ML20246G134
| ML20246G134 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cooper  |
| Issue date: | 08/22/1989 |
| From: | Milhoan J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV) |
| To: | Trevors G NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8908310231 | |
| Download: ML20246G134 (78) | |
Text
-.--
24
-l,.
i; AE 22 m
"[
In Reply, Refer To:
Docket: 50-298 i
' Nebraska Public Power District i
ATTN:
George A. Trevers Division Manager - Nuclear Support P.O. Box 499 Columbus. Nebraska 68602-0499 Gentlemen:-
This. documents the meeting held on August 10, 1989', in the' Region IV office between Mr. Hugh Parris, Vice President, Production,' members of his staff, and Region'IV representatives, as identified in the attached attendance list.
This meeting was held in response to your request to discuss general issues of interest to the licensee.and NRC, Region IV.
The topics covered during your presentation are described in the enclosed
. meeting summary.
It is our opinion that this meeting was beneficial and prov a better-
- understanding of the issues discussed.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10 Code of Federal: Regulations, a copy of this letter will be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room.
Should you have' any questions concerning this letter, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Sincerely.
Original Signed By:
James L Milhoan -
James L. Milhoan, Director Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosure:
l Meeting.Sumary cc:
(see next page) l r
RIV:DRP/C C:
84 D:
9 GU4adsen;df GL table J M 1hoan g
8/p/89 8/n/89 8
9 g
l 8906310233 9999pp fDR ADOCK 05000298
/::If 1
PNU
ymw=..;.
[g 1,.
- 7., -
[:ig )p-e 4 ;;;g y,
4 s
t
-3
'., *.: 7. ; 3
- 3'.
3q l'
i, ij
/j.
jf m
'!~
.'J i
~
f' lNeb'raskal Public. Power District: -
0
.1 Nl ' o.
,V.
'i -
a Lgf 4,r hI
- 3.,
s t
e g.g Tec w/ enclosure:
i
';'T Cooper Nuclear Station.
$h?,
1: ATTN: : Guy Horn, Division Manager q'
'Jh
-of Nuclear Operations
/
\\
hj 4* -P.O.cBox 98h o
E Brownville, Nebraska 68321' 4
Kansas ~ Radiation. Control Program Director.
y&-
l L4-Nebraska Radiation: Control Program Director.
L ;,..
( W idi.DMB!f(IE45) E 4
k bec distrib. by RIV:
RRI' R. D. Martin, RA 4 - -
SectionChief(DRP/C)
Lisa Shea, RM/ALF RPB-DRSS~
MIS: System
' RIV File' Project Engineer (DRP/C)
. DRP' DRS-l
'P. O'Connor, NRR' Project Manager (MS:
13-D-18) 1 l-l
)
i-l q
1' l
f, e
.7 e
f 9
@: s
m;
,[
- [
i 6
MEETING
SUMMARY
ll
. Licensee:-
Nebraska Public Power District (NPPD) p:.:_
~
Facility:
Cooper! Nuclear Station,.(CNS).
-Operating License:l DPR Docket'No.:
50-298 h
Subject:
General issues of mutual interest
- On August 10,J1989, Mr.' H. G. Parris,= Vice President, Production, NPPD, and members of his staff, met with' NRC. personnel in~ the NRC office in Arlington,.
Texas. The; meeting was held at the request of the licensee. Topics discussed-
- included plant specific simulator, detailed control-room design review, safety assessments.. and general l office engineering support..
Attachments:
1.-
Attendance 1.ist 2.
Licensee Presentation.(NRC' distribution'only)
pr..
c 4-
., h.~
r
-ATTENDANCE LIST.
Attendees at the Nebrasra Public Power District (NPPD) meeting with NRC on February 8,.1989, at the NRC Region IV office were:
NPPD H. G. Parris, Vice. President - Production L. G. Kuncl, Manager, Nuclear Power Group G.' A. Trevors. Division Manager, Nuclear Support R. E. Wilbur, Division Manager, Nuclear Engineering and Construction-E. M. Mace, Engineering Manager, Cooper Nuclear Station G. S. McClure, Manager, Nuclear Engineering L.. P.: Kohles, Manager, Nuclear Products and Construction Department W.- Fehrman, Project Manager, Nuclear Products and Construction W. L. Swantz, Project Manager, Nuclear Projects and Construction NRC R. D. Martin, Regional Administrator J. L. Milhoan,' Director, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)
T. P. Gwynn, Deputy Director, DRP J. P. Jaudon, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety P. W. O'Connor, Project Manager, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation G. L. Constable, Chief, Project Section C, DRP W. R. Bennett, Senior Resident Inspector, DRP G. A. Pick, Resident Inspector, DRP
' G. L. Madsen, Project Engineer, DRP i
l
p L
NPPD - NRC REGION IV MEETING AUGUST 10, 1989 INTRODUCTION H. G. PARRIS PLANT SPECIFIC SIMULATOR-J. C. MURPHY DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW
- PANEL UPGRADES G. S. McCLURE
- ANNUNCIATORS L. P. KOHLES SAFETY ASSESSMENT
- SRAB RESTRUCTURE L. G. KUNCL
- CNS SYSTEM ENGINEERS E. M. MACE
. GENERAL 0FFICE ENGINEERING SUPPORT R. E. WILBUR CLOSING COMMENTS H. G. PARRIS
1 l
l COOPER NUCLEAR STATION PLANT SPECIFIC BWR SIMULATOR b
e L
\\
f
' ss a m i..
t b
+55.k$khiah_m_'$55k!E iff w
em
=m h.
LJ,;
j q gj j gLjLLU_
1
m.
w t
,).
t
')
l..
1 i
i l
1 PRESE\\lTATION OUT_INE l
- PROJECT ORGANIZATION SCHEDULE L
- PRESENT STATUS CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT.
SYSTEM
- MAJOR MODIFICATIONS
& ENHANCEMENTS
__------r-enum aus= em-=
e.ame m.mem name a-a.m. a.se== m e-anmien -w O,
O T
W 2
H ~ m *u NY l
u U
<tm _d
~e m
~
Z w $ a$
w2 o m
2 Oe l
C two zw -
-q W
e H
55di v2m O,&
l a
e 9
O w
o 4
W O2o C C l
06 I
s_
Qv CP
,Z
- C e
h Q<C WC um E Em W
[
t ww o mwW i
W gg=
wg
=-
eu o
kW 2.
m m
2__
kw
-01 3,0 0
-1 Ot 7
w 5
N L
E 2
u.
m O
vP W $
w 2
O
- <C e
m I
<3%e 2
<w Z
o C
m O
O www e
ww
+-
-e v g g<
zs e
z to -
t>
o m -- a w
Oc OS -
kC
~
Wze 2
oC H i E;DO z' m W
ar w
w Si E=
9 *g 5
8
'l
-er
=
b a
O uwc I
wo5 a
a 1
o$2 un -
D u
L 2' 2
g w
O e ~2 Ow$
b C
e w
<C E
6--
u w
9 x <u J
ww o w
(
3 2 u
~
,,J w w eO
)
O3 u
ji 3
y w
a EZ E Q,J 9
2 J
e w.
~o O
s d
J ut<
5 LU "C
Uo e
DI Zl 5
w Ul f
O b
se e e
y a
wC 3 O
p u
E.o m F 7W e m
u
)
@Eo
$$5N l
-F l
m z _.
- a m _.
e Et <
m w 2 H'
$5De O
b
\\
o D
u u
I I
l i I m
e e
e w o-wO
=
n l
O wE W"&
3 94 G o.
