ML20234F492: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 15: Line 15:
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA TO NRC
| document type = CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS, INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE, PUBLIC ENTITY/CITIZEN/ORGANIZATION/MEDIA TO NRC
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
| project =
| stage = Request
}}
}}


Latest revision as of 17:47, 6 October 2021

Resubmits Request for Permission to Interview Participants in ACRS Bodega Bay Deliberations.Since Natl Security Not Involved in Application,Request Resubmitted.Related Info Encl
ML20234F492
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Bodega Bay
Issue date: 02/06/1965
From: Pesonen D
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION TO PRESERVE BODEGA
To: Manly W
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
Shared Package
ML20234A767 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-665 NUDOCS 8709230142
Download: ML20234F492 (6)
v • d • e


Text

_

SAY AMA CHAPTER (

i f orthom CcH0cr:.?: .Ascocic' tion 1br To Preserve Ioc'cca :-:esd and Harbor F.10'JdC J %VR.%

  • Ccrkclcy[, Clifomic 3cca cana stree:

ADVI5 ORS 1

Ansel Adams l David Brower John tmmons  : February 6, 1965 L ", ! ",, ,_

g . ,, ,.,, h,.[ y [ Q Ao /;ccM COMMITTCE Harold Gnom Dr. W. D. Ihnly, Chairman ou ng,.C7W GMCGUARDS

i co ,or.on h A.E".C.

Advisory Cc mittee on Reactor Safeguards l w.idon F. Hedd United State Atomic I.'nerCy Commission ' g gg I

o. H.s norb Washington 25, D.C. 7g J )

P tf

"d' H'"i"8 9 8,0J0 4 L9g, 24 3 d,5 0 l

Dear Dr. Xanly:

3 l

D. a. tvien k I waam P.nn son, Jr.

Thank you for your letter of January 25th, outlining the Thomos Parkinson Committee's policy Cn public ECCecC to its proceedings.

x.nn.,8 a..,o,n I do not feel, however, that it is entirely responsive to my origi-7 ,g ,,,,gg, nal letter of Nove bar 12th.

oowd e, p.,on n Eueusive s,cretary I am under contract uith Coward-McCann, Inc., of New York to write a case history of a particular reactor project. The publishers rightly feel that the public is entitled to under-stand precisely what happens in these proceedings, beyond the broad Regulations.generalizations incorporated in the Code of Federal

{

i The fact that this ic already a raatter of public interest i is chovn by the encloced copy of PC&S Procress (December 1964),

which the applicant has distributed to approximately 2 million l households in northern California. You vill note that the ccepany I

has emphaciced that recorvationc about the safety of the Bodega l installation were a " minority view," implying that the ACBS i

v1s unand.cous in its approval of the project. But the ACRS report of October 20., 1954, contionc no such unanimity and offers no cupport "ninority for the inference that disapproval of the cite was a view."

I can find no cupport in 10 CF3 2,9--cited in your letter--

for the implication that eithcr administrative or Congressional intent the fact. was to diccourage public access to ACR3 proceedings, after  ;

Indeed, a clcce reading of the regulations suggests that the ir. tent wac juct the oppocite--to facilitate such access except where catters of national cecurity are involved. Clearly ,  !

national security ic not involved in the Bodeda Bay Atomic Park ]

application. <

Since the ACR3 is a publicly constituted body, cince national security 13-not involved, and since I cannot agree that the Co nittee'c own internal policy, ac outlined in your letter, has anything to do with the Co=mittee's ability "to per-form its functions effectively," I must again request permission to interview participants in the ACRS' Eodega Bay deliberations, cc:

Honorable John E. Moca, Jr. ,Cincerely,.

Covard-McCann, Inc. e

. " , . Ofj ot-wg y Purposei To worit for preservation of v6;

,n.c and historic heodlonds of Bodece Tavid 1.y and E. Pesonen to msvre th.

6COSj c i

_ - _ - _ ~

~

h., 6bS$ [?

(- < y ~- .f a

) h2CNN@($)@ lhh"'fk-g g-

) N,9 i. 's. I l ~.l.oSw.s . t,, - y j', ' ) i PN.shd mowy or Pool.s C,os end flestd4 Comsaav, e CsMo+a row muro c 4 6; C.M:as 8 Gu::&cs I vvv vvvwvv n. w .

- . . J vn.f mono.,W tc, Col,f orn.e L /,

YeWaie ru HCHT T4 ha obsta ar17:eAroay h3 SAN Fv ANCl$Co D Cin t N 0 su.uS WITH C#4tiHMAS 5E ALS =*

NumWe 12 j mec, -

, . s Jbr n.

