ML20244C807

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:08, 22 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards ACRS Repts Re Dresden Units 2 & 3 & Millstone Point Bwrs for Info & Guidance in Preparation of Technical Info in Support of Application for Provisional Ol.Special Consideration of Adequacy of ECCS for Util Suggested
ML20244C807
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/20/1966
From: Morris P
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To: Pratt M
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP.
Shared Package
ML17055E652 List:
References
FOIA-89-101, FOIA-89-114 NUDOCS 8904200426
Download: ML20244C807 (2)


Text

. . ~ - - _ . ~ a-- -

y,. 8 N $

L t -

y C 4

C 0 Y 1, I i

g.
  • W October 20,19k Y

Docket No. 50-220

'? f 9 /

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 300 Er'e 2oulevard West I 30* p l

Syracuse 2, New York {

t' '

yL Attention: Mr Minot H. Pratt Vice President and Chief Engineer f d

Gentlemen:

Since Rep'ila tory Staf f and ACRS review of the Nine Mile Point reactor applicatl n for a construction permit, the Commission has issued Construction Permits for the Dresden Unit 2, Millstone Point and Dresden.

0 Unit 3 boiling water reactors. The reports of the ACRS on these reactors indicate several of the major safety considerations that will need to be evaluated in depth during the forthcoming provisional operating license review for the Nine Mile Point reactor. Accordingly, copies of these letters are herewith transmitted to you for your information and guidance in the preparation of the technical information in support of an application for a provisional operating license.

Although it would be desirable to have the topics outlined in these letters discussed in detail in the Final Safety and A:alysis Report, we recognize that printing and filing schedules miphe preclude this. In any event, we j believe it appropriate that you now consider developing the scope of the i information on these topics that will eventually be required.

As a result of the recent Dresden Unit 3 review, significant changes in l

/ the design of the engineered safeguard systems for tnis facility were proposed. These changes involve increasing the effectiveness _and reli-ability of the emergency core cooling systens. The increased capability N

V and reliability results from providing a "Icw pressure, high capacity" (corefloodingsysteminadditiontoandasa" backup"tofheredund, m -< g ant ,y

/ core spray system. f 10 C3 O

. C29 D *

&~Q t

& m U

f V si NM

'\ , 75 _ h k

B904200426 890413 >

dbW Sd9NA - m

l '9k e

~ '

4;

.. .. +

October 20, 1966 1

.L Niagara Mohawk Power i Corporation .,.

11 Further, al"high pressure, low capacity" coolant injection system will j

be provided for inventory makeup in the event of small primary system' I ruptures in which the primary system would not depressurize rapidly.  ;

One of the two Emergency Condencers was deleted to permit this change j to be made. The " backup" system will be automatici d? pressurization of .{

the primary system. To further. increase overall station safety, pro- i visions will be included to supply service water to the main steam condenser in order to provide a continuous supply of makeup water for the feedwater system. In regard to emergency power for the engineered safeguard systems, the capacity of the emergency diesel generators will be increased over that originally proposed.

In recognition of the importance of emergency core cooling systems, as evidenced by the above, we believe you should give special consideration to the adequacy of such engineered safeguards for your reactor.

Sincerely yours, O

Petcr A. Morris, Director Division of Reactor Licensing

Enclosures:

As stated above cc: Mr. Arvin E. Upton LeBoeuf, Lamb & Leiby 1821 Jefferson Place, N. W.

Washingbon 6, D. C.

4 e

N' l C O P Y p.

,d

~

- ., . 1 _ _. _ _ _ _ ~