ML20059N824
| ML20059N824 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 10/01/1990 |
| From: | Bettenhausen L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Ellen Brown PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| References | |
| CON-#490-10890 OL, NUDOCS 9010170332 | |
| Download: ML20059N824 (17) | |
Text
n w
ng r
e iq.
Docket No. 50-443 00T 1 1990
'Public Service Company of New Hampshire ATTN: Mr. Edward A. Brown, President and Chief Executive Officer New Hampshire Yankee Division y
Post Office Box 300 Seabrook, New Hampshire 03874 l
Gentlemen:
Subject:
Maintenance Program Team Inspection This letter is to infe ye.; that the NRC intends to perform a team inspection t
of your maintenance program at the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant in Seabrook,
?
New Hampshire, on December 3-14,-1990 and to request your assistance in accomplishing this task. The inspection will focus on'the performance of
- s maintenance and whether components, systems and structures of your plant are
'. adequately maintained and properly repaired so that they are available to perform their intended safety function.
In order for us to properly prepare for the inspection and maximize the onsite time spent in observation of maintenance in progress, we request that you.
furnish the reference material identified in Enclosure 1 to this letter. 'To
-assist you in the gathering of the requested reference material, we.have
. enclosed a-Maintenance Inspection Tree (Enclosure 2) which is used by the team as' guidance during the inspection. The team leader will be contacting a member of your staff shortly regarding the information that will be needed prior to the start of the inspection and to arrange a suitable date for a meeting to i
explain the-inspection andLassessment methodology.
.A copy of the NRC Temporary Instruction 2515/97,'" Maintenance Inspection,"
Revision 1 is enclosed for your information.and to aid in the preparation for the inspection (Enclosure 3).
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
If you have any. questions regarding this. matter, please contact' Peter. Drysdale, Team Leader, at (215) 337-5289 or Norman Blumberg at (215) 337-5199, or myself at (215) 337-5291.
' Sincerely, Original Signed By:
Lee H. Bettenhauten, Chief Operations Branch Division of Reactor Safety Om OdO 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY ORYSDALE/SEABR MTI/9/11/90 - 0001.0.0 10/01/90
$no2288EFE8lk gol g
a
~.
g Public Service Company of 2
1 1
New Hampshire-Enclosures-1.
Request for Material.
'2.
Maintenance Inspection Tree
-3.
NRC Temporary Instruction 2515/97 Maintenance Inspection u
'cc w/encls.:
L. E. Maglathlin, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, PSNH
-T. C. Feigenbaum, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, NHY J. M.;Peschel, Regulatory Compliance, NHY R.- M. Katich, Manager of Generation Facilities Licensing, NUSCO J. F. Opeka, Executive Vice. President, NU G. Garfield, Esquire D.~ E. Moody, Station Manager,.NHY T - Harpster, Director of Licensing Services-R..Hallisey, Director,' Dept. of Public Health, Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
S. Woodhouse, Legislative Assistant Public Document Room (PDR)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
. Nuclear Safety Information Center (WSIC)
NRC-Resident Inspector State of New Hampshire, St.0 Commonwealth of Massachusetts, SLO Designee Seabrook Hearing Service List bec'w/encis.:
Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)
Management Assistant, DRMA (w/o encis)
J. Caldwell, E00 V.~ Nerses,.NRR K.-Abraham, PA0 (20) SALP Report and (2) Alll Inspection Reports
~
m.
~R. Bellamy,.DRSS L. Bettenhausen,.DRS i
.E. McCabe, DRP P. Drysdale, DRS J' Johnson,-DRP N. Dudley, SRI'- Seabrook (w/ concurrences)
DRS Files (3) 06 0
DRS:RI Nn DRS:RI ERSiRI l
Drysdale/ajk/dmg.
Bessette Bettenhausen 09/M/90 09/#/90 p9/0//90 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DRYSDALE/SEABR MTI/9/11/90 - 0001.1.0 09/28/90 l
L m
~
f 4
' m.7
{
4i
') -'
SEABROOK HEARING SERVICE LIST Thomas Dignan, Esq Diane Curran, Esq.
Robert K. Gadd III, Esq Harmon, Weiss & Tousley-Ropes and Gray
'2001 S Street, N.W.
j 225 Franklin Street-Suite 430 E
Boston, Massachusetts 02110-2624 Washington, D.C.
20009 Atomic Safety and. Licensing Board Senator Gordon J. Humphrey
.a
- Panel U.S. Senate 1
i U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 531 Hart Senate Office Building-Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20510
^
Robert A. Backus, Esq.
Judith H. Mizner, Esq.
