ML20128M185

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards FEMA Final Rept for 850227 Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise.Assistance to State of La & Tensas Parish in Resolving Improvement Items Encouraged.Items Should Be Resolved Prior to Next full-scale Exercise
ML20128M185
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/14/1985
From: Brownlee V
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: Richard J
MISSISSIPPI POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8507110600
Download: ML20128M185 (2)
v • d • e


Text

'

i d ,

'30%1? M Mississippi Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. J. B. Richard O Senior Vice President, Nuclear P. O. Box 23054 Jackson, MS 39205 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

FEMA FINAL REPORT GRAND GULF NUCLEAR STATION EMERGENCY EXERCISE OF FEBRUARY 27, 1985 Please find enclosea for your information, a copy of the FEMA Final Report for the Grand Gulf Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise of February 27, 1985.

Your attention is directed toward the suggested areas for improvement identified

~

by FEMA.

We encourage you to assist the State of Louisiana and Tensas Parish in resolving the improvement items identified by FEMA. Resolution of these items should be completed prior to the next full scale exercise.

We also encourage you to work closely with the above cited State and parish in development of the scenario for the next full scale exercise to effectively test those areas in which improvement items were identified.

Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.

Sincerely, i

o Virgil L. Brownlee, Chief Reactor' Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosure:

FEMA Final Report cc w/ enc 1:

J. E. Cross, General Manager ,

R. T. Lally, Manager of Quality

. Middle South Services, Inc.

R. B. McGehee, Esquire Wise, Carter, Child, Steen and Caraway P

(ce's cont'd. on page 2) 8507110600 850614 PDR ADOCK 05000416 i\

p PDR

.5E 3 5~~

Mississippi Power and Light Company 2 (cc'scontinued)

N. S. Reynolds, Esquire Bistop, Liberman, Cook, Purcell

& Reyrolds R. W. Jackson, Project Engineer bec w/ enc 1:

NRC Resident Inspector '

Document Control Desk State of Mississippi i

RII RII RII RII RII RdI#

g ACunningham M Cline e j% & Collins \

JSgohr 4 RCarroll V nciera 6//o/85 6//3/85 6//G/85 6/ '/85 6/fl/85 6/J2/85

4 K Federal Emergency Management Agency 1 Washington, D.C. 20472 MAY l 41985 MEMORANDUM FOR: Edward L. Jordan Director Division of Energency Preparedness and Engineering Response Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission FROM:

Assistant Associate Director Natural and Technological Hazards Programs

SUBJECT:

Exercise Report for the February 27, 1985, Exercise of Offsite Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Plans for the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station -y[

Attached are two copies of the Exercise Report for the February 27, 1985, partial-participation exercise of the offsite REP plans for the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. The exercise report dated April 30, 1985, was prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency Region VI staff. The State of Louisiana voluntarily participated on a limited scale at the Grand Gulf exercise to support Tensas Parish. The State of Louisiana demonstrated its offsite radiological emergency preparedness capabilities at the full-participation joint exercise conducted at the River Bend Nuclear Genera-ting Station on January 16, 1985. The River Bend exercise report was transmitted to you by memorandum dated May 7, 1985.

As a result of the Grand Gulf exercise on February 27, 1985, there were no Category A deficiencies identified. Therefore, the capabilities demonstrated by the State of Louisiana are found to be adequate to protect the health and safety of the public in the vicinity of the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Robert S. Wilkerson, Chief, Technological Hazards Division, at 646-2861.

Attachments as Stated 4 85051

\ 55 850514 I b' ' b P,DR K 0500 g 6

^

. 45% c.' 'c.X' bh;y e>a A 6,2
:.1..', .T'"lsl,eQ ,r

- w: u.;

n -.-W.. Q :.M.%  : e. , .y . .. .. , r

.:r...4,;3-

~. 4 . , m

.kw.5 4 ,. C ,  : ,

r'q' Af. C :t f n,Ty 4e ',3 L

jn. -

... .!f-Y kR.

]

Yh' '*D

$$e.fh?

A ,.,.~*. .9:.y.5 tj

..- p z. g. ' "' . 7

,3

, e;

.,.i .:.j>.

p:- . ,,

...~:g:: A.d , %q-t " ,. , .g *

'n 4 c , i

. jsf , .% , 1

,. .m ,

, :,>4e.p,.4 W@.  ;

(C A

.M a  :

vidQ  :.. p' s. y;5 ,E,a? -;+h. . W:' . :~ :.:.YZr v

f m. -

2-1,% g '& , - .f.. ,fV,,,. t n-

,,u D i ;dp . y : , ,$ ~

.?.h hh'yy i5  ; . hi ;.a hS@C.*M*' * *  : L': -

5 f~N.hk..::[ff,r. < .,. ' t,

~,,

m'yL:},f[:"{?m .tw'.*4,?'gl%(5ln.%y..yg{y.yf h, 6'y:.yj

[;.yl5g,(jji.}n;pf . .. ,: GQ y 5% .-i . . . s '

_%. z. )

yT ,

3

'b

' - i g' ,

19,Q. _, y .@c , .Jr k: l 9 !W .nt i
  • "^

, Am?. n A , .

- / .-yg. q~. y[;;t-[ er.m"

,e Mhsru ,6.x.(5w g[)?T'J 'W' : ; {'l,V l'V: ^' . 5g t Nh.*.

^. .I'); hs wes:9 [V.2)W  ; ,

b,[.LU

c. 7 Ye i[X .: , * , a .y.t biJ.? .3 . '

. v. .a v . .

h'g ;hhYI/E

.; eg.:.g h.p. ,,@'hhb ' .b

-, n, h

Nh,:r# ,

hh,;.. Wd,'A" % ';YM&?(O.;& $ l ' b d. , Sk *%d, '-h

2

'S;Q" h fl.g(lt,Kh:,gIdiL

& ENESdENdNRA,hIREDNEihl EXEIt[. P,dRE SIN, b .i.ib% '*

f ~

j. ' . Agg gd
l. . .e - ,' 4,'

, p - ', -

s' . . ,' ,g,2' C W'+ ,,t Mp;... , ,. ..,-

, -[, . .tnd

. Nuclear Power Plant: Grand Gulf Nuclear Station,, ,'..  ; . :y.

jd T 6,.

' . . 'l

~

- j.

Applicant: Mississippi Power and Light Company I'., ' '.

.. .y s; . . , .

l - I,,, Location of plant: State of Mississippi -

Port,Gibson, Mississippi
Date of Report: April 30,1985

. ,c .

s s~_'*

&Date of Exe.rc.ise:

.. - , . s; February 27, 1985 m&i-....y Qal (p-

, P artic,vT,b"

.ntsr $ tate . . of*fLobisiana

.,~s,a?.' (small, scale)

Tensas Parish (small scale)

}

, p .x +

y Federal Emergency Management Agency '

'W Region VI i* Federal Center .

9

,' v . O

. , *. A . vbN. . , N , .ra 805 N L. oop 288 . . .

- J . .~% Denton;&,nexas 76201

- e. ,. . . . .,.a.

