|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217L7971999-10-20020 October 1999 Submits Results of Review of 990521 & 0709 Ltrs Which Provided Core Shroud Insp Results & Tie Rod Stabilizer Assemblies ML20217G1291999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards Errata to Safety Evaluation for Amend 168 Issued to FOL DPR-63 on 990921.Description of Flow Control Trip Ref Cards to Be Consistent with Application for Amend ML20217K2831999-10-14014 October 1999 Submits Response to NRC Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Reactor Licensing Action Estimates, for Fiscal Yrs 2000 & 2001 ML20217H3211999-10-0808 October 1999 Forwards Changed Pages for Issue 5,rev 1 of Nine Mile Point Station Physical Security & Safeguards Contingency Plan,Iaw 10CFR50.54(p).Without Encls ML20212K8601999-10-0606 October 1999 Responds to Concern in 990405 Petition Re Residual Heat Removal Alternate Shutdown Cooling Modes of Operation at Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station,Unit 2 ML20216J9311999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 981119 Suppl RAI Re GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design-Basis Accident Conditions ML20212J4651999-09-30030 September 1999 Informs of Completion of mid-cyle PPR of Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station on 990916.Determined That Problems in Areas of Human Performance & Work Control Required Continued Mgt Attention.Historical Listing of Plant Issues Encl ML18040A3701999-09-30030 September 1999 Provides Changes to Application for Amend Re Volumes 1-11 of 981016 Submittal & Discard & Insertion Instructions Re Integration of Proposed Changes,In Response to NRC RAIs ML20212K8641999-09-30030 September 1999 Informs That During 990927 Telcon Between J Williams & J Bobka,Arrangements Were Made for Administration of Exams at Plant During Wk of Feb 14,2000.Preliminary RO & SRO License Applications Should Be Submitted 30 Days Prior Exam ML20212J8831999-09-30030 September 1999 Informs That Util 980810 & 990630 Responses to GL 98-01 & Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at NPPs Acceptable. NRC Considers Subj GL to Be Closed for Plant ML20212E9801999-09-23023 September 1999 Submits Info in Response to Request for Estimated Initial Operator Licensing Exam Needs,Per Administrative Ltr 99-03 ML20216F7101999-09-17017 September 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990806 RAI Re USI A-46,verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical & Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors.Nrc Is Informed That Actions Required for Resolution of USI A-46 Have Been Completed ML20212B2821999-09-14014 September 1999 Responds to 990712 Correspondence Which Responded to NRC Ltr Re High Failure Rate for Generic Fundamentals Exam of 990407 for Nine Mile Point.Considers Corrective Actions Taken to Be Acceptable ML20212D8981999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards ISI Summary Rept for Refueling Outage 15 & Flaw Indication Repts.Supporting Info Repts & Calculations, Encl ML20212B2581999-09-10010 September 1999 Requests That Name of Bm Bordenick Be Removed from Nine Mile Point,Units 1 & 2 Service List ML20211P5771999-09-10010 September 1999 Forwards Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-63 & NPF-69, to Transfer Licenses to Amergen Energy Co,Llc.Ts Pages & Proprietary Addendum,Included.Proprietary Encl Withheld ML20212A1341999-09-0707 September 1999 Forwards Summary Rept Secondary Containment Leakage Testing, Dtd June 1999 for Nine Mile Point,Unit 1,IAW TS 6.9.3.f ML20211K8141999-09-0101 September 1999 Forwards Reactor Containment Bldg Ilrt,Iaw Plant TS 6.9.3.e.Testing Confirmed That TS 3.3.3/4.3.3 & 6.16 Primary Containment Leakage Requirements Were Satisfactorily Met ML20211L9221999-09-0101 September 1999 Confirms That Licensee Will Retain Weld 32-WD-050 as IGSCC Category F Until Completion of Reinspection Program,In Response to NRC ML20211J6461999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990625 RAI Re NMPC Responses to GL 92-01,rev 1,supplement 1, Reactor Vessel Structural Integrity ML20211K3001999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards Semi-Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for 990101-990630 & Revised ODCM, for Nine Mile Point,Unit 1. Format Used for Effluent Data Is Outlined in App B of Regulatory Guide 1.21,rev 1 ML20211K5031999-08-30030 August 1999 Responds to Ltr Addressed to Chairman Dicus, Expressing Concerns Involving 990624 Automatic Reactor Shutdown.Insp Findings & Conclusions Will Be Documented in Insp Repts 50-220/99-06 & 50-410/99-06 by mid-Sept 1999 ML20211H1921999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards Application for Amend to License DPR-63,supporting Implementation of Noble Metal Chemical Addition by Raising Reactor Water Conductivity Limits in TSs 3.2.3.a,3.2.3.c.1 & 3.2.3.b ML20211P5161999-08-26026 August 1999 Discusses Submitted on Behalf of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp Written Comments Addressing 10CFR2.206 Petition & Request That Ltr & Attached Response Be Withheld from Public Disclosure.Request Denied ML20211G4921999-08-26026 August 1999 Advises That Info Re Comments Addressing 10CFR2.206,dtd 990405 Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,In Response to ML20211D7731999-08-20020 August 1999 Forwards Semiannual FFD Program Performance Data Rept Covering Period 990101 Through 990630 ML20211B9371999-08-18018 August 1999 Provides Addl Info Re Application of Method a at Nmp,Unit 1 as Described in Generic Implementation Procedure,Rev 2 (GIP-2),NRC Supplemental SER 2 & Documents Ref in GIP-2 Upon Which GIP-2 Is Based ML18040A3691999-08-16016 August 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990510 RAI Pertaining to NMP Application for Amend Re Conversion of NMPNS Unit 2 Current TS to Its.Nrc Requested Info Re Several Sections,Including Section 3.6, Containment Sys. ML20210Q0031999-08-11011 August 1999 Informs That Due to Printing Malfunction,Some Copies of Author Ltr Dtd 990726,may Not Have Included Second Page of Encl 2 of Ltr ML20210R6661999-08-10010 August 1999 Confirms Conversation on 990721 Re Concerns of Syracuse Anti-Nuclear Effort on Status of 2.206 Petition (Filed 990524) & Upcoming NRC Performance Review Meeting on Nine Mile Point Units 1 & 2 ML20210R8101999-08-10010 August 1999 Forwards 1998 Annual Repts for NMP & co-tenants,including Rg&E,Energy East Corp/Nyse&G,Chg&E & Long Island Power Authority,Per 10CFR50.71(b) ML20210L5321999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards List of Subjects Discussed During 990714 Telcon with Representatives of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp on Unit 1 Re USI A-46 Issue ML18041A0711999-07-30030 July 1999 Forwards Rev 1 to NMP2-ISI-006, Second Ten Year Interval ISI Program Plan for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Power Station Unit 2. Significant Changes from Rev 0 Listed ML20210J9351999-07-29029 July 1999 Informs That NMP Is Changing Completion Date for Replacement of Valves Having O Rings with Installed Life Greater than Eight Years.Replacement to Be Completed by 991031, During Hydrogen Monitoring Sys Maintenance Outage ML20216E1491999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Two Ltrs Received from NMPC Re Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Core Shroud Related to 10CFR2.206 ML20210E9151999-07-23023 July 1999 Discusses Evaluation of Recirculation Line Weld 32-WD-050 Indication Found During 1997 Refueling Outage (RFO14) at NMPNS Unit 1.Requests Notification of Decision to Retain Category F Classification Until Listed Conditions Satisfied ML20209G7911999-07-12012 July 1999 Provides Info Requested in NRC Re 990407 Generic Fundamentals Exam Failure Causes & Corrective Actions ML20209G3711999-07-12012 July 1999 Provides Final Root Cause Evaluation Re GL 94-03, Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of Core Shrouds in Bwrs, for Unit 1 ML20209G2001999-07-0909 July 1999 Forwards RFO-15 Core Shroud Insp Summary Rept, as Required by GL 94-03, Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of Core Shrouds in BWRs & BWRVIP Rept BWR Core Shroud Insp & Flaw Evaluation Guideline (BWRVIP-01) ML20209F8561999-07-0606 July 1999 Forwards Rev 1 to Nmp,Unit 1 COLR for Cycle 14. Rept Is Being Submitted to Commission in Compliance with TS 6.9.1.f.4 ML20211K5071999-07-0606 July 1999 Submits Concerns Re 990624 Event Involving Automatic Reactor Shutdown.More than 5 Failures Were Identified in Event Number 35857 ML20196J6421999-06-30030 June 1999 Discusses Completion of Licensing Action for GL 96-01, Testing of Safety-Related Logic Circuits, Issued on 960110 ML20209B7071999-06-30030 June 1999 Responds to NRC Request for Info Re Y2K Readiness at Nuclear Facilities,As Contained in GL 98-01,Supp 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Y2K Readiness Disclosure,Encl ML20211P5271999-06-29029 June 1999 Submits Written Comments Addressing Petition Dtd 990405, Submitted by R Norway as It Relates to Expressed Concerns That Involve NMPC Activities.None of Relief Requested in Petition Warranted ML20196K6461999-06-29029 June 1999 Discusses Ofc of Investigations Rept 1-98-33 Re Unqualified Senior Reactor Operator Assuming Position of Assistant Station Shift Supervisor at Unit 1 on 980616.One Violation Being Cited as Described in Encl NOV ML20209B3501999-06-25025 June 1999 Submits Torus Shell & Coupon Corrosion Rate Determination for Nmpns,Unit 1.Torus Meets ASME Code Requirements,Iaw NRC 920825 & 940811 SERs ML20212J4431999-06-25025 June 1999 Discusses Responses to RAI Re GL 92-01,rev 1,suppl 1, Reactor Vessel Structural Integrity ML20209B3531999-06-25025 June 1999 Informs NRC That All Actions Associated with NRC Bulletin 96-003, Potential Plugging of ECC Suction Strainers by Debris in Bwrs, Has Been Completed.Summary of Actions Completed & Other Pertinent Info Is Provided in Attachment ML20196F5721999-06-23023 June 1999 Forwards Rev 3 to NMP1-IST-003, Third Ten Year Inservice Testing Program Plan, Which Will Begin on 991226.Program Plan Conforms to Requirements of 1989 Edition of ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code.Three Relief Requests,Encl ML20196G1461999-06-23023 June 1999 Informs That Actions Requested in GL 96-01, Testing of Safety-Related Logic Circuits Completed 1999-09-07
[Table view] Category:NRC TO UTILITY
MONTHYEARML20062G7671990-11-21021 November 1990 Advises That Financial Info Submitted for 1990 Satisfies 10CFR140 Re Guarantee of Deferred Premiums ML20059F5351990-09-0606 September 1990 Advises That Request to Extend Date to Submit Response to Generic Ltr 89-10, Safety-Related Motor-Operated Valve Testing & Surveillance, Denied Due to Safety Significance of Issue IR 05000220/19900061990-07-31031 July 1990 Forwards Insp Repts 50-220/90-06 & 50-410/90-06 on 900531-0712 & Notice of Violation.Corrective Actions Did Not Identify Addl Blue mark-up Controlled Components Which Were Out of Position & Subsequently Discovered by Inspector ML20059M9301990-06-13013 June 1990 Forwards NRC Performance Indicators for First Quarter 1990. W/O Encl ML20248D3531989-09-25025 September 1989 Forwards Amend 18 to Indemnity Agreement B-36,reflecting Changes to 10CFR140,effective 890701 ML20247A0611989-05-0404 May 1989 Forwards SER Accepting Util Response to Generic Ltr 83-28, Item 4.5.2, Reactor Trip Sys Reliability,On-Line Testing. Technical Evaluation Rept Also Encl ML20195J1011988-11-29029 November 1988 Forwards Amend 102 to License DPR-63 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Revises Tech Spec 6.2 to Make Table 6.2-1 Consistent W/Requirements of 10CFR50.54(m)(2)(i) & 6.2.2.e to Clarify Staffing Required During Hot Shutdown ML20206K7071988-11-18018 November 1988 Forwards Insp Repts 50-220/88-30 & 50-410/88-29 on 880926-30.No Violations Noted IR 05000220/19882011988-10-26026 October 1988 Provides Summary of Significant Findings in Advance of Insp Rept 50-220/88-201,so That Appropriate Corrective Actions May Be Factored Into Restart Planning Activities.Issues That Must Be Resolved Before Sys Declared Operable Listed ML20155E2091988-10-0404 October 1988 Forwards Exemption from 10CFR50.54(w)(5)(i) Requirements Re Property Insurance Rule Effective 881004.Rule Requires Licensees to Obtain Insurance Policies That Prioritize Insurance Proceeds for Stabilization & Decontamination ML20150E9351988-07-0101 July 1988 Forwards Amended SALP Repts 50-220/86-99 & 50-410/87-99 for Nov 1986 - Feb 1988 & Feb 1987 - Feb 1988,respectively ML20155F4111988-06-10010 June 1988 Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-220/88-09 & 50-410/88-09 on 880307-11 & 0404-08 & Notice of Violation ML20237C1091987-12-11011 December 1987 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-220/87-22 on 871019-23.No Violations Noted ML20237A3341987-12-0808 December 1987 Informs of Written & Operating Exams Scheduled for Wk of 880229.Requests That Ref Matl Listed in Encl Be Provided as Scheduled.Reactor Operator License Applications Should Be Submitted 30 Days Before First Exam ML20236B5821987-10-15015 October 1987 Forwards Exam Rept 50-220/87-16OL of Exam Administered During Wk of 870803.Related Info Also Encl ML20235Q9291987-10-0101 October 1987 Forwards Combined Requalification & Replacement Exam Rept 50-410/87-18OL Administered on 870707-09.Final Program Evaluation Will Be Issued Following Next