Lw y~ e. x _ u n ,,.m e ,w c.

/ ._ _ . . _ , . ,

. - y , j ,. ,..mg 8 ., _n

. vt s u c l, pea Ds:!sion FoHows D!s=gm=r.i .y J.1C C=m=Hisa and SiaH PG&E has decided to withdraw its app lication to the Atomic Energy Commission for the construction exprewd concern over the lack of any experimental of the Hodega flay atomic plant. In making the an- or esperience proof. test of them.

nouncement, Robert H. Gerdes, PG&E president, de- i:v vim 'The doubt raised by the StatT, althouch n minor.

clared.

pocuoii. is sudicient to cause us to @i'tEdiEour ap!

..We have repeatedly stated that u. . any reasonabb piaro We would be the last to desire to build a

.with any substantini doubt existing as to pub.

doubt exists about the safety of the propoecd Hodega plant, we would not consider ' going forward wd. h it.

[% e have made provision for adequate cice .

Many Exports Found if Sound generating capacity elsewhere to take care of our cus-(mnnt needs for the several years immediately ahead.

'The Bodega site and the engineerin~ design of uc F pp.- Fuhre Orighf the safe plant wmc studied extensively and co"rdirmed as ur demon to withdraw the Bodega apph, cation ,

by eminent consultants in geology, seismology 9 d"" ""I *0"" " h V" I St 8ny c niidence whatso-and seismic design. The Advisory Committee on Hva ewr in nuclear. electric generatm.n. Atomic pla actor Safeguards, an independent group of twelve eminent scientists and engineers established 44 hv law safeshown.

5 has and dependable, Mck>ar fuel os experience is plentiful and in Califo to advise the Atomic Energy Commission. came 'to the .. mp y ,

is becoming the most economic heat source same are sound. conchision. We are convinced that these viewpactant [ P"#"rn. unnation. Its apphcation is especially im-ing California. or meetm, g the future energy needs of grow,

'The regulatory stafT of the AEC. howeser, ha.s recently reported that it has some doubt 'at the pres. ?G&E's purpose remains, as always, to provide ent state of our knowledge' about the capahi! icy of Our t ustomers with the most eflicient, reliable an-1 the stiucture to w,:h dand the maximum assumed safe service at the lowest feasible rates. Further deve!-

earthquake. Althou.:h agreeing that 'the propowd en- opment of this important peaceful use of the atom is

iriecring principles appear reasonable.' the Stafi has es3ential to this objective "

i Additional comment on the Bodega Plant, Page 2. )

(n ,

~.,a ". , .-?a.

ono,m ~ .

/: n  ?

< > c.,

e ir 3 m x. 7 +'

,r~

,, o n 3

- a J - ... . - r u. .' %.O G 2,.: ~ . . . 's m r. a n (' > . J * ' *

./

ihas , Gain linin;idy t.har gen tiir e<>m!,ined .

a w) a \JO J.

H ,'

'- 0 GO N

b, che ' ' 31i (ne and telephone service tor . typical San Fmncisco 'i househohl are the second lowest amon;: the 25 largest Only six large cities in the United States have hills cities in the United States, according to a survey by of les than $15. The highest charge for the three serv-the California Public Utilities Commis3 ion. io.sstisG.s2 L94 in Boston and 14 cities have bills of more than Only in San Antonio. Texas, where ;:as and ch c:rie sen ice.s Ahhough gas and electric service rates vary some-are pmvided by a tax. exempt municipal wha:

svslem. are the rates lower. thmughout the PG&E service territory. charges Ibed on usage of 50 therms of gas.150 kihewatt in San Francisco reflect low rates in Northern and hours of electric energy and indis idual !ine residentialWntral n California. Fif ty therms of gas cost $4.00 in telephm.e se, vice. San Fmnci3co resents nay M3 ~.; ndsco. down from $4.01 last year and 150 Thi., ihnne i4 don a 27 eenta imm last year due to a.84.93 lasthours kilowatt year. of electricity cost $109, down from rme re<h.clion for both gas and electric customers of NINE STln Antonio's gas and electric rate 3 were nm n analy8is of the Utilities Commission's figures l '

UU'H DC " Y bI IOT NOS

reduced g g' during the pa ! vear and the comb.ned total g . h sn ce which on the average in the other cit 4cs covered by the survey costs M 28.

Los Angeles. also with a tax exemp: mun cipal PG&E's gas and electric rates are lower now than elect.ic system. was third lowest in the nation at th.y wre 30 yems c when the value of the dollar was con.siderably higher.