. %ne e,.4. ,

.'. 'f'.;7' '. -

~

i ."' 4 k h$456 h

'50

5. N c'.g. g;&,

4

,f DR ADOCK 05000416 1

S MN'.' '

<fk fi.hr'N'ifj? 'f ei ;?ff r .nW hid.. h '"3/ d 3).Dh)f.y,O' '

J't..

y,i, -l,'s.lff p,'J ,

. w A PDR

<K . qG__ ,y.; . -'

@'r".T

_.?j;(: . ,

';[%

~ -;W ^ ,J K'.,?

'A

~~

.> M) ,' . ,, l.1

CONTENTS A B B R E VI ATI O N S . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv EX E R C ISE SU M M A R Y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v State of Louisiana Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi Local Govern ment Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vi 1 I NT RO D U C TIO N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I 1.1 Exercise Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 Fede ral Ev al ua t o rs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3 Exercise Obj ec tives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.4 Exercise Sce nario Su m m ary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.5 Ev aluatio n C rit eria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2 E X E R C ISE EV A LU ATIO N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.1 Louisiana State Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.2 Local EOCs and Support Organizations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.2.1 Te nsas P ar is h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.2.2 Te nsas P ar is h EO C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.2.3 Ferriday Reception Center . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3 DEFICIENCY TRACKING AND SCHEDULE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ...... 18 4 EVA LU ATIO N O F O BJ E CTIV ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4.1 Summary of FEM A Objectives Remaining to be Met . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 4 4.2 Objectives Met or Yet to Be Achieved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 TABLES 1 Summary of FEMA Objectives Remaining to be Met . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 2 Objectives Met or Yet to be Achieved - Grand Gulf . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23

- = _ . . . _ . . _ . . _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ - . _

ABBREVIATIONS ANL - Argonne National Laboratory DOE - Department of Energy DOT - Department of Transportation EOC - Emergency Operations Center EOF - Emergency Operations Facility EPA - Environmental Protection Agency FEMA- Federal Emergency Management Agency GGNS- Grand Gulf Nuclear Station HHS - Health and Human Services LNED- Loulslana Nuclear Energy Division LOEP- Loulslana Office of Emergency Preparedness LP&L- Loulslana Power and Light Company MP&Ir Mississippi Power and Light Company NRC - Nuclear Regulatory Commission USDA- United States Department of Agriculture i

iv l

l - - - - - - - . . - - - - . . .. ._

EXERCISE

SUMMARY

The Grand Gulf Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise held on February )

\

27, 1985, was the fourth exercise testing the response capabilities of off-site l

organizations. Previous exercises were held on November 4,1981, and January 26,1983, and April 11, 1984. This year's exercise was a small-scale exercise only. The Federal

! Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) evaluated the off-site response capabilities in each of these exercises. A full-scale testing of State capabilities was demonstrated in the River Bend exercise held on January 16, 1985. The State of Louisiana voluntarily participated on the limited scale in the Grand Gulf exercise to support the Tensas Parish respcase effort.

The Grand Gulf Nuclear Station is located on the Mississippi side of the j Mississippi River. Portions of the 10-mile EPZ extend into Tensas Parish, Louisiana, for which Region VI has evaluation responsibilities for off-site response capabilities. Tensas Parish has also assumed responsibility for the evacuation of a small portion of Madison i

Parish which enters into the 10-mile EPZ. There are no permanent residents in this area, however. Occupants would be limited to hunters and fishermen in the area.

On February 28, 1985, three post-exercise meetings were held: A post-exercise meeting at 9:00 a.m. with the six member Federal Evaluation team to develop a preliminary evaluation; a 1:00 p.m. evaluation meeting with Tensas Parish officials in the Educational Media Center, St. Joseph Louisiana; and a 3:00 p.m. general critique of the exercise at the same location with representatives of Mississippi Power and Light Company, Federal, State and local officials, the general public and the press.

This document provides narratives, areas for improvement and recommendations for each jurisdiction and field activity tested. Each area for improvement with corresponding recommendation is described by jurisdiction in Sec. 2 of this report.

Section 3 provides a summary listing of "A" deficiencies that would lead to a j

negative finding and "B" deficiencies, including those requiring priority attention. There v

were no Category "A" or Category "B" deficiencies found during this fourth exercise.

The summary is in tabular format and provides space for State and local jurisdiction response. Identified areas for improvement are discussed in more detail in the Narrative Section of this report.

Section 4 of the the report contains in tabular format an " Objectives Met or Yet to be Achieved" compilation. This is based upon FEMA objectives developed from NUREG-0654, IL The following summarizes the February 27, 1985, small-scale exercise performances of Tensas Parish and support organizations.

STATE OF LOUISLANA OPERATIONS i

State of Loulslana participated in the Grand Gulf exercise on a limited scale only to support the response efforts of Tensas Parish, Louisiana. Their participation included dose assessment activities for benefit of the exercise only. They were not objectives of the State and therefore, although they are summarized in Sec. 2, no evaluation has been 1 included. FEMA Region VI latest evaluation of the State of Loulslana's present response

- capabilities may be found in the River Bend report for the River Bend Exercise held on January 16, 1985.

LOCAL GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS Tensas Parish is the only Parish located in Louisiana which is within the 10-mile l EPZ with exception of a small area of Madison Parish for which Tensas Parish has agreed i

to provide emergency response measures. The State, through coordination with Tensas Parish, prepared exercise objectives to correlate with the scenario developed by l

Mississippi Power and Light for the Grand Gulf Exercise. However, since the scenario did not call for the plume to enter the Louisiana area of EPZ, the parish deviated from the plan with an "!njected situation" in which the plume extended into Sector M on the si q, - - , -n-. --, - - ., - --

I*ouisiana side. Their response activities to this situation are discussed in detail in the narrative.

As substuntiated by the following narrative and evaluation, the Tensas Parish officials attain very effectively demonstrated the capability to respond to a nuclear incident.

vii

1 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 EXERCISE BACKGROUND On December 7, 1979, the President directed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to assume lead role responsibility for all off-site nuclear power facility planning and response.

FEMA's immediate basic responsibilities in Fixed Nuclear Facility Radiological Emergency Response Planning include:

e Taking the lead in off-site emergency response planning and in the review and evaluation of State and local government emergency plans insuring that the plans meet the Federal criteria set forth in NUREG-0654 FEMA REP-1, Rev.1 (November 1980).

e Determining whether the State and local emergency response plans can be implemented on the basis of observation and evaluation of an exercise conducted by the appropriate emergency response jurisdictions.

e Coordinating the activities of volunteer organizations and other involved Federal agencies. Representatives of these agencies listed below serve as members of the Regional Assistance Committee (RAC), which is chaired by FEMA.

- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)

- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS)

- U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) j - U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) l l

t

2 1.2 FEDERAL EVALUATORS Six federal evaluators participated in this fourth-year exercise which evaluated the response capabilities of Tensas Parish. These individuals, their agencies, and evaluation locations are listed below:

Evaluator Agency Location Al Lookabaugh FEMA Overall Coordinator Communications-Tensas Parish EOC (St. Joseph)

Gary Jones FEMA Reception Center (Ferriday)

Maryetta FEMA Tensas Parish EOC Cunningham (St. Joseph)

Tom Goertz HHS Tensas Parish EOC (St. Joseph)

Gary Kaszynski ANL Reception Ceater (Ferriday)

Jim Opelka ANL Dose Assessment (LNED)

(St. Joseph) 1.3 EXERCISE OBJECTIVES ,

The exercise objectives for Grand Gulf were limited, in Louisiana, to a small-scale exercise of the Tensas Parish off-site emergency response plans for coping with a radiological emergency incident at the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. The objectives were developed through joint discussion between Mississippi Power and Light Company (MP&L); the Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV (NRC); the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region VI (FEMA); the Louisiana Nuclear Energy Division (LNED);

Louisiana Office of Emergency Preparedness (LOEP); and Tensas Parish Officials.

3 e

Exercise objectives for Mississippi Power and Light Company, Grand Gulf Nuclear Station and Mississippi State / Local organizations come under the jurisdictional reporting of FEMA Region IV, Atlanta.

Louisiana State / Local Objectives Actions to be tested:

1. Notification of State and local response personnel and support authorities.
2. Activate Tensas Parish EOC and partially activate Tensas Parish Media Center; State support as necessary to support Tensas Parish (Media Center deleted during pre-exercise State / Federal meeting).
3. Test coordination of emergency press releases with Louisiana Office of Emergency Preparedness.
4. Test primary and backup communications systems.
5. Test reception center at Ferriday (Note: Tensas Parish will depart from Mississippi scenario and test other actions).

Additional Objectives for GGNS Exercise 2/27/85 l

(distributed at State / Federal Pre-Exercise Meeting 2/26/85)

6. Test decision-making ability; test capability to coordinate response.

l l

7. Demonstrate adequacy of facilities and displays to support emergency operations.
8. Demonstrate ability to continuously monitor and control j emergency worker-exposure.
9. Demonstrate adequacy of facilities for mass care of evacuees.

4

10. Demonstrate adequate equipment and procedures for decon-tamination of emergency workers, equipment, and vehicles.
11. Demonstrate ability to monitor emergency classification levels continuously and implement procedures in a timely manner.
12. Demonstrate capability to effectively process all incoming messages in a timely manner.

1.4 EXERCISE SCENARIO

SUMMARY

The plant is at 98% power near the end of the second 18-month cycle. A combination of forced outages in other Middle South Utilities, Inc. plants has put the entire grid at 5% undervoltage. A severe thunderstorm watch is in effect in Warren, Clairborne and Adams counties. New fuel is being moved and channeled in the Auxiliary Building fuel pool in preparation for the upcoming outage. Spent fuel channels are being recycled. Drywell floor drain leakage is at 4 GPM and has been slowly increasing since startup from a forced outage (2 weeks ago) to repair a leaking CRD flange gasket.

A spent fuel bundle is dropped and damaged, causing high area radiation, high ventilation radiation and increasing readings on the CAM. An Alert is declared. Some time later (while recovery from the fuel handling accident is still underway) lightning strikes the switchyard and ESF Transformer 12, causing a loss of all off-site power. A j scram transient occurs, causing the leak on the CRD flange to increase to 60 GPM. The electrical transient causes a " flash fire" in Division 11 switchgear; Division I and II power are restored.

Core cooling is being maintained by RCIC and/or HPCS when failures of these, including a break in the RCIC steamline, result in Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) water level and drywell pressure reaching the Site Area Emergency levels. LPCS Pump trips on j instantaneous overcurrent when it is started, so there is no injection system capable of injecting water into the RPV.

l l

i 5

The core is uncovered and fuel failure results. The RCIC Steam Line break is not isolable for about 30 minutes and ultra-high noble gas and lodine activity is released to the Auxiliary Building. SGTS efficiency has been reduced to the point that General Emergency levels of activity are released to the environs. A General Emergency is de-clared and Protective Action Recommendations are made for evacuation out to 2 miles and sheltering out to 5 miles.

The RCIC Steam Line is isolated and RHR A is recovered to provide core reflood. Dose rates at the site boundary decrease, allowing the emergency to be de-escalated to Site Area Emergency and subsequently to the Alert level.

Premise The following scenario of events hypothesized at Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (GGNS) includes postulated failures which could conceivably cause fuel failure. The scenario is not entirely realistic, nor all inclusive in allowing credit for engineered safeguard systems or human actions. The sequence of events provides a partial basis for a sequence of resulting radiological parameters on which to base an all-inclusive emergency planning exercise, but does not necessarily represent a possible sequence in a real incident.

Assumptions and Inputs The assumptions and inputs which are germane to the development of the l

radiological results follow:

l e MP&L's off-site dose calculation procedures were used to determine l

the magnitude of the release required to cause the selected off-site dose. This activity was assumed to come entirely from the RCIC steam line until RCIC isolates. At that point, the activity comes from the Enclosure Building.

6 e Design basis dats in the Grand Gulf FSAR (Section 15.6.4.5) were used throughout, thereby assuming by inference an equilibrium core condition and design basis specific activity in steam and reactor coolant. The exception to this is flow rates. The flow rates used are as follows:

Flow from the Auxiliary Building is 2800 cfm. Flow from the Fuel Handling Building is 300 cfm. Flow from the Enclosure Building is 15,800 cfm. Recirculation flow to Enclosure Building is 14,900 cfm.

Flow from SGT3 to atmosphere is 4,000 cfm.

e Projected off-site doses were calculated as a function of distance from the plant, time after release, and meteorology.

e Dose rates in and around the Auxiliary Building were estimated as a function of time after the hypothetical release into the Auxiliary Building. in these e'stimates, other fission products released with the iodines were considered.

e Deposition of airborne fission and activation products and stratification of the heavier noble gases may be ignored.

e There is no infiltration from the Auxiliary Building into the Control Room /TSC habitability envelope, e The operators are assumed to comply with the Emergency Procedures and, as such, would not depressurize the RPV until the level drops to Top of Reactor Fuel.

e ESF 12 transformer is lined up to Bus 16.

e Twenty-five percent of the radioiodines from fuel inventory are assumed to be released into the Auxiliary Building.

7 Discontinuities The following identified discontinuities depart in some respect from the expected. Only those discontinuities associated with development of the radiological consequences of the scenario are included. Discontinuities associated with the plant design and operational performance are not included.

e The operator will not be allowed to depressurize the RPV before 1115.

e Only radiolodines and noble gases are considered in analyzing off-site dose consequences. This is consistent with the FSAR analysis.

However, if s!! the radiolodines in the water released during the RCIC steam line break become airborne, other fission and activation products also in the water would likewise become airborne. This source is considered in-plant but not offsite.

e Restoration of SRV accumulator pressure via nitrogen bottles may actually be hampered by the extremely high airborne activity in the Auxiliary Building, but it is assumed that the SRV accumulators are restored in time to permit Steam Cooling / Emergency RPV Depressurization as specified in the scenario (approximately 1145).

e Following RCIC line isolation, releases continue from the Enclosure Building and dissipate to Alert levels in i hour 45 minutes. Actual i dissipation time to these levels would be somewhat longer.

e The radioactive airborne concentration released from the Auxiliary Building through SGTS remains constant until RCIC isolation.

l However, actual effluent releases would increase due to recirculating fans causing airborne saturation in the Enclosure Building.

i l

i

8 TIMETABLE FOR EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATIONS 0900 ALERT - Fuel handling accident occurs.

1110 SITE AREA EMERGENCY - RPV level reaches - 160 inches.

1245 GENERAL EMERGENCY - Fuel failure results in effluent radiation levels at the General Emergency Level.

1445 SITE AREA EMERGENCY - Dose rates at the site boundary have decreased. Plant conditions have improved.

1530 ALERT - Dose rates at the site boundary have decreased.

1600 Exercise terminates.

SEQUENCE OF EVENTS Clock Time 0800 Initial conditions given to shift personnel.

e No action is necessary at this time.

0855 Fuel handling SRO observes that an unchanneled spent fuel bundle was dropped and bubbles are seen flowing up from the bundle.

e Refuel floor of the Auxiliary Building is evacuated.

0856 High Alarm on fuel handling area radiation monitor RAH-LO24 sounds; increasing levels on the ARM recorder. GM monitor in fuel handling area reads 15 mR/hr.

o Operators respond to alarm.

0858 Control Room is advised of the incident.

e Operators initiate ONEP's 05-1-02-11-9 and 05-1-02-11-8.

e Operators consult 10-S-01-1.

e Shift Superintendent is advised by Fuel Handling SRO of events that have taken place.

4

-- m

9 e CAM is reported to be at the alarm point.

o H.P. dispatched to sample for Airborne Activity in 208 ft. el.

e Shift Superintendent has on-shift communicators make notifications.

e Control Room actions are logged.

1.5 EVALUATION CRITERIA The Grand Gulf exercise evaluations which follow in Sec. 2 are based on applicable planning standards and evaluation criteria of Section II, NUREG-0654-1, Revision 1 (November 1980). Region VI evaluated the exercise using the modular format.

Each jurisdiction or off-site activity evaluated is discussed by narrative and listing of deficiencies and areas for improvement with accompanying recommendations.

Deficiencies are presented in two categories. Category "A" deficiencies cause a finding that the off-site preparedness was not adequate to provide reasonable assurance that appropriate protective measures can and will be taken to protect the health and safety of the public living in the vicinity of the site in the event of a radiological emergency. At least one deficiency in this category would necessitate a negative finding. Category "B"

!!sts all other-deficiencies in this category in which the demonstrated performance during the exercise was considered faulty' or needing corrective action. Even with the presence of these deficiencies, other factors indicate that reasonable assurance could be given that in the event of a real radiological emergency, appropriate measures can and will be taken to protect the health and safety of the public. Deficiencies in this category should be relatively easy to correct in comparison to Category "A" deficiencies. A finding of adequate could include several deficiencies in Category "B". There were no Categorv "A" ce "B" deficiencies determined during this exercise.

Areas for improvement are also listed as appropriate for each jurisdiction or off-site activate. They are not deficiencies but suggestions for improved performance.

10 2 EXERCISE EVALUATION On the basis of general criteria set forth in NUREG-0654/ FEMA-Rep-1/Rev.1 (November,1980), an evaluation has been performed of the February 27,1985 exercise of the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. This eaaluation, including areas for improvement and recommendations, is presented herein. FEMA Region VI will maintain close liaison with the State and local governments in determining the corrective action (including time frame) needed to resolve each area for improvement in accordance with established criteria and guidelines.

2.1 LOUISIANA STATE OPERATIONS The State of Louisiana participated in the Grand Gulf exercise on a limited scale for the purpose of supporting the exercise efforts of Tensas Parish and its participating primary response organizations. The only specific State objectives demonstrated and evaluated related Jo notification of State response personnel and testing of primary and backup communication systems. Capabilities in these activities were successfully demonstrated. They performed dose assessment during this exercise only for the purpose of supporting the efforts of Tensas Parish. A Federal evaluator was assigned to the State's mobile office in Tensas Parish and he observed the dose assessment activities.

Ifowever, because it was not a State objective, evaluation of their dose assessment activities will not be a part of this report. The capability of the state to adequately implement its emergency response plans was evaluated during the River Bend annual emergency response exercise on January 16, 1985. Reference should be made to that report for a detailed discussion of State response capabilities.

r 11 2.2 LOCAL EOCs AND SUPPORT ORGANIZATIONS 2.2.1 Tensas Parish Narrative Tensas Parish, Louisiana, lies within the 10-mile EPZ of the Grand Gulf Nuclear Station. The EOC is located in the Parish Courthouse, St. Joseph. The town of St.

Joseph itself is located 12 miles from the plant. However, the Parish does have a mobile EOC which is being equipped for relocation should such become necessary in a real emer-gency.

Tensas Parish has agreed to assume the notification and evacuation responsibilities for the area of Madison Parish which lies within the EPZ. No permanent 4

residents live in this area but transient population could be present during an emergency since the area is a designated hunting and fishing area. The sirens can be heard and the fish camps have been briefed in emergency response procedures.

2.2.2 Tensas Parish EOC The EOC received a call at 9:20 a.m. from the utility on the dedicated line stating that an Alert had been declared at 9:07 a.m. In response to this, activation procedures were initiated. A checklist was used of all responsibilities at the Alert level. Security was requested for the EOC at 9:20 a.m. and at 9:23 a.m. the Civil Defense Director was told this had been accomplished.

All " Alert" related duties were completed by 9:50 a.m. Security was maintained throughout the day. 0-200 range dosimeters were " zeroed" and distributed at the beginning of the exercise. Readings were not needed since no plume was involved. A survey meter was used to monitor radiation within the EOC. Initial staffing consisted of the Civil Defense Director, the assistant coordinator, and members of the Police Jury.

~

L2 Later, representatives from LOEP, State Police, the Health Department and Council on Aging arrived to complete the EOC staffing. A 24-hour call-up system is in place, and persons not required to report to the EOC were placed on standby.

As in previous exercises evaluated, the EOC was capably managed. Leadership by the Civil Defense Director was apparent and effectively exhibited throughout the exercise.

The EOC, although limited in size, was adequately furnished with sufficient equipment and space for each representative. Back-up power is available should there be a primary power source failure. Maps were posted showing location of sirens, evacuation sectors and population (by sectors). Also, a status board was placed where visible by all staff, and it was systematically used and updated as information was received. The failure to use the status board had been identified during the 1984 exercise as an area for improvement. A Parish plan was not visible but was available in the EOC if needed.

However, it was never necessary to request its use as all staff are thoroughly familiar with their responsibilities and duties.

Because of limited activities, formal briefings were not necessary. However, all staff were aware of decisions required and were involved in decision making relating to their particular areas.