4 4'O
.J p*
oE I
JDgEm c
w u
w Dw 12
I
{
w EZd bE>c M
wO
~
a l
i I
i 1
I 1
f "Ih j,
t l
1 e
i
.s l
- l3 it y
g r.
l l.
t
.r..........
~.,_.
ee.
r......
.~.
w
~.
- r:
=,
E, r.........
l
&C l-g-R.'..
R
.,E.
n
. 2..........
~~
.:s n
.,d..
c x
r
, r...
[t2.........
~-
..r p p p.g
. a a
p.
s C 4.
g e..........................
e r
...... p.. a.
-r,%
.~
..e...........................
c
- e.
a c
w 8
t z
O z
.. b.
e' m
l' o.
w
~
.~
~
R.
~
m u
s
~
r
, i,e.
...,c
... l >; '.....
I
.p >
..... jr jr
..i e
.....p..
.t..............e l
..I.
1
. e.
. t,.
14,.
6.,.
i
.g j,.
= x v
a l
i_t i,
p
.... pp.
.t..g
.i.g.
~..
1,...
....g.
~
m l
. p..
i N
'E
.8
=*..
g O
e no x
g
....b a.
1-
<E-g e
A II W
m.:
g C
gg a
=*
a
.Y
'r E
D.E$DE c.$.,.
D E
a O
==-
e I
5 g*
g
-a r t*
g y i
u et -
e Ft
- rr i
gge -
=
Y. E F g a=
3 rE me o
E W
g gg-RE
.g S..r".,*E g
- 5. "
9 rO
..l.pr.r
- er.s; r*.-.**p 5, e.
t;*
g p.
E e
-E F
5 Egg
- 4. %.
w
~ t ~
tt
.eSa-G 5. L s t' " e l*we Lwe r
g ee snst g- -
e--L_t E-Esz w-r-
- ]gever 8'
i a n h E E, !-
E t w r
=
r
-er n-E g
.. g& ass g.la r
e f
-l EEE
- e. f.
I (
~ r E
I : :
r i
l l
,.t,,-.,..
y.
,4f e
. g.
.m== eso..nsme enn ems. =amm emm.e e-.
.m..m. eu.m.am
==m===.m. e-ema..ne=.mme,.mme eman..=m.====.m. eman..ms..mm..ame eu mm.
e e
e
.e e
e e
. i e
e e
e e
e e
e o
e e
e e
e
. *- e e
e
.e
,e
.e.e
.e
-.e
.e
.e
.e
.e
.e e.
e o
.e e
. +
e-e e
e e
e h.
gp
.e e
e e
e
+ '
o e.
e e
t e.
e e
e m,,-
+
e e
.e
.e
.e
.e e
e e
o e
e e
e e
a e
e W
en..
. e e.
.e
.o e
e e
e e
e e
e D* -
go, e
. e e
,e 4
e e
I.. e e
o
.e
.o
.e e
e e
e e
o e
e e
e e
+
e
..e
.e e.
"'m>
.e
.e..e
.e
.e e
o e-e e - e..e
.e
.e e
e em an.N
- e..o e.
e e
o e
e e
.e e
e
.e e.
e.
.e
.e e
e e
e
+
e e
e e
e e, e e
e o
e e
e
.e.e
.e
.e e
e e
o e
e e
o e
e e.
e.
e e
e e
e e
e
.. +..
e
- 4..
.e
.e o
e e
o e.
e e
o e
e o e e
e mue se. amam e
e e
e e
e
- * = = '
e e
e e.
e.
.e S.
.e
.e
.o e
o e
e e *==
e e
e e
e.
e
.e e.
.e e
e e!
e e
.e.e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e o
e e
e e
e e
+.
e e
e e
o
-e e
., ' e e
e e
i e
e
.e
.e
.e
,e 4,
e e
i e
.e
.e.o e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e e e
e i
e e
e e
e e
o
.e..o e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e i
e e
.e e.
e.
e e
e
.mm.
e.
e.
e.
e e
e e
e o
e 4
e t
e.
.e
. e e
.o
.e
.e
.e 4,
e e
o e
e e
e e
e o e e
e e
o e
e e
e o e.
o e
e e
e e
e o
@ * *. e o
e e
e e
o e
e e
.e
.e e
e a
e e
dm
.e
.e
.e
- e..o e
e.
e +
)
e
.e
.e e.
.o e
e e
em e.
e e o e
e pm.
I e e..
.e.e
.e
.e
.e 4
.e.e e
e.
e o
e i
e e
e e
e e
. +
e
.e i
e e
e o
e e
e
.e
==
e e
e e
e e
e e
i e
4 e o e
o e
e.
- e. e.
e o
e e
e e
e e
E
.e e.
e.
e.
e.
I
.e o
e
.o e.
e e
.o s
.e e
e e
e e
v.
e e
u e.
.e
.o e
e e
.=
=.
e e
e.
- e..e o
4 I
f
.e e
e e
. e e
e l
e e e e
e e
e
.e
.e e
e
.e o,
.o e
i era i
.o.e.e
.e e
.e
.o e
e e
.e
.ame e
e I
e s
.e
.e e.
.o.e e
e e
e o
e e
I e
e e
e e
e e
e o
e i
e e
.e.e
.e
.e.e
.e
.e
.e
.o
.e o
e e
e e
e e
e g
a e.
I.
- e. e.
e.
.e e
i e
e e
e
.e
.e
.o e
i e
,e e
e e
.e
.e e.
e e
i...
e
.e e
e e
e e
e o
e o
e e
I e
o e
o e e,
.e
.e e.
.e.e e
e
=ae===.-
e e e
o
.e.e
.e e
e 6
e e
e.
o.
e e
e e
e e
o e o e
e e.
e e
e
- e..e
.e e.
a e
o e
e e
e e
e e
IE e
e e
e e
e e
.e
.o.e Kg e
e o
e e
e o
e e
e e
.e e.
.e
.e
.e
.e
.e
.e e
o e
o e
e e
e e
e
.e e
e
. + e e
.e
.e e
e e
e e
e o
o e
e e
e a '.
e...
e o
e e.
e o
e e
e e
e e
. e e
e e
a e
e e
es==
e e
e.
.e
.e.e
.e e.
.a e
e e
+
e e
e e e
e
.e e
e e
e e
e
. e e
e e
e o
e o
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e.
W e.
.e
.e
.e
.e
.e
.e o
4 e
o e
4 e
e.
e-e o
e.
=='
,e e
e e
e e
e N
e o
e.
- e. e.
.e o.
e.
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
.. e o
e
.e
.e
.e
.o
.e
.e M
e e
e e
e e
e e
ng/
,e e
e e
- e..e e.
e e
E e.
.e e
e e
e e
e e
e O
.e
.e
.e e. e.
e e
e.
e e
e o
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
t e
e W
a.
e.
e.
a.
e.
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
o e
o e
. e e e
g.
.e
.o
.e oR e
o e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e.
e.
o e
e e.
e e
5
.e
.e e
e e
e e
e e
.e
.e e
e e
e w
.. e
.e
.e
.e o
e.
e.
e e
e
.e
,e
.e e
e e
e e
e e-e o
e o
e e
e e
s e
e e
e e
e.
e e
e e
e o.
e o
e e
e o
o e
e o
e o
e e
e.
.e
.e e. e.
e.
e.
e.
pu.
e e
o e
.e e
e e
. e e
e.
e e
e e
e e
.e
.e e
o e
.e e
e e
e e
e e
.e e
.o
.e e,
e.
e.