1wif s e

l

s

~

/* .

l5f .

/.

L .. . . i -

( i j , s ,. s .. .

.!) w u \.M U N,. JJ f . ~ . UJ sv .. . .. ~u

~

'A im.nb 1 of (';dif<,; . newcapers i? .o a

editd;al comment on the recent deci.sion o: .. or De,ponJ h: ed.to.nd be: ded "P(MM Geb 'A.Plui for withdmw its app!ic.ition beinic the Aton m 3.ne .;y ' v."lin San Jose MERCURY said:

Pacc G K ,&erde Co. do.crve,. an *A.plus' for Commiulon for the conatrucdon of a nud ar ;u e *. .ani v rc+on dhilit y.

plant at ilodega Head. .

ret w tha week abandoned planx-and $1 md.

Tiie SS. Ch:!ON!C: O oid: h..n u or:o .d sue deu lopmenwfor a nuclear power plant

.n . :. h.>..i He...I in Ma rin Count v.

"By c.merib n;: ils mie. car power project at MoU :a

!! cad. the Pacide Cas A Eketric Co. has hvrd up to its The deci ion was taken on the advice of a minority M.ni report f rom the Atomie Energy Commixxion. The own repeated prorai<e., to make safety its overridm;; con. maiority of AEC experts in seistnology and nudear re.

aideration in going forward there.

actor construction felt the Bodega Head plant would he "In the face of conflicting judgments bv two .:irien nt s. . . . A minorif v thought it would probably be safe but gmuns connected with the Atomic Energ'y Commi,, ion, d"'l II"' Inunt Mate of know  ;

the l'GSE intelli:;ently concluded that it wou!d be unwbe tual remior construction made a, lodge about earthquakes t impossible to give un.

to build n nuclear plar.t that h ft any ,,ubstanti.d 6.aht 4""DI "DP'"V3I-existin ; as to public safety. It reacimd this ri.ncimion T"" i * '

even though it remains convinced that its o. ;no ring aad the no."th. enough for PG&E. It abandoned the plans ons already invested so that there could he design for the ph:.nt is entirely safe. no nor qon of endangering puhhc safety.

..We comiqment the I,GLn. r. aa.,xen:ent na Th;s m commun:ty responsibility of the highest order.

m

,. eiDe Gu & Electric Co. deserves the praise and the what clearly

ood faith anoygooo ti.ej.u[qic wa .. interen ana for sm,v...+ aatn "To coneA . a, at hke this in the realna < f . ac
i c r. . r.ai:ude u proud toofsalute all of this Northern.

hrm. California. The MERCURY ing and geolo ..c... c:;pertneu a not easy for cn <.r dea.

tion that taka pra in its engineering >Lill an ' . awl. ,o,

'" " , I" had this to say:

cd;;e. All t;. more cr:dit, therefore to the ICS. for j

  1. '"9*"f the Pac.fic Ga s and. Electric Company

~ .

""'" m on

,i electing not a, make a an'aorn and implacab:c n u .t o.'it. "*I h ,4

,.The . .

p$.a'at at .s,odega Bay is commendable. plans to, build i

of cour>que gon o; ryuclear m.sta!!ations for elec;ria p;nver e s::a .em ans in the picture. If not . & donega' .A stali opinion by the atomic energy coramission that an atar.'.ic p:Lat jvdl doubtless be proposed for a.imewhere there is lack o! proof of safety of the plant because of its elt.e . . or aar t.m aay Arca; a particular pite. n,ot the locuon Ajacent to the San Andreas earthquake fault acva ae o: rc elear technology, has been delea: ct pmwW the company to scrap its plans.

..PGG President Robert Hc Gerdes has declared this T. .32. 3WS CALL BULLETIN said in mart: hs pmgmm decision will not deter the utility from pressing forward to build nuclear powered generators.

- _E fuident Robert H. Gerdes was up aUinst "h,aturally it should not, because the, development of j

canJ.c.ing reports from AEC sources on the safeiy of pow 0r (fom nuclear fuded plants is as inevitable as to-the cair. par.y's. proposed nuc! car power plant at Bo, ega {

m. , m now a sunrac. But until man knows more about this l 3aurce of energy and how to control it no one should

.. . e * ..oci . . _ .

take unneccusary risks such as building a plant on an  !

prdiminary wor) ca 7.ars already r. c.q. .:n earthquake fault. Moreover, the Bode *~a Adv;aory Cararm.i waen.. . tneana stan AE.t.a G, AnCs han,smted . o, een, n.

iaccause of its recreational potential.,, site was un.