Communication systems at the EOC consist of dedicated landline with police radio and commercial telephone as backups to the following: State EOC, other local EOCs, reception centers, neighboring states and utility. Conferencing on the dedicated landline can tie together LNED, LOEP, utility, Mississippi OEP, highway patrol, Clairborne County Mississippi Civil Defense, Port Gibson Mississippi police and Tensas EOC and sheriff's office. Omnifax is also available.

The communication center is located in a separate building adjacent to the EOC. Messages over the dedicated line are received and recorded, then hand carried to EOC to be logged in and posted on the chart in EOC. Overall communication is very

13 good. All messages were authenticated, which corrected the deficiency no. I listed in the 1984 exercise report.

The following two areas for improvement identified in the 1984 exercise report had been addressed and corrected either prior to or during this exercise.

(1) The communications operator was familiar with the full range of capabilities of communication.

(2) Also, a log was maintained of all messages incoming / outgoing from the EOC.

At the beginning of the exercise the Director announced they would be giving special attention to areas of deficiency or needed improvem nt cited during last year's exercise. Each situation was addressed and problems corrected during this exercise.

A 1985 survey has been made of residents within Tensas Parish to update information. The procedures used and information obtained were explained. The return

) response has been triple the response rate in past years. Most comments have been i

excellent and positive.

Also, the Civil Defense Director has initiated and obtained updated Letters of Agreement required from necessary response organizations. Copies of these were provided the evaluators for updating the FEMA copy of the Parish Plan.

It was explained that during the day Tensas Parish would leave the scheduled scenario so they could test their planned evacuation of the complete town of St. Joseph and activation of the reception center at Ferriday. At 10:00 a.m. these variations were initiated. The plume was plotted as being within Sector M. A " General Emergency" was simulated. The call to activate Ferriday Reception Center was placed at 10:00 a.m.

An official order by the Mayor to evacuate the town of St. Joseph was received and logged. Recording in city records was simulated. The school superintencent was contacted for approval to evacuate the schools. The revised scenario called for schools to be evacuated 15 minutes before the general public. The Parish had earlier this year l

14 demonstrated the actual evacuation of approximately 400 school children; at which time they were loaded on buses and driven around the parking lot. That activity was personally monitored by the Civil Defense Director who reported that private school students were evacuated in seven minutes and the two public schools within fourteen minutes.

During the exercise calls were placed to the PBS, Radio KNOE FM, and Channel 8 TV to simulate the Alert. A call to TV Code No. 452 was simulated to block out Cable TV and issue an evacuation notice. Stren and tone alerts were simulated by 10:30. It would be expected to take approximately forty-five minutes from evacuation to arrival at Ferriday Reception Center.

School buses in Tensas Parish are first used for evacuation. However, if drivers and buses are not immediately available, the Parish has an agreement with Madison Parish for buses. Buses in Tensas Parish are individually owned by bus drivers, but all school buses in Madison Parish are owned by the Parish.

At 10:35 a.m. the Health Department and Council on Aging (who earlier had been placed on standby) were requested to report to the EOC. They quickly arrived and began their procedures to evacuate the mobility-impaired. They simulated requesting the Parish to order from Madison Parish two wheel chair vans and three regular vens.

Franklin Parish was placed on standby for providing additional vans if needed.

In summary, all activities of the Tensas Parish staff were in accordance with Parish plans. All past deficiencies and areas for improvement were corrected. The staff capably demonstrated the knowledge and actions necessary to fulfill their emergency response roles during a real event. There were no deficiencies or areas for improvement during this exercise.

DEFICIENCIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS Category "A" - None Category "B" - None

15 AREAS FOR IMPROYEMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS None.

2.2.3 Ferriday Reception Center Narrative The Ferriday reception centee is located at the Ferriday High School gymnasium. The Ferriday Fire Chief was the City Civil Defense Director in charge of P

the reception center. He was called by the Concordia Parish Civil Defense Director at 9:55 a.m. requesting that the reception center be placed on standby status. Another call was received at 10:00 a.m. from the Tensas Parish Civil Defense Director requesting that the reception center be activated. Immediately following that call, various volunteer organizations, local hospital, sheriff, EMS (ambulance present), fire department, etc.,

were contacted to respond to the emergency at the reception center. By 10:30 a.m. the center was fully staffed and ready to receive evacuees. Acceptable levels of staffing were available to meet the needs of the evacuees who were to be registered, monitored and decontaminated if necessary. Students from the high school were utilized as the evacuees for this exercise.

Adequate equipment was available for use in monitoring the evacuees. There j were three CDV-715s, four CDV-700s, and two CDV-720s, as well as a sufficient number j of 0-200R dosimeters and chargers. All emergency workers wore protection clothing and demonstrated adequate training and knowledge concerning their duties and responsibilities. However, in future exercises or a real event, it would be beneficial for the monitors to receive a briefing (prior to arrival of evacuees) on the procedures to be used.

Direction and management of the reception center were capably administrated by the City Civil Defense Director. His volunteer staff enthusiastically demonstrated and expressed concern for the effective receipt and monitoring of the evacuees.

16 9

Evacuees were screened initially for contamination outside the gymnasium. They were then rechecked inside before being processed. Those found to be contaminated were separated and sent around to the outside of the reception center to a rear door which accessed the showers. Individuals with contamination on only their clothing were not separated from individuals contaminated and requiring showers. Individual decontamination in the showers was described and for the most part was acceptable; procedures on disposal of shower washwater were not clear. Changing of paper was simulated after each person was tested; and, the placing of contaminated clothing in bags was also simulated. Following a simulated shower, the person was again monitored. If no contamination was detected, he proceeded to the appropriate registration desk within the reception center.

Communication capabilities consisted of two telephone lines, portable walkie-talkies, and a back-up fire radio. Effective communications were demonstrated between the reception center, Concordia and Tensas Parishes.

All objectives assigned to the reception center were met during the exercise.

DEFICIENCIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS Category "A" Deficiencies - None Category "B" Deficiencies - None AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT AND RECOMMENDATION e

Description:

Initially, monitoring personnel stationed outside the entrance of the gymnasium did not follow standard monitoring procedures on evacuees.

e Recommendation: Prior to arrival of evacuees, provide monitoring personnel with a review of procedures. Suggest that a team leader be selected and given the responsibility for reviewing the procedures with the monitors.