Backus, Meyer and Solomon Counsel for West Newbury E
116 Lowell Street 79 State Street.
l Manchester, New Hampshire 03106 Boston, Massachusetts 02110 William Armstrong Suzanne Breiseth-
~
Civil Defense Director Board of Selectmen Town of Exeter Town of Hampton Falls 10 Front Street Drinkwater Road Exeter, New Hampshire 03833 Hampton Falls,-New Hampshire 03844 m)
Honorable Peter J. Matthews Anne Goodman, Chairman' o
Mayor, City of Newburyport Board of Selectmen-l City Hall 13-15 Newmarket Road Newburyport, Massachusetts 01950 Durham,_New Hampshire.03824 L
Edwin J. Reis, Esq.
H. Joseph Flynn, Esq.
L-
_Mitzi A. Young, Esq.
Assistant General Counsel i
.0ffice of the General Counsel Federal Emergency. Management Agency-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 500 C Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C.
20555.
Washington, D.C.
20472 Jane Doughty-Gary W. Holmes, Esq.
Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Holmes and Ellis 5 Market Street 47 Winnacunnet Road Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801 Hampton, New Hampshire 03842 Paul McEachern, Esq.
Allen Lampert L
Shaines and McEachern Civil Defense Director l
25 Maplewood Avenue Town of Brentwood i
P.0. Box 360 20 Franklin Street Portsmouth, New Hampshire 03801 Exeter, New Hampshire 03833 Administrative Judge Robert R. Pierce, Esq.
Kenneth A. McCollom Atomic Safety and Licensing Board j
N
'1107' West Knapp Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
)
Stillwater, Oklahoma 74057 Washington, D.C.
20555
'Seabrook Hearing Service List 2
)
Robert Carrigg, Chairman Administrative Judge Board of Selectmen Ivan W. Smith, Chairman (2)
Town Office Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Atlant Avenue U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission North Hampton, New Hampshire 03870 Washington, D.C.
20555 John Traficonte, Esq.
Mr. George L. Iverson, Director Assistant Attorney General New Hampshire Office of Emergency Office of the Attorney General Management One Ashburton Place State House Office Park South 19th Floor 107 Pleasant Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Ashod N. Amirian, Esq.
Geoffrey Huntington, Esq.
Town Counsel for Merrimac Assistant Attorney General 145 Main Street Office of the Attorney General P. O. Box 38 25 Capitol Street Bradford, Massachusetts 08135 Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Administrative Judge George Hahn, Esq.
Richard F. Cole Attorney for the Examiner Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Hahn & Hesson
,q p U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 350 5th Ave., Suite 3700 Washington, D.C.
20555 New York, New ~ York 10118 Richard R. Donovan Peter J. 3rann, Esq.
Federal Emergency Management Agency Assistant Attorney General Federal Regional Center Office of the Attorney General 130 228th Street, S.W.
State House Station, #6 Bothell, Washington 98021-9796 Augusta, Maine 04333 Michael Santosuosso Office of the Secretary (2)
Chairman U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Board of Selectmen Washington, D.C.
20555 South Hampton, New Hampshire 03827 ATTN: Docketing and Service Section R. Scott Hill-Whilton, Esq.
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Lagoulis, Hill-Whilton & Rotondi Board (6) 79 State Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Newburyport, Massachusetts 01950 Washington, D.C.
20555 Jack Dolan Barbara J. Saint Andre, Esq.
Federal Emergency Management Agency Kopelman and Paige, P.C.
Region 1 Counsel of Amesbury, Newport, &
J. W. McCormack Post Office &
Salisbury Courthouse Building 101 Arch Street Room 442 Boston, Massachusetts 02110 Boston, Massachusetts 02109
)
)
o
-s' 4
ENCLOSURE 1 Plea'se provide three sets of the requested documents.
The team leader will contact a member. of your staff regarding the best method of transmitting the documents to us.
l[
We request that you provide pertinent documents covbrin'g each element of the R
Maintenance Inspection Tree (Enclosure 2), including your management and administrative controls, procedures, instructions and guides.
Experience has shown that providing the requested information makes preparation for the inspection easier for both yourself and the team.
If you do'not have a docu-ment for specific-item within an element, you need not' generate it to comply with this request. The blocks on this tree identified as 1.0, 2.0, etc. do not require information from you.
Some documents may be applicable to a number of elements.
For these, provide the document and list the elements for which it -
applies. Also, to aid in planning the onsite inspection, provide th*4 appro-priate contact for each element.
In addition.to information provided for the inspection tree, we also request that you include'the following information.
Documents covering any of the following that were already provided for the tree elements need only be listed.
Description-of methods by which maintenance performance is measured. Are performance indicators used? What are they? Who is informed of the-reports used to assess maintenance performance.
Description of process for communications with vendors for technical services and latest technical information on equipment and systems installed at.the plant, and interfaces with equipment and NSSS vendors for training, modifications, and equipment replacement.
Documents which describe the preventive-maintenance and predictive main-tenance programs.
Which equipment is included?
How is maintenance frequency determined?
-What is done with results of these maintenance actions?
The number of craft personnel for electrical, mechanical, and I&C main-tenance organizations.
Please include foremen and the foremen to craft ratio.
The average years of experience for each individual and the turnover rate.
Description of shift work and work assignments.
How do licensee super-visors decide on which craf t or contractor is to perform what type to work?
ap v
e 2
t
~
Identify significant equipment failures which' occurred during'the last two years, include.those identified during.the last refueling.
Describe the maintenance and testing of diesel. generators and class IE electrical equipment.
- Provide the following Maintenance Work Orders (MW0s) status, i
Current total listing and status of MW0s, number in planning, number in-1 final sign-off, number on hold for lack of parts, number on hold for engineering assistance, number available to be worked on.
Projected number-of corrective MW0s to be outstanding at startup by priority.
Rate of completion of corrective MW0s in terms of number completed per month and manhours expended (by craft).per month for the past 12 months; Current number of preventive MW0s for the past 12 months.
Rate of-completion of preventive MW0s for the past 12 months.
i Estimated-manhours required to complete current preventive maintenance MW0s.
Number of MW0s requiring rework over the past six months.
Provide five corrective maintenance procedures for work that is scheduled for the outage (e.g., MOVs, PRVs, Solenoid Operated Valves, Safety / Relief Valves, ECS Pumps, Batteries, Switchgear, etc.).
Provide.five preventive-maintenance procedures that are' scheduled prior to your next scheduled outage.
i Provide-your overall maintenance schedule.
i J
- (
n n
~'
ENCLOSURE 3-
' n, W h'*
j UNITED STATES M
' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I
W,
{
y' WAsHmGioN, D. C, M6$ -
-- o, a
'U-U g'
NRC INSPECTION MANUAL poca TEMPORARY _ INSTRUCTION 2515/97, REVISION 1 o
MAINTENANCE INSPECT!CN l
j 2515/97-01 PURPOSE This temporary instruction (TI) provides guidance for conducting a perfor-mance-based inspection of an established and implemented maintenance process;-
at-all operating nuclear power stations.
L
'2515/97-02 OBJECTIVES l
The primary objective of this Ti is to determine whether -all components',
systems, and structures of nuclear power plants are adequately maintained-so that -they can be relied ~upon to perform their intended ~ functions.- R' Additionally, this-Tl :should determine whether the maintenance process
. provides. for the prompt repair of plant components, systems, and structures, as dppropriate to their~ prescribed functions.
.2515/97-03 ~ BACKGROUND NRC has' examined their nuclaar power plant maintenance programs and has found a -wide variation in their effectiveness. _ Inadequate maintenance has been ~a significant contributor to. plant and system reliability problems 'and, thus,-
is a safety concern.
Analysis of operational. events has shown that nuclear power-plant. components, are not being maintained at a level of reliability R commensurate with their importance to safety.
1 This TI'was ' developed to inspect and assess the effectiveness of mainter.ance at' selected nuclear power plant sites.
A Maintenance inspection Tree-(tree)
- will be used as guidance during these inspections to collate and.present inspection findings.
The tree is intended to provide a systematic approach-to the' performance of the Einspections and to ensure a level of-consistency.
R l
'2515/97-04 CONDUCTING ~ TEAM INSPECTIONS The maintenance team inspections will be announced when the team leader prepares for the' pre-inspection visit (Section 04.01) to the site.
The full-scope inspection cycle will generally be of a 6-week duration, with the team leader' possibly taking an additional 2 weeks to initially coordinate the inspection, gather infonnation, and issue the final inspection report.
'n l
li L
1ssue Date:
09/22/09 i
V
1, 1.
.,'The f, weeks of team ef fort should gererally consist of I week of preparation,
,1 week of in-of fice inspection, I weeks of onsite inspectinn, and ? weeks of 1
do'cumentation.
The sequence of the inspection effort will be determined by the regional of fice, for example, the 2 weeks of our ite inspection may be j
consecutive or separeted by I week of in-of fice inspect on.
j Generally, the inspection team will be compnsed of the following six members:
une team leader (region) i i
two reactor / project engineers (re one radiation specialist (region)gion) l two engineers (HQ)
{
1 The team composition and/or the extent of effort for individual members may bt adjusted by the region.
For example, the extent of involvement of the
)
radiation specialist may be less than 6 full weeks, as determined by the regional of fice.
In addition, the regions may include involvement of the resident inspector (RI) to the extent that is nomally covered by IP-62703 monthly examinations.
The RI should be provided training in the use of the logic tree by the appropriate team leader for this purpose.
The project manager (PM) will be generally involved with each inspection to' l
the following extent:
be available to the team leader to facilitate contacts with the licensee attend 1 to 2 days of the team preparation attend final pre-exit team meeting i
attend exit meetings The team will detemine what failures of significant equipment (probabilistic R
)
risk assessment (PRA)-identified, safety-related, or balance of plant (BOP) that af fects safety-related and special interest items) have occurred and t
will inspect the licensee's trending and maintenance activities to schedule. R repair, and prevent further failure of that equipment.
Other selective examinations of equipment failures attributed to maintenance will be examined to determine the adequacy of licensee corrective actions and root-cause deteminations of the failures. The inspection should be perfomed following 4
- review of the elements of the Meintenance inspection Tree (tree) and the additional inspection guidance provided in the Maintenance Inspection Guid-l I
l ance Volumes I and 11 (separately distributed).
This guidance should be used as an aid in detemining adequacy and implementation of maintenance activities and tn evaluate them.
The tree is also used as a tool to provide a level of uniformity in inspection structure and in the preliminary recording of the inspection results.
It is important to stress that the tree does not drive the inspecticn, but it does represent guidance in the areas of inspection to be considered in planning the scope of the inspection, with R inspection results recordeo on the tree to tne extent completed.
The tree consists of three major sections:
(1) Overall Plant Perfomance, (2) Management Support. of Maintenance, and (3) Haintenance Implementation.
The inspection requirements for Haintenance Inplementation, which focus on the plant systems, corr.ponents, test and surveillance data, and related activities, will receive the major portion (at least 80 percent, including direct observations of maintenance heing performed) of the inspection effort.
L t
Issue Date:
09/22/89 251 0 97 L+
y e
y a
lt should be recogni;'ed that irspection r(sults frot* the Maintenance
[
'(
.' ' implementation area will also provide input tn the Mar.agement. Support area.
,lt is cxpected that por tions of the Management Support of Maintenanct-sections of the tree, rspecially the Panagement Commitment and Managenient Organization stett ions, could be conducted by a single team meirber in a relatively short titue.
1 The amount of inspection ef fort devoted to the individual subsections of j
the tree will be determined by the regional office, taking into account inspection findings, time and staff limitations, and future inspec-recent tions planned to cover specific areas.
The inspection is to determine the effectiveness of the total integrated 1
maintenance process of the power reactor licensees.
Therefore, the team inspection may be directed into areas for which explicit regulatory require-4 ments may not exist.
Thus, the inspection is oriented toward analyzing the performance of maintenance activities rather than toward the identifi-cation of violations.
A specific example of an area not subject to explicit requirements is the licensee's participation with the Institute of Nuclear power Operations (INPO).
Review of licensee resolution of INPO activities shall be conducted in accordance with established policy and, thus, observa-tions in this area, when warranted, should be treated as indicators of strengths or weaknesses.
t Although the inspection may result in the identification of inadequacies that are not covered by explicit regulatory requirements, there is no intent to
" ratchet" licensees.
Individual findings that licensees are not following published tiRC guides and industry guidelines do not necessarily indicate that a program or area is inadequate.
The goal of the inspection effort is to j
emphasize the use of plant experience, test, reliability and surveillance R data, component failures, PRA insights (available to the licensee or provided R
the team by the Risk Applications Branch), and iter s of interest in to evaluating the licensee's maintenance process in terms of capabilities and perfomance, and to identify major strengths and weaknesses as they are related to safety significance.
T 04.01, Team Leader preparation.
A meeting should be held with the licensee to describe the scope of the inspection and to obtain preliminary review materials, such as the licensee's procedures for planning, conducting and r
assessing maintenance, as well as organizational charts, work schedules, i
equipment lists, component failure and trending data, completed work orders, R and related quality control (00) inspection procedures.
The material obtained by the team leader from the licensee should be distributed to the team members for their review.
Following completion of the in-office review of the licensee's maintenance process, the team leader will discuss the results of these reviews with the team members and factor them into the plan for the onsite inspection.
04.02 Inspection preparation.
In preparation for site inspections, the inspection team should review the elements of the Maintenance Inspection Tree to determine which areas may have received recent inspections, which areas may nnt be applic6ble, and which areas will be reviewed at the plant site.
The three major parts of maintenance (i.e.,
overall plant perfomance, management support of maintenance, and maintenance implementation) should be inspected to the degree required to provide a valid conclusion regarding the effectiveness of the licensee's maintenance program.
I L
2510/97 Issue Date:
09/22/89
t During the prepare (ion phase, the team should select several components l
cnd/or sys teras for detailed inspection either throuch consideration of cvsilable PPA
- insights, licensing trending' data, component failures R in safety-related or 80P systems that af fect safety, or selected equipment of
(
heightened interest tu the Commission, such es check valves, mutor-operated valves, solenoid-operated valves, and air systems.