3 son casag reen on u.,c ty .,.acu.r s i, "Sa, faced i : h a re;u.onable doubt, Gerda did dut POS's had a.. aya said it wou!d do under sus circum. The Stockton RECORD said:

stances: !!v Whdrew the .ppl;ention, "The PG&E made a wise decision, one that will earn j "PUC Cornmisnioner Will.'am ilennett-hode to the w da public approval." l plant--said Mr. Gerdes is entitled to the grcatest credit for his coura;;o and judgment? We concur. The Bakersfle:d CALIFORNIAN said:

"This ducs out m. ..a ihe end of ouelem power ,an.ra. The company, af ter the AEC had examined all of the tion in California. The prosrarn will be pash<d in other ..nd rukd that some <;aention remained regarding sites where earthquake hazards are nt,t acute. Resuhant the safety of the proposal, has withdrawn its application economics will be feh by all electric comumers

  • in a public-spirited gesture. It is to be praised for its act io n."

w u ,z n ,

y

p. :2e . .. a; g 1 . e. ' Q, a 7dlf . kut Digaina Your Way to China - -

In the 100,000 pccduciag wells The ener.:y flowing through the that supply the United States with nation's gas lhws each day is equiv-MD natural gae, drillers have dug al nt to the daily octput of GC0

(

NM#

thrcunh the ca .h from here to China Hoaver Dams. C ". V '

more than 12 times over. -

More than one out of Sve U S. YA.) PqD .)

It is esti- Y '* a new color teIcv; .;cn se. c . L PG&E customers familis now enjoy an annual in.

_ A' .L"s^ gq/.

C .I ' 3; O 'd.!dv en average of 80 cents a rnonth to come exceeding .t.i.CCO. Each year 7Y (N d b.] MFd su~y operate. New black and white sets 400.000 families join this group and cost 63 cents per month to operate,grou about

p. a million join the $10,000
496 '

2 PG.w:7.; Progreos 1J[.

i e

_________m__________ _ - - - - - - - - -

t' 7

OFFICE OF THE CH TRMAN WHITE HOUSE MAIL '

72y TO: GENERAL MANAGER

<.-DTEECTOR OF REGULATION REPLY WITHIN 48 HOURS (SEE SPECI.AL INSTRUCTIONS BELOW)

FOR APPROPRIATE REPLY FOR APPROPRIATE HANDLING REMARKS

' Rec'd 0". m . nf Reg, Date h.19 4_ k- _

Time __3 li . . .

Beth'-~t/ ~' ARNO W R. FRITSCH FOR THE CHAIRMAN 08.-7j W  % R: r- -t ., s w. #

i rp

r. . -

.uW ' $ *.' )

  • , .Y,a'ovana v

, y ,,;* MfA ; 4.; JY i i

.w

.ne.

, f:

a c

s, ' -: *

? ,,- .

l, 1& ; 7 , , , ,[

' M ' Mg ~. p

y ,. 9 % i 0"9"' % ^m M ed! t > - <
  • 1, e

. w a hy

~

Tg '?-

l

~

8 N9 N

  • D ATE OF D 'OCUMENT ' / f!' TIL N

i.'. nedecedt see W 138 7/28 % .E LOCATION V ~,

TO , >'

ACTION PROCE$51NG DATES M $$ ~Ac knowledged a INFORMATIONAL C0F( 015TJtlBUTIO b cho trmon I

'Y FOM l

,; ADNS < A No kW)h. I .

.g. 4 F.M f.)

_ADA. Y -' ti' ' '

hep. DS.' T T* $

i M $[M[e%@M'5F'] 4 Final '

fj ,

4 a s

% .D .

nGC ,7'

~ tt L *'.

"'#u.t DESCRIPTION . , I4,E. helsinet * '

I;\ .

  • 4l' l '.k' ,;f.;bCh. -[l'DoAr lhe,,

REMARK 5 k

.[

4

[V "^

' (f,

  • - jt W88 8 ..l',, M R4 Alldtr WW E te F' " *. 2 Esthl-( 'i.-' plant'ah2-[d , r, -

[ ~4k I I/I, k ,,

~ Jg

- [. . ~?f, '.h S '\ W '

{

, f. e l

i

.: q , ,n '".3- y(, ,

  • ,w- .N y, k, au, .Q - # 0 ";' ' '. . . q s .

7 wt .- k. :l - '

i

. 3 ,; ,

+

m? a=,: I

..g *

)

l, o  ;. '

, :Q$$ . c. b . -. ? jip,g' j., . 'l;2 s- r. /;' ,

+.'