.e
.e e
e e
e e
e o
e e
e-- an..nse e
o.
e.
e.
e e
e e
e
.e
.e
,e e
e o
e e
.e o
e e
e e
e.
e.
.e
.e
.e e
o e
o e
e e
e e
e e
o e
e e
e e
e
+
O e
e o
e e
e
.e e
o e
e e
4 e
e e
e e
e e
g.)
e e
e.
e.
.e
.e e.
.e.e
.e
.e e * *
- e e
e e
e o
e e
o o
.e
.e e.
e, o,
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
o e
e e
e e.
e e
e e
e.
.e
.o e
e e
e e
- e o e
e
=
e
.e e.
o e
e e
e e
e.
.e e
e e
e e
e e
e e
o e
e e
o e
o e
.e e.
.e
.e e
e e
e e
e e
o e
e e
e a
m e
e
.o
.e e
e e
o e
e e
e N
e l
e e
- * +... e e
.e
]
e e
e e
e e
e o
e e
e e.
.e
.e.e e.
e e
e o
e e
e e
e e
e e
e o
e e
e e
o
.e e.
e e
e e
e o
e e
e sm e
e e
e e
e p
e 4
e a
e e
I e
e a
e e
e e
o e
e o
e p.
e e
o e
o e
t e
s e
e
.e
.e e
e e
o e
o e
ggs
.e
- e..e
.e e
e e
e e arp
.o.e
.e
.o e.
.e e
e 4
e e
o e.
e e
e
.e
.e
.e
.a e
e e
o e
e e
e e
e e
e 3
e.
e o
e e
e e
e e
e e
e.
e e
e e
e e
.e
.e
.e e
e e
e e
e e
R 5
e.
e.
a.
.e e.
e.
e e
o e
e e.
e one ME p
e.
e e
e e
o e
e e
e e
e, e
==
e e
e o
.e.e
.e
.e e.e an.
e.
o.
e.
e e
e o
e e
.e e
e e
e e
2 w
==
e e
e.
- e..e
.e e
e o
e e
e o
e e
e.
e
.o
.e.e
.e e
e e
ng e-O e
e e
.e e
e w
e e
e
.e m
.e e.
e e
e e
e e
e h
.e sn.
e.
e.
.e
.e y
a e
e e
e e
e.
t=n o
e
.e e.
e.
.e e
e e
e o
e e
.E e.
.e
.e
.e o
e e
e e
e e
e e
o.
e 3;
e e
e e
e e
. emuse ass =.mmm. ease. umm ama mo essa. emmen emm emm. es..mmm.usam. oms..mme, ema. mm. ame..unn.
e emme..mo emas emm. em b emm.m e amaus. emus. amme m
C heJ n
e-M 3e.
eu.
78%
6 fe.
bed ge.
4 W
- m.
e-M e
g 4
g,,
Es) e U
Ch w
W em=
o-e=
g g
m e-
.ms E
w 6 J.
5 M
w and as e-N e*
h
.4 b.J W
e'.
hJ D*
- =
W W
W D.
M 6.e n=
4C M
- 'a Q
W o
e
- =
.S
- =
2 s
to E
W e-E w
_e,--__-
____m_-______._-------
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - ' - - - - - ~ - ' ^ - ' - ' - - - - " - - ' - - - - - - -
' ~
COOPER NUCLEAR STATION PLANT SPECIFIC BWR SIMULATOR
\\ FACILITY STATUS e
T%
4 h
SU U
SS t
g =$,. k,h,5 Es_hM!!.
AS f
'~
3t
_, g _1 0UL4LK
.w r,.
-t
.. :n :
a M
l 4
R 4
WW bb Qb ll r-r
[
-]
il il 11
_[ 3 D ! l p
\\-
l O
O d
i d
2 l
_l 5l l
,}
w e
m
/N N
I l
K
\\.
,g
~
/
l
$l e LP, a
5 t
L
, l 0
j-[
c l!
a ii I
5 i
e 1e
=
%\\
.sg g
a O
/
I I
}g b
[7 L
1 8
]S!
0 I
k/
1, f
i i
s i
e m
i s
O3 1
l I
I
.s
\\
Y e
tw
..m eM c7 c,
gw_.
glg g 3
_-n
~
Figure 3.
Doors into the Simulator Complex Corridor s
g, r0:
- c. r i
Ia c
4 i
ey t
-T;
,x.
~
4,,,
,[i
.)
i';;\\
~
4:
j ji e
65 t{';,
s;
..'ll (sj.'.
l
?0:
. ' 'l
<.f yp;c i ')),.
4 -
DUE _
NN s,
..;xau,.
a Figure 4.
Corridor out.2ide the Computer Room
a i
~._
s.-
~ r;. ;;g
%ygy;
.,,'i'.p:x 'N:, h' ' r - -
s,,,,,,..
J m
..,. t.j-
.:.,,'.yMw.,g 3
5
'P.
~p
.%J7.5+ ~ ~..
.,...;,,uwe
. -9 j 4
., ; B<:dy;,.e:
-~
- i?.K :,. '..
. ' t, C.
w:k.sh p.c; '
-NT 3
.. 7..g y*. A.' ys,.~..,w..%- t e,t_ws...gty., y C
wwvs. whe
=-c e 416 Figure 1.
CNS Training Center - Outside in front j];
a p.'.
A hk
.g
.z. ya-
,.,,gn-.
d..,
Vf
- * ?'.~ ? %s3.?:?f..%+1,* ce,x.y.7.n,
.. :r%.w"
.w 4
~
, ".,, ~ :.> @. ' ;n, ; g%. _,, ',
~
R.,
., c.r ~;.y ; y. ~ <-' :~ g
'; f.~ y ;;': *,._-
.^* '.* -
.- ' W.
... _';,.,.;.- 7 a i,.
--~
...u g
..,.~.:......
c-c.
Figure 2.
CNS Training Center - Outside in back.looking I
at the North Doors into t.he Simulator Room
\\
t. __
~
_. _ ~
[.
- Wr.,
.?
E t
"?
I.
d
.I
,, $$Ei s;
y,,, y J ' 2
, fl:
Figure 5.
Corridor leadfng to the Instructor Station
.<~
~
EE s
t.
Figure 6.
In the Instructor Station looking out into the Simulator Room i
)
'p.,.
, y s
, mha
,r*
g.
-4 a.
v.
- m
'e. _
1 I
i i
1 j
, 44 - 3977 i
x., n. J W g. h,; q : w.%g y p :y,: > <
- r_
g
.me.y c,.
. ~y,. +;;g~s.
x.
en.
igure 7.
In the Simulator Room looking back at the Instructor Station j
l 1
W::
_d
/. _ _. _ _ _ _
~ I.
-. - - '\\
~L_
.vw-
. a.- -
.x 1
r
/
u
~. %g... wg~.wg_+, 7sM.e4 $.;;;iv / ; ' _ _ _ _,....,..
.s
.. o g-
-/,,.
-n 2f,q'y,.s.a-&,.:g**/:? j R&Mu ;v%
M^
L rg *.
^
'"p,
~g.><
~~ m.. %Mg ::
}7 r
r.a
.~.
l : p ub.',fw: q;.c -
,j y:.y,- Rp p i
,7 's c e
^ q:y'y
- w.
.. a 1*...~ h. :
g-u.,'. a,,,,va;,. ~,?,h :; ;-
.c n w
..c y'.
Y,,Q$Q
, l.,
'4
- ;c
- u'.'