The PRA insights tr.ay be used to select components or activities whose pottettal failures are i
predicted to contribute..most to the risk at that plant.
At least one high.
risk system should be included to verify that all performance-releted i
maintenance has been accomplished, including preventive maintenance. Equip-R ment failures provice a vehicle for review of various aspects of maintenance, s
including ront-cause analysis and trending, equipment history, corrective R actions, and past maintenance (preventive or corrective),
inspection of failed equipment repairs or work packages will provide the opportunity to 1
examine the adequacy of the interaction of all licensee functions supporting maintenance, including engineering analyses ard trending.
Review of performance indicator data, systematic assessment of ifcensee performance (SALP) reports, previous inspection findings, licensee event reports (LERs), maintenance radiation exposure history, and other direct I
measures may identify potential weak areas at that plant for. which more detailed inspection may be required.
Figure 1 (Inspection Flowchart) depicts the initiators that may be selected to enter the tree.
3 During the preparation phase, program strengths and weaknesses in certain areas may be recorded on the Maintenance Inspection Tree (working tree).
If there are sufficient data to provide an evaluation rating during the prepara-tion, the elements should be rated in accordance with the Maintenance inspection Guid6nce.
However, selected items and, in particular, identified i
weaknesses should be verified during the onsite inspection, even if an
(
f evaluation rating is assigned during the preparation.
04.03 Onsite inspection. An entrance meeting shall be held with the licen-i see tc detail the scope and schedule of the inspection, introduce the team members, and establish the licensee's contacts for the inspection.
The team should obtain from the licensee the status of ongoing work applicable to
'3 the inspection or that may affect the perfonnar.ce of the inspection or the inspection schedule.
Schedules and plans for the exit meetings and the interim meetings between the team leader and licensee m6nagement should also be establisheo during the entrance meeting.
Team members'shall perfonn a detailed walkdown inspection of the plant on the first or second day on site to observe the overall plant and equipment material condition.
This walkdown inspection, in which the team should observe the condition of numerous valves, pumps, motors,' etc., should include, but not be limited to the following:
Condition of components-Significance of tagged equipment Housekeeping and environment Adequacy of labeling Corrparisons with drawings and/or procedures Status of annuncictors This walkdown inspection may provide indications of areas requiring further exemination during the inspection, 3
issue Date: 09/22/89 2515/97 l.
.e Thc onsite inspection should focus on t he direc t. observatier. of work in l
bl J
pr gress.
Including the followire of litersee work with ceuipment in i
., progr(ss (e.g.,
tegouts, procedures, work packages, engineering support, materials, cenw.unications, testing, approvals, quality control etc.), significance of the maintenance backlog, rework, licensee asstssmentho of the perfortnance of maintenance, work control processes control of inter-faces, post-maintenance testing, plant material condition, and maintenance facilities.
On the basis of the collected data, the team should determine the apparent i
cause of any problems noted; that is, if the cause is related to the adecuacy of procedures, work packages, qualification of personnel, management, engineering, etc. 'This analysis should provide entry into specific elements of the tree, which then becorr.es a tool to explore the suspected causes and to assess effectiveness of the implementation of applicable elements.
areas listed need not be used in fonning conclusions for each element.
All Furthermore, other areas of inspection selected by the team may be used for entry to tree elements.
J 04.04 Analysis.
Using the inspection findings and results noted on Maintenance Inspection Tree, the team should determine whether each of the the j
b areas inspected has been adequately implemented by the licensee and whether or not there is enough information to assign a rating.
The Maintenance inspection Guidance and Criteria previously provided also assists use of the Maintenance inspection' Tree.
t elements identified cn the work sheets.The team will assign a rating to the applicable J
The team should assign an overall evaluetion rating to each of the elements inspected.
When this analysis has been completed, an overall rating can be determined in accordance with the Maintenance Inspection Guidance and Criteria.
i 04.05 Exit Meeting.
Before the final days of inspection, issues and findings should be reduced to definitive wr;iting and then used to highlight the presentation version of the Maintenance Inspection Tree (the Presentation i
Tree) and to complete the rating roll-up.
The exit meeting should include a brief discussion of the preliminary inspection findings using the presenta-tion Tree to depict inspection results in a susenary fashion; however, the licensee should be informed that the findings are preliminary until they are reviewed by regional management and the inspection report is issued.
04.06 Report Preparation.
Because of the broad extent of the inspection, documentation of inspection activities should begin early in the process to minimize the time required to complete the final report.
The final report should document the assumptions used, the elements inspected, the elements that were not applicable, licensee conclusions consistent with IMC-0610. strengths and weaknesses, and overall
.i' The report should address elements of the tree to at least the depth of the tier with eight areas (e.g., Direct Measures, Management Commitment and involvement, etc. ).
