|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217N1931999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-12 on 990927-30.No Violations Noted.Insp Exam of Activities Under License as They Relate to Emergency Preparedness & to Compliance with Commission Rules & Regulations & with Conditions of License ML20217G8771999-10-14014 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-10 on 990920-24.No Violations Noted ML20217G7401999-10-14014 October 1999 Forwards MOR for Sept 1999 for Cooper Nuclear Station. Rept Includes Documentation of Challenges to Safety/Relief Valves,Iaw TS 5.6.4 ML20217C2671999-10-0808 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-03 on 990823-27 & 0907-10.No Violations Noted.Purpose of Insp to Ensure That Licensee Had Effective Programs for Identifying,Evaluating & Correcting Problems Which Could Impact Safe Plant Operations ML20212K9661999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards Safety Evaluation Accepting plant-specific Safety Evaluation Rept for USI A-46 Program Implementation at Cooper Nuclear Station ML20216J1081999-09-28028 September 1999 Ltr Contract:Task Order 048, Cooper Safety Sys Design & Performance Capability Insp, Under Contract NRC-03-98-021 ML20212J5061999-09-27027 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-07 on 990718-0828.No Violations Noted.Inspectors Focused on Implementation of Licensee Reactor Safety & Emergency Preparedness Programs ML20212F3641999-09-22022 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-09 on 990823-26.No Violations Noted ML20216J8061999-09-20020 September 1999 Forwards Rev 37 to Safeguards Plan,Iaw Provisions of 10CFR50.(p).Rev Withheld,Per 10CFR73.21 ML20212C4921999-09-15015 September 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Cooper Nuclear Station.Rept Includes Operating Data Rept,Unit SD Rept & Documentation of Challenges to Safety/Relief Valves ML20212A6061999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-08 on 9900816-20.No Violations Noted.Insp Focused on Implementation & Effective Performance of Access Authorization/Fitness-for-Duty (Behavior Observation) Program & Access Control of Personnel ML20211N5271999-09-0202 September 1999 Responds to NRC 990823 RAI Re Y2K Readiness at Cooper Nuclear Station,Per GL 98-01,Suppl 1 05000298/LER-1999-006, Forwards LER 99-006-00 for Cns.Commitments Made by Util Encl1999-08-26026 August 1999 Forwards LER 99-006-00 for Cns.Commitments Made by Util Encl ML20211F1311999-08-24024 August 1999 Forwards Rev 1 to Calculation Nedc 97-044, NPSH Margins for RHR & CS Pumps, in Support of 990615 Proposed Amend to DPR-46 Re Containment Overpressure Contribution to ECCS Pumps NPSH Requirements 05000298/LER-1999-003, Informs That Commitment Re Insp Rept 50-298/98-15 & LER 99-003,to Bound Extent of Condition & Take Appropriate C/As Is Now Complete.Addl Time Is Required to Accommodate Training of Engineering Support Personnel1999-08-23023 August 1999 Informs That Commitment Re Insp Rept 50-298/98-15 & LER 99-003,to Bound Extent of Condition & Take Appropriate C/As Is Now Complete.Addl Time Is Required to Accommodate Training of Engineering Support Personnel ML20211F4661999-08-23023 August 1999 Discusses GL 98-01 Issued by NRC on 980511 & NPPD Responses for Cooper Nuclear Station & 990628 & Results of Visit to Plant on 990811-12.Staff Determined That Integrated Contigency Plan Incomplete & CNS Not Y2K Ready ML20210R0301999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Cooper Nuclear Station,Iaw Guidance Provided by GL 97-02.Rept Also Includes Documentation of Challenges to Srvs,Per TS 5.6.4 ML20211A9501999-08-12012 August 1999 Discusses 990720-21 Workshop Conducted in Region IV Ofc,Re Exchange of Info in Area of Use of Risk Insights in Regulatory Activities.List of Attendees,Summary of Topic & Issues,Agenda & Copies of Handouts Encl ML20210P6761999-08-10010 August 1999 Requests That Following Changes Be Made to Distribution on NRC Correspondence ML20210P6861999-08-0909 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-06 on 990530-0717.No Violations Noted.During Insp,Inspectors Identified Two Issues Categorized as Being Low Risk Significance & within Licensee Response Band ML20210N1331999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amend to FOL DPR-46.By Ltr Licensee Withdrew Amend Request Which Would Have Revised Usfar to Reflect as-built Configuration of Reactor Bldg Isolation Dampers ML20210L1461999-08-0303 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Requests Submittal of Ltr Identifying Individuals Taking Exam,Personnel Allowed Access to Exams & Mailing Address for Exams ML20210K6071999-08-0202 August 1999 Submits Withdrawal of Proposed License Amend Re Secondary Containment Isolation Description & Refueling Accident Analysis Results ML20210K3811999-08-0202 August 1999 Forwards Listed Info,Which NPPD Believes Demonstrates Ability to Obtain Funds in Amount of $10 Million for Payment of Such Premiums within Specified Three Month Period,Iaw 10CFR140.21 ML20210G5101999-07-28028 July 1999 Forwards fitness-for-duty Program semi-annual Performance Rept for Period of 990101-0630,per Provisions of 10CFR26.71(d) ML20210D2541999-07-21021 July 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-02 on 990628-0702.Purpose of Insp Was Primarily to Evaluate Effectiveness of Licensed Operator Requalification Program.No Violations Were Identified ML20210C2041999-07-20020 July 1999 Discusses 990715 Mgt Meeting with Midamerican Energy Co Re risk-informed Baseline Insp Program Recently Implemented at Cooper & Fort Calhoun Stations ML20209H8191999-07-15015 July 1999 Forwards Safety Evaluation on GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, for Cooper Nuclear Station ML20209E6951999-07-12012 July 1999 Discusses Response to RAI on GL 92-01,rev 1,suppl 1, Rv Structural Integrity. Recommends Review of New Database Diskettes on Listed Website.Comments Due by 990901 or Data Entered Into Rvid for Plant Will Be Acceptable