REFERRED TO 1" r DATE .A

'.asely f/ w . .verty' .

. PREPARE FOR SIGNATURE OF: - N j.

- - .A a -? . g, w.. 3

. . 4 v -CHAIRMAN Q K : M_r 9,f i f' 1.;y;.-).1' I

msnia

' ~ ' ' wa.w .sp~ -.o

..J v, x s.m;. , is M

1 s ..v cr3.sgow r

x w' ~~ .e DIRE' TOR OF.RECULATION w

  • I'

- :p' N' ',8 a ;6 e " ' N

n,,, ,,g N en - ..__

- = _ . -__ ... ........... ......... .,.......

, k. '

asan -

.. . ,; ..ameper. . . + . i.2 - a v .m.s. a. o .

. :s n .:, p .9

, r., ,

F COMMUNICATIONS CONTROL' '

4 8 i: '

l'. ') h. hl Y. $1 ( *

) ,-

'br - " s. k '

& M J nyzg DR'771 7

8 L l*

w.A.s .e:n M: 1 - z;;- .9e.

I f__ _- J - Y r

her ')' 5ts Y

~ ^ ^ ^

%M a . _ e ,_.

8% 14 7 ~

~/

a _.ze.

3..zt.=xs; 7x. s r ;  : -.

x m */, a.

Y d7 O ; nMw ' set, J :, A d 5 ,e f A Ot_-a i

.-_.--.7,-

4 &_ f'./ l V

.a* & u 47 . ,- 2:- ,, *

,3 p _ ,_ ..

, ,a n=,o k m x.;, ~ m ~ C '~ y K 2L M -

}L O h f asa + it ~r a 4 a i s x w

/ h =1se d M M 4c r g

s

,e 4 r - W. r,i .+

o "d~' q. ;

ao 2

. o 3

'OR- 771

s

(

)

g~ -, ,,.g c-n a ,, - - ~- ~

C ONT'R '~'SER" M

7, *k /t, M AW M ACElON~C05PLETlON '6'EADLINE" - . "'I y

~

g . g_ , . 1 s, s '

-"[.4, }-

'9 6 { DATE o o EHT LOCATION

^f '

'g' g *

l. j M

, , , ; 8

'T O I

. ., '] '

3 -

ACTION PROCESSING DATES #

INFORMATIONAL COPY Di$TRIBUTION '

% (- g 4-Ackr owle[gN ' & ' * '

Nolemen 'ADN$4-'T 8", ,

'*'Qt, eM, ADA- '

) - s I"I",R* P*d ' ' ; a

  • g? . ' ($ -

4 4.-. .,, ;* (

  • F inel ~ W.-

' U' ' 4

, . , . . . .. Bep. Dir. nGC MOOL -

'*f' A.D. RL' '?,Mu

,DESCRIPTIO, N h2 Original O c pr i. dOis? ;;'/N ",I

s. -

.p REMARKS .D- y.,

fee Sagaisy from 3. Pasonen 4td 2/6/O esmoemdag aw ,

tatai$$y '

? j

.,1dth m E=hara.rs

+

4 ug.,, a gowm ~e t .

Sodese Amy. . . -

  • **3.; r,3;.

. n.o ws e**"+'"*" '"'

w.afM.m

' ' ' ^ -

g " .-,- g. . .

s

' h Ml

, ^

~~"

-f . IT

+

.nt . - IFSM,7...-d

t. y .

\ j REFERRED TO DATE PREPARE FOR $1GNATURE OFs U ( N- ..g%g M ,

.(.

j*g I

  1. D'@J/

-*5 2/s/u c"*/ nc ; ..

g t. p e _& ~ 7,.g#M^; r e-i M.Wi h. .-

- m y

3 jJ DIRECTOR OF. REGULATION

.... w,

-y v.- .>

gv .-

. +

~...tp,. ,. . , . ,'I s,

. ,% y.

,, ~s . ,y .

i, Qjfl; (specify) ' ,' , , '-

w.

4.. , , ,

pg ?{ ' ' g j

,fe y-

,,a.g.g... .

. . ,, .g u..

. .:.......... .... .. . .m--

mwem

- .. \

g. $o(/yW

. ... r, , -

e l

_ ,. . jpgb J qiCHTui$ tory oineCT6a OrneosaTi6n .

COMMUNICATIONS CONTROL

-* n -w - - ;sP %. e rN.E,g

=

  • 4C,g t ,s t ~

" ' ES 5 l

j

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20234F492&oldid=3294545"