ML20213E516

From kanterella
Revision as of 00:43, 5 May 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/86-01
ML20213E516
Person / Time
Site: Cooper Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/05/1986
From: Gagliardo J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Pilant J
NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
References
NUDOCS 8611130199
Download: ML20213E516 (2)


See also: IR 05000298/1986001

Text

-

. .*

NOV 5 886

In Reply Refer To:

. Docket: 50-298/86-01

Nebraska Public Power District'

ATTN: J. M. Pilant, Manager, Technical

Staff - Nuclear Power Group

P. O. Box 499

Columbus, Nebraska 68601

Gentlemen:

Gentlemen:

'

Thank you for your letter of October 7,1986, in response to our letter

and Notice of Violation dated September 8,1986. We have reviewed your reply

and find it responsive to the concerns raised in our Notice of Violatio,n., We

will review the implementation of your corrective actions during a future

inspection to determine that full compliance has been achieved and will be

-

maintained. ,

Sincerely,

%~I6?nn! Sign?d If/t >* *

G. E. I A!,l." -

[J.E.Gagliardo,. Chief

\ Reactor Projects Branch

cc:

Guy Horn, Division Manager

of Nuclear Operations

Cooper Nuclear Station

P. O. Box 98

Brownville, Nebraska 68321

,

Kansas Radiation Control Program Director

Nebraska Radiation Control Program Director

RIV:TSB/0S OS d RSB k RP

.JRBoardman DMHunnicutt audon TFWesterman Gagliardo

n /4 /86 K/f/86 /(/86 g/y/86 /r/86

hE"S0$$$$$$83,e i

PDR

I \

~ _ _ _ _ ,

_ _ _ .- _

+ . , _ ,

y_ L,y

r '-

-

. w.

!

"

Nebraska Public Power District 2 .

"

  • ,-
.

. .

,

'

DISTRIBUTION: ' '

bcc to DMB: IE01 , .

'

bec distrib. by RIV: . ,

'

{ *RPB DRSP .

-

t

~*RRI R. D. Martin, RA

"; *Section Chief (RPB/A) *D. Weiss, LFMB (AR-2015)

  • R&SPB *RSB ,

~

  • MIS System
  • RIV File

' *RSTS Operator

]

'

  • w/766

.

4

+

t

f

i

i

s

b

I

i ,

,

,

,_;. _ - - . - . _ . - - _ , . . _ , - , _ . . . ..,__..__..___,-..._.._..__.-_-.--.--._...._..-s- 3

_ _ _ _ _

. .

(.

.

.

.. .

. . ..

.

~

.s .s

. .

h Nebraska Public Power District " ""%h[$$hfbst"*"

CNSS867847

'

g'g rb

'

'

October 7,1986

I OCT I 01986 q

L

E;i\

_ .)

Mr. J. E. Gagliardo, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Region IV

611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000

Arlington, Texas 76011

Subject: NPPD Response to Inspection Report 50-298/86-01

Dear Mr. Gagliardo:

This letter is written in response to your letter dated September 8, 1986,

transmitting Inspection Report 50-298/86-01. Therein you indicated that one

of our activities was in violation of NRC requirements.

Following is a statement of the violation and our response in accordance with

10CFR2.201.

STATEMENT OF VIOLATION

Preventive Maintenance Procedures

Cooper Nuclear Technical Specification, Section 6.3.3, states that

procedures shall be provided for preventive maintenance of plant

equipment that could have an effect on nuclear safety.

Contrary to the above, preventive maintenance procedures had not been

provided for all of the plant equipment that could affect plant safety.

REASON FOR TIIE VIOLATION

The statement of violation is correct in that preventive maintenance

procedures do not exist for all safety related plant equipment. It should

be noted, however, that most of the vendor recommended preventive

maintenance is performed on the majority of safety related equipment

through either the CNS Preventive Maintenance (PM) Program, or the

CNS Surveillance Program. The violation occurred because the station

did not have procedures which prescribed the manner in which the

existing PM Program had been developed, nor did procedures exist which

required the station PM Program to be maintained current with changing

vendor recommendations.

,, , , ci m i,

I _U -

D' h

-- --

-

.

..

.-

  • Mr. J. E. G gliardo

= * Octcbsr 7,1986

,

'Page 2

CORRECTIVE STEPS TAKEN AND RESULTS ACHIEVED

A PM upgrade program has been initiated which, when completed, will

cause the existing station PM requirements to reflect those recommended

in the safety related vendor manuals. The program consists of:

1. Comparing the existing station PM requirements to the vendor

recommendations, and

2. Resolving the differences either by generating new PM's or

surveillance procedures or by an engineering evaluation to

provide a documented disposition for not performing the

vendor recommended action.

Presently, the program is approximately 65% complete.

CORRECTIVE STEPS WHICH WILL BE TAKEN TO AVOID FURTHER

VIOLATIONS

The upgrade program described above will be completed to make the PM

program current. It will also be maintained current in the future by

establishing formal procedural controls.

DATE WHEN FULL COMPLIANCE WILL BE ACHIEVED

Formal procedural controls for maintaining the program will be in place

by December,1986. The upgrade of the present program will then be

implemented by January,1987, and full compliance will be achieved as of

that date.

Should you have any questions regarding this response, please contact me.

i

Sincerely,

i

%

J. M. Pflant

Technical Staff Manager

Nuclear Power Group

_ ..

JMP:JRF:ss

.

I

i

g

==. w,-w-we c w- *=v= vywwerwoema ew m*-~ = e - - . .. .. j