ML20204K057

Forwards Insp Rept 50-062/86-01 on 860527-29 & Notice of Violation.Response Should Describe Actions Taken or Planned to Improve Radiation Control Program

ML20204K057
Person / Time
Site:	University of Virginia
Issue date:	07/30/1986
From:	Walker R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Mulder R VIRGINIA, UNIV. OF, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA
Shared Package
ML20204K061	List: IR 05000062/1986001 ML20204K057 ML20204K074 ML20204K099
References
NUDOCS 8608110270
Download: ML20204K057 (2)

See also: IR 05000062/1986001

Text

c

.

.

JUL 3 01996

Docket No. 50-62

License No. R-66

. University of Virginia

ATTN: LDr.R.U.Mulder, Director

Reactor Facility

Charlottesville, VA 22901

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-62/86-01

This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted by

B. K. Revsin on May 27-29, 1986. The inspection included a review of activities

authorized for your Pool Reactor facility. At the conclusion of the inspection,

the findings were discussed with those members of your staff identified in the

enclosed inspection report.

Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within these

areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and

representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of activities

in progress.

The inspection findings indicate that certain activities appeared to violate NRC

requirements. The violations, references to pertinent requirements, and elements

to be included in your response are described in the enclosed Notice of

Violation. During the exit interview, you stated that you disagreed with

Violation D. We have reviewed the basis for your disagreement and have

determined that the violation is correct as written.

In addition to the need for corrective action regarding the specific matters

identified in the enclosed Notice, we are concerned about the implementation of

your radiation control program that permitted this situation to develop.

Consequently, your response should describe those particular actions taken or

planned to improve the effectiveness of your program. The first violation

described in the enclosed Notice is similar to a violation contained in the

Notice 'sent to you by our letter dated January 25, 1985. Because "similar

violations," as described in the NRC Enforcement Policy, are of significant

concern to the NRC, please give particular attention in your response to the

identification of the root cause of this problem and your corrective action to

prevent recurrence.

In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,

Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures

will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.

The responses directed by this letter and its enclosures are not subject to the

clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

l

l

8608110270 860730

PDR ADOCK 05000062

G PDR

__ _

/ I

16 d

_. _

'

.

l

University of Virginia 2

Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.

Sincerely,

.

Roger D. Walker, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosures:

-

1. Notice of Violation

2. NRC Inspection Report

bcc w/encls:

License Fee Management Branch

Document Control Desk

Commonwealth of Virginia

.

IE W

T' % Wdp q

.

7/xf//G %g

RII

RseykI RII RII I EI

evs n:

'

amC m

II

4% Nh(,~ RIIl

3 .

DCollin Stohr L ellen 9e redrickson DVerrelli C1 T@ k*3

0$/o/86

f CFp/p/86 Of//f/86 07/yf/86

6) 86 0/ /86

0/f/86

2 o7/ [Jt