Set of Requalification Exams ML20235J1311987-09-23023 September 1987 Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-220/87-15 & 50-410/87-24 on 870803-07.No Violations Noted ML20238A8771987-08-31031 August 1987 Recommends That Site Specific Info Sheets & Appropriate Training Re Use Be Developed & Provided to Emergency Notification Sys & Health Physics Network Communicators to Facilitate Responses to NRC Requests for Data.Samples Encl ML20237H5441987-08-12012 August 1987 Forwards Results of Nonradiological Chemistry Stds Insp Activities for All Region I Licensees During 1985-1986. Results of Measurements Made by BNL Also Included ML20236K0701987-07-29029 July 1987 Informs of Results of Review of Util Responses to Item 2.1, Generic Ltr 83-28, Equipment Classification & Vendor Interface (Reactor Trip Sys Components). Requirements Met ML20245C1671987-06-22022 June 1987 Forwards Exam Rept 50-220/87-05OL of Exam Administered During Wk of 870406-09 ML20214S5471987-06-0404 June 1987 Forwards Revised NRC Form 398, Personal Qualifications Statement - Licensee. Rev Made to Reflect Changes to 10CFR55 Effective 870526.All Applications for Licenses to Be Submitted on Revised Form as of 870526 ML20210D1921987-04-29029 April 1987 Advises That Operator Requalification Program Evaluation Scheduled for Wk of 870706,per Telcon.Ref Matl Listed in Encl 1 Should Be Furnished by 870511 ML20205G8441987-03-25025 March 1987 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-410/87-05 on 870202-05.No Violations Noted ML20204F3051987-03-18018 March 1987 Forwards Insp Rept 50-410/87-03 on 870112-28.No Violations Noted ML20207S7951987-03-17017 March 1987 Forwards Exam Rept 50-410/86-69OL on 861210 ML20204F0751987-03-16016 March 1987 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-410/87-07 on 870209-13.No Violations Noted ML20207S5891987-03-12012 March 1987 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-410/87-06 on 870210-13.No Violations Noted.Steps Taken to Correct Deviation Noted in NRC Verified ML20207R6441987-03-11011 March 1987 Forwards Safety Evaluation Re Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 1) Equipment Classification.Program Acceptable.Eg&G Technical Evaluation Rept Encl ML20207S4241987-03-0909 March 1987 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-220/86-07 IR 05000410/19860331987-03-0202 March 1987 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-410/86-33.Actions Examined During Insp 50-410/87-06 Satisfactory ML20211F5721987-02-17017 February 1987 Forwards Radiological Controls Insp Repts 50-220/87-02 & 50-410/87-04 on 870112-16.No Violations Noted.Weaknesses in ALARA Program & in Control of Portal Monitors Identified ML20211A3121987-02-11011 February 1987 Forwards Insp Repts 50-220/86-26 & 50-410/86-65 on 861117-870104 & Notice of Violation.Activities Re Maint of Reactor Bldg Integrity & Corrective Action for Unplannned Scram While Shut Down Violated NRC Requirements ML20211A9161987-02-0404 February 1987 Discusses Safety Insp Rept 50-410/86-56 on 861001-1116 & Forwards Notice of Violation.Violations Demonstrate Need for Addl Training & Improved Oversight of Operations to Assure That Plant Operated in Accordance W/Tech Specs ML20212K9991987-01-22022 January 1987 Forwards Insp Repts 50-220/86-17 & 50-410/86-61 on 860825- 29.No Violations Noted.Programmatic Weaknesses in Mgt Sys Noted & Should Be Addressed.Enforcement Conference Will Be Scheduled to Discuss Apparent Violations & Weaknesses ML20212H7391987-01-16016 January 1987 Forwards Insp Rept 50-410/86-67 on 861201-05.No Violations Observed ML20207Q3571987-01-14014 January 1987 Forwards Safety Evaluation Re MSIV Logic Mods Resulting from 861203 Full Scram,Per 861218 & 870106 Meetings.Mods Do Not Meet Requirements of 10CFR50,App A,Gdc 21 or IEEE Std 279.Issue Must Be Resolved Before Initial Criticality ML20207P3971987-01-13013 January 1987 Informs of Lasl 870323-26 Site Visit to Conduct Analysis in Order to Identify Areas in Which Sabotage Actions Could Result in Radiological Releases in Excess of 10CFR20 Limits. Listed Diagrams Should Be Provided to Lasl ML20212G7771987-01-13013 January 1987 Forwards Safety Insp Rept 50-410/86-68 on 861208-12.No Violations Noted ML20207K3261987-01-0202 January 1987 Forwards Insp Rept 50-220/86-24 on 861103-07.No Violations Observed.Rept Identifies Addl Example of Concern Re Lack of Conformance to Approved Procedures (Ref Insp Rept 50-220/86-13) ML20207K2311986-12-31031 December 1986 Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-220/86-27 & 50-410/86-66 on 861201-05.No Violations Observed ML20207J4381986-12-24024 December 1986 Forwards Insp Rept 50-410/86-53 on 860922-26.No Violation Noted ML20207N4031986-12-23023 December 1986 Forwards Notice of Violation from Investigation Rept 1-84-014.Investigation Conducted in Response to Allegations That Util QA Auditors Harassed & Intimidated as Result of Findings of QA Audit 84-4 Conducted in Jan & Feb 1984 ML20207N0621986-12-18018 December 1986 Forwards Insp Rept 50-220/86-13 on 860910-12 & 15-19. Concerns Raised Re Inadequacy of Control of Operations, Surveillance,Maint & Mod Activities.Actions to Control Vendor Technical Info Not Responsive to Generic Ltr 83-28 ML20211Q1951986-12-16016 December 1986 Requests Cooperation in Increasing NRC Resident Inspector Visibility at Site.Nrc Plans to Implement Showing of Videotaped Presentation Throughout Region I During General Employee Training ML20212A3001986-12-16016 December 1986 Forwards Insp Rept 50-410/86-64 on 861117-21.No Violations Observed ML20214W9501986-12-0505 December 1986 Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-220/86-22 & 50-410/86-58 on 861029.No Violations Noted.Licensee Demonstrated Adequate Ability to Implement Emergency Plan IR 05000220/19860191986-12-0303 December 1986 Forwards Safety Insp Repts 50-220/86-19 & 50-410/86-54 on 860929-1002.No Violation Noted.Concern Re off-hours Dose Assessment Capability Noted.Corrective Actions Discussed in ML20238C1681986-11-20020 November 1986 Forwards Safety Evaluation Re Util 861111 & 17 Requests for Removal of MSIV Actuators from Four Valves Used to Maintain Secondary Containment Integrity.Proposed Changes Acceptable. W/O Safety Evaluation ML20214D1011986-11-14014 November 1986 Requests That Util Evaluate Concerns Re Telephone Access to Plant Computer & Provide NRC W/Results 1990-09-06