04.07 Follow Up.
Any unresolved f'indings identified during the inspection will be appropriately tracked and resolved by the regior.cl of fice, i
2515/97 Issue Date:
09/22/89
's 2515/97 05 INSPEC110N RfQUIR[fiENTS Tid inspection shall include selective examinations of the aspects of main-tenance listed in Sections 05.01 through 05.03, including each of the areas
/
related elements of liccrsee activities identified under the sections.
and
(
'To the extent possible, selective examinations should be based on observation of maintenance and equipment work activities in progress, review of licensee implementation of maintenance procedures and controls, results of ' review of s
selected do'cuments (such as work packages, equipment test results, and engi-neering evaluations), and interviews with personnel).
05.01 Overall Plant performance Related to Maintenance a.
Direct Measures.
The team shall conduct appropriate examinations of plant. operability, equipment availability, and plant material condition that-can be directly related to the effective implementa-tion of a maintenance process.
Before conducting the inspection of plant perfomance, the inspector should i
review available plant information on (1) availability (2) operability, and (3). reliability.
Infomation on these items can be obtained from the plant's.
operating history.
Other sources for obtaining the infonnation are SALP reports, Perfonnance Indicator Data, AEOD-Scram Studies, ESF Actuation
- Studies, Safety. System Unavailability Studies. Technical Specification Violations.
Monthly Operating Report Data, and Capacity Factors from NUREG-0020.
Data collection should be directed to those measures related to safety significant aspects of the maintenance process.
In addition, the i
inspector should conduct a detailed walkdown inspection of the overall plant material condition to assess the effectiveness of the licensee's maintenance external condition of equipment.is reflected in plant housekeeping and in the
(
l process to the extent that it The scope of the inspection shculd include examination of direct measures by using information gleaned from plant and equipment for the following:
Historical data Material condition 05.02 Management Support of Maintenance Management Comitment and Involvement.
The examination of management a.
i effectiveness concerning maintenance should be directed to deter-mining - the extent of corporate and plant management awareness and support of the maintenance and resolution of maintenance problems and should include examination of:
The application of industry initiatives.
Extent of manacement direct participation in maintenance and in corrective actions (management vigor and example),
b.
Management Organization and Administration.
The inspection of management organization and administration controls should be directed to determining how the organization supports maintenance activities, what maintenance activity plan has been established, how the maintenance activity plan has been implemented, corrected, and controlled, a nt' the control of resources.
The inspection should include examination of:
Issue Date:
09/22/89 2515/97
'IT n
n.
1 Progrcm coverage for mamtenance 1
Policy, coals,_ end objectives for maintenance Allocation of resources
..]
Definition of aaintenance requirements Performance measurement Document Control System for naintenance j
Maintenance decision process i
_g.
c.
Technical Support.
The areas that are to be selectively examined for the technical support organizations with regard to mbintenance are as follows:
i i
internal and/or corporate connunication channels Engineering control
_ Licensee acknowledgement of risk significance
- -Ouality control R
1 Incorporation r,f radiological controis into maintenance process Safety Review Consnittees Regulatory documents Trending R
Examples of the applicable departments or organizations subject this inspection are:
to Engineering (nuclear, instrumentation and control (It,C),
t mechanical, electrical, licensing, systems,etc.)
Quality Assurance (0A)
Quality Control (00)
-)
Health Physics (HP)
Safety Fire Protection Operatic,ns 05.03 Maintenance Implementation a.
Work Control.
~
The inspection of the work control process should be I
directed to work ' order documentation, equipment history, observation of' testing in progress, planning and scheduling, and document review.
The inspection should incluoe selective examination of:
- ' Review of maintenance in prngress Work order control Maintenance of equipment records and history Job planning Work prioritiration L
Maintenance work scheduling Backlog cor.trols Maintenance procedures Post-maintenance testino Review of completed work control documents b.
Plant Maintenance Orcanization.
The inspection of the plant mainte-nance organization should be directed to how the organization
)
supports maintenance activities, how the maintenance activities are controlled, how the organization establishes documentatinn, implemented, and the ef f ectiveness of i
.2515/97-l ~
Issue Date: 09/22/89 t
~,
' /.
' the coordination and feedback lines of communicetion bet wee: plar,t nid nagement ard craf t personnel, cnd the effectiveness of interfaces t;ith Cther departments, especially operations.
The inspectinn shculd include selective examination of:
i
- Control 'of plant maintenance activities Control of contracted maintenance-
)
Deficiency identification, control, and corrective i
action system Maintenance trending Support interfaces 1
Maintenance Facilities Equipment, and Materials Control.
c.
i The fol-lowing at:e to be selectively examined for the area of facilities, equipment, and material controls, as well as for their support of the maintenance process:
~
Maintenance facilities and equipment Material controls Maintenance tool and equipment control Control and calibration of measurement and test equipment i
d.