ML20209D8731999-07-0808 July 1999 Refers to 990707 Meeting Re Licensee Recent Maintenance Program self-assessment.Also Discussed How Licensee Incorporated Assessment Findings Into Rev of Maintenance Performance Improvement Plan.List of Attendees Encl ML20209B7851999-07-0101 July 1999 Forwards Corrected Occupational Radiation Exposure Repts, for Cys 1996 & 1997.Util Stated That Repts Did Not Properly Tabulate Number of Personnel Receiving Exposures Less than 100 Mrem by Work & Job Functions in CY96 & CY97 05000298/LER-1999-005, Forwards LER 99-005-00 for Cns.Commitments Made by Util Encl1999-07-0101 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-005-00 for Cns.Commitments Made by Util Encl ML20196J2471999-06-29029 June 1999 Discusses Completion of Licensing Action for GL 97-04, Assurance of Sufficient Net Positive Suction Head for ECC & Containment Heat Removal Pumps, 05000298/LER-1999-004, Forwards LER 99-004-01.Commitments Made by Util Are Encl1999-06-28028 June 1999 Forwards LER 99-004-01.Commitments Made by Util Are Encl ML20209B5451999-06-28028 June 1999 Submits Response to NRC GL 98-01,Suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Nuclear Power Plants. Disclosure Encl ML20196H0331999-06-24024 June 1999 Informs NRC of Deletion of 1991 Commitment Contained in Ltr Re Feedwater Nozzle Bypass Leakage Monitoring at Plant ML20196F7511999-06-24024 June 1999 Discusses 990622 Meeting with Public at Arbor Manor, Alburn,Ne to Provide Overview of Pilot Insp Program ML20209A7221999-06-23023 June 1999 Submits Revised Pages to Proposed Change to Plant TS Previously Submitted in ,Per 990615 Telcon with NRC ML20196F5331999-06-22022 June 1999 Forwards Examination Summary Rept for FW Nozzle Examinations Performed During 1998 Fall Refueling Outage at Cooper Nuclear Station.Rept Covers Past Examinations Up to & Including 1998 Fall Refueling Outage ML20196B4681999-06-17017 June 1999 Forwards TS Bases Changes Made at Plant Subsequent to Receipt of License Amend 178,dtd 980731,for Conversion to Its,Through 990610.List of Effective Pages for TS Bases, Encl ML20196E1411999-06-16016 June 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-05 on 990502-29.Noncited Violations Identified ML20195H8891999-06-14014 June 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990315 RAI Re GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal-Binding of SR Power-Operated Gate Valves, 180-day Response Submitted by District on 960213 ML20195F6171999-06-0909 June 1999 Informs That GE Rept, Matl Presented by GE 970709 Meeting at Cooper Nuclear Power Station Re Replacement of ECCS Pump Suction Strainers Between Nppd,Ge & NRC Staff, Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure as Requested ML20207G3031999-06-0808 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Cooper Nuclear Station EP Implementing Procedure EPIP 5.7.1, Emergency Classification,Rev 24,under 10CFR50,App E,Section V Provisions.No Violations Identified ML20195E2351999-06-0808 June 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990517 RAI Re Util Proposed Change to TS Re Calibr Frequency of Reactor Recirculation Flow Transmitters Associated with APRM ML20207G4481999-06-0808 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Cooper Nuclear Station EP Implementing Procedure,Epip 5.7.1, Emergency Classification,Rev 23 C2,under Provisions of 10CFR50,App E,Section V ML20207G3001999-06-0707 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Cooper Nuclear Station Ep,Rev 33,under Provisions of 10CFR50,App E,Section V.No NRC Approval Required Based on Determination That EP Effectiveness Not Affected by Changes ML20207G4531999-06-0707 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Cooper Nuclear Station EP Implementing Procedure EPIP 5.7.1, Emergency Classification,Revision 25,under Provisions of 10CFR50,App E,Section V ML20207D3811999-05-27027 May 1999 Informs That During Next 6 to 12 Months,Starting 990530,NRC Plans to Conduct Insps Shown in Attached Insp Plan.Insps Include Both Planned Baseline & Supplemental Insps (Formerly Core & Regional Initiative Insps) ML20207A5191999-05-19019 May 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-04 on 990321-0501.Four Violations Identified & Being Treated as non-cited Violations 1999-09-30
[Table view] Category:NRC TO UTILITY
MONTHYEARIR 05000298/19900291990-11-0909 November 1990 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/90-29 ML20217A3691990-11-0707 November 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/90-33 on 900904-1016.Violations Noted But Not Cited ML20058G1461990-11-0505 November 1990 Ack Receipt of Submitting Rev 13 to Emergency Plan.Changes Acceptable for Implementation.Commitment Date for Submission of Changes Is 901031 ML20058H0581990-11-0101 November 1990 Forwards List of Unimplemented Gsis,Per Generic Ltr 90-04 IR 05000298/19900251990-10-16016 October 1990 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/90-25 ML20059M8751990-10-0202 October 1990 Informs That Util Response to Generic Ltr (GL) 90-03, Relaxation of Staff Position in Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2, Part 2 'Vendor Interface for Safety-Related Components,' Acceptable ML20059M7391990-09-28028 September 1990 Forwards Sys Entry & Retest Insp Rept 50-298/90-31 on 900910-14 & 17.No Violations or Deviations Noted ML20059M4651990-09-27027 September 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/90-30 on 900827-31 & Notice of Violation ML20059E2691990-08-31031 August 1990 Forwards Safety Evaluation Granting Licensee 900525 Relief Requests RP-14 & RP-15 for Relief from Requirements to Measure Pump Inlet Pressure & Instrument Ranges, Respectively ML20058P4151990-08-0808 August 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/90-26 on 900616-0715.No Violations or Deviations Noted ML20056A1701990-07-30030 July 1990 Advises That Written Licensing Exams Scheduled on 901119 & Operating Licensing Exams Scheduled on 901120.Preliminary Applications Should Be Submitted at Least 30 Days Prior to Exam Date to Review Training & Experience of Candidates ML20055J2301990-07-24024 July 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/90-27 on 900709-13.