IR 05000416/1982032

From kanterella
Revision as of 18:06, 3 June 2023 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IE Insp Rept 50-416/82-32 on 820503-07.Noncompliance Noted: Failure to Control Drawing & Failure to Calibr Measuring & Test Equipment within Required Frequency
ML20058G853
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 05/28/1982
From: Belisle G, Bemis P, Butcher R, Upright C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20058G706 List:
References
50-416-82-32, NUDOCS 8208030434
Download: ML20058G853 (19)
v • d • e


Text

. .

,

S 9 UNITED STATES

,g J * " 4 ,g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

+ .,

g g REGION 11 ;j 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W.. SUITE 3100 0 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303

  • ...+ ,

Report No. 50-416/82-32 Licensee: Mississippi Power and Light P. O. Box 1640 Jackson, MS 39205 Facility Name: Grand Gulf 1 Docket No. 50-416 License No. CPPR-118 Inspection at Grand Gulf 1 ite near Port Gibson, Mississippi Inspectors: -~tt W

4' f 7 2.-

G. A. Belisle /Date' Signed h2$ $E -

~

/ Date figned

. . emis, fj g

, f2f 9'

5 7C. Butcher 'Date Signed Approved by: M 6 /$8[/fC___

Ief

.

Daf.e Sjfgned C. M.' Upright, J'eftion, Branch Engineering IVt ecti 4 Division of Engineering and Technical Programs SUMMARY

'

Inspection on May 3-7, 1982

'

Areas Inspected This routine, announced inspection involved 96 inspector-hours on site in the areas of licensee action on previous enforcement matters, OA/QC administration, audits, document control, maintenance, design changes and modifications, surveil-lance, procurement, material storage and handling, records, test and measuring equipment, and licensee actions on previously identified inspection activities.

I Results Of the 12 areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified in 10 areas; 2 violations were found in 2 areas (Failure to control drawings, paragraph 7.a, Failure to calibrate measuring and test equipment within required frequency, paragraph 14).

t 8208030434 820722 PDR ADOCK 05000416 O PDR

_-. _-. - - .-- --- . - - . . ._ - . . . . _ _ . .-

- '

, . .

,

l

REPORT DETAILS i

, Persons Contacted f

Licensee Employees J. Holder, M&TE Supervisor J. Kelly, QA Supervisor R. Kennedy, Surveillance Coordinator

  • C. McCoy, Plant Manager S. Pruitt. ISI Coordinator H. Pyle, QA Representative
  • T. Reaves, Jr., Manager of Quality Assurance
  • J. Roberts, Startup Supervisor R. Williams, Office Services Supervisor

, *J. Yelverton, Nuclear Site Quality Assurance Manager Other licensee employees contacted included technicians, operators, i

mechanics, and office personnel.

NRC Resident Inspector i

A. Wagner

  • D. Scott t
  • Attended exit interview

.j -

4 Exit Interview

The inspection scope and findings were summarized on May 7,1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The licensee acknowledged the

_

inspection findings.

, Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Enforcement Matters-l The following list of abbreviations is defined and used throughout this

report.

! Accepted QA Program MPL-TOP-1A, Revision 2 l CAR Corrective Action Request

'

MAR Monitoring Audit Report l NPE Nuclear Plant Engineer i QA Quality Assurance

QC Quality Control

! TCN Temporary Change Notice l The following items were reviewed with respect to licensee's correspondence

+

dated January 29, 1982.

!

!

!

!

t I

_ - - . - - - _ . - . -

, - . , . . _ . - _ . _ _ _ _ _ . , . . _ , . . , , . . . _. . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ --_

. .

,

L (Closed) Violation (416/81-46-01): Failure to Identi fy Temporary Alterations. The inspector reviewed AP 01-S-06-3, Control of Temporary Alterations, Revision 6 and identified that this procedure delineates the controls to be used during installation of temporary alteration The inspector conducted a tour of selected instrumentation and wiring cabinets. No misuse of temporary alterations was identifie (Closed) Violation (416/81-46-02), Failure to Control Temporary Change Notices. The licensee has revised the procedures cited in the viola-tion to correct the TCN problem and the inspector did not identify any TCN problems in the plant operations manual .

4. Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspectio . QA/QC Administration (3574078)

References: (a) QAP 1.10, Duties Responsibilities and Authority of the Quality Assurance Field Supervisor (QAFS)/ Quality Assurance Operations Supervisor (QA05), Revision 5 (b) QAP 1.20, Duties, Responsibilities and Authority of Site Quality Assurance Representatives, Revision 4 (c) QAP 1.30, General Office QA Organization and Duties, Responsibilities and Authority of General Office QAR's, Revision 5 (d) QAP 2.10 Quality Assurance Status Report to Management, Revision 1 (e) QAP 5.10, Procedure Preparation, Procedure and Manual Revision, Distribution, and Control, Revision 8 (f) QAP 6.10, Performance of Documentation of Reviews (g) Quality Assurance Program Project Summary Q List, Revision 11 (h) NPE 01-502, Q List Control, Revision 0 (i) AP 12-S-01-1, Quality Section Procedures Instructions, Revision 2 (j) AP 12-S-01-15, Plant Quality GGNS Trend Analysis Report, Revision 4

- *

. .

.

The references were reviewed to verify that they met requirements of the accepted QA _ Program, NRC Regulatory Guide 1.33 and ANSI N18.7 as endorsed by that program. The inspector reviewed the following aspects of QA/QC admin-istration:

-

The licensee's QA Program clearly defines or identifies those struc-tures, systems, components, documents, and activities to which the QA Program applie Procedures and responsibilities have been established for making changes to documents that define or identify those structures, systems, components, documents, and activities to which the QA Program applie The iicensee has established administrative controls for QA/QC Depart-ment Procedures to assure review and approval prior to implementation; methods and procedures for changes and revisions; and, methods a'nd controls for distribution and recal Responsibilities / methods have been established to assure overall review of the effectiveness of the QA Progra Based on this review, one inspector concern was identifie During the review of the references listed above, the inspector identified that titles for QA personnel are not consistent with recent organizational change During the next revision to the QAPs the licensee agreed to make the titles consistent with the existing organizatio . Audits (35741)

References: (a) QAP 18.00 Quality Assurance Audits Planning and Scheduling, Revision 1 (b) QAP 18.10, Quality Assurance Audits, Revision 8 (c) QAP 18.12, Supplier Quality Assurance Audits, Revision 2 (d) QAP 18.14, Quality Assurance Monitoring Audits, Revi-sion 1 (e) QAP 16.10, Corrective Action Request, Revision 11 (f) QAP 16.12, Corrective Action and Response Extentions, Revision 2 (g) QAP 16.14, Escalation to Obtain A Response Or Corrective Action, Revision 1 (h) QAP 16.16, Follow-up Action on Audits of MP&L (Grand Gulf) By Other Groups, Revision 1

-. - - . . . - - _ _ . - - . -

.

. .

)

i 4

(i) QAP 15.10, Stop Work Order, Revision 6

'

(j) QAP 2.40, Indoctrination and Training of Quality i

Assurance Personnel, Revision 7  !

(k) QAP 2.10, Quality Assurance Status Report to Management, Revision 1  !

The inspector reviewed the references listed above to verify they . met -

requirements of the accepted QA Program, NRC Regulatory Guide 1.144 and ANSI i

N45.2.12 as endorsed by.that program. The inspector reviewed the following aspects of the audit program:

, -

The scope of the audit program has been defined and is consistent with

,

Technical Specification requirements.

l

-

Responsibilities have been assigned in writing for overall management of the audit progra i -

Methods have been defined for taking corrective actions when def t-ciencies are identified during audit The audited organization is required to respond in writing to audit finding '

-

Distribution requirements for audit reports and corrective action i

responses have been defined.

,

-

Checklists are required to be used in the performance of audit To verify implementation of the audit program the inspector reviewed selected MARS performed during 1980-1982. During 1980, the licensee. per-4 formed 108 MARS; during 1981-134; and 1982-41 (to date). The inspector also l reviewed the followup actions taken on CARS that were identified during these audits.

'

[

The inspector was able to determine from the number of MARS performed. the l areas of inspection, and the number of deficiencies (CARS) identified during j the auditt that QA personnel are involved in many aspects of plant acti-l vities.