, pam um y"w' 4;sw' ' en.wowp'- m W'+'
4 n f.6MNW 4
.,1 4
~ ~ hh?*;'..,:*3bycQw:!:.t%dMW GTt"G726 4 M i
^ " e "* *
- %'.".s".AW,465y wsw ^'
p y n, g. _v ci.c,..n p
gure 8.
At the North Doors looking back toward the Computer Room and Maintenance Room doors
'~~
- ,.. e a
~ _ -
r
-:6w f'
O A
o
'a y g lI._:..
. rgjff:' M ^ *s#g i.... ;w,
's s
Figure 9.
Looking into the Maintenance Room from the door into the Simulator Room 4
I
'p-3
~
-?~. q.
lJg Yl${;[)~6I~
~ ~ ' 'q W-A l
. J.i
.J.
I te g
U"n -
--. L
- ~
~#
l BE e.
-?>
(.
Y th_?.:
u,
,' ? ' &n.';&
__, f,; '
g-4.f.
,r.
n
.2: ;.. s 5
a 4-ie I
- f I
E
,j ;
,. m
,.Q)y * ;f(Q.,
V l
i l
Figure 10.
In the Maintenance Room looking back at the Halon bottles and door into the j
Simulator Room 1
l
____m_.m___m._m_____-___.m_m_
l 1
.,q x
.1
'~,.. ---
.?
4
..: - g' n'
.g..
}.
\\
f; t
1.
8
- ta 4;
\\
A if
\\
- m L
t
\\
\\
y_
p..,
- ~
.$),
aa + m y,.
u..
t
,c y
- " 7['4: gr 8
Figure IL Looking into the Computer Room from the doors into the Maintenance Room
\\
y,,
..- - - ~
.s
=
\\
3-y k?;;{4;
+
a Q.,-
a<~
Afe.'-
i
.< g 3-I g.xp
- ,n;i, a
- g, if.' *hpj ',
. ye;,
or Figure 12.
Looking back into the Computer Room from the doors into the Corridor.
/
COOPER NUCLEAR STATION PLANT SPECIFIC BWR SIMULATOR
\\
i PAXEL STATUS i
b
.A e
' l I
el' q
E MM R MB B
r.
5m S
a[JpwgFisWisIEijijig;==lR$!P c
s-e g=a m m.
__1- - 1 b t
w...
. W N!'_
U
F j
~
~
i
.i 5
~
i
.z
~ &
Iij
. ' w :..
^;
1,
%~
.. f ^;:
~
p
~
n Y
f one r
~~
m
.s g..
__I,
m3 eg rc eenup -
~
h./
mm-Figure 1.
Panorama - Panels 9-4, 9-5 and Board A i
. &g
.Y a 'l*i g' h
' l n
f w
i O
~
e7s
'g~g i
1 1,_
- .~
g v~;a s e's m it**ar g.C J
. = ~
n
_C
- Lyg.-
l:
- de4
., ' -) - w\\r Tigure 2.
Panorama - Panels 9-3, 9-4, 9-5 Board A, and Board B
~
'l I
2,
. gp*"
c
~
_s.
g-ggg s
^ ~hh
"&T -
_ _ _ _ ~
~7s q *k M h,
h 5
W'
- r
/ c..
s m
__t:
s -
T
.m==
g W%
v
)
o Figure 3.
Panorama - Panels 9-4, 9-5, Boards A, B, and C m -.s le -
.a i l?
s c.:
c.7
==
m9 h. g:e g r.~A ~
a 4
- _ man I..
7-. '. '
)Q
'g gk*
,g y
%v Tik N
3
- g
\\
m ew -
./
i'
+5 '
?
e.
2 Figure 4.
Panorama - Panels 9-3, 9-4, 9-5, RO, BOP, and CES Desks j
- q h &..
l R:ql :- l5,, '
q.:2-Q; l
2 Il y V
-.g
~
~
U, f. h 9, }g g
...y 3,..h;-lg.f'.\\\\I'.b'.
L m
a
'M
~
- . 5
' 7
~
)
i fkf.f
,"fr5- ' '., e
~'
p*
I 4
f
,.. s q
4
. 're 9
.,k Figure 5.
Looking down Panels 9-3, 9-4 and 9-5 f
j D
0 00))o IOJCC00Otlu,u, rr r NCC00 0:]1r]
%n n
N, %
v y
I gs.
h h
M *',
Panel 6.
Looking down Board C, B, A and Panel 9-5
+p,
1 -
7 hg]lh 5_d lE i
n g p V
za
- 1..
.19
' **-,g..g 5
o g.: q<
'j yti j
Figure 7.
Panel 9 This panel has most of demarcation and labels done i
l;
% Mji
'N una y?f
^
$h j,ppi -
Ww
=.
u.
.#g y,
!= x l=.
J.
= w
.ifh]
.g
[
E
~
5.I.. y Pc
=
Ri m
t
-l n
A; m
.7 W
'E.
I 9%
eki WWh$
9-Figure 8.
Panel 9 Depicts Ronan Annunciator Box and CRT.
I u p.
@]nM H$[h
,gg 2
[ k, jQ,,
5
.s i g b l'll10 l l"*b**
1.w wres I-.=-irs: L7.=:=_
70...
204.i%O4 l -- l.;l'!.L[
Il
,.1.
=1 Y
$_s.o t,
sli' E.
,,,,,,, t J., ;
.., ~,,
.l.',T. ',;
oe ;*
~;
L!
n y
i
+
g
_E E
~}
'f.$5
. SW % Auk
.*B88 h a
es ame r
, ;l y,
- ly, g 3o
.m..
-e E e=es, "has.sw orioso sus
?
== E l. _=._ g::=l
_fl
==
[
.O Figure 9.
Ronan Annunciator Box
%,6. rll5 m' lip'iq,
cm pr
,n
-y'id r %.6 n
"u :.tw;m,,;.
T C
,,, seu vy y
.... g; <
w.
e
, ?;;-
r
._.-x....
,.. r-1 r C 6
...,y..
f,,,
y,y l
l 2
u.au
- 6..
.i,,,
E
)
.J
,3
- tyggy, t3yy
'x Figure 10.
Panel 9 This panel had some major gW rework done to locate the CR'
552 h w
E ?
23$Q h;:::
- s,,,:h -
- +
- st; 7
1 7 O
m.,,,,,,,
?**--
s
"*mune;
,i 4
g '
R ~
,w,,W.1 E
I
.h EJ l'&
[ * * '"l [El e
7 N'yii&l}&
"J D
..gey ;A
~
N
- 4 *A *.'L*A
-wp40*.*
g>*4 *1
- 2 %,A*^g{: 7 Ye.
Figure 11.
Vertical Board A
' ~~
.!.E
.'.T
~"
~:
'O'.
- m 2=r une IE
'3:~
A t
~,,,,,?C S' Q.
~~;.
,y
~ ~ ^'
}
~
' _ ~ _ "
?*_~5 l
.Y*".
=;.
33
+
- +:
~ * *
?
a i
__;...G
~
m
- 3 3E; r
MM M
q
~
m ase % m j
l fg i.
'*:1
- 2i
+&
MM g
ggy
- 1.. }[g asa--
ca
" " " " " - "~"^~"-"'"'
O
',A sc Oh.
b O
4 sggsf[
[
a9
~
o4*gy;
$"' ~
k j
.s h
/.
e)
^$
y L, w+
- e w
ss:f?