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Actions Taken Re Previous Insp Findings Examined ML20055G8751990-07-20020 July 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/90-20 on 900611-15 & 25-29.No Violations or Deviations Noted ML20055G1841990-07-18018 July 1990 Confirms 900720 Mgt Meeting in Region IV Ofc Re Emergency Actions Levels,Annual Exercise & Emergency Preparedness Program Enhancements ML20055E6841990-07-0909 July 1990 Discusses Generic Implications & Resolution of Control Element Assemblies at Plant.Util Should Submit Plans & Justification for Any Continued Use of Old Style Control Element Assemblies Beyond Current Cycle for NRC Review ML20055D9441990-07-0505 July 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/90-22 on 900516-0615.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Actions Taken W/Regard to Previously Identified Insp Findings Examined IR 05000298/19900121990-06-28028 June 1990 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/90-12 IR 05000298/19900051990-06-27027 June 1990 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC That Util Evaluated Observation Re Vital Area Key Control,Per Insp Rept 50-298/90-05.Initiatives to Delineate Responsibilities for Vital Key Exchange During Shift Turnover Appropriate ML20055C7741990-06-18018 June 1990 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/90-18 on 900416-0515.No Violations or Deviations Noted ML20059M9251990-06-13013 June 1990 Forwards NRC Performance Indicators for First Quarter 1990. W/O Encl ML20248H2791989-10-0606 October 1989 Forwards Comments from Bnwl Re Util Scenario for Exercise Planned on 891025 IR 05000298/19890251989-10-0505 October 1989 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/89-25 ML20248E8151989-10-0202 October 1989 Confirms 890926 Telcon Re Change of Dates for Maint Team Insp Preparation Meetings from 891023-25 to 891031-1102 ML20247Q6071989-09-21021 September 1989 Forwards Amend 11 to Indemnity Agreement B-57,reflecting Changes to 10CFR140, Financial Protection Requirements & Indemnity Agreements, for Signature IR 05000298/19890291989-09-19019 September 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/89-29 on 890801-31.No Violations Noted IR 05000298/19890161989-09-14014 September 1989 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/89-16. Implementation of Corrective Actions Will Be Reviewed During Future Insp IR 05000298/19890061989-09-13013 September 1989 Discusses Insp Rept 50-298/89-06 on 890206-10 & Forwards Notice of Violation.Concerns Raised Re Various Failures to Log or Rept Security Incidents.Decision Re Ofc of Investigations Findings Will Be Sent Separately ML20247G8531989-09-12012 September 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/89-24 on 890731-0804 & Notice of Deviation ML20247D4731989-09-0606 September 1989 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/89-22 ML20247C0581989-09-0505 September 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/89-27 on 890821-25.No Violations or Deviations Noted ML20247G8051989-08-30030 August 1989 Forwards Summary of 890712 Meeting W/Util Re SALP for 880201-890415.Util 890811 Response to SALP Also Encl ML20247B3801989-08-30030 August 1989 Summarizes 890818 Region Iv/Senior Util Executives Meeting in Arlinton,Tx Re General Matters on Topics Discussed, Including SALP Process in Region 4.List of Attendees & Agenda Encl ML20246H9501989-08-28028 August 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/89-26 on 890717-21.No Violations or Deviations Noted ML20246F8171989-08-25025 August 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/89-30 on 890807-11.Violations Noted,But No Citation Issued ML20246G3201989-08-22022 August 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/89-25 on 890701-31 & Notice of Deviation ML20246G1341989-08-22022 August 1989 Documents NRC 890810 Meeting W/Licensee,Including H Parris & Staff in Region IV Ofc to Discuss General Issues of Interest to Licensee & Nrc,Region Iv.Topics Covered During Licensee Presentation Described ML20246E1291989-08-21021 August 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/89-28 on 890731-0804 & Notice of Violation.Response to One of Two Violations Required ML20245K9991989-08-11011 August 1989 Confirms 890808 Conversation in Which Util Agreed to Participate in 891012 NRC Regulatory Impact Survey.Info Re Survey Provided ML20245J7291989-08-0909 August 1989 Advises of Maint Team Insp Scheduled for Wks of 891113-1204, Per 890807 Telcon.Purpose of Meetings Is to Define Scope of Insp,To Discuss Interfaces Between Team & Staff & to Receive Info to Support Badging Team Members for Unescorted Access ML20245H1131989-08-0404 August 1989 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/89-18 ML20248C2121989-08-0303 August 1989 Ack Receipt of in Response to 890608 Notice of Violation Re Insp Rept 50-298/89-19.Util Basis for Denial of Violation Not Substantiated & NRC Concludes That Violation Did Occur ML20247M1671989-07-27027 July 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/89-21 on 890626-30.No Violations or Deviations Noted IR 05000298/19880291989-07-27027 July 1989 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/88-29 ML20236E6561989-07-24024 July 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/89-23 on 890626-30.No Violations or Deviations Noted ML20247L9501989-07-24024 July 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/89-22 on 890601-30 & Notice of Violation ML20246M4961989-07-11011 July 1989 Provides Agenda for 890809 Meeting of Senior Util Executives Sponsored by Region IV at Univ of Texas.Recipient Scheduled to co-lead Discussion of SALP Process W/J Milhoan ML20246N2051989-07-10010 July 1989 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/89-17 ML20246A7091989-06-22022 June 1989 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/89-18 on 890416-0531 & Notice of Violation.Nrc Considers Inadequate Station Mod Work Instructions Significant.Other Weaknesses in Plant Mod Process Identified in Paragraph 6 in Insp Rept ML20245K5371989-06-22022 June 1989 Forwards NRR Ack Receipt of Petition Filed by Ecology Ctr of Southern California & Stating That Petition Being Treated Under 10CFR2.206 of NRC Regulations ML20245B5591989-06-20020 June 1989 Forwards SALP Board Rept 50-298/89-12 for 880201-890415.NRC Pleased Overall,Although Sys for Identifying to Mgt Areas Where Corrective Actions Needed Should Be Improved 1990-09-28