17 ,

e

Description:

Individuals contaminated on their clothing only were not separated from individuals bodily contaminated and requiring showers. Procedures were unclear on disposal of shower wastewater.

e Recommendation: Separate individuals contaminated on their clothing only from those requiring showers. Provide a forum for review of procedures for disposal of shower wastewater; discussion sessions should include representatives of the reception center and State officials.

e

Description:

Suitable drainage at the reception center was not available for water used for washing down vehicles, e Recommendation: Locate vehicle washdown area where suitable drainage or storage of washwater is available. Alternatively, securely quarantine vehicles and if necessary decontaminate at a later time with additional assistance from the State.

l

18 3 DEFICIENCY TRACKING AND SCHEDULE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS Section 2 of this exercise report has provided a listing of areas for improvement with recommendations noted by federal evaluators during the Grand Gulf Exercise conducted February 27, 1985. The evaluations were based on the applicable planning standards and evaluation criteria set forth in Section II of NUREG-0654-FEMA-1, Rev.1 (November,1980) and exercise objective. There were no !dentified Category "A" or "B" deficiencies cited by the evaluators. All 1984 defielencies were satisfactorily corrected during this exercise. Therefore, no " Deficiency Tracking Schedule" is required for this report.

l l

19 4 EVALUATION OF OBJECTIVES 4.1

SUMMARY

OF FEMA OBJECTIVES REMAINING TO BE MET Table 1 on the following pages provides a listing of those FEMA objectives which, according to the FEMA RAC Chairman, have not been satisfactorily met or tested and which should be incorporated into the exercise objectives on or by the fifth year of the five-year period in which all the objectives should be tested. These should be considered in the development of future exercise objectives; as well as those FEMA objectives which, although previously tested and satisfactorily demonstrated, must be tested and evaluated during any exercise of offsite State and Local response capabilities. -

1 W"

, 20 TABLE 1 Summary of FEMA Objectives Remaining to Be Mdt Grand Gulf Nuclear Station As of February 27,1985 -

FEMA Objective Jurisdiction

! /

9 -.. Demonstrste apptenelate equipment and pro- State / Local (not tested) cedures for collection, transport, analysis of samples of soil, vegetation, snow, water, and milk. (I.8)

> 11. Demonstrate ability to project dosage to the State (not tested) public via ingestion pathway exposure, based on-field data, and to determine appropriate protective measures based on PACS and other relevant factors. (I.10,I.11,J.11)

12. Demonstrate ability to implement protective State / Local (not tested)

< actions for ingestion pathway hazards.

(J.0,J.11)

18. Demonstrate organizational ability and re- Local (not tested) sources necessary to effect an orderly evacuation of mobility impaired individuals within the plume EPZ. (J.10.d)
21. Demonstrate ability to make the decision State (not tested)

, based on predetermined criteria, whether to issue KI to emergency workers and/or the general population. (J.10.f.)

. 22. Demonstrate ability to supply and administer State (not tested)

KI, once the decision has been made to do so. (J.10.e.)

'2'3 .' Demonstrate ability to effect an orderly State / Local (not tested)

~

evacuation of on-site personnel. (J.2.)

24 Demonstrate abili:y to brief the media in a' State (11-4-81 Deficiency) clear, accurate and. timely manner. (C.3.a., Local (1983 Deficiency)

C.4.a.)

26. Demonstrate ability'to establish and operate Local (1983 Deficiency) rumor control in a coordinated fashion.
32. Demonstrate ability to identify need for, State (not tested) request, and obtain Federal assistance.

(C.L.a..b.)

1 e , , -r ,.. -. ,,,:- = - - - - - n - a, -

--r -- ,-- -e e -,- ,-- ,-, ,- ,r-..-e- p - -, n - ~ - - -- -m

21 .

TABLE 1 (Cont'd)

FEMA Objective Jurisdiction

33. Demonstrate ability to estimate totsi State (not tested) population exposure. (M.4.)
34. Demonstrace ability to determine and imple- (State / Local (re-entry ment appropriate measures for controlled not tested) recovery and re-entry. (M.I.)

1 f

22 4.2 OBJECTIVES MET OR YET TO BE ACHIEVED Table 2 on the following pages provides a comprehensive summary of FEMA objectives, NUREG-0654 reference elements,1985 exercise objectives, jurisdictional responsibility, exercise dates, deficiencies noted during past exercises, and dates on which objectives were met.

I 1

o .

TAbt.E 2 Ote jec t i ve m 80st or Vet to be Achieved -- Ctand Cull Page I on 11 Jurisdictional Deficiency Responsibility Noted Date Object ive Met NUM EC-0654 Esercise Objective Date of (by Deficiency)

F LMA Ob ject ives ksterence February 27, 1985 State Local Esercise Tracking No.) State Loc al

l. Demos.st rate abilit y t o mobilize E.1, E.2 Notification of State and X X 2/27/85 1984 Deficiency 4/II/84 4/11/84 Local response personnel Tenses Parish 2/27/85 2/27/85 etall and act ivate f acilities (S&L) psomptly. and support authorities 50C (Also 1984 objective) ----- ------

lpb ject ive sur which capability st. ovid be demonstrated during Activate Tensas Parish 1 2/27/85 4/II/84 4/11/84 BOCl State support as 2/27/85 cacs. esercieel pecessary to support I

Tensas Parish (Also 1984 objective)

X 1/26/83 1/26/83

2. pcmonst rate ability to f ully A.2.a. A.4 X 4/11/84 4/11/84 [j stall lacilities and maintain (S&L) stalling around tiew clock.

penunst rate abilit y t o maba A.I.d. e X X 1/26/83 1/26/83 A.

A.2.a 4/11/84 decisions ased to coordinate ------------- ---- ---- ---- - -------- ----- ------

cmessency activities. (S&L) 2/27/85 Test decision-making X

. lObicctives for which capa- abilityi test capability bilia y shuuld be denunstrated to coordinate response.

during eacts esercieel P

TAmt.E 2 ( Cunt 'd ) Page 2 of II Jurisdictional Deficiency temponsibility Noted Dat e Ob ject i ve Net NUMEG-OLS4 Esercios Objective Date ut (by Deliciency)

Fe br ua ry 27, 1985 State Local Esercine Tracking mu.) State Local FLMA bbiett ives k ul e r es.t e X X Deficiencias 1/26/83 4/11/84

4. utmunstrate adequacy ul Racili- C.).a. H.2 t aen and displays to support it. J  !!/3/81i (S&L) 1/26/83 emergency operat ions. ..... .... ..... ......... ...... ......

Demonstrate adequacy of X 2/27/85 2/27/85 lObiuttivum for uhich tapa-bilit y al.uuld be demuust rat ed f acilities and displays during each usercisel to support emergency operaticas.

I Deficiency b unst rate abilit y t o tummuni- F I cas e with all appropriate (S&L)  !!/4/81 na S'

lutations, organizations, and 1/26/83 1/26/53 4/11/84 l ivid per ous.nel . Tallulah Rcpt.

Center lOb jett i ven t ur uhich capa- ------------- ----- ---- ----- --- ----- ------ ------

bilia y shuuld be demus st rated 2/27/85 2/27/8$

dus ing each esercieel Test primary and backup I I 2/27/85 communicattions systems (Alau 1984 objective) 1.8 1 X 11/4/81

b. utmus.mt rate ability su mobiliae 1/26/81 1/26/81 and deploy field muniturisag (S&L) teams is t ism:t y lashion.

lOb3ctLiven tur uhicla caps-belit y bl.ould be denunst rated durisg eatle esercimej P

i

9 las!.g 2 ( Cont 'd )

Page 3 ut !!

