ML20212L922: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, NRC TO UTILITY, OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project =  
| project = TAC:60779
| stage = Approval
| stage = Approval
}}
}}
Line 26: Line 26:
==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
EVALUATION OF RECIRCULATION PUMP ROOM DUE TO AN OIL FIRE AND THE PREVIOUS DIL COLLECTION SYSTEM EXEMPTION (TAC 60779)
EVALUATION OF RECIRCULATION PUMP ROOM DUE TO AN OIL FIRE AND THE PREVIOUS DIL COLLECTION SYSTEM EXEMPTION (TAC 60779)
Re: Big Rock Point Plant By letter dated July 1, 1986, Consumers Power Company provided a response to NRC concerns regarding a previously issued exemption to the 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, Section 111.0 requirement for an oil collection system to be installed on the reactor recirculation pumps. During subsequent review of the exemption by NRC staff members, while conducting an Appendix R audit, an error was identified in certain calculations for temperature rise for the recirculation pump room due to the ignition and burning of lubricat-ing oil from the recirculation pump.
Re: Big Rock Point Plant By {{letter dated|date=July 1, 1986|text=letter dated July 1, 1986}}, Consumers Power Company provided a response to NRC concerns regarding a previously issued exemption to the 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, Section 111.0 requirement for an oil collection system to be installed on the reactor recirculation pumps. During subsequent review of the exemption by NRC staff members, while conducting an Appendix R audit, an error was identified in certain calculations for temperature rise for the recirculation pump room due to the ignition and burning of lubricat-ing oil from the recirculation pump.
After a review of the information provided in the July 1,1986 letter, the NRC staff has found the conclusions reached in the original exemption for the oil collection system remain valid.
After a review of the information provided in the {{letter dated|date=July 1, 1986|text=July 1,1986 letter}}, the NRC staff has found the conclusions reached in the original exemption for the oil collection system remain valid.
A copy of the staff safety evaluation is enclosed.
A copy of the staff safety evaluation is enclosed.
If you should have any questions regarding this issue or the NRC staff findings, please contact your NRC staff Big Rock Point Proiect Manager.
If you should have any questions regarding this issue or the NRC staff findings, please contact your NRC staff Big Rock Point Proiect Manager.

Latest revision as of 07:13, 5 May 2021

Forwards Safety Evaluation Supporting Original Exemption to 10CFR50,App R Requirement Re Oil Collection Sys to Be Installed on Recirculation Pumps.After Error Identified, Review of 860701 Info Validated Conclusions
ML20212L922
Person / Time
Site: Big Rock Point File:Consumers Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/16/1987
From: Zwolinski J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Berry K
CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
Shared Package
ML20212L928 List:
References
TAC-60779, NUDOCS 8701290438
Download: ML20212L922 (2)


Text

,

9 January 16, 1987 Docket No. 50-155 Mr. Kenneth W. Berry Director, Nuclear Licensing Consumers Power Company 1945 West Parnall Road Jackson, Michigan 49201

Dear Mr. Berry:

SUBJECT:

EVALUATION OF RECIRCULATION PUMP ROOM DUE TO AN OIL FIRE AND THE PREVIOUS DIL COLLECTION SYSTEM EXEMPTION (TAC 60779)

Re: Big Rock Point Plant By letter dated July 1, 1986, Consumers Power Company provided a response to NRC concerns regarding a previously issued exemption to the 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, Section 111.0 requirement for an oil collection system to be installed on the reactor recirculation pumps. During subsequent review of the exemption by NRC staff members, while conducting an Appendix R audit, an error was identified in certain calculations for temperature rise for the recirculation pump room due to the ignition and burning of lubricat-ing oil from the recirculation pump.

After a review of the information provided in the July 1,1986 letter, the NRC staff has found the conclusions reached in the original exemption for the oil collection system remain valid.

A copy of the staff safety evaluation is enclosed.

If you should have any questions regarding this issue or the NRC staff findings, please contact your NRC staff Big Rock Point Proiect Manager.

Sincerely, Original signed by John A. Zwolinski, Director BWR Project Director #1 Division of BWR Licensing

Enclosure:

DISTRIBUTION:

Safety Evaluation v -Docket File y CJamerson CHinson JPartlow

'NRC PDP JStang OGC-BETH NThompson cc: See next page Local PDR TRotella RBernero ACRS (10)

BWD#1 Reading JZwolinski EJordan GHolahan OPA / BGrimes TBarnhart (4)

DBL:BWD#1 DB : g#1 DBL:RWD#

1 DBL:Bd#1 CHinson CJamerson JS a :ac TRotell JZwolinski 5

i/i/M i s f] i /ts/ \ /4/81 8701290438 870116

~

DR ADOCK 05000155 PDR

Pr. Kenneth W. Perry Consumers Power Company Big Rock Point Plant CC:

Mr. Thomas A. McNish, Secretary Consumers Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 -

Judd L. Bacon, Esquire Consuners Power Company 212 West Michigan Avenue Jackson, Michigan 49201 Big Rock Point Plant ATTN: Mr. David P. Hoffman Plant Superintendent 10269 U.S. 31 North Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Mr. Bud Heeres County Commissioner 303 Sheridan Charlevoix, Michigan 49720 Office of the Governor Room 1 - Capitol Building Lansing, Michigan 48913 Regional Mministrator Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region III 799 Roosevelt eload Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Nuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section Office Division of Radiological Health P. O. Box 30035 Lansing, Michigan 48909 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Resident Inspector Office Big Rock Point Plant 10253 U.S. 31 North Charlevoix, Michigan 49720