ML061510245: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML061510245 | | number = ML061510245 | ||
| issue date = 04/13/2006 | | issue date = 04/13/2006 | ||
| title = | | title = Email: Request to Add to Database | ||
| author name = Ashley D | | author name = Ashley D | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA | | author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA | ||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened | No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened | ||
FD. Ashley - Flaw Evaluationlfa relevant indication is.wpd Page 1 1414 D.Ashley Flaw Evaluationif a relevant indication is.wpd | FD. Ashley - Flaw Evaluationlfa relevant indication is.wpd Page 1 1414 D.Ashley Flaw Evaluationif a relevant indication is.wpd Page Flaw Evaluation If a relevant indication is discovered during a Section XI ISI inspection, and the flaw is dispositioned by analysis, a TLAA will be conducted to determine if the flaw will exceed the acceptance criteria during the life of the component. | ||
Page Flaw Evaluation If a relevant indication is discovered during a Section XI ISI inspection, and the flaw is dispositioned by analysis, a TLAA will be conducted to determine if the flaw will exceed the acceptance criteria during the life of the component. | |||
If the flaw exceeds the acceptance criteria, and the decision is made to embed the flaw using a weld overlay, the embedded flaw, it results in the creation of a new TLAA. | If the flaw exceeds the acceptance criteria, and the decision is made to embed the flaw using a weld overlay, the embedded flaw, it results in the creation of a new TLAA. | ||
Has Oyster Creek dispositioned any relevant indications by analysis and has Oyster Creek conducted a TLAA for the relevant Indication? | Has Oyster Creek dispositioned any relevant indications by analysis and has Oyster Creek conducted a TLAA for the relevant Indication? | ||
Has Oyster Creek used a weld overlay to embed any relevant Indications and have they conducted a TLAA for this situation?}} | Has Oyster Creek used a weld overlay to embed any relevant Indications and have they conducted a TLAA for this situation?}} |
Latest revision as of 05:22, 14 March 2020
ML061510245 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Oyster Creek |
Issue date: | 04/13/2006 |
From: | Ashley D NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA |
To: | Hufnagel J Exelon Corp |
References | |
%dam200606, TAC MC7624 | |
Download: ML061510245 (3) | |
Text
[D -page Page 1~
I D.Ashley - request to add to database.
From: D. Ashley To: John Hufnagel Date: 04/13/2006 3:32:04 PM
Subject:
request to add to database.
John, George-Attached are the subject questions from the Audit Team Leader.
He requests that you add to the Q&A Database and include in your next update for ADAMS addition.
regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301-415-3191 djal @nrc.gov
Ec:\tEmp\G}0 .TMP Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (443EA734.9DF: 9: 10848)
Subject:
request to add to database.
Creation Date: 04/13/2006 3:32:04 PM From: D. Ashley Created By: DJA1 @nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time exeloncorp.com Transferred 13 April, 2006 3:32:33 PM john.hufnagel (John Hufnagel)
Post Office Delivered Route exeloncorp.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1204 13 April, 2006 3:32:04 PM Flaw EvaluationIf a relevant indication is.wpd 6152 13 April, 2006 2:56:22 PM D. Ashley.vcf 232 13 April, 2006 3:32:07 PM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened
FD. Ashley - Flaw Evaluationlfa relevant indication is.wpd Page 1 1414 D.Ashley Flaw Evaluationif a relevant indication is.wpd Page Flaw Evaluation If a relevant indication is discovered during a Section XI ISI inspection, and the flaw is dispositioned by analysis, a TLAA will be conducted to determine if the flaw will exceed the acceptance criteria during the life of the component.
If the flaw exceeds the acceptance criteria, and the decision is made to embed the flaw using a weld overlay, the embedded flaw, it results in the creation of a new TLAA.
Has Oyster Creek dispositioned any relevant indications by analysis and has Oyster Creek conducted a TLAA for the relevant Indication?
Has Oyster Creek used a weld overlay to embed any relevant Indications and have they conducted a TLAA for this situation?