ML061510245: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML061510245
| number = ML061510245
| issue date = 04/13/2006
| issue date = 04/13/2006
| title = 2006/04/13-Email: Request to Add to Database
| title = Email: Request to Add to Database
| author name = Ashley D
| author name = Ashley D
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA
| author affiliation = NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:[ D-page I D. Ashley -request to add to database.
{{#Wiki_filter:[D                                                                                                             -page Page 1~
Page 1 ~From: D. Ashley To: John Hufnagel Date: 04/13/2006 3:32:04 PM  
I D.Ashley - request to add to database.
From:             D. Ashley To:               John Hufnagel Date:             04/13/2006 3:32:04 PM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
request to add to database.John, George-Attached are the subject questions from the Audit Team Leader.He requests that you add to the Q&A Database and include in your next update for ADAMS addition.regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301-415-3191 djal @nrc.gov Ec:\tEmp\G}0 .TMP Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (443EA734.9DF:
request to add to database.
9: 10848)
John, George-Attached are the subject questions from the Audit Team Leader.
He requests that you add to the Q&A Database and include in your next update for ADAMS addition.
regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301-415-3191 djal @nrc.gov
 
Ec:\tEmp\G}0     .TMP                                                                               Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties       (443EA734.9DF: 9: 10848)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Creation Date: From: Created By: request to add to database.04/13/2006 3:32:04 PM D. Ashley DJA1 @nrc.gov Recipients exeloncorp.com 3:32:33 PM john.hufnagel (John Hufnagel)Action Transferred Date & Time 13 April, 2006 Post Office Delivered Route exeloncorp.com Files Size MESSAGE 1204 Flaw EvaluationIf a relevant indication is.wpd 2:56:22 PM D. Ashley.vcf 232 Date & Time 13 April, 2006 3:32:04 PM 6152 13 April, 2006 13 April, 2006 3:32:07 PM Options Auto Delete: Expiration Date: Notify Recipients:
request to add to database.
Priority: Reply Requested:
Creation Date:          04/13/2006 3:32:04 PM From:                    D. Ashley Created By:              DJA1 @nrc.gov Recipients                                           Action                Date & Time exeloncorp.com                                       Transferred          13 April, 2006 3:32:33 PM john.hufnagel (John Hufnagel)
Return Notification:
Post Office                                         Delivered             Route exeloncorp.com Files                             Size               Date & Time MESSAGE                           1204               13 April, 2006 3:32:04 PM Flaw EvaluationIf a relevant indication is.wpd       6152                13 April, 2006 2:56:22 PM D. Ashley.vcf                     232               13 April, 2006 3:32:07 PM Options Auto Delete:                       No Expiration Date:                   None Notify Recipients:                 Yes Priority:                         Standard Reply Requested:                 No Return Notification:             None Concealed  
Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Security: To Be Delivered:
No Security:                         Standard To Be Delivered:                 Immediate Status Tracking:                 Delivered & Opened
Status Tracking: No None Yes Standard No None No Standard Immediate Delivered  
 
& Opened FD. Ashley -Flaw Evaluationlfa relevant indication is.wpd Page 14 D. Ashley -Flaw Evaluationif a relevant indication is.wpd Page 1 14 Flaw Evaluation If a relevant indication is discovered during a Section XI ISI inspection, and the flaw is dispositioned by analysis, a TLAA will be conducted to determine if the flaw will exceed the acceptance criteria during the life of the component.
FD. Ashley - Flaw Evaluationlfa relevant indication is.wpd                                                           Page 1 1414 D.Ashley Flaw Evaluationif a relevant indication is.wpd Page Flaw Evaluation If a relevant indication is discovered during a Section XI ISI inspection, and the flaw is dispositioned by analysis, a TLAA will be conducted to determine if the flaw will exceed the acceptance criteria during the life of the component.
If the flaw exceeds the acceptance criteria, and the decision is made to embed the flaw using a weld overlay, the embedded flaw, it results in the creation of a new TLAA.Has Oyster Creek dispositioned any relevant indications by analysis and has Oyster Creek conducted a TLAA for the relevant Indication?
If the flaw exceeds the acceptance criteria, and the decision is made to embed the flaw using a weld overlay, the embedded flaw, it results in the creation of a new TLAA.
Has Oyster Creek dispositioned any relevant indications by analysis and has Oyster Creek conducted a TLAA for the relevant Indication?
Has Oyster Creek used a weld overlay to embed any relevant Indications and have they conducted a TLAA for this situation?}}
Has Oyster Creek used a weld overlay to embed any relevant Indications and have they conducted a TLAA for this situation?}}

Latest revision as of 05:22, 14 March 2020

Email: Request to Add to Database
ML061510245
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 04/13/2006
From: Ashley D
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRA
To: Hufnagel J
Exelon Corp
References
%dam200606, TAC MC7624
Download: ML061510245 (3)


Text

[D -page Page 1~

I D.Ashley - request to add to database.

From: D. Ashley To: John Hufnagel Date: 04/13/2006 3:32:04 PM

Subject:

request to add to database.

John, George-Attached are the subject questions from the Audit Team Leader.

He requests that you add to the Q&A Database and include in your next update for ADAMS addition.

regards, Donnie Ashley NRR/DLR/RLRA Oyster Creek License Renewal Project Manger 301-415-3191 djal @nrc.gov

Ec:\tEmp\G}0 .TMP Page 1 Mail Envelope Properties (443EA734.9DF: 9: 10848)

Subject:

request to add to database.

Creation Date: 04/13/2006 3:32:04 PM From: D. Ashley Created By: DJA1 @nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time exeloncorp.com Transferred 13 April, 2006 3:32:33 PM john.hufnagel (John Hufnagel)

Post Office Delivered Route exeloncorp.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1204 13 April, 2006 3:32:04 PM Flaw EvaluationIf a relevant indication is.wpd 6152 13 April, 2006 2:56:22 PM D. Ashley.vcf 232 13 April, 2006 3:32:07 PM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened

FD. Ashley - Flaw Evaluationlfa relevant indication is.wpd Page 1 1414 D.Ashley Flaw Evaluationif a relevant indication is.wpd Page Flaw Evaluation If a relevant indication is discovered during a Section XI ISI inspection, and the flaw is dispositioned by analysis, a TLAA will be conducted to determine if the flaw will exceed the acceptance criteria during the life of the component.

If the flaw exceeds the acceptance criteria, and the decision is made to embed the flaw using a weld overlay, the embedded flaw, it results in the creation of a new TLAA.

Has Oyster Creek dispositioned any relevant indications by analysis and has Oyster Creek conducted a TLAA for the relevant Indication?

Has Oyster Creek used a weld overlay to embed any relevant Indications and have they conducted a TLAA for this situation?