | |||
. | |||
. UNITED STATES OF AMERTCA | |||
EUCLEAR EECUIATORT CGESSION | |||
. | |||
STATE OF ISUISIAEA 5 | |||
FARISE OF WEST FILICIAEA $ . | |||
In the Matter of I Docket Bos. 50-458 | |||
CULF STATES UTILITIES CGEFANY l | |||
(River Bend Station, | |||
Unit 1) | |||
AFFIB&VIT | |||
W. J. Cahill, Jr., being duly sworn, states that he is a Senior | |||
Vice President of Gulf States Utilities Company; that he is authorized | |||
on the part of said Company to sign and file with the Nuclear Rggulatory | |||
Coorsis sion the documents attached heretos and that all such documents | |||
are true and carrect to the best of his knowledge, information and belief. | |||
/ , | |||
W. Cahill, Jr. /[ | |||
l | |||
.. | |||
Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the | |||
! State and Parish above named, this M day of M a &7 ,19M. | |||
: . | |||
$AK d * | |||
~ | |||
N | |||
~an W. Middlebrooks L | |||
i | |||
totary Public in and for | |||
' | |||
West Feliciana Parish, | |||
Louisiana | |||
My Conunission is for Life. | |||
i | |||
l | |||
i | |||
! | |||
.. | |||
_ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ . | |||
- | |||
. - - _ | |||
- - - - . - . - _ _ . - _ | |||
}} |
Latest revision as of 16:22, 19 December 2021
ML20207E793 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | River Bend |
Issue date: | 07/16/1986 |
From: | Gagliardo J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
To: | William Cahill GULF STATES UTILITIES CO. |
Shared Package | |
ML20207E797 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 8607220425 | |
Download: ML20207E793 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000458/1986016
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:*
,, JUL 1 6M In' Reply Refer To: Docket: 50-458/86-16 Gulf States Utilities ATTN: William J. Cahill, Jr., Senior Vice President River Bend Nuclear Group P. O. Box 2951 Beaumont, Texas 77704 Gentlemen: Thank you for your letters, dated May 30, 1986, and July 7, 1986, in response to our letters, dated May 1,1986, and June 13, 1986. We have no further questions at this time and will review your corrective action during a future inspection. Sincerely, Original signed By 1 E. Gagliardo J. E. Gagliardo, Chief Reactor Projects Branch cc: Gulf States Utilities ATTN: J. E. Booker, Manager- Engineering, Nuclear ^ > Fuels & Licensing P. O. Box 2951 , Beaumont, Texas 77704 Louisiana Statt University, Government Documents Department - ' Louisiana Radiati ontrol Program Director - RPB/A g : B/A C:RPB / RBennett a don JGagl d 7/p/(
,
7/ //,/86 7/s/86
i I 8607220425 860716
A ADOCK 05000458
I ' PDR
Q PDR /[ kg
L
V . ' ~~ . , bec to DMB (IE01) bec distrib. by RIV: RPB DRSP Resident Inspector R. D. Martin, RA Section Chief (RPB/A) D. Weiss, LFMB (AR-2015) MIS System RSB RSTS Operator R. Bennett R&SPB RIV File
, l
. * GULF STATES UTILITIES COMPANY } RIVER BEND STATION POST OFFICE BOX 220 ST FRANCISVILLE. LOUISIANA 70775 ARE A CODE 504 635 6094 346 8651 May 30, 1986 RBG- 23800 . File Nos. G9.5, G15.4.1 Mr. Robert D. Martin, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV F - - - -' ---- , 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 l[[ ha ij [N b,. 2 Arlington, TX 76011 'I Dear Mr. Martin: 'i M - 419f6 River Bend Station - Unit 1 Refer to: Region IV ~ _ Docket No. 50-458/ Report 86-16 This letter responds to the Notice of Violation contained in NRC I&E Inspection Report No. 50-458/86-16. The inspection was performed by Mr. Michael E. Skow during the period March 31 through April 4, 1986 of activities authorized by NRC Operating License NPF-47 for River Bend Station - Unit 1. . Gulf States Utilities Company's (GSU) response to Notice of Violation 86-16-01, " Failure to Have Adequate Procedures", 86-16-02, " Failure to Follow Procedures", and 86-16-03, " Failure to Follow Procedures", are provided in the enclosed attachment. This completes GSU's response to the Notice of Violation. Sincerely, o W. J. Cahill, Jr. Senior Vice President
( River Bend Nuclear Group
WJC/ b/DK/ /je e Attachments
l
.
