ML20202E809

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:46, 7 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-440/86-08.Further Corrective Actions Needed on Violation 4 Re Criteria 4 & 5 of 10CFR2,App C
ML20202E809
Person / Time
Site: Perry FirstEnergy icon.png
Issue date: 07/11/1986
From: Norelius C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Edelman M
CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
References
NUDOCS 8607150020
Download: ML20202E809 (2)


See also: IR 05000440/1986008

Text

_ _ _ - __ _

.__ _ _ _ _ . ..

Sm o

o

.

JUL 11 1986

Docket No. 50-440

The Cleveland Electric Illuminating

Company

ATTN: Mr. Murray R. Edelman

Vice President

Nuclear Group

Post Office Box 5000

Cleveland, OH 44101

Gentlemen:

We have carefully reviewed your response to Inspection Report No. 50-440/8f308

tiansmitted by your letter dated May 28, 1986.

With regard to Notice of Violation 50-440/86008-03, we acknowledge your

corrective actions and have no further questions at this time.

With regard to Notice of Violation 50-440/86008-04, we believe the violation

should stand as written for the following reasons:

With regard to Criteria No. 4 of 10 CFR 2, Appendix C (It was or will be

corrected, including measures to prevent recurrence, within a reasonable

time.): The measures which were finally agreed to in SPP-1401 were

adequate only after numerous discussions with your staff. Initial

actions proposed by your staff were inadequate.

With regard to Criteria No. 5 of 10 CFR 2, Appendix C (It is not a

Violation that could reasonably be expected to have been prevented by the

licensee's corrective actions for a previous violation.): While you are

correct that the NRC did not list this as a repeat violation, there were

previous examples where the need to have control over activities

affecting quality were cited at the Perry facility. (Forexample, refer

to Inspection Report No. 50-440/85017). This was not an isolated case

in which several valves were mispositioned; rather, it was a case in

which several valves were mispositioned without quality systems control.

l

a

,

I

.

8607150020 860711 l

PDR ADOCK0500gO

O

p u\

__ - _-_____-___-__-_-_-___-------------------L----

l YO l

..

n

.

. , ~

.

i

p

.

/

The Cleveland Electric Illuminating

Company

2 WL111%

Should you have any further questions regarding this Notice of Violation,

please contact me.

Sincerely,

Original Signed by W. S. Little

Charles E. Norelius, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

cc: J. J. Waldron, Manager, Perry

Plant Technical Department

M. D. Lyster, Manager, Perry Plant

Operations Department

L. O. Beck, General Supervising

Engineer, Nuclear Licensing and

Fuel Management Section

DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch

Resident Inspector, RIII

Harold W. Kohn, Ohio EPA

Terry J. Lodge, Esq.

James W. Harris, State of Ohio

Robert H. Ouillin, Ohio

Department of Health

RIII RIII RIII

LA3Y

Knop /jp

LQ Y

Warnick Norelius

Y