Jurisdictional De ficiency Responsibility Muted Date Object ive Met NukEG-06h4 Esercise Objective Date el (by Deliciency)

Reference Fe brua ry 27, 1935 State Local Esercise Trackin8 Nu.) State Local FEMA Ob jec t ives X 11/4/81 1/26/83

1. Demos. trate appropriate equip- I.S. 1.18 X 4/11/84 ment and procedures lur (1.8-S&L) determining ambient radiation (I.ll-S)

Icwels.

lOb ject ives lor uhich caps-bilit y mieuuld be demusentrat ed during satte esercisej N

o. Demonst rate appropriate equip- 1.9 X X  !!/4/81 (n (S&L) I/26/83 stat and procedures Ier measurement of airburne radiu-iud ne concentrations as luu as 10~ pCi/tt in the premente ut siebte Esses.

l Ot. iet t i vea f or ut itle tapa-bilit y steuuld be denunnt rated

  • dus isig eacle usercinel 1 Mot
9. Demuunt rate appropriate equip- 1.5 Te st ed mese t and procedures f or collec- (S&B.)

tion, transport, analysis ut samples ut soil, vegetation, muuu, unter and milk.

lOb jett iven t ur utiitle capa-bil it y al.uald be demusent rat ed dus is g entle enestinel

r - . _ . _ . - - . .

TAh8.E 2 ( Cunt 'd )

Page 4 of II Jurisdictional De ficiency Responsibility Noted Date Object ive Net NUMEC-06S4 Esercise Objective Date of (by Deficiency)

FLMA object iven Nelerence February 27, 1985 St at e Local Esercise Tracking No.) State Loc al

10. Demonst rate ability to project 1.10, J.10 X 11/4/81 Junage to the public via plume l1.10-S) 1/26/83 capunure, based on plant and l J .10-S& L) lield data, and to determine appropriate protective measures bened on FAG's, available me. citer, evacuation time est imates and all other appropriate facture.

lOb jec t i ven lor whicle capa- b3 bilit y should be denunstrated U during each usercisel

14. Isemunnt rate ability to pruject 1.10, 3.11 X Wut
dosage to ties public via inges- J.!! Tested t ion pat hway ca pumure, bened on (S) liefd detal and to determine ag. prog.riate protective memnures based on FAC's and ot her relevant lactors.
12. Ocaunst rate ability to imple- J.9, J.!! X X Not Not ment protective actions lur (J.9-S&L) Tested T==ted it. gent ion pat hway hasards. (J.!!-5) l

. .[

TAhl.E 2 (Cunt 'd )

Page S ut i1 Jurisdictional Deliciency kesponsibility lioted Det e Object ive &t NUMEC-06)4 Esercise Objective Date of (by Deliciency)

Ft.ptA Otaject ives hetsrence Fe brua ry 27, 1985 State Local Emercise Tracking lio.) State Loc al l Is. Rumo.. trate ability tu atest E.6, Append. 3 x x  !!/4/81 1/26/83 1/26/83 t i.e put,lic wi thin the 10-mile (S&L) Deticiency kPZ as.d dimmenisiete an isait ial isist ructional message uit t.iss !$

mie.utes.

lt&jectives for which s.apa-I bilit y should be demuruttat ed durisig eetle esercieel N

..- N

14. Ih munnt rat e at,ili t y t u turmu- E.S. E.7 X X 11/4/81 1/26181 I/26/81 lat e mud Jint ribute appsupriate (S&L) Def icienc y i sis t r uc t i usen t o i t.e pub.. su a timety a m als i on.
14. sarm.,unt rat e organisat ius.al J.9, J.10.a.g X 11/4/81 4/11/84 al ili t y asul remuurces soccemmary (S&L) Deficiency t o nias. age es orderl y awacu.st ion et all or part ut the plume E PZ .

lOlsjectiven tur utaich capa-belit y thuuld be demusist rat ed during each esercisej

.. _ _ _ ~ - --

e- 28 me

=e =e m m en 3 S a e3 e y  %

, ==

3 g =*

8 4

44

.e 3 **

W w N 4 W eiw

%  %% 2 .e y 8"

-e

=e

> .O4 a ..

w e e W

a. .#A 8

as me e e Q es et m

heaum w

  • h C O w e3 C 9 ==

8 0 .w n e

w3m. C

+= 3 U4 ee Q w y 4 2 h to A>

w G

ws e Q **

w W to me 3 en 2M

-e > m e M M e .as u M M C.=.

3 4

.m em 3

.e a w=

e e 9 C ee O.% .G.e te e e 3 4 me "I e .

M W

eD tM g s@

W **

.G

=e a 4m CN eh to

..ae g u 3 to n.

sa mU M lha M

e

  • .O.

em 9 A. ***. 1 d u *g *g

  • g eg O E O .e O .e O .e "'t .e M

/ $ ",o M "e M "o M *~

d. - ,- ,-

58 35 "9

I h h hC h=

te nn I to 3 g 3 ns 1 .=3

  • a aw aw 4.=.

a.

9 a 1 a 1 N.

3 a 1 W a

U .3 e w me U > me U 3 9 34 m 3 3 5

-ea 3 4 w 3 C 3 1 a J=

2 4 eM 4 d w 3 3 M 3 3 8 -e to G'4 3 3e 3 ==.

a 3 .3 3e 3= a .3 = 2e e

.=

3 a g a>3y= 3

=o

..Je a

3 y

> m y 3 .m2 G .e

.1.

g aeaa ea3 e a h e

.e 4 ww 4 w == 3 e aW h=a.e m

J .se inw .= ==

q ww .m to to to to 3 .m

= 3 U to to

= 3 3 .=3 3 3 ,3 .=e4.s ..C.

..s, e3 5. .C

.m .= e 3 a. e e a s 4 e

( J Q 3au nm .G.= a e 3e 3 to uW t W t.

J .g.e .C.e s.

n &a3to r 3 he 3 to u 3 km 3 to ==

    • 4 J e .toe e C am 0 4 2 3 UM 37 e 1 E ha Je =
3. =3 = = to e a me * .M= =3 e h e = w 3 a

8 3. ee33 3 e e3 4 e e ea.=. .m 3 g e .s =

J 3 4 as to e to t.

a a

.he h- .=J- a. .h .uo _g is to d .s ea e m = = e. .h .3.

=me

  • . . 3 3J e ..h

= 3.e = g 1 -==e aa e a

2 d *3 {. === =3 a 3 3m= m 1 gJ wg 3 g.== m.

M i g

WJ 3 > 3 -.a= s sJ a e .3e e-3 3-=

3J J==

2 e es aD ' 2 em 7 .