[

'

Cased on this review, no violations or deviations were identified.

l 7 .* Document Control (35742)

References: (a) Accepted QA Program, Policy 6

! (b) QAP 5.10, Procedure Preparation; Procedures and Manual j Revision, Distribution and Control, Revision 8

.

a I

i

  • , - . ~ . ~ . _ - . - - . . . . . _ _ . . -, , , ,.

-

. .

(c) AP 01-S-02-7, Control and Use of the GGNS Operations Manual, Revision 9 (d) AP 01-S-05-3, Control and Use of Design Specifications, Revision 0 (e) AP 01-5-05-4, Control of Technical Manuals Revision 3 (f) AP 01-5-05-5, Control and Use of the Master Document List, Revision 1 (g) AP 01-5-05-6, Distribution and Control of Plant Drawings, Revision 6 (h) AP 01-S-06-8, Control of Technical Specifications, Revision 2 (i) AP 09-S-01-17, Changes to Technical Specifications, Revision 1 (j) OSSI 13-5-01-55, Maintenance of Plant Drawings, Revi-sion 7 The referenced documents were reviewed with respect to the licensee's acceoted QA Program and NRC Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, as committed to by that progra The inspection verified that administrative controls have been established for indexing, issuance, and revision of drawings, vendor technical manuals, Technical Specifications, and procedures affecting quality. Drawings and administrative procedures were chosen for verifica-tion that controlled copies were being maintained per the master document maintained by the document control cente Based on this review, the inspector identified one violation and one concern as discussed in the following paragraph Failure to Follow Procedure The inspector chose eleven safety related drawings from the Control Drawing Distribution (CDD) list dated March 27, 198 The following discrepancies were note (1) Drawing M10818, Revision 9 for system G-36 - No copy in the control room or in the Maintenance Planning Center (MPC).

(2) Drawing M1083B, Revision 14 for system B-21 - No copy in the Technical Support Center (TSC).

(3) Drawing M10838, Revision 14 for system E-12 and system E-38 - No copy in the control room or the TS .

-. . _ . . .-- - . - . _ _ _ . _- . - -. _ _ - . - .- .

  • *

.

.

i t

l 1 (4) Drawing M10838, Revision 15 for system E-51 -

(a) The control room had Revision 14 and Revision 15 marked system E-51 (b) No copy in the MPC (5) Drawing M1085A, Revision 19 for system E-12 - The control room had Revision 18 and Revision 19 marked system E-1 (6) Drawing M1087, Revision 16 for system E-12 - The control room had Revision 13 marked for system E-1 (7) Drawing M10908-8, Revision 11 for system E-31 - No copy in the TSC.

,

(8) Drawing E1109-28, Revision 1 for system R-21 - Drawing not marked

"As Built" which would indicate system has not been turned over to '

MP& ,

10 CFR 50, . Appendix B Criterion V and the accepted QA Program, Policy 5, require that activities effecting quality be prescribed by documented instructions, procedures..or drawings and the activities be accomplished in accordance with those instructions, procedures, or

, drawing The licensee failed to follow AP 01-S-05-55, paragraph 3 6.5.1, which states that all superseded and revised drawings will be

removed from the working or controlled files and paragraph 6.2.2.a(1)

which requires that the CDD program be updated and controlled copies

<

issued upon receipt of a drawing or drawing revision. The failure to j follow procedures is a violation (416/82-32-01).

' Procedure Revision Tracking A comparison of the controlled plant administrative procedures versus the master index dated April 3,1982 revealed one concern. AP 01-S-01-1, Revision 7 is the latest revision but Revision 6 was in the l controlled sets in the plant quality assurance and field quality assurance offices. A check by the licensee indicated that Revision 7

'

had been filed prior to Revision 6 and Revision 7 was replaced by Revision 6 due to the filing error. This is a small number of dis-crepancies for the large number of documents reviewe . Maintenance (35743)

References: (a) AP 01-S-01-3, Maintenance Section, Revision 2 (b) AP 01-S-01-5, Quality Section, Revision 2 l

'

(c) AP 01-S-07-1, Control of Work on Plant Equipment and Facilities, Revision 7

.- . . - - -- -. -- - - . - - - . - - - - . _ . -- - _ _ _ - _ _

.._. . _ .- . . _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ .

-- .. . __ _ _ . .

. .