Personnel Control.
The following areas of personnel control are to be selectively
- examined, including consideration of
- staffing, training, and qualification:
Staffing control i
Personnel training Test and qualification process Assessment of the current personnel control status 1
2515/97-06 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS I
t The appropriate regional of t1ce will document the findings and the actions I
taken in an inspection report and, in addition to the norinal distribution, will forward one copy to the Director, Division of Licensee Performance and
(
Quality Evaluation, Office of NRR, and one copy to the Director, Division of
!=
Reactor, Safety, in each of the other regional offices. A copy of the R Maintenance. inspection. Tree colored to reflect the inspection results for R each inspection _ conducted should be sent to the Chief of POEB at mail stop R L10-A-19.
R
'2515/97-07 COMPLET10N SCHE 0t!LE Inspections' should be scheduled so that they are completed prior to April, R
1991.
l 2515/97-08 EXPIRATION This tempora ry instruction shall remain in effect until April 1991 or R until the inspections have been completed.
~ issue Date: 09/22/89 2515/97
L *# '
2515/97-09 NRR CONTACT 4#
Any questions regarding this temporery - instruction should be addressed to A. T. Gody (301-492-1117).
2515/97 STATISTICAL DATA REPORTING Record the actual time spent to perform this inspection against inspection procedure number 25597,for the 766 system and 2515/097 for RITS.
2515/97-11 ORIGINATING ORGANIZATION INFORMATION 11.01 Organization Responsibilities. The Perfomance and Ouality Evaluation Branch of hkR will provide support and overall guidance for these inspec-tions.
11.02
_ Estimated Resources.
Each inspection is planned for 6 weeks for 6 persons with 2 of the 6~ weeks being direct onsite inspection (IE staff weeks) and I week in-office inspection, with expected additional effort by the team leader (a total of 38 staff weeks).
This total includes prepara-tion, inspection and report writing.
11.03 Parallel Inspection Procedures The inspection procedures that this Tl may satisfy totally or in part are listed below.
Where credit is teken, the inspection report should note the inspection procedure number per lHC-0610.
The region should make final
}
determinations based on the scope and documentation of the inspection.
37701 56700 62704 37702 61700 62705 37828 CIP 61725-72701 38701 62700 83000 series 38702 62702 92700 CIP 41400 62703 CIP 92701 ENO
) Issue L' ate:
09/?2/89
1 ENCLOSURE 2 WORKING TREE
+Rrr mmAToRs e.
MAINTENANCE INSPECill I
t t est CeMulbi f aama SAN
/
4 ses emedfl tstem a ts%het 4.see e Matt tema nat sovk at lynant amemas semes)
- [.d
in.
& IMIpett O P. ant a 9fE8 r
I 2
i
"':'".V.--
+
..e
..a,
.i..
a.,
10 tellhafh3 tr teftf
=
$4443 1e et
- 88'888' RDentA /
esnesma.t 364safata seeet /
E8"*'**'**
ao no imann if
_M
,e, g-a% age
,/
gg saticus a
lata et.Wue 5 g
m 4 hap @ D ti se se reasets Deutale gr #,
samm Demme-Elias. Jam e,tamaa /
earrte #
CedRa5 F0s CM>ckelt #
e are eufY N WSWil DelthmG CanN89fJ SIE, e abWalWft
'I
_ Dsasadil e artkahJ14 gg g,4, MW's **$
8 u et.e /
pyg e tamagatate
- nat' is e naammi sais e Mt1 Pita %Ik afe MNLWtth 5 By attuatag e ifLI aLRLARat
,ga g g g,
e IRSMalth M
. Guia$il 8 W 4D8e(4 88343 e paAE pdfl Ceti 3p i L sa 8 48EIII'I 00hdP e 3[ggylg y f aam,akhi e
e Satanen (WP084
- 8*888 tit ** FRJC1#
m gas.se e scatt 4 guggDet NetN1 I
"a"u #
A e maa.stutui ggpq e f et as gggg e
n..
t e=
-,=,;;a t
e a.,..
e
...a a e --
ii==4 a i e -en i
- e. -..oi
-m.e e.a "ia '== a=*
.u
. am e==.==
a e.
.u,,,
numeen catcM S a = =.E140, arrute!