[Table view] Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217L7971999-10-20020 October 1999 Submits Results of Review of 990521 & 0709 Ltrs Which Provided Core Shroud Insp Results & Tie Rod Stabilizer Assemblies ML20217G1291999-10-15015 October 1999 Forwards Errata to Safety Evaluation for Amend 168 Issued to FOL DPR-63 on 990921.Description of Flow Control Trip Ref Cards to Be Consistent with Application for Amend ML20212K8601999-10-0606 October 1999 Responds to Concern in 990405 Petition Re Residual Heat Removal Alternate Shutdown Cooling Modes of Operation at Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station,Unit 2 ML20212J4651999-09-30030 September 1999 Informs of Completion of mid-cyle PPR of Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station on 990916.Determined That Problems in Areas of Human Performance & Work Control Required Continued Mgt Attention.Historical Listing of Plant Issues Encl ML20212K8641999-09-30030 September 1999 Informs That During 990927 Telcon Between J Williams & J Bobka,Arrangements Were Made for Administration of Exams at Plant During Wk of Feb 14,2000.Preliminary RO & SRO License Applications Should Be Submitted 30 Days Prior Exam ML20212J8831999-09-30030 September 1999 Informs That Util 980810 & 990630 Responses to GL 98-01 & Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at NPPs Acceptable. NRC Considers Subj GL to Be Closed for Plant ML20212B2821999-09-14014 September 1999 Responds to 990712 Correspondence Which Responded to NRC Ltr Re High Failure Rate for Generic Fundamentals Exam of 990407 for Nine Mile Point.Considers Corrective Actions Taken to Be Acceptable ML20211K5031999-08-30030 August 1999 Responds to Ltr Addressed to Chairman Dicus, Expressing Concerns Involving 990624 Automatic Reactor Shutdown.Insp Findings & Conclusions Will Be Documented in Insp Repts 50-220/99-06 & 50-410/99-06 by mid-Sept 1999 ML20211G4921999-08-26026 August 1999 Advises That Info Re Comments Addressing 10CFR2.206,dtd 990405 Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,In Response to ML20211P5161999-08-26026 August 1999 Discusses Submitted on Behalf of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp Written Comments Addressing 10CFR2.206 Petition & Request That Ltr & Attached Response Be Withheld from Public Disclosure.Request Denied ML20210Q0031999-08-11011 August 1999 Informs That Due to Printing Malfunction,Some Copies of Author Ltr Dtd 990726,may Not Have Included Second Page of Encl 2 of Ltr ML20210L5321999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards List of Subjects Discussed During 990714 Telcon with Representatives of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp on Unit 1 Re USI A-46 Issue ML20216E1491999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Two Ltrs Received from NMPC Re Nine Mile Point Unit 1 Core Shroud Related to 10CFR2.206 ML20210E9151999-07-23023 July 1999 Discusses Evaluation of Recirculation Line Weld 32-WD-050 Indication Found During 1997 Refueling Outage (RFO14) at NMPNS Unit 1.Requests Notification of Decision to Retain Category F Classification Until Listed Conditions Satisfied ML20196J6421999-06-30030 June 1999 Discusses Completion of Licensing Action for GL 96-01, Testing of Safety-Related Logic Circuits, Issued on 960110 ML20196K6461999-06-29029 June 1999 Discusses Ofc of Investigations Rept 1-98-33 Re Unqualified Senior Reactor Operator Assuming Position of Assistant Station Shift Supervisor at Unit 1 on 980616.One Violation Being Cited as Described in Encl NOV ML20212J4431999-06-25025 June 1999 Discusses Responses to RAI Re GL 92-01,rev 1,suppl 1, Reactor Vessel Structural Integrity ML20195F9971999-06-11011 June 1999 Discusses 990513 Fax Which Forwarded Copy of an Open Ltr to Central New York on Nine Mile One Nuclear Reactor, & Petition to NRC Re Nine Mile Point One Core Shroud Insp, Signed by 187 People ML20195G9661999-06-11011 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Petition Requesting Action Under 10CFR2.206 Sent to W Travers on 990524.Petition Requested That NRC Suspend Operating License Issued to NMP for Nine Mile Point Unit 1.Staff Reviewing Issues & Concerns Raised in Petition ML20207H1021999-06-10010 June 1999 Advises That Info Re Theoretical Basis for Shear & Torsional Spring Constants in Holtec Sf Rack, Submitted in & Affidavit ,marked Proprietary,Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790(b)(5) ML20207G5281999-06-0909 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Expressing Concern for Reactor Core Shroud for Plant,Unit 1.NRC Staff Requested to Conduct Insp of Reactor Shroud,Including Areas Outside Core Shroud Welds & Publicly Disclose Results 1 Wk Before Plant Restart ML20137S9381999-06-0909 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Petition Requesting Action Under 10CFR2.206 Sent to W Travers on 990405.Petition Requested That NRC Take EA Against Util & Senior Nuclear & Corporate Mgt ML20207G2171999-06-0707 June 1999 Forwards SE Accepting Proposed Mod to Each of Four Core Shroud Stabilizers for Implementation During Current 1999 Refueling Outage for Plant,Unit 1 ML20207H3961999-06-0707 June 1999 Informs That NRC NRR Reorganized,Effective 990328. Organization Chart Encl ML20195D5001999-06-0404 June 1999 Discusses NMPC Request That GE-NE-523-B13-01869-113, Assessment of Crack Growth Rates Applicable to Nine Mile Point I Vertical Indications, Rev 0 Be Withheld from Public Disclosure.Determined Info Proprietary & Will Be Withheld ML20207D3141999-05-28028 May 1999 Ack Receipt of 981203,990325 & 0415 Ltrs,Which Presented Several Concerns & Comments Re Operation of Nmp,Plant,Unit 1 During Last Operating Cycle ML20207E8131999-05-28028 May 1999 Responds to Re Concern for Core Shroud Insp Plan for Plant,Unit 1.Insp Results Cannot Be Made Available Before Plant Restarts ML20207A4881999-05-20020 May 1999 Discusses Expressing Concern Re Core Shroud at NMPNS Unit 1 & Indicating Desire to See Further Testing of Any Cracks & Release of Rept to Public Before Unit Restarted ML20207B0171999-05-18018 May 1999 Forwards Safety Evaluation Accepting Rept TR-107285, BWR Vessel & Internals Project,Bwr Top Guide Insp & Flaw Evaluation Guidelines (BWRVIP-26), Dtd December 1996 ML20206U5191999-05-17017 May 1999 Forwards SE Accepting GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, for Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20206N6881999-05-12012 May 1999 Forwards Copy of NMP Ltr of 990430,responding to 990325 & 0415 Ltrs Re Core Shroud Evaluations for Plant Unit 1 ML20206M2041999-05-10010 May 1999 Requests Util Provide Written Comments to NRC Addressing Petitioners Expressed Concerns That Involve Licensee Activities.Petitioner Asserts That Util Actions Resulted in Placement of Confidential & Fraudulent Employee Evaluation ML20206K1681999-05-10010 May 1999 Forwards RAI Re 981116 Request for License Amend to Change TSs Re Implementation of Sys for Detection & Suppression of Coupled neutronic/thermal-hydraulic Instabilities in Reactor at Plant,Unit 1.Response Requested by 990621 ML20206L3981999-04-30030 April 1999 Responds to Requesting Addl Info to Either Respond to Apparent Violation,Or Prepare for Predecisional Enforcement Conference Re Apparent Violation of NRC Requirements Identified by OI in Rept 1-98-033 ML20205Q6471999-04-13013 April 1999 Discusses OI Report 1-1998-033.Purpose of Investigation Was to Determine Whether SRO Willfully Violated Conditions of SRO License by Assuming Assistant Station Shift Supervisor Position After Failing Requalification Scenario Evaluation ML20205N0591999-04-12012 April 1999 Forwards RAI Re Which Describes Proposed Core Shroud Repair for Core Shroud Vertical Welds at Plant,Unit 1.Response Requested by 990414 ML20205J3761999-04-0808 April 1999 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.App a Records Already Available in PDR IA-99-179, Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.App a Records Already Available in PDR1999-04-0808 April 1999 Final Response to FOIA Request for Documents.App a Records Already Available in PDR ML20207L0111999-03-11011 March 1999 Forwards RAI Re GL 96-05, Periodic Verification of Design-Basis Capability of Safety-Related Motor-Operated Valves, for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station,Units 1 & 2 ML20207L5711999-03-0404 March 1999 Informs That Info Submitted with 990203 Application Marked as Proprietary Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Per 10CFR.790 & Section 103(b) of Atomic Energy Act of 1954,as Amended ML20207K3701999-03-0303 March 1999 Forwards NRC PRB Meeting Summary Re Recipient Ltr of 981214, Expressing Concern for Degraded Core Shroud & Vessel Internals at Nine Mile Point Unit 1 ML20203E7281999-02-11011 February 1999 Responds to to W Travers & Submitted Pursuant to 10CFR2.206,requesting That NRC Convene Public Hearing to Consider Revocation of Operating License for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station,Unit 1.Petition Does Not Meet Criteria ML20203B4671999-02-0808 February 1999 Informs That Licensee 990111 Application & Affidavit Submitting HI-961584,HI-971667,HI-92801 & HI-89330 Will Be Marked as Proprietary & Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure Pursuant to 10CFR2.790(b)(5) & Section 103(b) ML20206R8331999-01-14014 January 1999 Advises That, Licensing Rept for Reracking Nine Mile,Unit 1 Spent Fuel Pool, Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure, Per 10CFR2.790 ML20199E2701999-01-14014 January 1999 Ltr Contract:Mod 1 to Task Order 235, Review & Evaluation of Nine Mile 2 Nuclear Plant Application for Conversion to Improved TSs - Electrical Sys, Under Contract NRC-03-95-026 ML20206R6161999-01-12012 January 1999 Informs That on 981124 Licensee Submitted Revs to TSs Bases for Plant,Unit 1.Revs Update Listed Bases to Incorporate Design Changes Affecting Reactor Fuel,Reactor Vessel Water Level Instrumentation & Drywell Leak Detection Sys ML20199D2801999-01-12012 January 1999 Informs That on 981204,NMP Submitted Rev to TSs Bases for NMPNS Unit 1.Rev Update Bases for 3.6.2 & 4.6.2 Protective Instrumentation. Forwards Modified Pages for NMP Unit 1 TS Bases for Insertion Into TSs ML20206R0831999-01-0404 January 1999 Informs That Privacy Info Re Investigation Rept Entitled, Results of Independent Team Investigation of Concerns Involving Erosion & Corrosion of Flow Elements, Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20198L1971998-12-24024 December 1998 Informs That Based Upon Conclusion That Current Design & Licensing Basis Does Not Credit Containment Overpressure to Ensure Adequate NPSH to Core Spray & Containment Spray Pumps,Nrc Considers GL 97-04 Closed Per 980807 RAI ML20198L3831998-12-23023 December 1998 Forwards Insp Repts 50-220/98-15 & 50-410/98-15 on 980927-1121.No Violations Noted.Notes Challenges Faced by Unit 2 Operators Due to Equipment Performance Problems 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ _ .- _
% UNITED STATES
- J ,
f- ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION
'I ,'^
I* l WASHINGTON, D.C. 20E45 .,
ACES Committee Members SHB- < - HW -- ~
i U $ i .
m acn.v ncrea m i k i Docket' No. 50-220 HE{ K-g g, n :L-- FEB 2 d}vg {- G lj ns _ gr_ AiG -- - _, ,
SH3 N- U- ~~
d JMH- P - N1P. k- o ,2 $
Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation gg y ,,g, wns_fc_ ,, j '
300 Erie Boulevard West g7 y^ f4; t Syracuse, New York 13202 Mailed- b2 M ij' -
l
~
< b Attention: Mr. Minot H. Pratt J j / ,
F .
Vice President and Executive Engineer 'Q./g n
r Gentlemen:
This refers to Amendment No. 2, dated June 1, 1967, to your application Tor a construction permit and operating license for the Nine Mile Poin_t 1(
Nuclear Station located in the town of Scriba, New York. l During meetings held on December 19, 1967 and January 22 and 23,1968, we discussed various technical aspects of the facility design with your [l
' representatives. We indicated at these meetings that additional informa-tion would be required to allow us to continue our review. In general, ]
this information is related to design changes made during facility ,
construction, the engineered safety features , the instrumentation and "
l control systems, your safety analysis, and the conduct of station operations. < VK D
Examples of design changes that have been made since the construction permit was issued include: the arrangement of isolation valves on the feedvater #/
and emergency condenser lines, the core spray nozzle configuration, the <
j initiation signals for the ECCS, the automat:ic isolation capability on the J mechanical vacuum pump and the check-valves and a buffer system included in the liquid poison system.
The instrumentation and control system is not described in sufficient detail to allow assessment of the independence of the safety channels. The t
capability of instrumentation and equipment located within the drywell to withstand the accident environment is not described. .
The consequences of certain types of equipment malfunctions have not been considered in your safety evaluation. For example, neither the consequences '
of an inoperative check valve in a feedwater line following n loss of off-site power nor the effect of failures in the reactor building closed loop cooling system are discussed.
- n. -- n f
, , - ,;;' L M h
F -
.) . . , , , :i . _,
g li.;nv h dub q1 :
., . u !g.d, " ) !;i . b yh g 8904200433 890413
[Dy c ,f D, Q n , (,gg
n-- _- -
1 \ -
l Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation FEB 2 01968 The assumptions and equations used to calculate the off-site doses resulting from potential accidents and routtae operation are not included in your safety analysis. The iodine separation factors assumed in your
, analysis are not adequately supported.
The capability to isolate the reactor building normal ventilation system in l the event of a refueling accident to prevent excessive doses is not properly included in the analysis.
1 We vill continue our review of your application with respect to the fore-Boing matters upon receipt of the additional information. A lb t of specific comments in regard to the above. items and others is attached. This list is not complete; however, it illustrates the kind of information needed.
We vill be available to discuss and clarify any of the foregoing matters..
Sincerely yours, y Original Signed by Fet:r e P- .
h Peter A. Morris, Director L Division of Reactor Licensin6 i
Enclosure:
Request for Additional Information
; cc: Mr. Arvin E. Upton, Esquire LeBoeuf, Lamb & Leiby i '
1821 Jefferson Place, N. W.
Washington, D. C. 20006 i
i t
l
(
_m_________m_ . _ _ . _ _
1-t
' 4 4
I
( .
. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION 'l
[
l[ >
NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION ' Ej m a
.k DOCKET NO. 50-220 C E L g$ c.
le Ud I. GENERAL a
{- ~.E w
- 1. Describe, in detail, the quality control program follwed during the construction of the plant. This report should include an
' identification of the responsible organization (s) with regard to:
establishing performance requirements, selection of appropriate codes, preparation of specifications (design and/or procurement),
l-fabrication and installation for all plant systems and structures.
For all of the organizations responsible for the quality control of a system or structure, a description of the quality control l r organization ehould be provided.
? 2. It is our understanding that the arrangement and fabrication j'
i methods of the control rod stub tubes used in the Nine Mile Point l T .
( reactor vessel are similar to those used in the Oyster Creek Vessel, i J Describe L:alyses, non-destructive test results and other special s precautions taken to assure that cracking in the control rod stub
{ tubes vill not occur. This information should te ritmitted as periodic
;. status reports until the evaluation is completed.
l l I 3 Provide the design and fabrication details of the isoletion valves
, on the emergency condenser steam supply lines. For other lines which penetrate the containment that do not have automatic isolation valves incide of the containment, prWide the basis and details for the
, design along with an appropriate safety evaluation.
- k. Describe the operating cycle of the remote control valves for l
[l recirculation and minimum f1w for the steam jet air ejectors under loss of off-site power and loss of coolant conditions.
E 5 Provide a list of all Class I systems and structures for which a l
} dynamic seismic analysis was conducted. Indicate which of the Class I systems and structures were analyzed for earthquake loads using only the static methods described in the Final Safety Analysis Report.
For each Class I system and structure, discuss the bases used to establish the type of analysis performed.
1 l t
(
l
- ~+,.n... . - ., . _ . .
4
( , ,
II. ENGINEERED SAFETY FEATURES 1.
Describe the expected performance of the Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) with an analysis that gives curves of:
- a. peak clad temperature versus break size, i b.
per cent of fuel rod perforations versus break size, and
[
1
- c. per cent metal water reaction versus break size.
This analysis should consider.the following combinations of
) ECCS operation: -
)
- a. auto relief and core spray-b.
one motor driven feedwater pump and core spray.
The above analysis should be performed for breaks in both steam and liquid lines.
, 2. If the plant is operating and the electrically driven feedwater
; pumps are not in service, describe the necessary procedures and instrumentation required to put them in service to cope with a
; loss of coolant accident.
( 3 We understend that changes to the core spray nozzle configuration f have been made to improve the distribution of the water over the g core. Provide an . evaluation describing the safety implications
[ of the changes.
I i 4.
Provide an analysis that demonstrates that an adequate net positive i suction head will be avEilable to all pumps connected to the torus j for all postulated operating conditions. State the energy sources j used to calculate the absorption pool temperature, including a curve 1
of integrated decay heat versus time. Describe the allowance made i
for deterioration of piping and filters with regard to pressure loss.
p 5 Describe the provisions that have been made to cool the pumps located in the lowest elevation of the reactor building. State the required
[ ambient conditions for the equipment in the area and an analysis to g demonstrate how this ambient condition will be met. Provide a s
f Piping and Instrumentation diagram for the reactor and turbine building i
closed loop cooling systems.
- 6. We understand that a high drywell pressure signal can initiate the ECCS. Provide the design details and criteria for this signal.
Describe the instrumentation, controls and interlocks that allow i
the' operator to assess the operation of engineered safety feature systems under post-accident conditions. The description should include location, redundancy and testability.
(
i
{ .
8.
Provide the basis used to establish the frequency of radiation
+ monitoring of the raw water discharge from the containment spray heat exchanger. ,
i 9 !
1 Describe the procedure for testing the liquid poison injection
; .. system. Describe the action to be taken if the immersion heater fails. l i In addition, we understand that check valves and a buffer '
i system have heen added. Describe these changes.
., 10.
i The Final Safety />nalysis Report states that a delay of 60 seconds in achieving rated flow in the core spray loop would be acceptable ~ i Provide an analysis to support this statement. -
I 11.
Certain engineered safety feature pumps are located on the bottom l
level of the reactor building. These pumps may be inundated by either en influx of Ground water or failure of a pump suction line.
i Describe the measures that have been taken to insure that core
; cooling will not be lost due to flooding. . Discuss provisions for alternate sources Of core cooling.
I*
12.
( Provide design details of the core spray piping and sparger ring f located in the reector vessel. Describe the analysis performed, 4
l including load combination equations as well as the resulting stresses and deflections. The effect of seismic, ncrmal and blowdown loads,
{ alone and in combination, should be included.
4, l 13 Describe the design provisions to prevent actuation of the auto relier system in the unlikely event that alternating current power is not
?
I available. Pre-programmed blowdown of the reactor pressure vessel should be prevented unless alternating current power is available to the emergency bucaes.
1 i 14.
What reactor coolant leakage, directly in so the drywell, can be tolerated I' h'
- without exceeding a high drywell pressure of 1, 3 and 5 psig? Assute the plant is operating at rated power conditions. t
/ III. REACTOR C007. ANT SYSTEM i
1.
Describe the time-sequence of events and the variations of parameters j pertinent to core cooli,ng which will occur as the various protection ,
j systems' respond to the loss of off-site power because of:
{
i I
- a. the system frequency increasing
- b. the system frequency decreasing, and
- c. the loss of all transmission lines.
( Equipment operation should be assumed that results in the minimum L
loss of water from the reactor vessel. ..argins available for pre-venting actuation of the auto-relief ar; tem should be identified.
___m__.__._-._._..____- - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1
, j 1
. l 1
l l
Consideration of primary system leakage should be included in the 6
analysis as well as acceptable variaticus in initial drywell pressure.
I 2.
Describe the time-sequence of events and the variations of" parameters pertinent to core cooling which vill eccur if the level control valve )
for an emergency condenser fails in the full open. position for the
[ cases described in 1, above. How long is cooling available froc.
this system with the level control valve failed open? How is such a failure detected? What instrumentation presents the inventory of water I available for this system to the operator? Describe how the condensate transfer pump is used to provide make up for this system, 3 For each syctem containing reactor coolant describe:
a.
- b. the neemal expected leak rate and the " abnormal" lean rate,
' the leak detection system used ,
- c. the sensitivity, the time required to detect the "abno; mal"
. I leak rate, and the amount of reactor coolant lost during l this time because of the abnormal leak,
- d. the operators response to an-abnormal leak rate,
{ ( e. the procedure for isolating and repairing the leak.
$ 4.
Describe the time-sequence of events and the variations of parameters f
- pertinent to core cooling which will occur if during the worst case of 1, above, the feedwater isolation valve fails full open. Describ'e 4
how such a failure could be diagnoced by the operato.r.
j 5
^
Describe the time-to-automatic-blowdown as a function of reactor coolant leaka6e to tt." dryvell assuming only on-site power is available.
1 1
- 6. Tabulate the quality control tests and inspections performed on
(, reactor coolant system ecxnponents end the installed system. Include
! type ct test, . manufacturing or' construction stage when test was performed, j agent that performed the test, basis of acceptance, .and agent that reviewed or evaluated the test results.
1:
7 List possible sources by which oil could contaminate the primary 3
j coolant assuming single failures; describe how oil in the primary a coolant is detected and the time interval to detect it. For the' -
case where the maximum quantity of oil enters the coolant describe l the effects of oil contamination of the primary coolant on reactor l
j operations and process such as core reactivity, fuel heat transfer characteristics, instrumentation.
l
(
( .
-5
- 8. Describe how the pressure vessel material surveillance program will be used to evaluate the nil ductivity transition temperature of the pressure vessel. -
9 Specifically describe the areas of the Reactor Coolant System which f will be available for periodic inspection, the types of inspection methods to be used, and how the results of'such inspections will
{ be ana'lyzed and interpreted.
t i 10. Provide a description of sequence of operation and curves of reactor pressure, coolant inventory and clad temperatures, versus time
' following the instrument air failure assumed in Appendix E-55-3 20.2 with and without' loss of off-site power. The time period should extend to shutdown and depressurization of the reactor. Indicate how long the emergency condensers will provide cooling and the actions required thereafter.
- 11. What is the hydrogen inventory in the primary coolant during normal
' operation? Spacial distributions should be indicated; i.e., concentration
; in the pressure vessel, hot well, rate of discharge out the stack, etc.
f ( 12. Provide an evaluation of plant transients initiated at or near the rod I
! block limit. Discuss the basis on which the normal operating line (power to flow) is established. '
n l*
13 We understand the core thermaland hydraulic characteristics for the Nine Mile Point are similar to those for the Oyster Creek plant. Therefore, the sensitivity analysis conducted for Oyster Creek plant would appear to
; be applicable to the Nine Mile Point Plant. This point snotld be clarified and the following information should be provided:
L i a.
Bases for selecting the confidence levels used in the analysis.
- b. Justify use of "best fit" for the critical heat flux data rather than l
- i. - the " lower limit" curves used in APED 3892.
fp c. For each of the following parameters, provide the probable error and the basis for its determination and how such errors affect the minimum critical heat flux ratio.
Inlet enthalpy Local Peaking Factor I Reactor Core Power Channel Flcw Radial. Peaking Factor Core Flow Integrated Peaking Factor Pressure
- d. Provide the peaking factors within a fuel pin used to obtain the local power distribution within a central and peripheral fuel assembly.
( e. Provide the method used in calculating standard deviation in the MCHFR using parameters listed in c, above.
1 +
1
( .
IV. INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL l
- 1. Identify which reactor protection and engineered safety feature actuation circuits are identical to those installed at Oyster Creek.
l 2. Evaluate the portions of these systems which are not identical to
; Oyster Creek for compliance with the Proposed IEEE Standards for
?
Nuclear Power Plant Protection Systems, f 3. Identify, describe and justify any interconnection between reactor protection or engineered safety feature actuation circuits and control
; circuits.
- 4. Describe each type of channel which provides signals to the reactor protection or engineered safety features actuation circuits. This description should include:
- a. Type of channel (pressure, temperature, condenser vacuum, etc.)
- b. Number of channels monitoring parameter
( c. Sensor readout capability (blind or indicating)
- d. Sensor power supply (self or from external source) i
- e. Functien (reactor protection or engineered safety
; features) t l f. Failure modes and effects
- g. Instrument error (complete channel)
{
- h. Locations where two or more sensors are on a j f, common line or penetration l l 1. Routing and protection of wiring from sensor to amplifier units to reactor protection or engineered
(( safety feature panel related to preventing a common mode failure I
, J. Power supply. f I l l 5. Identify components or equipment which must function during and following i the design basis accident (DBA). Specify the design ratings of the components and equipment pertinent to their operation while coping with the DBA.
( Describe the qualification or preoperational testing that has or will be accomplished to determine that equipment will function in the accident j environment.
)
1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - - _ l
_I t'
[ , .
7, 6.
Describe.the isolation of the annunciators and/or data logging computer -
interconnections.with the . protective system.
} 7.
l Describe how protective system and engineered' safety feature equipment I will be' physically identified as safety system equipment in'the plant.
;i 8.
Specify the safety function of the radiation monitors described in i, Section VIII of the FSAR. )
-level safety action will occur.For each monitor, specify at what preset I
- ) For each monitor, justify th,. sensi-tivity and preset level chosen. Justify the use of two-of-two or one-of-one. logic. Justify the lack of recording of any radioactive effluents <
9.
Identify other instrumentation and control systems that-are identical to those installed at Oyster Creek. For example:
- a. Rod Worth hinimizer
- b. Control Rod Drive
- c. .' Recirculation Flow Control
- d. Pressure and Turbine Control
- e. Reactor Feedwater Control
- j. f. Rod Block v
f 10.
i Describe the facilities provided to permit continuous occupancy of the control room following DBA. For example:
. It
! a. Shielding
}_ b. Communication systems
; c. Fire prevention precautions j d. Radiation decontamination clothing i e. Lighting
} f. Ventilation system l- 11.
Justify the manual system to isolate the control room ventilation system.
12.
q Explain how the' control room radiation monitor provides adequate warning to personnel of radioactive contamination which enters the control room via the ventilation system.
i
- 13. Describe existing ability to shut a the reactor and maintain it in a safe condition from station (s) exterior to the control room. Identify meters, ability.
valves, switches, etc., presently available which provide this ,
14.
l- Outline the test program for reactor protection and emergency safety '
feature systems. This outline should identify the qualification, field installation, preoperational start-up, and periodic in-service !
1 I
( .
tests which have been or will be performed. In addition, it should discuss any mandatory codes, " check and balance" procedures or inspections, and record requirements.
V. ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS I
- 1. Describe any right-of-way which is common to both the two 345 kv transmission f lines..
{ 2. Perform a failure mode and effects analysis of the AC system. Include the effects of all failure modes of the 115 kv reserve bus and the 4160 volt board #101.
l f-
- 3. For both the AC and DC power systems, describe the sequence of operation of the circuit breakers which connect the various power sources to the distribution syste2.
! 4. Describe the interlocks between the diesel-generator breakers and the i breakers to power board #101.
J 5. Describe the sources of DC power to the switchgear for equipment required p5 for the accident conditions. Show that the switchgear which connects
( equipment to one essential bus takes its DC power from one source while It the switchgear which connects equipment to the second essential bus takes its DC power from a separate tource, n
6,
{ Provide the basis for the protection circui*s which can shutdown the diesel-generators.
l'
( 7. Provide a flow diagram for the diesel-generator fuel system. Discuss i Precautions to preserve quality of fuel (e.g., replacement time, additives, ll sampling, etc.). Discuss availability from off-site sources under post-
- l. accident and loss-of-power conditions.
- 8. Describe the location of the 48 volt batteries which provide power for the l nuclear instrumentation.
s
- 9. Evaluate the relative advantages and disadvantages of starting engineered
~ [f . safety feature equipment in each loop simultaneously versus the proposed i
procedure to start this equipment sequentially.
- 10. Provide a current table of the magnitude and duty cycle of the diesel i
generator loads. Discuss the basis for both the magnitude and the duty cycle.
L
-l
- 11. Provide a current table of the magnitude and duty cycle of the battery loads following a loss of off-site power. Include two cases; 1.e.,
(a) with only maximum technical specification leakages and (b) with
( DBA conditions.
1
l
- f. .
l 1
i l
t -
)
VI. ACCIDENT ANALYSES
- 1. What is the total frequency associated with the 0 - 10 mph wind roses?
- 2. Provide the equations used to calculate changes in diffusion due to
! wind speed and elevation. Det.cribe the method used to calculate the weighting factor due to this effect.
)
l 3. List the sector data used to calculate the average chi (X) and dispersion factors.
$ 4. List the X/Q values used in calculating the doses for accidents and normal operation.
- 5. In order to evaluate how the activity in the Dresden I primary coolant can be correlated to the stack release rates, complete data on flow paths, flow rates, volumes etc. should be provided for the Dresden I ;
plant at the time the measurements were made (see Figure 9.1-1 in Vermont Yankee Amendment 3). Similar data is required for the Nine i Mile Point Plant. This information is required to understand the L claims for the noble gases and iodine transport factors and correlation :
l to radioactive gasecus release rates. The effect of stopping primary i [ system cleanup for various times should be presented. j j
l j 6. Figures E-31, 32 .2nd 34 show that the drywell and suppression chamber
, pressures are equalized before 65 seconds and that clad rupture will not occur untf3 about 100 seconds, i 4
; In view of this, your model for fission product transport to the sup-
! pression pool, and the removal of iodine there does not appear to be
! applicable. Provide a radiological analysis of the accident which j more closely follows the behavior of other factors involved. This !
should include data on the fraction of leakage which will occur !
directly from the dryvell to the reactor building, and its dependence l
{, on the performance of the containment spray system. l
? i l
[ 7. The total delay in tripping the spent fuel storage pool radiation monitor to closing the damper in the ventilation system appears to be over 60 seconds. It would appear that in the analysis of a refueling accident, a substantial portion of the radioactive iodine mig,ht be
; released without benefit of flitration. Provide an analysis to show l how these effects have be a accommodated in the design. Provide a
? detailed schematic showing duct sizes, length of duct runs, flow rates
; and equipment operating times. l l
- 8. We understand that automatic isolation capability has been provided on the mechanical vacuum pumps. Provide design details, including the
( instrumentation arrangement. Further, we understand that a second radiation monitor has been added to *.he discharge canal and that wind ,
velocity indication is to be provided in the control room. Describe l these changes.
_-___-____-______ __ 0
- c. -
y
%m , sp.;
'* s - __ __ _
'( , .
9.
Describe the interrelationship of exfiltration, building wake and atmospheric dfspersion.
10.
khat is the shortest distance from the facility stack to the site boundary (two conflicting numbers are stated.in the application)?
h 11.
F. Provide the design details for the charcoal filters, including' dimensions, I? filter type and method of cooling. Describe the' assumptions that were 1 used to calculate the filter heating values.
.; 32.
j Calculate the control room doses assuming TID release assumptions, 90%
filter efficiency and no other lodine removal.
Include calculations for the thyroid dose due-to intake of.cutside air. Have the primary con-4 tainment leak rates discussed in the FSAR been considered in evaluating control room doses?
{ VII. CONDUCT OF OPERATIONS
- (-
g 1.
3 Provide a detailed outline of the emergency plan that describes:
[ .a.
Delegation of levels of authority and assignment
?
(' - of responsibility necessary to meet the plan's objectives.
1 a' b. Actica levels used for initiation of emergency
,h proceduree.
't' I c. Instrumentation from which necessary data can be obtained to safely and efficiently implement the plan.
- d. Responsibilities and authorities of each group that would be used in plan implementation,
~ particularly the-capabilities expected by personnel j responding from local, state and federal agencies and the coordination of the efforts of all groups, y
- .g e. Action required by all personnel at the station, including visitors, during plant and site ' evacuations.
- f. Designation of evacuation routes. ,
- a. g. Capability of emergency communication systems.
e -3 L ;; h. Methods used to assure personnel accountability following plant evacuation.
(, i.
' Methods used to detect and isolate contaminated areas.
L
- j. Provisions made for medical treatment of serious l- injuries and contaminated patients.
l
r 7- - - - - < - - -- - -
c.- -.
,O*,,.,-
M
- >- r (.
.x 11
- k. M ilization of reserve personnel, i 1.
; Methods used to insure that _ each individual's responsibility and authorities are defined in a' simple fashion so that y;7 individual actions will not be burdened with complexity of requirements of the entire plan.
\:
j :
- 2. .
'$' Clarify the responsibilities of the audit committee to review and approve
)
acceptance tests, procedures;and plant modifications.
.j 3.
"j .
hfine the division of responsibility snd authority between Niagara l,
Mohawk operating staif during the preoperational and acceptance periods.
Clarify the duties'of the Shift Control Operators and other members of a shift during these periods as well as during power operation. Identify
' ' positions held by' licensed personnel.
[> 4.
' Describe the qualifications required of the on-site engineering staff'
[
as for well replacement as members of these of the review.and audit bodies. Descriho the' criteria individuals.
, j-5.
Provide a'detciled outline'of the proposed station operating procedures.
( This outline'should include the operating,~ai,ninierrative, and emergency
'[ procedures.
The scope and objective of each plant. operating procedure should.be given. Particular emphasis should be given to those procederes
'to be used in the event of an accident which may lead to an off-site
;; 4 hazard.
-{;
4 1
1
, J e'
.i l
f u
1 u
I L* - - - - - ------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ^ ~ ~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ - ~}}