[Table view] Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217N1931999-10-22022 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-12 on 990927-30.No Violations Noted.Insp Exam of Activities Under License as They Relate to Emergency Preparedness & to Compliance with Commission Rules & Regulations & with Conditions of License ML20217G8771999-10-14014 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-10 on 990920-24.No Violations Noted ML20217C2671999-10-0808 October 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-03 on 990823-27 & 0907-10.No Violations Noted.Purpose of Insp to Ensure That Licensee Had Effective Programs for Identifying,Evaluating & Correcting Problems Which Could Impact Safe Plant Operations ML20212K9661999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards Safety Evaluation Accepting plant-specific Safety Evaluation Rept for USI A-46 Program Implementation at Cooper Nuclear Station ML20216J1081999-09-28028 September 1999 Ltr Contract:Task Order 048, Cooper Safety Sys Design & Performance Capability Insp, Under Contract NRC-03-98-021 ML20212J5061999-09-27027 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-07 on 990718-0828.No Violations Noted.Inspectors Focused on Implementation of Licensee Reactor Safety & Emergency Preparedness Programs ML20212F3641999-09-22022 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-09 on 990823-26.No Violations Noted ML20212A6061999-09-14014 September 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-08 on 9900816-20.No Violations Noted.Insp Focused on Implementation & Effective Performance of Access Authorization/Fitness-for-Duty (Behavior Observation) Program & Access Control of Personnel ML20211F4661999-08-23023 August 1999 Discusses GL 98-01 Issued by NRC on 980511 & NPPD Responses for Cooper Nuclear Station & 990628 & Results of Visit to Plant on 990811-12.Staff Determined That Integrated Contigency Plan Incomplete & CNS Not Y2K Ready ML20211A9501999-08-12012 August 1999 Discusses 990720-21 Workshop Conducted in Region IV Ofc,Re Exchange of Info in Area of Use of Risk Insights in Regulatory Activities.List of Attendees,Summary of Topic & Issues,Agenda & Copies of Handouts Encl ML20210P6861999-08-0909 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-06 on 990530-0717.No Violations Noted.During Insp,Inspectors Identified Two Issues Categorized as Being Low Risk Significance & within Licensee Response Band ML20210N1331999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Notice of Withdrawal of Application for Amend to FOL DPR-46.By Ltr Licensee Withdrew Amend Request Which Would Have Revised Usfar to Reflect as-built Configuration of Reactor Bldg Isolation Dampers ML20210L1461999-08-0303 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Requests Submittal of Ltr Identifying Individuals Taking Exam,Personnel Allowed Access to Exams & Mailing Address for Exams ML20210D2541999-07-21021 July 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-02 on 990628-0702.Purpose of Insp Was Primarily to Evaluate Effectiveness of Licensed Operator Requalification Program.No Violations Were Identified ML20210C2041999-07-20020 July 1999 Discusses 990715 Mgt Meeting with Midamerican Energy Co Re risk-informed Baseline Insp Program Recently Implemented at Cooper & Fort Calhoun Stations ML20209H8191999-07-15015 July 1999 Forwards Safety Evaluation on GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, for Cooper Nuclear Station ML20209E6951999-07-12012 July 1999 Discusses Response to RAI on GL 92-01,rev 1,suppl 1, Rv Structural Integrity. Recommends Review of New Database Diskettes on Listed Website.Comments Due by 990901 or Data Entered Into Rvid for Plant Will Be Acceptable ML20209D8731999-07-0808 July 1999 Refers to 990707 Meeting Re Licensee Recent Maintenance Program self-assessment.Also Discussed How Licensee Incorporated Assessment Findings Into Rev of Maintenance Performance Improvement Plan.List of Attendees Encl ML20196J2471999-06-29029 June 1999 Discusses Completion of Licensing Action for GL 97-04, Assurance of Sufficient Net Positive Suction Head for ECC & Containment Heat Removal Pumps, ML20196F7511999-06-24024 June 1999 Discusses 990622 Meeting with Public at Arbor Manor, Alburn,Ne to Provide Overview of Pilot Insp Program ML20196E1411999-06-16016 June 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-05 on 990502-29.Noncited Violations Identified ML20195F6171999-06-0909 June 1999 Informs That GE Rept, Matl Presented by GE 970709 Meeting at Cooper Nuclear Power Station Re Replacement of ECCS Pump Suction Strainers Between Nppd,Ge & NRC Staff, Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure as Requested ML20207G3031999-06-0808 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Cooper Nuclear Station EP Implementing Procedure EPIP 5.7.1, Emergency Classification,Rev 24,under 10CFR50,App E,Section V Provisions.No Violations Identified ML20207G4481999-06-0808 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Cooper Nuclear Station EP Implementing Procedure,Epip 5.7.1, Emergency Classification,Rev 23 C2,under Provisions of 10CFR50,App E,Section V ML20207G4531999-06-0707 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Cooper Nuclear Station EP Implementing Procedure EPIP 5.7.1, Emergency Classification,Revision 25,under Provisions of 