- '*". /'-
e n.gea.,,ad
=
n e c,.
e e
= =...
e a. i = =a i
i=a.n
. weau;= ten avucn e cares =,=munit a
--is!iev e = =een me means e=== eacies e inn =
n====a e,a,,,,,,,,,,,
- 'an ** sus,a e es e one omasms e,,, e.e,u s,gggg,g iimi I
gggg g g3 e fett-manipaana e (AIPumW SEritant 41910 0 N SMMM e _las ase LA.4.S.ta. tut taan
- p,y
",.u, eitR&R tahE8Sch e,,,,,,,
e -a =
e o,-.a,
- r,,=,,,,,,
e -,m.e.
e, e = a.
e e AmmG e embas83 064WTV 10 4 a, s,e,ggg(44 m41 pt e seestas meg Canal bio 3
- (
ude%ea PAGEttl e fustacu e
a.=-a miaL.
e.m,,
k I'
e O.n.t.aa, pm esqPitte e a,p 68se.t.
llll== p/
n,.
=
e.e u at.
ee m. m
- Satmus mammen e, spann up.v s e ut # eJGiupt 4 masses ingsgseg
- s'3."d.%. '* ***
e.am. a.
e <=== acia e..
e afftensi tiPdelimistes e, py aggt a y e
a eg e emanaam meditaset BlaWKata 80 e emithang StamutWI OndsetEl g ft?v e,,t'se p #
na s'
NMalgtf 60EMast Otwat ggn g aCN1E3 g,ggg gagnact [
cm i
ptarenessG glahansat e maannig gafthAS e NCf.pC4 n. aft 1T e.RetuEl stent i
e -.m.c.,
ea-e a
... - =
- _. a.,u e,*" ~ =i
- = : a r' e
a.. u.
j,g pit 3418
~
e,, _
I 8'*"III e 84ESif Sahal
=,:=,, '
=
e Cai.i i.
si Octneot Cabma" IM '88V gvgttefg p eM ham hamG temibassE
' II IIII'O f-e R3esta PtT1calmei e est CasstsEmTB e EEftc Lff1ttlaparrt aan hagyug, gggg yggggg Nh e aPrutai M Madsel
..,a,a B
e.caria l a==
lleGa&I e stittgac MvEt 44 grealt
!?
g-meAllmaMJ f man myn,'
t una to sea enm*4 anno-a. <nrn.t entn-a enin-c.
43W6-4 enT4-4 amt 425779 C e bate e WPeaN e ERAE e Rani A3e4 e em Iff(RtKMT I
1 1
Jk
-L
i E TREE m
i
- 6...n..
i os.
f w.s t
y g..
m i
r
_. -. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ +
a.,.
E I
l l
I
.....m
=>
i.e t
/
s.fus III.
RI
- 6. t p
P f
F
- m..-
m-m.,, /,
r u
.i
.y r,,,
.. u w..
~~
- *a; a.-
- r." M.."
a.
- "=== ** '
t
~..,,m i
n a
i=
... c u-
,,,.,n,,.,,,
5
=>
1.m m
- m.
=
..u u
- L.,/
lllll=.,.
I
. - -... ~
......c l
..,,, n. m,,,
==
wm. =
...n...
...a....c..i.n
- =,,,,g;-
ri,*,:l:g=,'
=
. ig, m
5.,,.
- gy
. mi...-o.
r
. r.r.t.;.;-=
i.~===
n APERTURE r
- m,.-
CARD
- 1.TT.** um.
a.a=
- -=,/
- i. =
. au
=.a=.==-
e, mo g
r
. m.m.
Also Aya. dab)e On
.mcam
. ma.
.== i..i i.
i Apo ture L,ard
. c.ou. ms.
,. /
4 *=c
.e
- g'g.,=,,=.
't,.ll=
3=
u
.c.
t 7
.y,.
'.m.=i
.um.
_. m v,
m
.uu
.t
.a
. o.,m.=i..i m.a,.
=
LEGEND n
t l-
.w a.
=a
. (.'".'E=8
. t.t i'
. n 68 C..
fTi D4WI ECI=h IIdINED i
c=wo
.=E).0n,uenc.t.u.1111
,,,c p.
ct. ss.ss.06..
.,ani p,
W' 1.D.1.U
/., 1 p.u.es.
,9-1 t.
y
.,1
.I.
/
....as e t.ss.s.
Ek
..am.o. u
. cm.c
- wii a
t ci t s's=.
n :
iu.an ammi.ean m-,
t
,, g,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
a /
,8N
.Mu D Ed.IN,..M MT 9
. 'a*.a.=
=
=ou,
u is
.a
{"
W./4 I,31 (M. Ilk..I.WTI.H14.I.
.g as g
n
..a
- m. anni win u.
i L,
msw r.c wanc re
,,_,,,,,,, ou. i.e <ine
. aa' ca =*'.
. El.f.WM I./ i u,..n a (M sa 10.,.l.
JI d l:
(31,e/
o.
e - - -
y--
gg,, gygg,
,.,,,.,.9..W..,,.,E.&,.,,.
}
o.,..a...
- s. e.
n en e.s
.e. t.a.
r Dr.
Cul.N1 j
e iw.
i i
..ww
+
%3,,
425767-C i
?
4 l
i e
.