-

,

,

I t

(d) AP 07-5-01-6, Conduct of Maintenance Activities, Revision 2 TCN 8 i

j (e) AP 07-5-01-8, Control and Inspection of Maintecance Section Work Activities, Revision 1 i

r (f) AP 01-S-03-4, GGNS Quality Classifications, Revision 5 (g) AP 07-S-01-4, Control of Maintenance Section Records and I j

Documents, Revision 4 (h) AP 01-S-07-9, Housekeeping, Revision 2

(1) AP 01-S-07-13 Cleanliness Control, Revision 1

) (j) AP 12-S-01-2, Plant Quality Personnel Orientation,

] Training and Certification, Revision 3 i

(k) AP 12-S-01-3, Planning and Scheduling of Program Reviews, Revision 3

,

l (1) AP 12-S-01-4, Conduct of Program Reviews, Revision 2 (m) AP 12-S-01-5, Plant Quality Checking, Reporting and

) Follow-Up, Revision 2 i

! (n) AP 12-S-01-6, Qualification and Training of Plant Quality Inspection Personnel, Revision 3 (o) AP 12-S-01-7, Inspection Scheduling and Planning, Revision 1 i

(p) AP 12-S-01-8, Plant Quality Inspection, Revision 3 (q) AP 12-S-01-10, Review of Safety-Related Documents, Revision 1

<

i l (r) AP 12-S-01-12 Independent Reviewer Indoctrinatio .

I Certification, and Control, Revision 1 l- (s) AP 12-5-01-14, Stop Work Authority, Revision 2

! (t) AP 12-S-01-15, Plant Quality GGNS Trend Analysis Report, Revision 4 (u) AP 01-S-07-15, Preventative Maintenance Program, l Revision 0 i

(v) AP 01-S-03-1, GGNS Quality Program, Revision 4 i

.

!

!

.

-

--,y,-, . -- ,, . . _ -

, - . . , - _ _ _ . - . . . , . _ , , , - , . . _ . . , ...e ,.- . , - - - -. - . . . , , -. , , , ,

. .

-- . - - . . -.. . - .. - - . _ . . - ,

i

). .

- -

l

!

, 8

,

(w) AP 01-S-03-2 Plant Quality Deficiency Reports (PQDR's),

Revision 5

, .

(x) AP 01-5-03-3, Material Nonconformance Reports (MNCR's), !

Revision 6  !

The inspector reviewed the listed references to verify that they met requirements of ANSI N18.7 as endorsed by the accepted QA Progra The inspector reviewed the following aspects of the maintenance program:

'

-

Written procedures have been established for initiating requests for maintenanc Criteria and responsibilities for review and approval of maintenance requests have been established.

f f -

Criteria and responsibilities that form the basis for designating the activity as safety /non-safety related have been established.

_

'

-

Criteria and responsibilities have been designated for performing work inspection of maintenance activitie Responsibilities have been established for the identification of appropriate inspection hold points related to maintenance activitie Methods and responsibilities have been designated for performing functional testing of structures, systems, or components following maintenance work and/or prior to their being returned to servic l

-

Administrative controls for maintenance activities. requires that records be prepared, assembled, and reviewed for transfer to records i storag '

-

A program has been established for reviewing completed corrective maintenance records to assess the adequacy of the preventive main-

'

tenance program, to identify repetitive failures of parts and com -

l ponents, and to identify design deficiencies.

l l

-

Work control procedures require special authorization for activities

! involving welding, open flame, or other ignition sources and take cognizance of nearby flammable material, cable trays, or critical process equipment.

'

-

Methods and responsibilities for equipment control have been clearly

! defined.

j

'

-

A written preventive maintenance program for safety-related structures, systems, and components has been established.

I -

Administrative controls for special processes have been established.

$

J

~t+ -**n+---e -

..m - ea -s w - - . < * =

-

. .