10CFR50,App E,Section V ML20207G3001999-06-0707 June 1999 Ack Receipt of Which Transmitted Changes to Cooper Nuclear Station Ep,Rev 33,under Provisions of 10CFR50,App E,Section V.No NRC Approval Required Based on Determination That EP Effectiveness Not Affected by Changes ML20207D3811999-05-27027 May 1999 Informs That During Next 6 to 12 Months,Starting 990530,NRC Plans to Conduct Insps Shown in Attached Insp Plan.Insps Include Both Planned Baseline & Supplemental Insps (Formerly Core & Regional Initiative Insps) ML20207A5191999-05-19019 May 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-04 on 990321-0501.Four Violations Identified & Being Treated as non-cited Violations ML20206Q6171999-05-17017 May 1999 Forwards RAI Re 990301 & 10 Ltrs Re Proposed TS Changes to Calibr Frequency of Recirculation Flow Transmitters from Once Every 184 Days to Once Every 18 Months.Util Responses Should Be Provided within 30 Days of Ltr Date ML20206P0171999-05-12012 May 1999 Discusses GL 96-05 Issued on 960918 & NPPD Responses Submitted on 961118,970317,980504 & 990222 for Cooper Nuclear Station.Forwards Safety Evaluation Concluding That NPPD Adequately Addressed Actions Requested in GL 96-05 IR 05000298/19980091999-05-12012 May 1999 Refers to Insp Rept 50-298/98-09 Conducted Between 981227-990130.During Insp,Apparent Violation of 10CFR50.50 Identified & Being Treated as non-cited ML20206M1791999-05-11011 May 1999 Informs That NRC Ofc of NRR Reorganized Effective 990328. Reorganization Chart Encl ML20206H4191999-05-0707 May 1999 Informs That on 990407,NRC Administered Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam.Licensee Facility Did Not Participate in Exam,However,Copy of Master Exam with Answer Key,Encl for Info.Without Encl ML20206P8961999-05-0707 May 1999 Refers to Meeting Conducted at Region IV Office on 990506 Re Licensee Upcoming Rev to Strategy for Achieving Engineering Excellence & Plans to Achieve Performance Improvements.List of Attendees & Util Presentation,Encl ML20206H7541999-05-0505 May 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/99-01 on 990207-0320.Violations Being Treated as non-cited Violations ML20205R5541999-04-16016 April 1999 Submits Summary of 990330 Public Meeting in Brownville,Ne to Discuss Results of PPR Completed on 990211,which Allowed for Exchange on New Assessment Process,Current Performance Review & Upcoming Actions Taken in Response to Y2K Concerns IR 05000298/19980221999-03-19019 March 1999 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-298/98-22 on 990107.Finds Reply Responsive to Concerns Raised in NOV ML20205E8991999-03-19019 March 1999 Advises of Completion of Plant Performance Review on 990209 to Develop Integrated Understanding of Safety Performance. Overall Performance Was Acceptable.Problems with Communication in CR Resulted in Several Minor Events ML20204D9451999-03-18018 March 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/98-09 on 981227-990206.Three Violations Identified & Being Treated as Noncited Violations,Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20207M9591999-03-15015 March 1999 Forwards Request for Addl Info Re Licensee Response to GL 95-07, Pressure-Locking & Thermal-Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, for Cooper Nuclear Station ML20204B6771999-03-15015 March 1999 Submits Withdrawal of Amend Request for Operating License DPR-46.Proposed Change Would Have Modified Facility TSs Pertaining to Neutron Monitoring Neutron Detectors ML20207M9811999-03-15015 March 1999 Advises That Which Withdrew 980415 Amend Request, Being Treated as Withdrawal.Proposed Change Would Have Modified Facility TSs Pertaining to Neutron Monitoring,Flow Biased Rod Block Monitor ML20204B3301999-03-11011 March 1999 Forwards SE Accepting Third 10-year Interval Inservice Insp Program Plan Requests for Relief Numbers RI-13,RI-17 & RI-25 for Plant ML20204B7061999-03-11011 March 1999 Requests Approval of Proposed Operability Criteria for Use in Evaluation & Interim Resolution of Degraded & Nonconforming Conditions with Piping & Pipe Supports at Facility ML20205A5811999-03-0909 March 1999 Forwards Exam Rept 50-298/99-301 for Exam Administered on 990212.Exam Included Evaluation of Four Applicants for Reactor Operator License ML20207K3231999-03-0808 March 1999 Discusses 990224 Meeting Re Staff Critique of Refueling & Equipment Outage RE-18 & Implementation Status of Improvement Strategy for Engineering.List of Attendees & Matl Used in Presentation Encl ML20202G1701999-02-0202 February 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Generic Fundamentals Exam Section of Written Operator Licensing Exam at Util Facility on 990407.Authorized Representative from Facility Must Submit Ltr Listing Names of Candidates ML20202E3121999-01-22022 January 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/98-08 on 981115-1226 & Notice of Violation.First Violation Re Staff Failure to Follow Procedures (Two in Operations,One in Maint & One in Plant Support) ML20199G6041999-01-19019 January 1999 Informs That Effective 990118,JN Donohew Has Assumed NRC Project Mgt Responsibility for Cooper Nuclear Station ML20199E1521999-01-0707 January 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-298/98-22 on 981116-1208 & Notice of Violation Re Lack of Effective Oversight by Plant Mgt 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
,,
OC6
- 'o UNITED STATES 8[ g o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION wAsHmaTow, p. c.aosse t j
~s.,o.,,/ December 23, 1986 Docket No. 50-298 l l
Mr. D. E. Schaufelberger President and Chief Executive Officer Nebraska Public Power District P. O. Box 499 Columbus, Nebraska 68601
Dear Mr. Schaufelberger:
The purpose of this letter is to convey formally my support for any drug testing program implemented for Nebraska Public Power District employees and contrattors that contributes to the policy as described in the July 1986 Policy Statement on Fitness for Duty of Nuclear Power Plant Personnel (enclosed).