! sJ . 3M 3W Je l

  • 3 ea a 3 .* I

' M } l 1 e

e e r- -3 . . e i ,

g ** a 9 4  !

l Pe 4 4- n == = =

i I

i

  • e 1 Atl.E 2 ( Cuat 'd )

PaSe 7 ul II Jurisdictional Deficiency kesponsibility Noted Date Gbject ive Met NUREC-0654 Esercise Objective Date el (by Deficiency)

FLMA ob ject ives Reference February 27, 1985 state Lucal Esercise Tracking No.) State Loc al tu, bemunmarate ability tu tuse- K.3.a,b I 1 1/26/83 Part iall y Partially tinuously munitor and control (S&L) Deficiency met met emergency worker espumare. 1/26/83 1/26/83 lubjectives lor which caps- Demonstrate ability to X 2/27/8) 2/27/83 bilit y should be denunstrated continuously monitor and during each esercieel control emergency worker esposure.

to

24. Demunnt rat e abi li t y t o make t he J.10.1 I Mut wo decision, based un predeter- (S&L) Tested min =J criteria, whether to immus Ki to emergency workers asedfor the general pugnalation.
22. Demonstrate ability tu supply J.40.e X Not as.d admini s t e r E t , once t he (S&L) Tested du. inion has been made tu du ou.

1

24. Demonstrate ability to ellett J.2 I Nut see orderl y ev.tuat ion ut unmite (56L) Tented per munnel .
44. Dem. nat rat e abilit y t o briel C.3.a. X X 11/4/81 Pa rt iall y Partially t he media in a clear, accurate C.4.a De t ic ienc y met set and imety sens.er. (S&L) 1/26/83 Def ic ienc y I

Page 8 of Il TAtt.g 2 (Cont'd)

_- Deficiency Juri sdict i onal Date Obiestive Net Responsibility Not ed Date of (by Deficiency)

MUkEC-0654 Esercise Objective Tracking No.) State Local February 27, 1985 State Local Esercise FLMA Ob ject ives Reference

- - _ - - . _ 11/4/81 Partially I met Ikmunst rate ability to provide C.4.b Deficiency

24. ------ ----- -

(S&L) - -- --- - -

advance coordination el inf or- ----- -- - -- --

2/27/85 nation released. X X 2/27/85 Test coordination of emergency press releases ,

with Louisiana Of fice of Emergency Preparedness (Also 1984 objective)

._. 1/26/83 Not met [j X

Demonst rate ability to C.4.c Deficiency

26. (S&L) est ablish and operate rumur cuntrol in a coordinated lashion.

__.  !!/4/81 1/26/83 X

J.12 Deficiency 4/11/84

27. bemonst rate adequacy of pro- -------- - --- - - ----

cedures tur registration and (S&L) - -- -- --

2/27/85 radiological munitoring of . Test Reception Center at X 2/27/85 evatuces. Ferriday (Note: Tensas Parish will depart from

lub ject ives tur which caps- Mississippi scenario and bilit y shuuld be denunst rated test other actions) during each esercisel 11/4/81 (Tallulah)

Demonst rate adequacy of J.10.h I/26/83

28. (S&L) f acilities f or mesa care of (Winnsboro) evacuees. ...--.. .-- --

Demonstrate adequacy of 2/21/85 X 2/27/85 (Ferriday) facilities for mass care of evacuees

-w l

l i

1

TAtl E 2 ( Cont 'd )

Page 9 of !!

Juriedictianal Deficiency Re sponsi bi l i t y Noted Date Object ive Met IIUREC-0654 Esercise Objective Date of (by Deficiency)

FtMA Objectives Reference February 27, 1985 State Local Esercise Tracking afo.) State Local

19. Demonstrate adequate equipment E.S.a,b E 1/26/83 4/11/84 and pros;edures f or decontamina- (S&L) Deficiency (Tensas tion of emergency workers, Parish equipment and vehicles. Hospital) l Object ives f or which capa- Demonstrate adequate X 2/27/85 2/27/85 bilit y should be denunstrated equipment and procedures Ferriday during each esercisel for decontamination of Ileception emergency workera, equip- Center ment, and vehicles.

w e-*

10 . th monst rate adequacy el Efts L.4 X I/26/83 transportation, personnel and (S&L) psucedures for handling con-taminated individuals including proper decontamination of vehicle and equipment.

l Object ives f or which capa-bilit y should be denunstrated during each esercisel ,

II . Demonstrate adequacy of L.1 X 1/26/03 4/11/84 hospital facilities and pro- (S&L) Deliciency (Tensas cedures for handling con- Pariah Mem.

taminsted individuals.

Hospital) l Objectives f or which capa-bilit y should be denunstrated during each esercisel b

I 4

Tams.E 2 (Cont 'd ) Page 10 of 11 Juri sdic tional Deficiency Responsibility Noted Dat e object ive Net NUNEC-0654 Esercise Objective Date of (by Deficiency)

Ft.M4 Objectives heterence February 27, 1985 8 tate Local Esercise Trackin8 No.) State Local Demonst rate ability to identif y C.I.a,b I Not

$1.

s eed lor, request , and obtain (5) Tested Fedesal assistance.

Demus st rate ability t o estimate M.4 X Not 85.

tot al populat ion es pusure. (S) Tested 34 . Ocmonst rat e abi li t y t o det e r- M.I I 11/4/81 mice and implement appropriate (S&L) Partially gj Tested measures f or cont rolled re-

  • covery and reentry.

(no reentry)

Demoe.st ra t e al.e abili t y t o C.4 I I 11/4/81 1/26/81 si .

ellectively call upon and (S&L) utilise out side support agesicies uhen local capa-bilities are esceeded.

bemonst rate t he adequacy, oper- F.I X X 4/11/84 11/41/81 11/4/88 6.

ability and eflective use el (S&L) Def iciency 1/26/83 1/26/83 escr8ency cummunication equip- (Tallulah ment and the adequacy el com- Rece pt .

munications procedures and Ct r.

met hods . (corrected 2/27/85) l Objectives f or whicle capa-bilit y should be denunst rated Test primary and back-up X X 2/27/85 2/27/85 2/27/85 durin8 each esercisel communications systems (Also 1984 objective)

TAtl.E 2 (Cont 'd) p.g 3g og 33 Juri sdic ti onal Deficit .,

Respon si bili t y Wot ed Date Objective Net j NUMEC-8654 Eserci se Objective Date of (by Deficiency)

! FEMA object ives Reference February 27, 1985 State Local Esercise Tracking No.) State Local

17. I acost rate ability to munitur D.4 X X 1/26/03 1/26/83 Emergency Classif ication levels (S&L) -------------- --- ---- -----

continuously and implement pro- Demonstrate ability to X 2/27/85 2/27/85 cedures in a timely eenner. monitor emergency classi-lication levels continu-l' lubject ives lur which capa- ously and implement pro-bilit y shu.sid be denunst rat ed ceJures in a timely during each esercisej . manner.

J 18 . Demonst rate capabilit y to E Demonstrata capability to X 2/27/85 LJ l ellettively process all (S&L) ef fectively process all incoming messages in a timely incoming messages in a musene r . timely manner.

J

$9. prmonst rate t hat authority A.2.a,A.3 X 1/26/83 esist s in att ivat ing a recep- (S&L) (Winnsburu) 1 t ion cent er (as necessary) in a 4/11/84

  • t imel y manner. (Tallulah)

Itsbiectives f or which capa- Test reception center at X 2/27/85 2/27/85 Ferriday. (Ferriday) bility should be denunstrated during each esercieel

]

i 1

I 1

k i

4 I . .

>

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20128M185&oldid=2893143"