ML20196B309: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 20: Line 20:
==Dear Mr. Harrison:==
==Dear Mr. Harrison:==


By letter dated December 30, 1987 from Mr. T. C. Feigenbaum, New Hampshire Yankee (NHY) submitted the Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Comunities (SPMC) and requested that it be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790. A non-proprietary ("sumary") version of the report and an affidavit from Mr. T. C. Feigenbaum of NHY were also submitted.
By {{letter dated|date=December 30, 1987|text=letter dated December 30, 1987}} from Mr. T. C. Feigenbaum, New Hampshire Yankee (NHY) submitted the Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Comunities (SPMC) and requested that it be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790. A non-proprietary ("sumary") version of the report and an affidavit from Mr. T. C. Feigenbaum of NHY were also submitted.
The affidavit stated that the submitted information regarding namt..,
The affidavit stated that the submitted information regarding namt..,
addresses, places of business and similar identifying information regarding individuals and companies who have agreed to perform certain essential services in connection with implementation of the Plan constitutes confidential comunications under 10 CFR 2.790. Therefore, Mr. Feigenbaum stated the information should be withheld from public disclosure for the following reasons: Such disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy and could undermine efficient implementation of the Plan in the unlikely event of a real emergency at the Seabrook Station. He also stated that this informatton is of a type custonarisy held in confidence by applicants.
addresses, places of business and similar identifying information regarding individuals and companies who have agreed to perform certain essential services in connection with implementation of the Plan constitutes confidential comunications under 10 CFR 2.790. Therefore, Mr. Feigenbaum stated the information should be withheld from public disclosure for the following reasons: Such disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy and could undermine efficient implementation of the Plan in the unlikely event of a real emergency at the Seabrook Station. He also stated that this informatton is of a type custonarisy held in confidence by applicants.

Latest revision as of 07:08, 9 December 2021

Advises That TC Feigenbaum 871230 Submittal of Plant Plan for Massachusetts Communities Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure (Ref 10CFR2.790)
ML20196B309
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/05/1988
From: Nerses V
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Harrison R
PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
References
NUDOCS 8802110156
Download: ML20196B309 (3)


Text

o Docket No. 50-443' February 5,1988 Mr. Robert J. Harrison President & Chief Executive Officer Public Service Company of New Hampshire Post Office Box 330 Manchester, New Hampshire 03105

Dear Mr. Harrison:

By letter dated December 30, 1987 from Mr. T. C. Feigenbaum, New Hampshire Yankee (NHY) submitted the Seabrook Plan for Massachusetts Comunities (SPMC) and requested that it be withheld from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.790. A non-proprietary ("sumary") version of the report and an affidavit from Mr. T. C. Feigenbaum of NHY were also submitted.

The affidavit stated that the submitted information regarding namt..,

addresses, places of business and similar identifying information regarding individuals and companies who have agreed to perform certain essential services in connection with implementation of the Plan constitutes confidential comunications under 10 CFR 2.790. Therefore, Mr. Feigenbaum stated the information should be withheld from public disclosure for the following reasons: Such disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy and could undermine efficient implementation of the Plan in the unlikely event of a real emergency at the Seabrook Station. He also stated that this informatton is of a type custonarisy held in confidence by applicants.

We have reviewed your application and the material based on the requirements and criteria of 10 CFR 2.790 and, on the basis of Mr. Feigenbaum's statements, have detemined that the submitted infomation sought to be withheld contains proprietary comercial infomatior.

Therefore, the versions of the submitted infomati,n marked as proprietary will be withheld from public disclosure pursuant 10 CFR 2.790(b)(5) and Section 103(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. We note, however, that redacted versions of the information claimed to be proprietary in Enclosures 3, 4, and 6 were previously provided to the NRC as Appendices A and C to a PSNH submittal of September 18, 1987. That submittal is publicly available in our POR as Accession No. B709220259.

Withholding from public inspection shall not affect the right, if any, of persons properly and directly concerned to inspect the documents. If the need arises, we may send ccpies of this infomation to our consultants working in ,

this area. We will, of course, ensure that the consultants have signed the .

appropriate agreements for handling proprietary infomation.

1 8802110156 000205 )

PC)R ADOCK 05000443 l PDR l

t f

2 February 5,1938 If the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should change in the future such that the information could then be nade available for public inspection, you should promptly ratify the NRC. You should also understand that NRC may have cause to review this determination in the future, such as, if the scope of a Freeden of Information Act reauest includes your information. In all review situations if the NRC nakes a deternination adverse to tha above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.

Sincerely, ATI8In3I Signed bf Victor Nerses, Senior Pro.iect Manager Froject Directorate I-3 Division of Reactor Projects I/II cc: See next pace DISTRIBUTION:

Docket rjie NRC & Lccal PDRs PDI-3 R/F SVarga BBoger MRushbrook VNerses EShemaker,0GC EJordan JPartlow RWessman RBellany FCongel DPerrotti

  • See previous rfrrence OFC :PDI-3* :PDI-3* :M: M  :  :

. . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . : f .j.d. .'. . :: A C TD I R / P D I - 3

  • NAME :VNerses :MRushbrook :ES omaker :RWessman  :  :  :

.....:............:............:.g..........:............:............:............:...........

DATE :01/ /88 :01/ /88 :WLf/88 :01/ /AR  :  :

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

f

.=

k 7

the basis for withholding this information from public inspection should ch ge in the future such that the information could then be made available for blic inspection, you should promptiv notify the NRC. You should also unders nd that NRC may have cause to review this determinhtien in the future, such as, f the scope of a Freedon of Information Act request includes your informatio In all review situations if the NRC nakes a deternination '

adverse to t above, you will be notified in advance of any public disclosure.

Sincerely, Victor Nerses, Senior Pro.iect Manager Pro.iect Directorate I-3 Division of Reactor Projects I/II cc: See next page DISTRIBUTION:

Docket File NRC & Lecal PDRs PDI-3 R/F SVarga BBoger MRushbrook VNerses EShomaker,0GC EJordan JPartlow RVessman

}M SJ" '//9/87 0FC :PDI :0GC :ACTDIR/PDI.3:

.....:. ':PDI-)) .

g.......:.. ,...:............:.....

43... .:............:........................

NAME :V erses :MRu (ok :EShomaker :RWesshh  :  :  :

DATE :01//7/88 :01/l9/88 :01/ /88 :01/ \3/8A  :  :  :

1

  1. i 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY

-c 4, - ~ - ---