-

Procedures have been developed for cleaning safety related components and system Procedures for maintaining the cleanliness of previously cleaned systems have been establishe Clcanliness classification of plant systems have been establishe Administrative controls and responsibilities for general housekeeping have been established which include control of housekeeping during work activitie The inspector reviewed six completed maintenance activities to verify compliance with above references and that individuals completing the main-tenance activities met the qualifications of standards committed to by the licensee. The inspector chose ten pieces of equipment on the preventative maintenance master schedule to verify that required maintenance was per-formed and documente Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identifie . Design Changes and Modifications (35744)

References: (a) Accepted QA Program, Policy 3 (b) AP 01-S-07-4, Plant Changes and Modifications, Revision 5 (c) AP 01-S-06-3, Control of System Temporary Alterations, Revision 6 (d) NPE 01-302, Design Review of Contractor Prepared Design Documents, Revision 1 (e) NPE 01-303, Evaluation of Plant Staff Initiated Design Changes, Revision 0 (f) NPE 01-304, Performance of Design and Preparation of Design Change Packages, Revision 0 (g) NPE 01-305, Preparation and Control of Engineering Calculations, Revision 0 (h) NPE 01-306, Preparation and Control of Engineering Specifications, Revision 0 (i) NPE 01-307 Preparations and Control of Engineering Drawings, Revision 0 (j) NPE 01-501, Document Control, Revision 0

-

. .

The inspector reviewed the temporary modification, lifted lead, and jumper control logs to verify the log reflected the actual status of items involved, approved procedures were available, and independent verification (where appropriate) was performed. The inspector chose six jumpers and/or lif ted lead entries and verified the entries and installation or removal were properly accomplishe Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identifie . Surveillance Testing and Calibration Control (35745)

References: (a) AP 01-S-06-12, GGNS Surveillance Program, Revision 4 (b) AP 01-5-07-8, Control of Permanent Plant I&C Equipment Calibration, Revision 3 (c) AP 01-S-07-10, Preservice and In-Service Inspection, Revision 4 (d) AP 01-S-07-7, Planning and Scheduling Plant Work, Revision 3 (e) AP 01-S-07-01, Control of Work on Plant Equipment and Facilities, Revision 7 (f) FSAR, Section 13.5. (g) AP 07-S-01-4, Conduct of Maintenance Activities, Revision 4 (h) AP 01-S-02-2, Control and Use of GGNS Operations Manual (i) GGNS Pump and Valve Pre / Inservice Inspection Program (j) QA Monitoring Report #81/36 GE ISI and I&SE Snubber Inspections (k) QA Monitoring Report #81/32 ISI Requirements The inspector reviewed the references to verify that they met requirements of ANSI N18.7 as encorsed by the accepted QA Program. The inspector veri-fied the following aspects of the surveillance testing and calibration control program:

-

A master schedule for surveillance testing / calibration / inservice inspections required by Technical Specifications or 10 CFR 50.55a have been established which includes frequency for each test / calibration /

inspection, plant group responsible for performing each test /calibra-tion / inspection, and surveillance test status.

i

. -

. ,

-

Responsibility has been assigned in writing to maintain the master surveillance test / calibration / inspection schedules up-to-dat Requirements have been established for conducting surveillance tests, calibrations, and inspections in accordance with approved procedures which include acceptance criteri Methods and responsibilities have been defined for review and evalu-ation of surveillance test / calibration data including procedures for reporting deficiencies, failures, or. malfunctions identified during the l'

tests / calibrations or inspections with required verification that Technical Specification LCO requirements were satisfie Responsibility has been assigned for assuring that required schedules for all tests, calibrations, and inspections are satisfie Calibration requirements have been established for components associ-ated with safety related systems or functions but which are not speci-fied in the Technical Specifications as requiring calibratio The inspector chose twenty surveillance tests from the T/S to determine if these tests existed in the licensee's program. Of the twenty tests, two were found to be missing and it was also determined that none of the func-tional tests were in the computerized program. A similar item was found in a previous report, inspector followup item 416/81-46-12; therefore, this present finding will be considered as part of the previous findin The inspector also chose fifteen safety related non-Technical Specification instruments to verify their inclusion into the calibration progra Two systems instruments were found to be missing, but were scheduled for inclusion. This item will be considered as part of a previous inspector followup item 416/81-46-1 . Procurement Control (35746)

References: (a) QAP 4.10, Review of MP&L Procurement Documents Initiated Off Site, Revision 6 (b) QAP 4.20, Procurement Quality Requirements, Revision 4 (c) QAP 7.10, Supplier Pre-Award Evaluation, Revision 5 (d) 0AP 7.11, Periodic Evaluation of Suppliers, Revision 1 (e) QAP 7.12, Supplier Evaluation by QA Manual (Plan)

Procedure Review, Revision 1 (f) QAP 7.14, Supplier Evaluation By Telephone Survey, Revision 0

s

.,y .,-

r---- , . . , - - - , - - - - , , .

