ML20204K057
| ML20204K057 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | University of Virginia |
| Issue date: | 07/30/1986 |
| From: | Walker R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Mulder R VIRGINIA, UNIV. OF, CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20204K061 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8608110270 | |
| Download: ML20204K057 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000062/1986001
Text
c
.
.
JUL 3 01996
Docket No. 50-62
License No. R-66
. University of Virginia
ATTN: LDr.R.U.Mulder, Director
Reactor Facility
Charlottesville, VA 22901
Gentlemen:
SUBJECT: NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-62/86-01
This refers to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) inspection conducted by
B. K. Revsin on May 27-29, 1986. The inspection included a review of activities
authorized for your Pool Reactor facility. At the conclusion of the inspection,
the findings were discussed with those members of your staff identified in the
enclosed inspection report.
Areas examined during the inspection are identified in the report. Within these
areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and
representative records, interviews with personnel, and observation of activities
in progress.
The inspection findings indicate that certain activities appeared to violate NRC
requirements. The violations, references to pertinent requirements, and elements
to be included in your response are described in the enclosed Notice of
Violation.
During the exit interview, you stated that you disagreed with
Violation D.
We have reviewed the basis for your disagreement and have
determined that the violation is correct as written.
In addition to the need for corrective action regarding the specific matters
identified in the enclosed Notice, we are concerned about the implementation of
your radiation control program that permitted this situation to develop.
Consequently, your response should describe those particular actions taken or
planned to improve the effectiveness of your program.
The first violation
described in the enclosed Notice is similar to a violation contained in the
Notice 'sent to you by our letter dated January 25, 1985.
Because "similar
violations," as described in the NRC Enforcement Policy, are of significant
concern to the NRC, please give particular attention in your response to the
identification of the root cause of this problem and your corrective action to
prevent recurrence.
In accordance with Section 2.790 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2,
Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, a copy of this letter and its enclosures
will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
The responses directed by this letter and its enclosures are not subject to the
clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
l
l
8608110270 860730
ADOCK 05000062
G
16 d
/ I
-
__
_
_.
_
'
.
University of Virginia
2
Should you have any questions concerning this letter, please contact us.
Sincerely,
.
Roger D. Walker, Director
Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosures:
1.
-
2.
NRC Inspection Report
bcc w/encls:
License Fee Management Branch
Document Control Desk
Commonwealth of Virginia
.
IE W
T' % W
q
7/xf//G
dp%g
.
I
EI
RII
R kI
amC
m
4%
Nh(,~
RIIl
RII
RII
II
'
3
.
CFp/p/86 Of//f/86 07/yf/86
86 0/ /86
sey
DCollin
Stohr
L ellen 9e
redrickson
DVerrelli
evs n:
C T@ k*3
1
0$/o/86
6)
0/f/86
o7/
[Jt
f
2