IR 05000327/1986042: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 15:28, 17 December 2021

Advises That Based on Listed Addl Discussions & info,870406 Response Denying Violation Noted in Insp Repts 50-327/86-42 & 50-328/86-42 Valid.Example 2 of Subj Violation Withdrawn. Util Statement Re Solenoid Qualification Data Clarified
ML20236B007
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 07/22/1987
From: Zech G
NRC OFFICE OF SPECIAL PROJECTS
To: White S
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
References
NUDOCS 8707280301
Download: ML20236B007 (2)


Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

i-s'

'

j .

)

~

V JUL 2 2 U37 Tennessee Valley Authority MTTN: Mr. S. A. White Manager of Nuclear Power 6N 38A Lookout P' ace 1101 Market Street Chattanooga, TN 37402-2801 Gentlemen:

SUBJEC INSPECTION REDORT NOS. 50-327/86-42 AND 50-328/86-42 l

We have completed our evaluation of your April 6, 1987 response tc our February 26, 1987 letter concerning Violation 50-327,328/86-42-01 (Example 2). It has been. concluded that your reason for cenial is valid based on the following additional discussions and information:

1) The information presented in your April 6, 1987 respons ) Information obtained during the NRC inspection in April 1987 (87-22).

3) Discussions with ASCO concerning the subject valv ) Discussions with Franklin Research Center concerning ASCO solenoid valve Accordingly, we are withdrawing Example 2 of the subject violatio We do, however, wish to clarify a statement made on page 2 of the enclosure to your April 6,1987 response. In paragraph 2 of Item 1, TVA makes the statement that the ASCO NP8316 solenoid qualification maintenance data sheets (QMDSs)

and to 'que values for the valve bonnet-body screws were reviewed as part of the NRC EQ maintenance inspection conducted Deceiaber 8-12, 1987. This is incorrect, in that the NRC inspectors did not look at any ASCO qualification binders, QMDds, or valve bonnet-body screw torque values duri.ng the inspectio The only solenoid valve data reviewed during the inspection were for non-ASCO valve While this has no bearing on the above conclusion, it siauld be clarified for the recor We appreciate your cooperation in this matte

Sincerely, OfflGINAL SIGNED By q GARY G. ZECH Gary G. Zech, Assistant Director, Inspection Programs D' vision of TVA Projects Office of Special Projects cc: (See page 2)

"

8707POO301 870722 PDR ADOCK 05000327 G PDR ND

' ML_

_ _ _

.

'

JUL 2 21987

!

,

Tennessee Valley Authority 2 i

cc: LH. L. Abercrombie, Site Director Sequoyah Nuclear Plant IK A. Kirkebo, Director,

' Nuclear Engineering 14. L. Gridley, Director Nuclear Safety and Licensing d4 R. Harding, Site Licensing Manager bec: Of G. Keppler, OSP i 1&. D. Ebneter, OSP LR A. Iwolinski, OSP LB. D. Liaw, OSP L& D. Richardson, OSP 01A t.Sc R. Connelly,/RII K. P..Barr, 0$P (NRC Resident Inspector NRC Document Control Desk State of Tennessee

)

RII 5" R 20S I /bSP ad .sah

>

ucLFMc oy h

'arr 7Q//87 7//7/8'7 7/(lb7

,

- _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .