ML20207K370
| ML20207K370 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 03/03/1999 |
| From: | Hood D NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| To: | Gunter P NUCLEAR INFORMATION & RESOURCE SERVICE |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207K373 | List: |
| References | |
| 2.206, NUDOCS 9903170156 | |
| Download: ML20207K370 (3) | |
Text
.
_. _..__ _ _. - _. ~.. _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
L Mr. Psul Gunter, Director March 3, 1999 i
- ~ ~ * "
R:actorWatchdog Project Nuclear information and Rrsource Service 1424.16* Street, NW, Suite 404 -
Washington, DC 20036
Dear Mr. Gunter:
)
This is in reference to our telephone conversation of February 25,1999, during which you requested a copy of the NRC Petition Review Board (PRB) meeting summary regarding your i
letter of December 14,1998, expressing concem for the degraded core shroud and vessel intomals at Nine Mile Point Unit 1. After examining the contents of the meeting summary, the
- NRC has decided to provide you with a copy without a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
)
request because of your expressed intemst in the matter and your request to receive the information promptly, before the Unit 1 outage begins on April 11,1999. This exception is made as'a matter of courtesy since records of the PRB decisions and deliberations are normally exempt from public disclosure. The enclosure is a copy of the PRB meeting summary
~
dated December 31,1998.
I was not aware during our conversation that your letter no longer appears on the NRC's intemet webpage (http /www.nrc. gov /NRC/PUBLIC/2206/index.html) that indicates the status J
of 10 CFR 2.206 petitions. It was removed because, as indicated in the response, the NRC found that the criteria for consideration under 10 CFR 2.206 had not been met.
if I can be of further assistance, call me at 301-415-3049.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
Darl S. Hood, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate 1-1
~ Division of Ucensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
PRB Meeting Summary iJ dated December 31,1998 DISTRIBUTION:
i fOnebstFttJIIM&Of S. Little
' PUBLIC D. Hood J. Zwolinski-R. Subbaratnam i
S. Bajwa J. Goldberg, OGC ;
g j
f g\\
l0
. DOCUMENT NAME: GNMP1\\GUNTER2.WPD
- See Previous Concurence
^j To receive a copy of tnis document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachmpnt/ enclosure "E" = Copy with cttachment/ enclosure "N" = No copy
~/
DFFICE PM:PDI 1 lE LA: POI I,,/r l
D:PDI 1
,d l
D:DPLM //U l PRS Chair
- l NAME DNood/rst hl/f DATE 03/3.-/99 -
Stittle F # V Stajwa 4 %
Muojinskt '
NSerkow 03/ F /99 03/ 9/ /99 03/P/9a 03/ /99 Official Record Copy 9903170156 990303 PDR ADOCK 05000220 O
Mr. P ul Gunter, Director 3,arth 3,1999 Ricctor Watchdog Project Nucle:r information cnd R: source Service e'
142416" Street, NW, Suite 404 Washington, DC 20036
Dear Mr. Gunter:
N This is in reference to our telephone conversation of February 25,1999, during which you requested a copy of the NRC Petition Review Board (PRB) meeting summary regarding your letter of December 14,1998, expressing concem for the degraded core shroud and vessel intomals at Nine Mile Point Unit 1. After examining the contents of the meeting summary, the NRC has decided to provide you with a copy without a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request because of your expressed interest in the matter and your request to receive the information promptly, before the Unit 1 outage begins on April 11,1999. This exception is made as a matter of courtesy since records of the PRB decision: and deliberations are normally exempt from public disclosure. The enclosure is a copy of the PRB meeting summary dated December 31,1998.
I was not aware during our conversation that your letter no longer appears on the NRC's intemet webpage (http://www.nrc. gov /NRC/PUBLIC/2206/index.html) that indicates the status of 10 CFR 2.206 petitions. It was removed because, as :ndicated in the response, the NRC found that the criteria for consideration under 10 CFR 2.206 had not been met.
If I can be of further assistance, call me at 301-415-3049.
Sincerely, Original signed by:
l Darl S. Hood, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate 1-1 Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nucletar Reactor Regulation 1
Enclosure:
PRB Meeting Summary j
dated December 31,1998 DISTRIBUTION:
Docket File (50-220)
S. Little PUBLIC D. Hood i
J. Zwolinski R. Subbaratnam S. Bajwa J. Goldberg, OGC i
DOCUMENT NAME: GNMP1V3UNTER2.WPD
- See Previous Concurence i
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: 'C" = Copy without attachmpnt/ enclosure "E" = Copy 4
with tttachment/ enclosure "N" = No copy
,/
kiFICE PM:PDI 1 lE LA:PDI-1,,/,
I D: POI 1
,A l
D DPLM //V l PRS Chair
- l NAME DNood/rst L.f / y Stittle F F SBahse NMA JZwoM nski '
Kterkow DATE 03/ 3.-/99 03/ P /99 03/ 9/ /99 03/ V/99 03/ /99 Official Record Copy
.l J
... - -..~
t eS ub g
p h
UNITED STATES T
s NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
i WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006-0001
\\,,,,
4 Pbrth 3,1999 l
Mr. Paul Gunter, Director Reactor Watchdog Project Nuclear information and Resource Service 142418* Street, NW, Suite 404 Washington, DC 20036 t
Dear Mr. Gunter:
i This is in reference to our telephone conversation of February 25,1999, during which you l
requested a copy of the NRC Petition Review Boasti (PRB) meeting summary regarding your letter of December 14,1998, expressing concem for the degraded core shroud and vessel intamals at Nine Mile Point Unit 1. After examining the contents of the meeting summary, the NRC has decided to provide you with a copy without a Freedom of Information Act (FO!A) t request because of your expressed interest in the matter and your request to receive the informcSon promptly, before the Unit 1 outage begins on April 11,1999. This exception is made as a matter of courtesy since records of the PRB decisions and deliberations are normally exempt from public disclosure. The er. closure is a copy of the PRB meeting summary dated December 31,1998.
I was not aware during our conversation that your letter no longer appea.s on the NRC's intemet webpage (http://www.nrc. gov /NRC/PUBLIC/2206/index.html) that indicates the status of 10 CFR 2.206 petitions. It was removed because, as indicated in the response, the NRC i
found that the criteria for cor.3ideration under 10 CFR 2.206 had not been met.
j If I can be of further assistance, call me at 301-415-3049.
Sincerely, Dwn Dart S. Hood, Senior Project Manager Project Directorate : 1 Division of Ucensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
PRB Meeting Summary
. dated December 31,1998 j
i i
l
-.