. _ .

. *

.

r

!

(g) QAP 7.16, Supplier Evaluation By Records Review, '

Revision 1 (h) QAP 7.18, Supplier Survey, Revision 0 (i) QAP 7.20, Quality Assurance Source Inspection Program, Revision 3 (j) QAP 7.30, Quality Assurance Source Inspector Certifica-tion Program, Revision 0 (k) QAP 7.40, Evaluation of Performance of Supplier Audits, Surveys, Surveillance and Inspections By Non-MP&L '

Personnel, Revision 0 (1) AP 01-S-03-4, GGNS Quality Classification, Revision 5 (m) AP 01-S-09-1, Procurement of Material, Equipment and Services, Revision 10 The referenced documents were reviewed with respect to the licensee's accepted QA Program and NRC Regulatory Guide 1.123, Revision 1 as committed to by that program. The inspection verified that administrative controls had been established for generation and approval of procurement documents and for evaluation of bidders and supplier The inspector selected seven safety related items and verified the following: ,

-

Procurement documents were prepared in accordance with administrative control The items were bought from qualified vendor Procurement documents contained requirements for the vendor to supply  !

appropriate quali ty cocumentatio The approved bidders list is maintained in accordance with administra-tive control Personnel assigning quality classifications are cognizant of QA program

[ requirements.

j The following items were selected for review:

I

!

!

!,

I i

l'

,

,- . - - , ,.4 ~ , . . - , - .- ,.w_,.,,- , ,w-...,,--,..--,-,--,--,---,.w,-r-- , , , . - , ~ - - , , - - -

. - _ - . - _ - - - - . _ - _ - - . - . - _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ - - - _ _ - _ =

'

. .

,

i i

! 13

.

!

i

-

l Item Part Number Stem, assembly, valve 43357-415-5061 '

Starter, size 1,120V coil CR 206C022MYA

"

Spring valve 80253R0041

.

Block, Centact FF 74033-102-22 '

Valve, 3 way-AR0 .

81294R0055 l Fuse, plug in,1/32A,125V 82096S0008 l

'

j Gasket, filter mounting 80252R0107-j . Based on this review, no violations or deviations were identifie !

!

1 Receipt, Storage, and Handling (35747) }

References
(a) AP 01-S-03-3, Material Nonconformance Reports (MNCR's), ,

Revision 5

!

! (b) AP 01-S-09-2, Materials Receipt, Handling and Storage ,

'

! Control, Revision 6

) (c) AP 01-5-09-3, Identification and Control of Materials, j Revision 0 j (d) AP 01-S-09-4, Inventory Control and Spare Parts Program,

Revision 1 (e) AP 01-S-09-5, Control of Material Disposition, Revision 3 l

'

(f) AP 01-S-09-8, Control of Packaging and Shipping, Revision 0 i (g) WI 07-5-66-1, Warehouse Level A&B Storage - Temperature

. and Humidity Monitoring, Revision 2 (b) WI 07-S-66-1, Implementation of Material Controls -

Receipt, Handling and Documentation Control, Revision 1 (1) WI 07-S-66-3, Implementation of Material Controls -

Storage and Handling, Revision 1 (j) WI 07-5-66-4, Implementatiore of Material Controls -

l Instorage Maintenance and Control,-Revision 1

(k) PQSP 12-S-01-8, Plant Quality Inspection, Revision 3

, The referenced documents were reviewed with respect to the licensee's accepted OA Program and NRC Regulatory Guide 1.38, Revision 2 as committed to by that ; ogra The inspection verified that administrative controls

! had been established for receipt of safety-related items, for processing

, - _ - _ , , - - , . . , -

. _ . _ - __

. .

,

items received on site, and for storage and handling of tnese items following receip The inspector selected seven safety related and verified the following:

-

Receipt inspections were conducted in accordance with adminstrative control Disposition and storage of items was in accordance with administrative control Identification of trie items allowed tracing the item back to purchase, receipt, and quality certification document During an tour of tne warehouse the inspector verified that materials identified by receiving personnel to be in nonconformance with specified requirements were being administratively controlle The items selected for review by the inspector are specifically delineated in paragraph 11.

