ML20148P709

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revised Pages 2,9,14 & 17 to Insp Rept 50-416/87-32
ML20148P709
Person / Time
Site: Grand Gulf Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/01/1988
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20148P661 List:
References
50-416-87-32, NUDOCS 8804120072
Download: ML20148P709 (4)


See also: IR 05000416/1987032

Text

.

'

.

.

t

.

'

2

.

b.

Violation 50-416/87-32-02, Limitorque MOV, T Drains and Grease

Relief, Paragraph 13.c.(2).

c.

Violation 50-416/87-32-03, Raychem Heat Shrink Tubing in Unqualified

Configuration, Paragraph 13.c.(4) and 13.c.(10).

d.

Violation 50-416/87-32-04, Qualification Package for Lubricants,

Paragraph 13.c.(1).

e.

Unresolved Item 50-416/87-32-05, Nylon Wire Crimped Connectors on

Limitorque Dual Voltage Motors, Paragraph 13.c.(2).

f.

Unresolved Item 50-416/87-32-06, Accuracy Calculations for PAM

Instruments for Postulated Harsh Environments, Paragraph 13.c.(7).

g.

Unresolved Item 50-416/87-32-07, Summary Test Reports for Terminal

Blocks to Category 1 Requirements to be Upgraded, Paragraph 13.c.(8),

h.

Unresolved Item 50-416/87-32-08, Seal Assembly for Victoreen

Radiation Monitor Connectors, Paragraph 13.c.(11).

The licensee did identify some material as proprietary during this

inspection, but this material is not included in this inspection report.

3.

Licensee Action on Previous Enforcement Matters

NRC's Unresolved Items 50-416/86-39-04 concerning wiring in Bettis and

Hiller actuators and 50-416/86-37-02 concerning Raychem splices are closed

with this report.

These items are discussed in Paragraphs 13.c.(5) and

13.c.(10),respectively.

4.

Unresolved Items

Unresolved items are matters about which more information is required to

determine whether they are acceptable or may involve violations or

deviations.

Four unresolved items identified durin

discussed in paragraphs 13.c.(2),13.c.(7),13.c.(8)g this inspection are

and 13.c.(11).

5.

Electrical Equipment Environmental Qualification Program and Procedure

Review

The inspectors reviewed SERI/ Grand Gulf EQ Program directives to verify

establishment of an EQ Program in compliance with 10 CFR 50.49 including

the following:

Engineering Standard (ES) 21

Environmental Qualification Program.

-

8804120072 880401

{DR

ADOCK 05000416

'

DCD

,

l

_

- - .

-

-

..

'

.

<

.

,

'

9

.

Material Nonconformance Report (MNCR) No. 454-87 was written on

December 7,

1987, to document the procurement and installation of

commercial grade replacement parts in EQ equipment.

The scope of the

problem appears to be limited.

This is based on the inspector's review of

the disposition of the MNCR by NPE of the various equipment types and

systems involved.

It was determined that the root cause was poor

personnel-procedural interface within the Material Specialist group in

th9, (1) the procurement procedures were deficient and (2) the staff were

inadequately traired in the requirements of the EQ program.

This

situation was made worse by a deficient dedication process for

comercially procured replacement parts which did not require an

engineering review by NPE.

The use of commercial grade material in EQ

application is a design change and is sut' ject to design control measures

delineated in ANSI N45.2.11-1974.

In response to the inspector's

question concerning corrective actions taken to assure the continued EQ

0-Rings for

86164006)gement stated:

licensee mana

status of installed equipment,

and Solenoids for ASCO Kit

ASCO Kit #302-9296E (stock code GG

  1. 8321 AGE (stock code GG 85336008) were determined to be dispositioned as

"Rework".

Qualified replacement parts have been ordered, and Maintenance

Work Orders (MW0s) have been prepared for their installation.

Upon

receipt of the ordered parts the MW0s will be implemented and the removed

components will be forwarded to NPE for examination and if necessary

destructive tests.

Additionally, items in the warehouse associated with

stock codes GG 86164006, GG 85336008, and 6G 81106090 1.e. ASCO Solenoid

Valve #29701-5 have been dispositioned as "Reject", and will be scrapped

to prevent recurrence of installation.

At the time of the inspection, the environmental qualification status of

equipment having spare or replacement parts associated with the above

stock codes was indeterminate.

The above material nonconformance is,

there fore, classified as a licensee identified violation, in that

comercially procured spares and replacement parts were installed in EQ

equipment without an adequate dedication process.

This is identified as

Violation 50-416/87-32-01, Use of and Failure to Evaluate Commercial Grade

'

Parts for EQ Applications.

,

i

13.

Environmental Qualification Documentation Packages and In-Plant Physical

,

Inspection

a.

Environmental Qualifica :f on Documentation Packages (EQDP)

System Energy Resources's EQDP are prepared and controlled by the

Nuclear Plant Enginee r ng Department.

The packages included an

Equipment Evaluation C' ecklist, Aging and Radiation Calculation /

n

Analysis, Environmental Parameters, Test Reports, NRC IENs and IEBs

reconciliations, Vendor Notifications etc.

An EQDP is prepared for each specific type of qualified component

.

designated by manufacturer and model that are exposed to the same

j

environmental service conditions.

'

_

.

.

,

%

,

'

14

.