That Statement indicates that, at a minimum, an acceptable fitness for duty program at a nuclear power plant should include effective drug monitoring and testing procedures to provide reasonable assurance that personnel with access to vital areas of the plant are fit for duty.
While acknowledging the national debate on drug testing, it is expected that operati.ng reactor licensees will take all reasonable precautions to ensure that drug use does not adversely impact the safe operation of nuclear power plants and the public's safety. I encourage the use of Constitutional and effective drug testing methods, as an element of comprehensive fitness for duty programs, to make sure that nuclear power plant personnel are and remain free from the effects of drug use. Licensees may choose to establish and administer proper and effective pre-employment, annual, for cause, accident, random, and other drug testing programs for their employees and contractors with unescorted access to vital areas in their nuclear power plants. With regard to such programs being applicable to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) employees requiring access to your plant, the NRC intends to have its own fitness for duty program so it can certify NRC employees. In light of the ongoing Federal program associated with drug testing, there are a number of complex questions that we need to address and which need further study. We will communicate with you later when we have addressed such questions.
It is noted that your current testing programs have resulted in the identifi- ~
cation of drug use by some persons with access to vital areas. I endorse and i
support Nebraska Public Power District's efforts to implement a drug screening and testing program to be responsive to and consistent with the Comission's expectations.
Sincerely, 8612300049 861223 8 PDR ADOCK 0500 p P y ctor S lo, .
Executive Dir ctor for Operations OfN5tement
Mr. D. E. Schaufelberger
Mr. George A. Trevors Division Manager-Nuclear Support Nuclear Power Group Nebraska Public Power District P. O. Box 499 Columbus, Nebraska 68601 --
Mr. G. D. Watson, General Counsel Nebraska Public Power District Post Office Box 4999 Columbus, Nebraska 68601 Mr. Arthur C. Gehr Attorney Snell & Wilmer 3100 Valley Center Phoenix, Arizona 85073 Cooper Nuclear Station ATTN: Mr. G. Horn, Division Manager of Nuclear Operations Post Office Box 98 Brownville, Nebraska 68321 Director Nebraska Department of Environmental Control Post Office Box 94877 State House Station Lincoln, Nebraska 68509 Mr. William Siebert, Commissioner Nemaha County Board of Comissioners Nemaha County Courthouse Auburn, Nebraska 68305 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 218 Brownville, Nebraska 68321 ~
H. Ellis Simmons, Director Division of Radiological Health Department of Health 301 Cer.tennial Mall, South Post Office Box 95007 Lincoln, Nebraska 68509
_f-.... .
Mr. D. E. Schaufelberger DISTRIBUTION:
DCS NRC PDR Local PDR JGPartlow Reading DI Reading VStello JMTaylor RStarostecki JGPartlow RLSpessard PFMcKee JCunningham LBush JPMurray, OGC W0lmstead 0GC TDorian, OGC HRDenton RBernero
-DRMuller WLong SNorris ACRS(10)
. s h mE OFC :IE:DIR/ :IE:DIR " :0GC "4 f :EDO : : :
NAME :JPartlo sp:JMTay1 ---:... q -:VStello M4ertees : :
DATE:12p86 :12g/86 :12/g/86 :12/ /86 : : :
w
y i ., . .u .
),
- f . Federal Regleter / Vol. St. N3.149 / M:nd:y, August 4,1986 / Notices 37921 Commiselon peNoy Statement en abase problems to be a social, medical, the Conunission has decided to defer pleness for Duty of Nueiser power and safety problem affecting every implementation of the rule subject to plant personnel segment of our society.Given the successful lasplementation of fitness for pervasiveness of the problem it must be duty programs by the industry as aesney: Nuclear RegulatorF moognised that it exists to some extent Commissim. described in this Policy Statement. NRC In the nuclearindustry.Ptudence, is publi a separate notice in the actions Policy statement. therefore, requires that the Commission 4 Fedesel withdrawing the consider additional appropriate proposed rule, analysing the commente suasanastv: Dis statement tothe measures to provide reasonable pokey d &' g* on the rule, and explaning its intent to t"Y assurance that a person who is under reassess the possible need for th=8a= tan (NRC) with respect to the inDuence of alcohol or any rulemaking after en 18-month period, if Seness for duty of nuclear power plant substance legal or illegal which affects peonnel and decrees the acdvides circumstances warrant.De following 08 that person's ability to perform duties statement sets forth the Commission's - .