I Based on this review, no violation or deviations were identifie . Records (35748)

References: (a) Accepted QA Program, Policy 17 (b) QAP 17.10, Quality Assurance Records, Revision 6 (c) QAP 17.20, Quality Assurance Section Manual . Files and Status Logs, Revision 1 (d) AP 01-S-01-2, Of fice Services Section, Revision 1 (e) AP 01-S-05-1, Operation and Control of the Central Documents and Records System, Revision 2 (f) AP 01-S-05-7, Correspondence Control, Revision 2 (g) OSSI 13-5-01-52, Permanent Hard Copy File Maintenance, Revision 1 (h) OSS: 13-5-01-56, Operation of Central Records, Revision 1 (i) OSSI 13-S-01-58, Central Records Vault Temperature Humidity Requirements for Storage of Plant Microfilm, Revision 0

..

. .

.

.

The referenced documents were reviewed with respect to the licensee's accepted QA Program and NRC Regulatory Guide 1.70 as committed to by tnat progra The inspection verified that administrative controls had been established for maintenance, storage, and retention of required records generated during the operating phase and for turnover and control of records during the preoperational and construction phases. The inspector reviewed the licensee's program for the types of records noted below and verified that these records were on a master list, were readily retrieveable from the files, and were correctly stored and kept in a controlled environmen a.' Preoperational tests

' Procurement documents Maintenance records Receipt inspection and testing Q.A. audit reports Per:onnel training records Personnel qualification records (operator qualification records have not been turned over to central files at this time)

Based on this review, the inspector identified one inspector followup ite Policy 17 of the Operational Quality Assurance Manual (0QAM) paragraph 17.5.1 states in part that a system including provisions for preservation of quality assurance records shall be established. This requirement is imple-mented by paragraph 6.1.2 of reference (i) which states that the central records vault relative humicity shall not exceed 60? and shall not be lower than 30'o. While the inspector was in the vault, the relative humidity was 66* Th.is discrepancy had been identified previously by the licensee, is documented on MNCR-00003-79, and a solution is being pursued. This is an inspector followup item (416/82-22-03).

1 Test and Measurement Equipment (35750)

References: (a) AP 01-S-07-3, Calibration and Control of Measuring and Test Equipment, Revision 5 (b) AP 07-S-01-5, Maintenance Section Procedure Control and Use of M&TE, Revision 8 (c) AP 07-5-43-158, Calibration of Pressure: . Gauges, Revision 2 -

(d) AP 07-5-43-28 Calibration of Amprobe and TIF Clamp on Ammeters, Revi sion 2 (e) AP 07-S-43-42, Calibration of Fluke 8020A Digital Multimeters, Revision 1 (f) AP 07-S-43-106, Calibration of Orion 701ApH Meter, Revision 0

  • - -

,

-

.

,

,

.

,

%

- ,

,

s

- %

,

c," , 16 n s

~

,

,

-

,

~3 s s (g) AP 07-5-43~102,1 Calibration of Mechananalysis Model 308

, Vibration Vound/ Level Meter, Revision (2)

The ~1nspector' r'eviewed .the listed references to verify that they met requirements of the accepted QA Program and NRC Regulatory Guides 1.30 and ,

1.33 as committed to by that program. The-inspector verified the following aspects Df the s test and measuring equipment program: '

s , -

.

-

'Criterihand responsibility for assignment of the calibration / adjust- 1 '

ment freqdency have been establishe t

-

An equipment inventory list has been prepared which identifies equip-ment used on safety-related structures, systems, or components and the calibration frequersy of each piece of, equipmen ( -

-

Requirements exist for marking the latest calibration date on each piece of equipmen N

-

A sydtem has been provided foF a?suring that equipinent is calibrated before the date require Y

, ..x-

-

3 Requirements have been established which prohibit use of equipment

'whi,ch has not been calibrated within the prescribed frequenc Calibration controls have been established which require evaluation of the cause of equipment found out of calibration and the acceptability

'

of~ items c'alibrated using such equipmen '

.

g

's .