Prior to the NRC inspection team's arrival, walkdowns were being

performed by the licensee on various components identified by

previous inspections.

The splices on the hydrogen recombiner

were characterized by the licensee as "cosmetically"

unacceptable and work requests had been initiated to replace the

existing splices because of their appearance.

The NRC inspector

detemined that the effects of spray and high humidity war not

adequately evaluated.

The licensee stated that there was no

sealing requirement for the splices in that the splices were

located in an enclosure.

The inspector determined that the

enclosure was not moisture proof.

At the exit, the licensee

stated that the splices would be replaced with qualified Raychem

kits.

This replacement was completed under MWO-E76966 and

'

MWO-E76967 by December 31, 1987.

This is identified as an

example of Violation 50-416/87-32-03, Raychem Heat Shiink Tubing

Installed in Unqualified Configuration.

(5)

Bettis & Hiller Actuators - The inspector reviewed licensee

activities with regard to a previously reported problem

concerning the potential use of unqualified wiring with Bettis

1

and Hiller actuators on air operated valves (A0V's).

This was

1

identified in NRC Report No. 50-416/86-39 as Unresolved Item

50-416/85-39-04.

As a result of IEN 86-53, which was received

,

by the Mcensee in July 1986, the licensee decided to initiate a

j

comprehensive review of their Raychem splices at their earliest

available opportunity, which occurred during their first

refueling outage in September 1986.

During the course of their

inspection, the licensee identified 19 out of 99 valves that

contained unidentified wiring.

The installation of this wire

was traced to a construction / maintenance activity in 1982.

At

the time this wire was installed, GGNs' constructions standards,

purchase and procurement specifications required class IE wire

to be used in class IE applications. The unidentified wiring was

immediately replaced with known qualified and traceable wiring.

The wiring which was removed was categorized into eight different

,

wire types.

A representative sample of each of the wire types

was sent off to a materials analysis fim to identify the

l

specific insulation materials used. Once the specific materials

were identified the licensee performed an analysis, documented

in calculation EC-Q111-87001, R0 which demonstrates the wiring

i

had sufficient thermal and radiation withstand capability to

perform its function.

Based on this calculation, the inspector

concluded that the wiring was qualifiable for its intended

'

application.

The licensee also stated that none of the 19

valves were in the ECCS System and that all these valves would

have performed their safety (isolation) function within a minute

of the postulated harsh environment accident. Because this item

was licensee identified, would fit in the Severity Level IV

t;ategory, had prompt corrective action taken and could not have

been reasonably expected to have been prevented by any

licensee's corrective action for a previous violation, no

citation will be issued in accordance with the guidelines of

10 CFR 2 Appendix C, Paragraph V. A.

This Unresolved Item is

closed.

_

r

,

,e

4

,

,

17

.

IEN 86-53, Improper Installation of Heat Shrinkable Tubing,

dated June 26, 1986, was received at the utility in the early

part of July.

The first opportunity for inspection after

receipt of this IEN, was the refueling outage of Se ' amber 5,

1986 to January 1987.

At this time, the licensee .

'm'd a

.

routine walkdown inside containment for 10 CFR 50.49 equipment

and the IEN concerns.

As a resul t, some acn-standard raychem

heat shrink tubing installations were identified.

The license

determined from their records that the.e non-standard

installations were not covered by existing GGNS test reports.

Being in an outage, the licensee replaced all non-standard

configurations as a conservative measure to insure that this

item would not impact restart.

The licensee stated that they performed additional analysis and

obtained additional test data to show that the non-standard

Raychem configuration would have remained operable in the event

of a DBA.

(See 3ERI's Letter AECM-87/C045 of March 20, 1987 to

the NRC.)

This unresolved item is closed and up-graded to a

violation identified as an example of 50-416/87-32-03, Raychem

Heat Shrink Tubing Installed in Unqualified Configurations.

(11) dQDP 14.1, Victoreen Radiation Monitor - The file for the

Victoreen radiation monitors for high-range containment

monitoring was reviewed.

The qualification basis was

NUREG"0588, Category I.

The test conditions enveloped the plant

profile and the accuracy of detector was properly addressed and

is discussed in paragraph 13.c.(7) above. The test specimen was

identical to the plant installed item except for installation.

This component wt s tested by Victoreen 'i a number of

configuration $.

Af ter eight unsuccessful . tempts, the cable,

and connector were sealed in stainless steel conduit from the

detector to the LOCA chamber penetration.

This was the only

configuration that parsed the LOCA test.

The test report stated

that the intention was to seal the connector, but that the

proximity to the penetration made it convenient to seal up the

cable as well.

A+ GGNS, the connector assemblies are contained

in a stainless steel (SS) box, connected to the detector housing

with sealed high pressure metal bellows flex conduit, and sealed

at the cable entrance points.

During the walkdown inspectior.,

the NRC inspector requested that the access cover on the SS box

be removed in order to examine the splices.

The GGNS technician

had nc trouble loosening the approximately 7 'nch diameter cover

cap and screwing it off of the 6-inch diameter threaded collar

'

n the front Of the junction box.

It was clear that the cap had

taen only hand teg'.t and also there was no gasket, or 0-ring or

ither apparent sealing device for the heavy, machined stainless

' teel cap.

.

!

^~

o

e

e