,o-r w- e m<. LfP/ 1
I d
[C-ID$ %
. - - . . - - . - -. - . . _ . ._ " ' , . . , ATTACHMENT 3 RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION 50-458/8616-02
LEVEL V e
.
C. FAILURE TO FOLLOW PROCEDURES
,
REASON FOR THE VIOLATION Station Support Procedure (SSP)-1-004, Revision 0 (Station Document Control System) states that the IS-217 Report is the
,
primary document for identifying outstanding changes against. Stone
'
and Webster design documents. However, a modified IS-217 Report exists that identifies changes in the form of Pipe Support Revision Notices (PSRNs) to Category II and III large bore pipe support design drawings (i.e. , BZ/PSDD drawings). The modified
'
IS-237 is not addressed in ESP-1-004. Station Document Control
4
(SDC) was not aware of the existence of PSRNs or the modified IS-217. Both documents had been previously distributed by Stone &
'
Webster (S&W) Document System Group prior to this group's consolidation with GSU Station Document Control in late 1985. PSRNs were no longer being originated by S&W at the time of consolidation but some of those previously issued are not incorporated into their respective drawings, thus, they are still outstanding changes. CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH HAVE BEEN-TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED-
l The modified IS-217 is addressed in the Stone and Webster l Engineering Corporation Plant Services Procedure (PSP)-3.1-0,
- " Applicability of Construction Phase Interim Design Change
Mechanism to Operation", dated August 28, 1985. An approved change to SSP-1-004 has been implemented which addresses the modified IS-217 Report and references PSP-3.1-0. SSP-1-004 also discusses the need for using both the IS-217 and the modified IS-217 to ensure a BZ/PSDD is current.
4
CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS
l
The modified IS-217 will be distributed on a as-needed basis to document satellite stations. Since the IS-217 Report and the modified IS-217 Report are the only documents available for identifying outstanding changes against Stone and Webster design documents, this is determined to be an isolated case. DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED
l Full compliance has been achieved. l l l
___ ___ ___ _ - _ - ___ __ _ _
. _. - ._ - - _ - - . -- . -. . . , ATTACHMENT 2 RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION 50-458/8616-03
. LEVEL V
B. FAILURE TO FOLLOW PROCEDURES REASON FOR THE VIOLATION , Procedure ADM-0005, Revision 4 (Station Document Control) requires that documents transmitted to satellite stations- offsite be -" incorporated into manuals, etc. and the transmittal signed and returned within 10 working days of the date on the transmittal. Contrary to this requirement, 17 document transmittals older than 10 working days had not been incorporated into manuals located in ' the Emergency Operating Facility (EOF). Emergency Response
i Personnel were not updating EOF documents as required by ADM-0005. , Also, Station Document . Control (SDC) had not sent Delinquent s Notices to the satellite station as also required by ADM-0005.
Root cause of the problem appears to be a change in F.OF personnel resulting in responsibility for updating documents not being , carried over and. leniency on the part of SDC because of the new
l personnel in EOF.
CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH HAVE BEEN TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED
I All documents were incorporated into their respective manuals on
the day that the discrepancy was discovered by the NRC Inspector. The transmittals were then signed and returned to SDC. The EOF Satellite Station is now in compliance with ADM-0005 requirements.
CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER VIOILATIONS The new EOF personnel were given training by the SDC Supervisor to ensure they understood their satellite station custodial
j responsibilities. Documentation is available to support the
training given. Station Document Control personnel have been
i
verbally instructed to comply with ADM-0005 requirements for
- issuing Delinquent Notices. A memorandum has been issued !
) restating the verbal instructions given to SDC personnel. . [ DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED j Full compliance has been achieved.