/yo#
j;l+.
f-s
/
j',
/
// j'//,/
/
'/.7
/,
j
.. h?Y. '
ci+ - ve 2
o 4
ll..
p
.. # g
l P
e.
Figure 15.
!$4 ff_
g6 i
Alt. Shutdown O p, Panel - RHR
,, P
- u. 9 y
p PPp
-~
gs
+ It b
'd i
!! Y O
lEr I
s i
Y R
W l
Y J
- ]
I-ele se e.
e.
Figure 16.
Alt. Shutdown
,l.
ee
- w Panel - IIPCI q
rkMl 9
5 R a4
.a o
9q95 m.
9 s;3
- r:.
1.;
3
.[
Figure 17.
VBD-E - This Panel has CNS th R a (Also, no demarcations yet.)
S
'l
- g
- 7
- m. I Figure 18.
U s ot b en n"
demarcations yet.)
e a
N
,,j; f
f yj o
I Figure 19.
j
- 4 ON D-VBD-M - This Panel has not yet been Modified at CNS.
,,get (No demarcations yet.)
[
44 44 w
4e et N
.r/<.
N Q
.t
. -n
-M? W ff I
Figure 20.
Panel 9 This l
I di I
Panel was Modified g
in the 1988 Outage f
at CNS fee og g
{E
.1
{l e
m.
4es L
O s& &
K ey..
mmm
...--.m...m.
sme-wmemmies.-.2..
7
?
O x
\\
9.
Figure 21.
Panel 9 The Main Steam Line Radiation Monitors. Singer j
proposes to install new NUMACs that were put in at CNS during the 1989 Outage.
N f
6 t'
O I~
?
?!a a
.3 e
f, 6:
J g.
9 0
L u.
Figure 22.
Proposed NUMAC replacement. for Panel 9-10 Rad Monitors
4 0
2 13 11
,,3
- aru
- 1 r4
>ee g
a e
~
O h
l3r; it rema Mi&~J:"::'"
O
I gig
]
2*
u y;oe
?e e.
,7,o O
w
_._ _.y O
E Figure 25.
c Sound Powered Phone gggggg Commun2 cation Box x.,,,
c,c m
a
!L 2 2 *.t A
._~ '
, e e e e e-mass
~..
r:d k i.h l
If
..,g
\\
s 4 1
w t
,&~
$\\
/
i y,r
.<>s Figure 26.
Instructor Station (Foreground) - Actually only 4 terminals terminals should be on the desk with one Seiko I'rinter.
I
- r '-
~ ~ ~
O
~
't E:.
$IIllIIIIIIIIIIIl W-
~
P
/
9 J
Figure 27.
VAX PMIS IDT Terminal - on Instructor Station Desk
\\
l * *^
Ml
{
9-o L
Figure 28.
Masscomp TGIS Terminal - two on O
Instructor Station Desk l
l i
j
i r) g ts 9 ;1"!i+ 2fy;p;9y,.
~
17,j
- Mia g ;g
~
7t';teks m.n
- lQ;; -
O y
- .' r
. '_ z
,j s
$?
Figure 29.
Ronan X-600 Terminal - One on Instructor Desk and one on CRS Desk 6
4
_. _ _ = _
. SI L
CONFIGUh;WlON MANAGEMENT b
- SYSTEM -
L:
PROCEDURE FLOW P.ATH l
Discrepancy '
(TWR) e GE Office v
NPPD Project Simulator Review Manager Commitee e
p p
Approve &
Approve as Hold Reject Change Order l
0
}
p i
GE GE Mod cation Package e
internal Routing
~
NPPD Project Manager k
Change Order Issued j
CONF GURAT ON MANAGEMENT INPUT SCREENING PLANT MODIFICATIONS PLANT PROCEDURE CHANGES LERs REGULATION CHANGES TRAINING REQUESTS &
STUDENT FEEDBACK INDUSTRY OPERATING EXPERIENCE REPORTS SIMILAR PLANT TRANSIENTS
& EVENTS REFERENCE PLANT DATA
{
PREVIOUSLY UNAVAILABLE DATA J
l MODEL DEFICIENCIES l
l
__ g
MAJOR VODIFLCK lONS
& ENHANCEMENTS
- DCRDR PANEL MODIFICATIONS ANNUNCIATOR UPGRADE
. AUXILIARY PANELS: DG & ASD l
l l
Nebraska Public Power District Cooper Nuclear Station DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REYlEY (DCRDR)
/
i n; '-
A 4
4 v.. _ '
~ ' * * ' - - - -
^
~
w~.
a,
..e M"',,,,,,
g '
',,)
M 1',
.,p '..
- 1 3
K+'fd,
- v., l....
t
,,,, 4 9
a
('
.4emessen,,
I i s t.
'. /
- f!_y'
?
(
.s s
hV.. 5_
3 ~ -
f
- e (
- ,e g
p
'. t
~
s J'
).' a
---y..
v -,..
,.d.
.... ~... -
c.g
... w f
A g
'.1
.f ifWf '.
x%
X
.t l.%
- 4.g'.",y, a.
Z5:(,
aif m;a-Y Adp[l's.
"5/JN' k M
t.w ps @y 3m
.. A!,4 p W,..
..,..s 1,
..p 7 ' sp w.
.....t_,,
w t iw
,c.-
[
3 ;g 3.,,3,, ; g j,, ' n w ~..td
..pd -s
..,,.nc<-. :
a W...
'- ~
\\ j.gNf ;',y,
._ Q W ^l W Q fff Q,jgl W &fjff &
. ve ".
,g:.
.. g..
1.
.g
,g.
~)
,ftl;
' _ lQ n % ' M
- phy L,'4
%~. '
y) ' ~ '
4 -
i p
j.
.un a g
' -4' '.;_4.z
/
y
- ~%E,k.
g d
gh
TOPICS
Background
Objective ProjectTeam Methodology HED Summary Schedule Cost 1
i j
i
-______-_-__-_________-__-_D
9 l:
l
)
r SAC < GROUND TMI-1979 Supplement 1 to NU REG-0737 - Dec.1982 CNS Program Plan for DCRDR - March 1984 Task Analysis Requirements of Supplement 1 to NUREG-0737-May 1984 Conducted DCRDR - Aug.-Nov.1984 NRC DCRDR in-Progress Audit Conducted - Nov.1984 CNS DCP,DR Summary Report - Feb.1985 NRC Pre-implementation Audit - May 1986 CNS DCRDR results have been implemented in each outage since 1986 and will be complete in 1991
,__.--._____...___s___
M.
1 1
OBJECTIVE OF DCRD9 Improve station reliability and safety through better man-machineinterface
- Are the information and controls an operator needs to operatethe plantavailable?
- Are the Human Factors Engineering criteria satisfied?