4 -

New equipment wi.ll be added to the inventory list and calibrated prior

,'[to being placed f n servic Based on this review one violation was identified. ANSI N18.7-1976, Section 5.2.16 states that measuring and test equipment (M&TE) shall be calibrated at specific intervals,, or prior to each us Reference (a), section 6.4.3(a), states that calibration intervals will be selected. Of the ten
pieces of M&TE selected by theiinspector, seven had not been recalibrated by

'

the due date and, of thos_e seven, six were not pulled from service until

~~

i after their calibration due date. 'This failure to calibrate M&TE by the calibration due date constitu' a iiolation (416/82-32-02).

1 Licensee Actions On Pre ., h untified Inspection l'tems (Closed) Inspecto.- r'oi m .x, item (416/81-46-03): QA Review of Offsite Design Document The inspoctor reviewed QAP 3.10, Review of Design Documents Generated by Off Site Organizations, Revision 1 and memo from 3 T. E. Reaves, Jr , to ' File (File: 0290/0490/15906, QAMI - 82/32).

These documents delineate the review of offsite design documents and-I specify who qualified reviewers are. The inspector also reviewed the m results of se0eral reitews made by onsitt QA personnel (NPE-M-001.1,

DQR-82/01; NPE-M001.2, DQR82/02, NPE-M-001.3, and DQR-82/03).

.

\ ,

s.

i

!

!

_ . _ . _ . .- . - , . , _ _

. . .

,

17 (Closed) Inspection Followup Item (416/81-46-04): Commitment To Regulatory Guide 1.64. The inspector reviewed selected NPE admin-istrative procedures and identified that the requirements of Regulatory Guide 1.64 have been incorporated into these procedure (_ Closed) Inspector Followup Item (416/81-46-06): ANSI N45.2.4. and N45.2.8 Clarification. The-inspector reviewed PQSP 12-S-01-10, Review of Safety Related Documents, Revision 2 and identified that guidance is provided for witness / hold points- that meets requirements of ANSI N45.2.4 and N45. d. -(Closed) Inspector Followup item (416/81-46-07): Consumable and Expendable Items. The inspector reviewed the following documentation:

-

Memo from C. K. McCoy to J. W. Yelverton (File 0290/0294/16162, PMI 82/1976)

-

AP 01-5-09-1, Procurement of Material. Equ!pment, and Services, Revision 10

-

AP 01-5-09-3, Identification and Control of Materials, Revision 0

-

MSP 07-S-01-6,-Conduct of Maintenance Activities, Revision 4 These documents delineate the idertification and controls applied to consumable and expendable items, (Closed) Inspector Followup Item (416/81-46-08): Expanded "Q" Lis The inspector reviewed NPE 01-502, Q List Control, Revision 0 and determined that controls have been established for revisions to the "Q" list. The inspector also reviewed a memo from J. Pinto to distribution (File No. : 1500/0490/1600, PMI:. 82/082, dated January 29, 1982).

This memo delineates use of the Bechtel Q-List until completion of the Q*6 list at which time the Bechtel Q-List will deleted. The inspector reviewed nine preliminary Q*6 systems (P42,47, Z50, X70, Z10, M51, T42, P44 and~ Cll) and determined that these lists are more comprehensive and l detailed than the Bechtel Q-list. The total implementation of the Q*6

list is planned for the latter part of 198 (Closed) Inspector Followup Item (416/81-46-09) Maintenance Program l

'

Activities. At the time this item was opened the licensee's mainten-ance program was only 98% complete. The licensee has now completed and reviewed the maintenance activity procedures which were outstanding.

l l

' (Closed) Inspector Followup Item (416/81-46-10) Preventative Mainten-ance Program Activitie At the time this item was opened the

, licensee's preventative maintenance program was 98% complete. The l licensee has not ccmpleted and revic,.cd the preventative maintenance

activity procedures.

!

I L

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ .

.

. ..

, ,

18 (Closed) Inspector Followup Item (416/81-46-14): Control of Tech-nical Specification The licensee issued AP 01-S-06-8, Control of Technical Specifications, Revision 2 and AP 09-S-01-17, Changes to Technical Specifications, Revision 1 to control technical specifica-tion The inspector reviewed the referenced documents and had no further question :

em

- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=IR_05000416/1982032&oldid=3566687"