! , e
- s,-_,---.9 .,w, %.-g.,.,yw----g awe-ev---M--e--wea------'---e-yw ------e -e ,vg--- 4-y-f -rv-y-+ ---,--,---*-vmv.rwwww-www-ww----wwww
. . . , required to be performed in accordance with the ADM-0029. To ensure compliance with ADM-0029, Memorandum controls of No. APM-M-86-59 was issued on April 2, 1986 rescinding th'e new program described in Memorandum No. PMG-M-86-62, dated March 25, 1986. CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER VIOLATIONS The responsible requirements Plant Staff Maintenance personnel are aware of the of ADM-0003. is presently being developedGeneral Maintenance Procedure, GMP-0092 as an alternative to the torque wrench program described in ADM-0029. The procedure will meet the intent of the program described in Memorandum No. PMG-M-86-62 and establish torque wrenches. approved instructions for the calibration and control of The approval of GMP-0092 is presently pending the receipt device. of a newly purchased torque Torque wrenches will remain wrench calibration check under the controls of approved procedure ADM-0029 until GMP-0092 is approved and issued. DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED Full compliance March with the requirements of ADM-0029 was achievei on 27, 1986 after the relocation of the torque wrench calibration check device. ,
.
< .) m +-ry w w v- -- ..i.-sy wy,w9- - -.-wr - m _-w w w y e 9 - - p. - ww ..-
", , , ATTACHMENT 1
RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION 50-458/8616-01 LEVEL IV Reference Notice of Violation - J. E. Gagliardo to W. J. Cahill, Jr. dated May 1, 1986. A. FAILURE TO HAVE ADEQUATE PROCEDURES REASON FOR THE VIOLATION On March 25, 1986, in Memorandum No. PMG-M-86-62, the Plant Staff Maintenance Department removed torque wrenches from the controls of Administrative Procedure ADM-0029, " Control of Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE)", and provided new instructions for controlling torque wrenches. These program changes were made to provide controls for more reliable torque wrench calibrations by requiring the torque wrenches to have a calibration check before and after each use on plant equipment. The new program also expedited the process of issuing torque wrenches to Maintenance personnel. The M&TE device used to check the torque wrench calibrations remained under the control of ADM-0029. The new instructions also continued the use of M&TE Tracking Cards, as required by ADM-0029. Although the memorandum, issued on March 25, 1986, did cctablich controls for using torque wrenches at River Bend Station, the failure to implement an approved procedure in accordance with the requirements of ADM-0003 resulted in an apparent violation of Technical Specification Section 6.8.1. CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH HAVE BEEN TAKEN AND THE RESULTS ACHIEVED The new program, as described in Memorandum No. PMG-M-86-62, was discontinued on March 27, 1986 when the torque wrench calibration check device was relocated from the Maintenance Shop to the Site Standards Laboratory. This change resulted from the device's calibration having been suspected as out of tolerance. When returned to the Standards Laboratory, the device's calibration was confirmed to be out of tolerance by a 1.4 percent error for readings above 225 ft-lbs when used in the counter clockwise direction. A review of the M&TE Tracking Cards for the torque wrenches used during the 3 days of the new program, revealed that the torque wrenches in question were not used in the counter clockwise direction or in the ranges found out of tolerance. Therefore, all torque wrench applications during this period were acceptable. As a result of the calibration check device being removed from service on March 27, 1986, subsequent torque wrenches issued were _ - -- -- - . - - . . _ . .
. . . UNITED STATES OF AMERTCA EUCLEAR EECUIATORT CGESSION . STATE OF ISUISIAEA 5 FARISE OF WEST FILICIAEA $ . In the Matter of I Docket Bos. 50-458 CULF STATES UTILITIES CGEFANY l (River Bend Station, Unit 1) AFFIB&VIT W. J. Cahill, Jr., being duly sworn, states that he is a Senior Vice President of Gulf States Utilities Company; that he is authorized on the part of said Company to sign and file with the Nuclear Rggulatory Coorsis sion the documents attached heretos and that all such documents are true and carrect to the best of his knowledge, information and belief. / , W. Cahill, Jr. /[
l
.. Subscribed and sworn to before me, a Notary Public in and for the
! State and Parish above named, this M day of M a &7 ,19M.
- .
$AK d * ~ N ~an W. Middlebrooks L
i
totary Public in and for
'
West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana My Conunission is for Life.
i l i !
.. _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ . - . - - _ - - - - . - . - _ _ . - _
}}