HED = Human Engineering Deficiency l
l 1
DCRDR PROJECT TEAM i
i PROJECT MANAGER W. l. Swantz PROGRAM MANAcER PROGRAM MANAGER Operations / Enhancements Enoineerino/Inolenentation R. Brungardt W. L. Swantz ASSISTANT PROGRAM NUCLEAR ENG CONTRACT SUPPORT MANAGER DEPT S'JPPORT Black & Veatch M. Sparr/
S. McClure Engineering D. Bremmer M. Parr G. Pederson J. Mierau CORE REVIEW TEAM R. Brungardt (Operations Manager /SRO)
M. Sparr ( Assistant to Cperations Mgr)
J. Peaslee (Surveillance Coordinator /SRO)
M. Parr (I&C Engineering)
H. Jentzen (I&C Supervisor)
R. Krause (Operations Engineering)
D. Bremer (Operations Support Supervisor /SRO)
R. Black (Operations Supervisor /SRO)
M. Aburomia-GE (System Engineer)
J. Seminara (Human Factors Specialist)
Other SRO/ROs as needed l
l lL__-__--_____-___-_______-_____-_______--_______-________-_________-____________-_____-___-__-_-___-__--_
TEAM RESPONSIBl_ITES
. OPERATIONS / ENHANCEMENTS
- HED identification
- Resolution of HED's
- Development of integrated conceptual drawings
- Verification and validation of HED corrections
- Development of training plan on HED corrections and conducting the DCRDR training
. ENGINEERING IMPLEMENTATION
- Detailed design engineering
- Development and updating of control panel drawings
- Development of implementation plan and schedule
- Implementation of HED corrections l
I l
r Nh DCRDR METHODOLOGY 1,
IDENTIFY DATA SOURCES
- Control Room
- Emergency Operating Procedures (EOP's)
- Operating Records i
- Operators COLLECT DATA
- Control Room Survey
- Functional and Task Analysis
- Operating Experience Review EVALUATE DATA J
- Integrate Data
- Identify HED's
9 CO _ LECT DATA CONTROL ROOM SURVEY CHECKLIST Areas Surveyed No. Items Checked Panel Layout & Design 64/ panel Instrumentation & Hardware 78/ panel Annunciators 35/ panel Computers 41 Procedures 68 Control Room Environment 57 Maintenace & Surveillance 30 l
Training.& Manning 10 l
L-i
4 1
1 i
FUNCTIONAL AhD TASK ANALYSIS
- EOP Based
- Identify entry conditions to emergencies
- Identify operator tasks to control and mitigate the emergencycondition FunctionalAnalysis
- Identify information needed and controls required for each EOP EOP Control Room Needs Alerting Annunciators Information Indicating Meters Recorders Indicating Lights o
initiating Actions Switches (Pumps, Valves, Relays)
Performing Calculations Communication Equipment Controlling Actions Controllers
k,
?
TaskAnalysis
- Task Walk-Through
- Identify Availability of Equipment
-; Human Factors Engineering Criteria 1
I
OPERATING EX3ERIENCE REV EW Scram Report and LER Review
- CNS
^
- Other BWR's
. Operator Survey l
l' L____.__.__.__.__-_..._--.-_.______
-- t 4
. HED
SUMMARY
- a ENHANCEMENTS-75%
Improvements that are relatively simple to correct.
Lines of Demarcation.
Labeling Replacement of MeterScales Scale Zone Marking Color Coding Painting Panels MODIFICATIONS - 25%
i improvements that generally require movement of instruments or panel modifications and extend beyond the enhancement phase.
Relocattor Replacement Addition Removal i
e I
e m
w_--_______--
4 VBD-A BEFORE
=e=s,
- :: :e:: - -
.f :$$ 5.5I."$$ ; $ $ *M $ $ 0; M y y y
- _^
f 2I'-
g.4
,m (ine nitit g ulls Ha!
g si iln "a
u4 3
m L-I i Wis, i ll ll' il 11 IIII
.m 3..
~
~
- e*
ll1 til+l!Ill IIII!IIIIIY '
i
.:e III! h b IIII fl' b lll ml lllllI ~ I T
4 a.,,
~I
'r
.t
.5
^
- ^
l
~,
-.' r r
^
.1 ' y,s
~-A
^
4[@mmm-!#== =n uu.e"~
m9 5 Era ' I I v u
[K f R @.T>
s
' M*.:lWif ir ir e e R R S.1 t%=%.. m
~
AFTER d, j f***[",is -
[
kI
=
+
'ee -
k ti-f wu; ; _g %.,
t m hhA h.
"L jfS;h h@T[ f ""g w
Q, J@$$'DdE'"IEd.;n t
a ym w-
."J.#..#.',M i
- .t
+'
e
?h.[ hCT4
}'
'l j
[.
~ esm@;
-m, -
g '
_h;Q i
S';&
- * ~
p
- Q.m.x m P w g g
, e g,e - g
+-
7 E( w$ lk[g l]y w!$ $~Ig b Q.
'h
?
-u
VBD-B BEFORE 2,9 &
- m.,.7
_4
~
{ 67,'
_a.
- s...
g 7
4*g W ' $.* fe "
& M h.6 g ?,_ *g', W R' gggg
- e y y A -A r:
ss= = r.:c tc x v
= :-
=
l'-. E ?**
$ fh h $ h h h h h he'"~~-
~'
=s
%\\
AFTER
\\
i
~
. =.
I 6'
.,e g
q t
! $ I
- I
- 1 t
e 1 i
- I I
y
'"~
- ~,
- Ya,
he v
~ '
" =
' "' ' ' ~ ' {k ( %
- m W ;,'a,\\.c I
y7
'=
- R~
g _4 f, 91*
I 9
)
N
% syy
l HED's Per Information Source informationSource No. of HED's l'
. Control Room Survey 528 TaskAnalysis 80 Operating Experience Review 16 PMIS 59 SPDS 70 Total 753
H-HED's PER AREA No. of Area Function HED's l
9 Reactor & Containment Cooling (ECCS) 47 9-4 PCIS,RWCU,ReactorRecirc, RCIC 26 9-5 ReactorControl& Feedwater Control 48 YBD-R H&Y Control 31 YBD-J & S Sup. Chamber Press. Relief & Plant Sump Control 7
YBD-B Turbine / Generator & Condenser Control 36 YBD-C ElectricalDistribution 30 YBD-H PC Atmosphere-Yent and Drywellinerting 36 9-0 2 & 9-21 Steam Leak Detection & Process RM Recorders 54 9-10 & 9 Area & Process Radiation Monitor 23 YBD-A Feed Condensate,SerYlce& CirculatingWater 36 YBD-K Gas Treatment & Yending System 33 YBD-P1, Atmosphere Containment Atmosphere 38
& P2 Dilution (ACAD)
YBD-O & G Indication & Recording Systems for RMY 45 YBD-M Reactor Building Close Cooling to Water Sys.
28 FP Fire Panel 30 PMIS Plant ManagementInformation System 59 SPDS SafetyParameterDisplay System 70 i
Training & Environment 32 I
l
STATUS OF HED IMP _EMENTATION
+
Year Panel Function implemented 9-3 Reactor & Containment Cooling (ECCS) 1986 9-4 PCIS, RWCU, Reactor Recire, RCIC 1986 9-5 Reactor Control & Feedwater Control 1986 YBD-R H&Y Control 1986 YBD-J & S -
Sur ChamberPress. Relief andPlant 1986 SWnp Control VBD-B Tuiisine/ Generator & Condenser Control 1988 YBD-C ElectricalDistribution 1988 YBD-H PC Atmosphere-Yentand Drywellinel1ing 1988 9-02 & 9-21 Steam Leak Detect. & Process RM Recorders 1988 9-10 & 9-11 Area & Process Rad. Monitor 1988 VBD-A Feed Condensate, Service & Circ. Water 1989 VBD-K Gas Treatment & Vending Sys.
1989 VBD-P1, Atmosphere Containment Atmosphere 1990
& P2 Dilution (ACAD)
YBD-O & G Indication & Recording Systems for RMY 1990 VBD-M ReactorBldg.Close Cooling toWaterSys.
1990 FP Fire Panel 1991 PMIS Plant ManagementInformation System 1991 SPDS Safety Parameter Display System 1991 Annunciators 1991 1
CR Environment 1991 l
I l
=_
I, y
l:
- t hs m
b 7"
Cost and Man-Hours u
DCRDR
. Man-Hours -
- NPPD Engineering Lab'lExp.