"* . esfely,is not allowed. access to a vital y ' g"'C' licy on Atnew for duty and describes area et a nuclear power nlant. ow it wiu execute its responsibilities in esf;ty of the public.To provide ne nuclear powerindustry, with seasonable assurance that au nuclear assistance from programs dmloped his ama to e && ale ud sde
'of the public. '
power plant personnel with access to~ and coordinated by EEI and the lastitute vital armes at operating plants are fit for of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), PtBey Statement -
duty,licensus and apphcants am . has made and is continuing to make no Comunission recognises that the dmloping and impimenting Atness for embetantial progress in this area. Industry, through the initiatives of the g
em u Guide to Effective Drug and Alcohol /
"EEI ATask Force on Drug Abuse 2
- nd INPO. ha' d Md i C). EEI*
- Fitness for Duty Pohey Development."It Problems, Policies, and Programs *
- 3. semains the continuing responsibility of established in tes2 by EEI's Industrial Wloping an dimplem tir nuclear
. the NRC to independently evaluate utility employee Rtness for duty Relations Division Executive Advisory cpplicant development and licensee Consmittee, published guidelines in tess .h th-laalon stream the implementation o(fitness for duty . . to help the industry address the Isive of ance dindudry's initiative and 7 progrease to ensore that desired he'ulta how to establish comprehensive fitness . *. wishes to furth.er N such self.
are cchieved. Nothing in this Policy ..- for duty programs.ney were ypm n ,,,g,.-
Statement limits NRC's authority or subsequently revised in less as the "EEI SuW de counnd succeu M j responsibility to follow up on Guide to Effective Drug and Alcohol / u b operational events or its enforcement Fitness for Duty Policy Development Sine88%or duty programs and NRC'ss laidadm k Citbority when regulatory requirements
and were provided to all nucl, ear , ;
L are not met. However, while evaluating utilities, s the effectiveness of this guidance, the A series of EEI eponsored regional mfrala from new rulmaking a Stam b NRC latends to exercise disention in conferences in the 6tness for duty area for duty of nuclear power plant enforcement matters related to fitness in test and 1983 provided a forum for ""'I I" ' "I"I"*" d 18 "'"O'
/ for duty programs for nuclear power discussion ofindustry concerns related F"'the arom effective date.of this Policy pt:nt personnel and refrain from new to development and implementation of Statement.no Commission's decision ,
rulemaking in this area for a period of at fitness for duty programs. Topics to defw implementation of rulemaking in ;
le:st la months from the effective date addressed at the conferences included this ama is la recognition of industry ,
f of us ,ohey Statemeni.ne -im ,a,oc%uon. iegai es,eas. eNwts to date and the intent of the th=laalon invites interested membere training, and methods for bandling industry to utilise the eel Guidelines in I of the public to provide coaunents on controDed substances. An industrywide . denloping fitam for duty programs.
I tile policy state:nent. sonference sponsored by EEI in October h Commission wiu mrcin us Se t ntsb o em t see. '"
g,3 , eo n nu a to asommeses:Comunents should be sent been expanded to include information be responsible for evaluating licensee's to: Secretary of the th=ission. U.S. on chemical testing. As a result of efforts in the fitness for duty area to Nuclear Regulatory Commission, lacreased awareness in this area, the verify effectiveness of the industry W:ohington,DC30655. ATIN: programs.ne Commission will reassess Docketing and Service Branch. Hand nuclear industry has worked to develop ,
L, and implement improved fitness for duty the possible need for further NRC action J h deliver comments to: Room 1121.1717 H me.nwe programs concentrate based on the success of those programs
- i. Street NW Washington, DC between on e training of managers, supervisors, during the to-month period.
4:15 a.m. and 5 00 p.m. At the Commission's request, the and others in methods for identifying i Pon rusmeest esponesanose coerract: and dealing with personnel potentially industry agreed to undertake a review of
, Imren Bush. Opersting Reactor Programs unfit for duty. the program elements and seceptance
- Branch. Office o' inspection and On August 5.19s2, the Commission criteria for a fitness for duty program.
- Enforcement. I'.S. Nuclear Regulatory published in the Federal Register a EEI modified and issued the revised
[ Commission. Washington, DC 20555 proposed rule on fitness for duty (47 FR " eel Guideline to Effective Drug and
- . t:liphone FA1) 492-aoeo. 33ee0).De proposed rule would have Alcohol / Fitness for Duty Policy 1 supptassWrany esponesanoss: requimd licensees to establish and Development." Further. INPO enhanced L. Implement written procedures for its performance objectives and criteria Intadueden ensuring that personnelin a nuclear for its periodic evaluations to include s' he Nuclear Regulatory Coeunission power plant are fit for duty. Due to the appropriate criteria for fitness for duty.
$ (NRC) recognizes drug and alcol ol laitiatives taken by the nucl,rar industry. Copies of the documents describing the o
r ..
l a .'
f .
2 711:'.2 - federal Registee / Vol. 51. No.149 / M:nd:y. August 4,19M / Notices - ..E I
.. l N program elements and criteria for fitness Enforessnent
- are several tessons why I believe that for d:ty programs developed by the this would be a better approach.
