ML20141C756

Ack Receipt of Providing Assurance That B&W Has Capital to Cover Costs of Decommissioning All Nuclear Facilities

ML20141C756
Person / Time
Site:	BWX Technologies, 07001201, 07000824, 07000135
Issue date:	06/02/1980
From:	Page R NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To:	Jordan L BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
References
NUDOCS 8512300296
Download: ML20141C756 (1)

Text

,

O O w,w JUN t. 3 Mr. Leo V. Jordan

1. Assistant Controller- s1 / ,

i Babcock & Wilcox Company J '

.. .. P.O. Box 61038 > 2 s - -

' " .I l!. . New .Orleans,'. 1..

Louisiana 7016.1, ,. .'..

m ; r, .7

. ~

Dear Mr.'dordan:

L- R :: V~

L l .'" .  : ;

R,. .~ A ":.  : Q ., _ _.

_ .. . E.;

' ? "J' [,7.' ' ' ~ " . This'is to acknowledge receipt of your letter dated March _ 20, 1980, '

which provides the Comission assurance that the Babcock & Wilcox Company has sufficient working capital to cover the costs of decomissioning all its nuclear facilities.

Sincerely. ' " "

U nc a..u . ocum ty, R. G. Page, Acting Chief Uranium Fuel Licensing Branch Division of Fuel Cycle and Material Safety a."

DISTRIBUTION:

Docket 70-27

)p Docket 70-135 Docket 70-824 ,

Docket 70-1201 NftSS r/f LPDR(4)

FCUF r PDRG{f ""

IE HQ (2)

WTCrow FDFisher NKetzlach (3)

WANixon LTyson DCS (.4) @)RGPage / ,

E FCUF FCUP ((,fe F/J

. . . . . ~

NKe ch:mj LTyson . WTCrow . R.t g '

, ..........(

9, h t t 9e . . , .

4, , , . . ,, ..s...... - , . . . . . .

tx w.x pr<9ao s:ctcua W.,...........,.....~....................

0312300296 800602 PDR ADOCK 07000027 C PDR

c ,

W...

• l Distribution:

t/ Central File AEOD Reading File AEOD Chron. File h!AY 2 31380 CJHeltemes, AE00 CMichelson, AE00 C' I _..

l'Eff0RA! DUM FOR: Hornan H. Italler, Director Office of flanagenent and Program Analysis FROM: Carl Michelson, Director Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data "UBJECT: PROPOSED A0 DETERMINATI03 FOR Tile NOVEMBER 16, 1979 EVENT AT BtJI FACILITY, Ap0LLO, PA Our review of the latest draf t of this proposed A0 determination has resulted in two coments.

1. If the lung burden is 10 to 10 nC1 plus 3 nCi of Am 241, as deternined by LASL, .;nd not 50 nCi as previously indicated by the University of Pittsburgh,  !

the significance of this event nay be less than warranted for an AD, and i the event could be reported as an Appendix C item. It is unfortunate to be l reporting on an event six nonths later and still have such a large degree of uncertainty.  ;

2. Regardless whether this event is determined to be an A0, the actions taken to prevent recurrence should be specific with regard to hRC actions involving notification and requested corrective actions of the other licensees having similar operations. The fact that the staff is considerinq recomending that this event be reported as an A0 indicates the significance (in general, AO's l involve only approximately 1/2 of 1% of all reportable operating eveats) and, i thus, it should follow that counensurate action is indicated to prevent sini- ,

lar events from occurring in other facilities. In this case, it would seen i appropriate that correctivo action include audible continuous air nonitors  :

in operations involving Pu glove boxes. We continue to believe that the A0 i determination and report to Congress are not just a reporting ncchanism, but represent an important systen for the identification, analysis, feedb_ack,

~

and identification of corrective action to. regulatory activitics and to other potentially affectFITcunsees for events with potential serious consequences on public health add safety.

Thus, we believe that recomended A0 determinations should also cover the '

actions the staff has taken or will take to prevent similar events from occurring in other facilities.

We believe that this proposed A0 report should be strengthened and made specific in this regard.

80-06-1.pe f f p - 6 orico). 4Ebp . MOD ).k . C ar l U.l.qhe l ma . . .Il l r.ec tnr. . . . . . . . .

us . e c p..C. J. . . .l.t.e. m.e. s. .:.g t CM. .i.c h e l son. . . . .

Of tice for Analysis and Evaluation

.gp .0pdra tibit alD'a ts oc c > . N/.80 },5/]/80 .

mycmsf emn. c.y e 7 yyy.1 y m, , ,0 . -.w.. m

Dis tribution :

O O rcur rer PGDage WTCrow W ANi xon MAY 2 01980 Neiss LTyson DCS

-; Docket No.70-135 MEf 0RAllDU!i FOR: William O. Itiller, Chief License Fee fianagement Branch Office of Administration -

FROM: William A. flixon Uranium Process Licensing Section

SUBJECT:

t0STS A'lD !Will0VRS FOR LICEllSIfiG ACTIOl1 The contract costs incurred and nanhours use'd in reviewing the appli .

cation dateda/27/7o n niinf7a_ for anendnent of License !!o. 4.m ne~

Docket flo. Ein 'are tabulated below. ,

1. flame & Address: m,.g i .g%

G09 L u.,= gen;g, %13,,_g_gg3 0700013sAllS

2. a) Project Control flo.07nnniunme b) TAC flo.

3. Conpletion Dato:' Uay,_11.1979 4'ar a/27 letter -

4. ., Final Fee Type Identifico by flitSS: wwmgg

~ '

5. Contract Costs _ Associated with this License App 1tcation:

a For environmental review $ _

b For safety review $ _

c Total contract costs $ _

6. TAC Uork by flRR:- _ hours ,

7. Safeguards Time: . hours

8. Fuci Cycle Safety and Licensing flanhours:

a Cnvironmental review hours -

q, b Safety review fd.g hours

'g'. i: Total _ng hours briginal S1&ned by:

1 ckN5k[6r prisinal Signed by:

Approved: Ac Chief f f. a r i s tm F t t n_ " H enr e_n itina.

n.

H a nc h s

.ma- ,F, C,U, F,, g,,,,F,C,U,P, , , , , g,,,, / ,,,F .I , ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

..FCUP ,,,,, ,, . , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

- .* ..ddN, n,,,.:,s,h..... LTysan............. . . W I c r ow . . . . .. . . . . . ...Rw.......... .................... ......................

1 5/!/80,,,,,,,,,,,, s/dzap,,,,, ,,,,,, ,sgy,/8,9,,,,,,,,, ,.s. E,\/.a.0,,, ,, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

m.c .o. m i,.m mcu m * .. ..... ....... .... ...................