1.,031,502 33,300 NPPD 0perations LablExp.
515,751 25,000c E
NPPD Tech Support LablExp.
451,394 20,600.-
Consultants -
3,300,000-33,000.
Construction Labor 838,000 46,500 Materials '
612.000 Subtotal
$ 6,748,647 158,400 MH-
-Annunciators 3.594'.490' 84.370 MH Total
$10,343,137 -
242,770 MH i
s
[:
~l l
REASONS FOR SCHEDULE EXTENSIONS
- Started implementation in 1986 ratherthan 1985 due to IGSCC Pipe Replacement effort.
M modifications were much more time-consuming than originally planned.
-+
The Simulator Schedule and the DCRDR Schedule did not always match.
Need to controi number of workers in Control Room during the outage.
+
- NPPD committed to do a first class job upgrading the Control Room -
No short cuts.
Extensive acceptance testing of each design change.
- A new State-of-the-Ad Annunciator System is being installed.
- A new Feed Pump Control System delayed VBD-Afrom 1988 to 1989.
1
~ _
g- --
.\\-
l:~.
I 1
1
- COOPER NUCLEAR STATION ANNUNCIATOR UPGRADE PROGRAM I
)
i 1
)
1 l
i TOPICS L
Pro'ect His::ory i
i Pro ect Organization
.Sys':em Description
{
.Exis:ing System-HED'S
.h ew Sys':em Insta a: ion Sclecu e l
l i
E!'
s PROJECT HISTORY l
= DCRDR Summary Reaort-February 1985 L
= B ack & Veatch Engineers /Arclitects su amittec t1eir C \\ S Annunciator Re"las, Stucy-Aari 1986
= \\ RC On-Site 3re-m a ementation Aucit:
\\lP 3D committec to "urtier review oations arovicec in B&V Study-May 1986
= \\ 333 mace cecision to rea ace entire Annunciator System-May 1987
= Award o" Secuentia Events Recorcer anc Annunciator System Contract was awarcec to Ronan Engineering Com3any-\\ovemaer 987
= nsta ation of Annunciator -arcware-Began January " 989
.(
i
.I CNS ANNUNCIATOR REPLACEMENT PROJECT -
ORGANIZA110N CHART DMsianMarager of Eng.&Corst.
R.EWlbur Marager of NLclear Projects &Const.
L.P.KoNes Project Marager W. L.Swartz CNS Operalons Nuclear Support Engineering CRDR Core Team DonDeh(SRO)
M. A.Perr l
l l
l DetailedDesign Procedtres DesignChanges Engineenng G.McCright E. A. Rams ey NPPD Drafting A.M.Morisi fB&Vi (ESS)
(ESS) 1-
i
~
EXISTING ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM
= 3A\\ A_AlV Series 70 Soic-State visual annunciator system
= Auci3 e anc visua indications" rom 2000 "ie c in 3ut contacts
= ogic carc s activate " asling or steac y-on W1ite igit in annunciator wincow anc an aucia e a arm alnc'ivicua a arm circuits are larcl-wirec to incivic'ua igit aoxes
= A arge num aer o" a arm circuits lave mu ti-in aut contacts
L7 l
PANALARM ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM INADEQUACIES
= 61 -uman Engineering Je'iciencies icenti"iec
= Dana arm System coes not arovice re"as, ca3aaiity
= 20 annunciator Wincows not ocatec reasona]Iy c ose to tie contro anc incicating cevices to w1ici eaclis associatec
= Annunciator wincows are not prioritizec in a manner consistent wit 1 tie E guice ines s' lere are a num aer o" ow priority annunciator wincows w1ici slou c 3e com3inec into a sing e wincow
= 3ana arm system c'oes not 3rovic'e tie caaaaiity o"a larc coay arintout of eac, a arm occurrence l
s ' le system coes not 3rovic e any "orm o" l
recundancy or 3ackua caca3iity
= A. arm re ocation las to 3e larcwirec
E E
2
'kl g
l k.
\\'
- a.
t t t-1%!miliiis. _ y h
EiiiEim]
y!!".
~g 'unn:a
, ;?
y imme m Im=m> !f.
f===ami II.
g R
Lasiigm l(I
((I r-i w
y y.....y 3... ;
~23
~
a
~
f-T f-I l!
U
~
H 1
s L
'Ig'.
~
ii
- !ggI
~
g lio gg ss.
i
.y
-G sg n
E a
El g3
.g 7
g 1l\\,
H a.b D
E I
g E9D CR D j" O O
l-e-I 7
!=
7 iiE-E E!!!
17
-g 2
.Eifi w_
g f
.=
g==
- y
.[g rge C1 i
s 6 ' s
~
.i.Ji i
e b
r g,
g ye e
fi 1
ii i-7 h::
_4 s
a i
.i t
t=;;
23 E"hi7.3 i
d[ r R
E o
o 5 6 l
5 #
- f "g
$,a.pl $ !
"8 1
1 I
K
".Il 1
.;! 7 5
i.l l!!
si
.r JJ" y
.a 3
-,s", og 2
=
.~
-a n
y C
C C
I 6
O O
O u
le t
n l d lj
,.g E
h1 6
e }
W g
~$;*
~
$g* a~j;
- Ef;t i
- s i.
i
. U x
il l l
jk..-; \\
1
=J a
n j i
.ga;j y im,wg m c-;
y 5I((
!.n
.L P
2=-
- g==
0 h
.o
- I ;
,~
t t
t t
@/"\\%
.h NI
?
ggi V \\_j V \\ \\
$! E IJ IJ IJ IJ hs
\\lq[
l l1 l
l
];r,(
t u.
s-asc e
- s-l u
it 1
n o
s g
4; n
I 8
- s t
E
- 4 E
I
,, :1 t
l
ANNUNCIATOR INSTALLATION SCHEDULE 1989 S3 ring Outage 21 mu ti3 exers insta ec anc 3owerec ua 2 centra contro unitsinsta ec anc Jowered up interconnecting "jaer 03 tic ca3le insta ec 40% o" concuit, langers anc ca] e insta ec 3re-1990 S3 ring Outage a nsta ation o" remaining concuit, langers anc cab e 990 S3 ring Outage nsta ation o"new annunciatorsin Boarcs A anc 9-3 anc Dane's
, <, Q, V, >, P2 anc 9 anc insta C T's in 9-4, A anc E
1991 ra Outage nata ation o" remaining annunciators (i.e.
Boarcs 9-4,9-5, 3 anc C anc remaining bac< 3ane s) anc insta C rin 9-5 1
w-
- - - - - = - - -
~
. N "8
t
.p.t Y
SAFETY ^ REVIEW AND: AUDIT-BOARD (SRABF RESTRUCTURE NEED FOR' CHANGE
-CURRENTCOMMITTEELORGANIZATION.
' CURRENT OVERVIEW PROCESS LOOKING AT THE OPTIONS
-VISITS TO 0THER UTILITIES
~
-0BTAINING COPIES OF OTHER COMMITTEE CHARTERS
-REVIEW OTHER TECH SPECS
-POSSIBLE USE OF CONSULTANT
- - THE RESTRUCTURED SRAB
-REVISED POLICY AND CHARTER
-SENIOR LEVEL IN-HOUSE MEMBERSHIP
-0UTSIDE EXPERTISE ON COMMITTEE
-EXCHANGE WITH OTHER UTILITIES y
-USE 0F SUBCOMMITTEES
-ACHIEVE IMPROVED ABILITY FOR SELF-CRITICISM AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT E
~ _ _ _ _ -
m
.L!
s rr COOPER NUCLEAR STATION SYSTEM ENGINEER PROGRAM E. M. MACE ENGINEERING MANAGER - COOPER NUCLEAR STATION NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT AUGUST 10, 1989 Nebraska Public Power District
OVERVIEW l.
