ML20133L616

Informs That Listed Info Re Conformance W/Reg Guides 1.52, 1.140 & 1.143 Required to Be Submitted W/Planned 850810 Process Control Program to Determine Acceptability of Conformance,Per Review of 850724 Response to

ML20133L616
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	08/08/1985
From:	Youngblood B Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:	Edelman M CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
References
RTR-REGGD-01.052, RTR-REGGD-01.140, RTR-REGGD-01.143, RTR-REGGD-1.052, RTR-REGGD-1.140, RTR-REGGD-1.143 NUDOCS 8508120674
Download: ML20133L616 (4)

Text

-

1. 58% UNITED STATES

[  %), NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

7. rj WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

~

k . . . . . ,o# AUG 0 81985 Docket Nos.: 50-440 and 50-441 Mr. Murray R. Edelman, Vice President Nuclear Operations Group The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company P. O. Box 5000 Cleveland, Ohio 44101

Subject:

CEI's Conformance with Regulatory Guides 1.52, 1.140 and 1.143 -

Perry Nuclear Power Plant (Units 1 and 2)

My letter dated to you July 11, 1985 transmitted the staff's comments on Perry's conformance with Regulatory Guide 1.52, 1.140 and 1.143. Your response dated July 24, 1985 has been reviewed by the staff and found to be partially respon-sive to its coments.

My July 11, 1985 letter related that the staff's fiidings relative to Perry radwaste processing, as reflected in Section 11 of the Perry SER were no longer valid in view of CEI's plan not to utilize the UNI system to solidify radwaste.

Your response was that CEI will now utilize a mobile system for radwaste solidi-fication using the system detailed in the NUS Topical Report PS-53-0378, Rev. O entitled "NUS Process Services Corporation Topical Report on Radwaste Solidiff-cation System", found acceptable for referencing in licensee applications by letter from NRC (Cecil 0. Thomas) to NUS (R. H. J. Powell) dated May 10, 1985.

You also stated that CEI's Process Control Program will be submitted separately in response to the staff's comments by August 10, 1985.

In your planned August 10, 1985 submittal, the staff has requested that to fully satisfy its comment, that the following information be included:

(1) Any exceptions or deviations from the NRC approved NUS Topical Report (notedinyourJuly 24, 1985 response) dated April 1983, and the NUS response to the NRC licensing review questions in letters dated July 9, 1984 and April 2, 1985.

(2) Interfaces between the Perry plant and NUS System including:

a Means to contain spills or overflow b Liquid tank failure analyses implication c Radiological and effluent monitoring (d ALARA considerations ,

8508120674 850803 PDR ADOCK 05000440 A PDR l -

, ,/ Murray R. Edelman (3) Location and arrangement drawings of the NUS System in the Perry Plant.

(4) Waste classification program to demonstrate that the solid waste product is classified in accordance with 10 CFR 61, Section 61.55 and the NRC Branch Technical Position on Waste Classification.

(5) Specific characteristics and volumes of " wet" radioadtive waste to be processed by the NUS System.

(6) The capability of the Perry plant to meet the criteria of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 with the NUS System in operation.

The above listed information will be required to determine the acceptability of CEI's confomance with the subject regulatory guides.

Sincerely,

/^ l t

• A B. . Youngb od, Chief L ensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing cc: See next page t.

Tr Mr. Murray R. Edelman Perry Nuclear Power Plant The Cleveland Electric Units 1 and 2 Illuminating Company l

cc:

Jay Silberg, Esq. Mr. Larry 0. Beck Shaw, Pittman, & Trowbridge The Cleveland Electric 1800 M Street, N. W. Illuminating Company Washington, D. C. 20006 P. O. Box 97 E-210 Perry, Ohio 44081 Donald H. Hauser, Esq.

The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company P. O. Box 5000 Cleveland, Ohio 44101 Resident Inspector's Office U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Pamly at Center Road

,. Perry, Ohio 44081 Regional Administrator, Region III U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Donald T. Ezzone, Esq.

Assistant Prosecuting Attorney 105 Main Street Lake County Administration Center Painesville, Ohio 44077 Ms. Sue Hiatt OCRE Interim Representative 8275 Munson Mentor, Ohio 44060 -

Terry J. Lodge, Esq.

618 N. Michigan Street Suite 105 Toledo, Ohio 43624 John G. Cardinal, Esq.

Prosecuting Attorney Ashtabula County Courthouse Jefferson, Ohio 44047

AUG 0 81985

., Murray R. Edelman (3) Location and arrangement drawings of the NUS System in the Perry Plant.

(4) Waste classification program to demonstrate that the solid waste product is classified in accordance with 10 CFR 61, Section 61.55 and the NRC Branch Technical Position on Waste Classification.

(5) Specific characteristics and volumes of " wet" radioactive waste to be processed by the NUS System.

(6) The capability of the Perry plant to meet the criteria of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 with the NUS System in operation.

The above listed information will be required to determine the acceptability of CEI's conformance with the subject regulatory guides.

Sincerely, Originsi signed bys 3.J,Younablood B. J. Youngblood, Chief Licensing Branch No. 1 Division of Licensing cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION:

d[' Docket file~ " '~"

NRC"PDR Local PDR PRC System NSIC LB#1 R/F MRushbrook JStefano OELD ACRS (16)

JPartlow BGrimes l EJordan WGammill CWillis JHayes FCongel M mastra

, 16DL M I LB

/

efano/mac k 1 y gblood 8 6/85 4 5 1 /85

- _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ . - _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ - _ - - . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - - - - -