IR 05000416/1982028

IE Insp Rept 50-416/82-28 on 820315-0408.Noncompliance Noted:Failure to Follow Proper Procedures for Preoperational Testing

ML20054G936
Person / Time
Site:	Grand Gulf
Issue date:	04/26/1982
From:	Cantrell F, Wagner A NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20054G903	List: AECM-82-236, Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Rept 50-416/82-28.Corrective Actions:Startup Personnel Involved in Testing or Package Assembly Review Instructed to Scrutinize Administrative Functions of Test Documentation IR 05000416/1982028 ML20054G902 ML20054G918 ML20054G923
References
RTR-NUREG-0660, RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-660, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-1.A.1.1, TASK-1.C.5, TASK-TM 50-416-82-28, NUDOCS 8206220424
Download: ML20054G936 (6)

Text

1

.

1. o,, UNITED STATES 8' o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g s REGION 11 o 101 MARIETTA ST., N.W SUITE 3100

[

o- ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 g ***; **

Report tio. 50-416/82-28 Licensee: llississippi Power and Light Company Jackson,llS Facility llame: Grand Gulf Docket No. 50-416 License No. CPPR-118 Inspector: W ,[ ,b 4/zt/f'Z -

~

A. G. Wagner ~ f/ Date Signed Accompanying Personnel: F. a trell Approved by: -2 d c [. MX fl F. S. Cantrell, SectipyChief, Division of 'frate Sisned Project and Residefrt Programs SUttitARY Inspection on flarch 15 - April 8, 1982 Areas Inspected This routine, unannounced inspection involved 102 inspector-hours on site in the areas of Test Results Review, Startup Test Schedule Review, Preoperational Test Witnessing, Till Item Review, Inspector Follow-Up Items and Plant Tou Results Of the six areas inspected, no violations or deviations were identified in five areas; one item of noncompliance was found in one area (Failure to follow procedure, paragraph 10).

8206220424 820608 PDR O ADOCK 05000416 PDR

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

'

.

DETAILS Persons Contacted Licensee Employees

• N. L. Stampley, Senior Vice President

• J. P. ficGaughy, Assistant Vice President-

• C. K. ficCoy, Nuclear Plant Manager

• J. C. Roberts, Startup Supervisor

• J. W. Yelverton, Field QA Supervisor

• fl. A. Lacey, Field QA Engineer R. Roma, Test Supervisor R. McAnulty, Test Supervisor C. R. Hutchinson, Manager Other licensee employees contacted included technicians and operator * Attended exit interview Exit Interview The inspection scope and findings were summarized on April 8,1982, with those persons indicated in paragraph 1 above. The licensee had no comments regarding the inspection findings. Licensee Action on Previous Inspection Findings Not inspected. Unresolved Items Unresolved items were not identified during this inspection. Preoperational Test Witnessing The inspector witnessed portions of the following preoperational tests. The tests were witnessed to verify their conduct in accordance with Grand Gulf Startup flanual Chapter 5000 and 700 C71PT01 Reactor Protection System Preoperational Test If141PT01 Containment Cooling Preoperational Test E61PT01 Combustible Gas Control Preoperational Test i M51PT01 Drywell Cooling Preoperational Test The inspector had no comments regarding the conduct of test . .

-

.

2 Review of Startup Test Schedule The' inspector reviewed the proposed startup testing plan. The review was conducted to allow the inspector to become familiar with the program. The following comments were discussed with licensee management. This will be documented as an open ite (416/82-28-01). Cold Recirculation Loop Valve Test is included in Open Vessel Plateau Procedure 1-000-SU-99. It is not shown on the startup pla The following procedures appear to be required prior to exceeding 5%

power and are not yet-issue (1) SU-75H CCW-RWCU Hx Performance (2) SU-6H SE1 Performance (3) SU-10H IRM Range 6/7 Overlap (4) SU-12H APRf1 Calibration 150#

(5) SU-14H RCIC 0 150#

(6) SU-26H SRU 0 250#

(7) SU-36H Isolated Reactor Stability Test (8) SU-72H Collecting Drywell Cooling Data It is the inspectors understanding that these items will be reviewed by licensee management and appropriate action taken.

I Till Task Action Plan Implementation

,

A review was conducted of the procedures and actions implementing the

requirements of the TMI Task Action Plan. These requirements are delineated in NUREG 0660 and 0737. The licensee has responded to the NRC t,y letters AECli 81/153 of June 12, 1981, AECil 81/276 of August 19,1981, AE0181/387 of October 2, 1981, AECM 82/49 of March 23, 1982 and AECf1 82/100 of ltrch 19, 1982 describing the implementation or providing an implementing procedure for the plan item.

i .A.1.1 Shift Technical Advisor. A review was conducted of implementing procedures 01-S-04-7 Shift Technical Advisor Training l Program and 01-S-06-17 Responsibilities and Authorities of the Shift Technical Advisor. There are no further questions and this item is

. closed.

I j

' .C.5 Feedback of Operating Experience. A review was conducted of implementing Nuclear Plant Engineering procedures01-701 Onsite Document Review,01-702 Offsite Document Review and 01-704 Operational Analysis Section Reports. There are no further question This item

! is closed.

!

,

'

. .

3 Inspector Followup Items (Closed) Open Item 416/81-10-08. The inspector reviewed FSAR amendment 54 which corrected the standby liquid control system limit switch setting There are no further questions concerning this item. This item is close (Closed) Open Item 416/81-10-1 The inspector reviewed FSAR amendment 54 which deleted the requirement for an enclosure around the ' standby liquid control system. There are no further questions concerning this item. This item is close (Closed) Open Item 416/81-32-01. The inspector reviewed the results of a QA audit of operations personnel review of night orders. The results disclosed a prompt review by on shift personnel. There are no further questions concerning this item. This item is close (Closed) Open Item 416/81-56-04. The inspector was informed that the chemistry department has been put on controlled distribution for plant procedures. An audit of chemistry lab procedures were found to be the latest revision. There are no further questions concerning this item. This item is close (Closed) Open Item 416/81-13-02. The inspector reviewed a revision to administrative procedure 01-S-04-15 Required Reading. It has incorporated requirements for prompt review of procedure changes and important infor-mation by operations personnel. There are no further questions concerning this ite This item is close (Closed) Open Item 416/80-28-04. The inspector reviewed the latest revision to preoperational test procedure IC51PT01 Neutron lionitoring System. This revision incorporated the requirements for MP&L verification of detector tube measurements. These are no further questions concerning this ite This item is close . Plant Tour The inspector toured portions of the control building, auxiliary building and containment. The following activities were observed: construction, housekeeping, equipment preservation, fire protection, clearances and maintenance in progres The following comments / observations were made: It was noted that the suppression pool cooling lines had redundant stop check valves on them. FSAR section 9.1.3.2 states that they have redundant vacuum breakers while FSAR figure 9.1.2-6 shows stop check valves. This item is open pending review by NRC of the appropriate requiremen (0 pen Item 416/82-28-02). Temporary strainers and gages were installed in the suction lines of the High Pressure Core Spray and Low Pressure Core Spray pump There were no temporary alteration tags on the installation. They were listed on the master punch list. They are required to be removed prior

-.

, .

-

.

to operatio This will be tracked as a followup ite (0 pen Item 416/82-28-03). It was also noted that the containment and drywell did not appear to be at a satisfactory cleanliness level for critical operations, During the review of the temporary alteration requirements for the Low Pressure Core Spray pump suction strainer it was noted that the word

"will" was used for regulatory requirements. MPL topical 1A'has defined the word "shall" to denote regulatory requirements. Al though it is not specifically defined in the QA topical report it is the licensee's position that the words have the same meaning. tiP&L will include this position in the next revision of the Quality Assurance topical repor . Preoperational Test Results Review The following completed preoperational test procedures were reviewed for conformance with Grand Gulf Startup Manual chapters 5000, 7000, FSAR chapters 3, 6 and 14, Regulatory Guide 1.68 and licensee commitment E30PT01 Suppression Pool Hakeup, approved 2-22-8 The following items are violations of the administrative requirements of the Grand Gulf Startup ilanual. These items are examples of a failure to follow procedure. (Violation 416/82-28-04)

(1) The completion of paragraph 7.3 is not signed by the test superviso (2) Three data sheets of paragraph 8.6 are not signed by data take (3) Data sheet 8.6 has a correction made without a line through and initia (4) The test results were signed by the lluclear Support fianager instead of the fluclear Plant flanage (5) No justification was provided for no retesting on Retest Fonns.

l

'

The following comments were discussed with licensee management who will

'

take appropriate corrective action. These actions will be reviewed by the inspector during a subsequent inspection. (0 pen Item 416/82-28-l 05).

(1) There was not an independent group leader review conducte (2) Appendix III testing conditions were signed off prior to the completion of testing.

l (3) Field Reports E30-0013 and E30-0016 are not listed on the system punch lis m

.

. .

. ,

l I

'

1E21PT01 Low Pressure Core Spray, approved 2-23-8 The following item

~ is a violation of the administrative requirements of the Grand Gulf Startup lbnual. This item is an example of a failure to follow procedure. (Violation 416/82-28-04).

(1) Instrument Calibration 1E21-K150 on Startup Form 7.5 is marked N These was no TCfl or Exception processed for the chang The following comments were discussed with licensee management who will

, take appropriate corrective actio These actions will be reviewed by the inspector during a subsequent inspection. (0 pen Item 416/82-28-

-06).

(1) Appendix III testing conditions were signed off prior to i completion of testin (2) Field Report E21-0016, E31-0002, CWP E30-P-62 and Retest E21-43 are not listed on the system punch list.

1 M51PT01 Drywell Cooling, approved 3-3-8 The following items are violations of the administrative requirements of the Grand Gulf Startup tbnual. These items are examples of a failure to follow procedur (Violation 416/82-28-04).

' Paragraph 7.3.10, 7.3.11 and 7.3.102 have corrections which were not lined through and initiale . Paragraph 7.3.102 and 7.3.110 have test conditions changed from

" operate" to "off" without a TCf L20AT0124 volt Power Supply, approved 4-24-8 There were no comments concerning this revie P60AT01 Suppression Pool Cleaup Systen, approved 3-3-8 There were no comments concerning this review.

[ C41PT01 Standby Liquid Control, approved 3-8-8 There were no comments concerning this revie ..___ __

_ ___ _ . . _ _ _

._ _ _