SYSTEM ENGINEER PROGRAM COALS 11.
SYSTEM ENGINEER RESPONSIBILITIES 111.
SYSTEM ENGINEER TRAINING IV.
SCHEDULE V.
SUMMARY
Nebraska Public Power District
'i; 1
SYSTEM ENGINEER PROGRAM GOALS i
o PROVIDE TECHNICAL EXPERTISE AND CUIDANCE ON A SYSTEM BASIS TO ENSURE SAFE, RELIABLE AND COST EFFECTIVE PLANT l
PERFORMANCE o INSTILL A SENSE Or4 OWNERSHIP" FOR ASSIGNED SYSTEMS
- SYSTEM ENGINEER
- PEERS
- MANAGEMEMT i
Nebraska Public Power District
l I
h.
t i
l SYSTEM ENGINEER RESPONSIBILITIES l
ATTAIN A DETAILED UNDERSTANDING OF ASSIGNED SYSTEMS o
MAINTAIN A KNOWLEDGE OF ONGOING SYSTEM STATUS FOR ASSIGNED o
l SYSTEMS o EVALUATE SYSTEM PERFORMANCE CONDUCT COMPONENT FAILURE ANALYSIS AND INITIATE APPROPRAITE o
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS L
l l
l l
l i
Nebraska Public Power District L_____
SYSTEM ENGINEER TRAINING o SYSTEM SPECIFIC TRAINING o COMPONENT SPECIFIC TRAINING l
o MANAGEMENT POLICIES / EXPECTATIONS i
o STATION AND INDUSTRY INFORMATION SYSTEMS o ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS o SELECTED MAINTENANCE TRAINING o PERFORMANCE TRENDING l
l Nebraska Public Power District
+
i i
s i
T S
I
)
T U
C
)
I S
O U
H R'
Y I
C H
C B
C G
R N
G O
Y N'
x N
H F
i O
C I
H R
m R.
M.
E 3
C m
M L
G D
I t
5 E
@l L
t A
5 W
N W
E W
I SU C
i M
R A
S C
i r
E M
m t
N I
E T
E i
s P
t O
O t
l D
A y1 R
R O
5 i
M F
T E
E 1
M E
O 0
E T
A6 5
T S
E W
S Y
Z 0
Y S
I M
S L
s 8
{
T C
3j g
g E
5 l
09
/
03 5
3 2
4 i
5 5
5 4
1
/
1 1
5 T5 9
t S
X I
I O
D G
D D
RD 1
T b
D D
D D
D R
R R
R TR R
R R
R TR G
A I
M H
C N
5 5
5 5
5C 5
5 5
5 5
5 5 0 5
O l
0 0
~ 0 0
G 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 Y 0 0 0
N G
5 3
2 4
Il B
5 4
1 5
5 N
Ni 0
1 1
I N
S 0
A C
C' 09 D9 09 09 RD9 9
9 SD9 D9 SD9 09 PD9N G
08 08 08 0 8 T D8 8
08 M D8 ED8 G
G G
G P R G
P E G S P R'D 8 S0 0 D0I U
U U
U T E D U R E i - U A E C E E 0 S A
E I E
P M 0
R 3 P N A
A A S A N 5
A 5l A B 5 N 5 T 0
M t 5 A 7
13 17 M 11 I
1 E19 L
L L
TL EL EL TL FL NL10 R' 5
11 19 19 I1 15R 2
2 1 N 1
E 1
A 2Y 2
C S
M N
fCE E
E E
E I
E O
E I
E T
T P
T 1
R V
P M
N 9S 9S 9O 9 L 9O 9T 95.
9 N 9 L 9
C 5
O R
I 9
8Y 8Y 8
U 8O 8O 8
8 8
8 8 T 8l 8N 8
9 9E 9G 1
G S G S G E G E G R G O G 0 G E G E P 0.
0 U G
G E 1
U NN NI Z
U L AU NE U R U T 0
NW M
AT - I 2A T
E U O L
l C
2 I0 P0 l01 I01 S INL 1
A E C
G 4 L BD 1 T SW 0
i 8E 7L 1 D 5E 1 E A
X M 0
2$S I0 E0 I0 E0 Eo 1
E R AE C AE V AE R A E C I0ES E
2 S0 L1 S2 V3 Ht 5
T03T S 1S E1S S1S E1SClS V7 M8 l9 V0 O
S3 S
S E1SO1SA1S E2 S L S N2S Y S
AAESAE A AE L A E S AE E
_ =
j ;-
l
SUMMARY
o PROGRAM STARTED IN 1974
- APPROXIMATELY 6 ENGINEERS
- PLANT PROBLEMS
- POINT OF CONTACT
- NUMEROUS COL-LATERAL DUTIES
- INFORMAL PROGRAM o PRESENT PROGRAM
- 20 SYSTEM ENGINEERS
- PERFORMANCE TRENDING
- FAILURE ANALYSIS
- SYSTEM OWNERSHIP
- DETAILFD PROGRAM WITH SPECIFIED TRAINING
- MAINTENANCE ENGINEER POSITIONS
- ENGINEERING PROGRAMS DEPARTMENT
l 1
L L
GENERAL OFFICE ENGINEERING SUPPORT SUPPORT PROVIDED ENGINEERING ASSIGNMENT & PRIORITI7ATION G.O./ SITE COMMUNICATIONS DESIGN CHANGE INTERFACES IMPROVEMENT AREAS r
m_____________
t
.4 l
\\
SUPPORT PROVIDED Design Changes or Equipment Specification Changes.
Program Generation, Im Appendix R, Design Bases.plementation Support (EQ,
..)
Engineering Reviews & Studies (IN, GL, IR...)
Operations Maintenance Support (JCOs, Operability i
Analysis, Purchase Contracts...)
Configuration Management (As-Build, Engineering Standards, Design Criteria Documents, PRA Studies...)
Construction Management Support Nuclear Fuels Support 1
i
4 ENGINEERING ASSIGNMENT & PRIORITIZATION Work Planning & Management Committee Licensing & Operations Division Assignments Assignments with Nuclear Engineering Construction Division Proj ect Assignment s Engineering Work Outage Scope Change Request (OSCR) i l
l
\\
L___ _
M-
+.
w G.0./ SITE CONNUNICATIONS' Daily Site. Call '- NPG Manager & Division Managers Aircraft Access Microwave, GTE, FAX, Computer
'NED Outage Coordinator Project Task Forces Off-Site Meetings Design Change Data Base i
l-
Kkt w
DESIGN' CHANGE INTERFACES A
e l
Engineering Work Request I
Work Planning & Management Committee or OSCR-Basis.of Design Document Supervisor & Design Engineer Walkdown Supervisor Review NED Multidisciplinary Review Site Review SORC Review & Approval Constructability Review Design Engineer On-Site M
n
7:y; g--
- - - - - ~
w
,m g y..
IMPROVEMENT AREAS r
Work P1anning &-Management Comittee Constructability Reviews & Man-hour Estimates System Engineer Input Deportability Timeliness NED Site Interface Group NPG Commitment Tracking System
_ _ - _