Q Vidauons dany appl 1M reporung j industry are provided to NRC for review requirement or instances of a person W mosj important mason fw my p cod coanment. being unLt for duty such that plant preference for a rule and specific t ne NRC will evaluate the safety is potentially aHected will be guidelines is that a rule is enformable *4 cffectiveness of utibly fitness for duty subject to the enforcement process. Any while a policy statement is not. With a V programs by its normalreview of NRC staH enforcement action pertaining rule the Canmiselon would have a clear p industry activities. through reviews of to fitness for duty of nuclear power buis for enforcement acun in all cases -
INPO program status and evaluation plant personnel during the 18-month in whid a utility fails to establish and 4 reports, periodic NRC observation of the grace period will be undertaken only maintain an eHective finess for duty y conduct of1NPO evaluations, and direct program.ne NRC has broad authority y wM Commission concunence.
inspections conducted by the NRC's In addition to required reports and Perfornunce AppralaalTeams. Regional inspections. Information requests under under the Atomic Energy Act to take enforcessent action by issuing an order y j
Office, and Resident inspectors. NRC to CFR 5034(f) may be made and should there be an immadiate threat to
^
will clso r.onitor the proyess of enforcement meetings held to ensure public health and safety.ne individuallicensee programs. . understanding of corrective actions. 1rmn=lssion would also be able to take 13y way of further guidance to Orders may be lessed where ne===ary enfmoement action ifit could tie a l , i lienrnees. Commission expectations of to achieve corrective artmna on matters specific safety problem so a lapse in the ,
licensee programs for fitness for duty of affecting plant aafety. . licensee's As==== fa duty program.
nuclear power plant personnel may be in brief. the NRC's decision to use However, theramm1=.lon is unlikely to sunmarized as idlows- discretion in enforcement to recognize be able to do so.Forexample.if a e It is Commission policy that the sale, industry initiauves in no way changes maintenance worker makes a saistake in woe orpossession of alcoholic the NRC's ability to issue orders, call assembling safety equipment because he bevzreges orillegal drugs within enforcement meetings,or suspend is under the infloence of drugs or alcohol protected areas at emdear plant sites lla=na*= shoofd a signi& =nasafety and equipment later malfunctions. It la ;,
- is unacceptable. problem be found. - unlikely that the true cause of the i e 11is Commission pobey that persons . Nothing in this pohcy Statma shall mistake would be diseovered. In fact.
- within pmtected areas at nuclear limit the authority ofJthe NRC to conduct the probless would most likely be power plant sites shall not be under inspections as deemed nea== mary or to . attributed to some defectin the worker's the influence of any substance. legal take appropriate enfortament action - training. Further, waiting until a specific or illegal, which adversely affects when regulatory requirements are not safety problem surfaces or an immediate their ability to perform theit duties in- met. .
threat occws and then trying to conect tny wayrelated to safety: %e separate views of Commissioner the fitness for duty program after the
Asselstine follow.
fact is not the best way to ensure that
. program should at a mir.lmnm include .
This Policy statement is a step in the licensees have effective fitsees for duty the following essential elemerps:
right direction.Hunan erroris a ' ' programs.nus, car general -
dominant factor in the risk associated .* enforcement authority does not provide (1)possession A provision that the sale, sise, ofillegal drugs within the or'.}
- Mth the operation of nuclear . us per we: enoeshWty to, deal wie protected area wiD result in plants.-An adequate fitnese for duty- all potential fitness for duty prehlems in immediste revocation of access to Program is e====H=1 to mduce 1M -
a umelysnanner. Absent aspecanc vit:1 area's and discharge from~ nuclear chance that human error will be ceased. event,it would not allow us to do much power plant activities.%e use of
- by atility persormel i JQ safety. of anything if a Iwwname simply has not related work in a drug or alcohol developed ocimplementad an adequate
' cicohol or abuse of legal drugs within ,
' the protected area will result in irnpared statds policy stownts pmgramN pdcy stauw i immediate revocation of access to puts the Comrnission on record as re;wesents a continuation of the reactive t endorsing the concept of a drag and appmach to regulation which has so 1 vitti areas and possible discharge alcohol free workplace et plant sites, often failed in the past.
from nuclear power plant activities. A second reason ice e preference for
(?) A provision that any other sale. and that is useful.He statement also gives some goldance on what the a rule with adaimum gui[eh'nes is that possession, or use of illegal drugs will Commission expects of licensee ~ fitness the policy atatement is too amorphous.
result in immediate revocatico of for duty programs. However.1 believe Even the " spec 1Ec" guidance the cccess Io vital areas, mandatory Commission does provide is !altly that the Commission should have gone 1 reh:bihtation prior to reinstatement of further. vague.ne policy statement provides access and possible dacharge fmm instead of merely losuing a policy little insight into what the Commission auclear power p!snt activities. statement. the Commission should have considers to be an adequate fitness for (3) Effective monitoring and testing promulgated a rule.He rule should be a duty program or what standard the staff pmcedures to provide reasonable relatively simple, nongnaiptive rule is supposed to use as it monitors the cssurance that nuclear power plant which would do two things. First. It progress of the ladustry over the next personnel with access to vital areas would prohibit anyone whois unfit for elghteen months. -
are h1 for duty. duty from being permitted access to %e Comrnission should work together
%e industry. by periodic briefings or vital areas of plants.Second,it would with the tridustry to identify the ~
cther appmpriate methods. is expected require licensees to have a program and essential elements of an edequate is keep the Commission informed on procedures to ensure that no one who is fitness for duty program. While the program status.%e NRC may also fmm unfit for duty gains access to vital areas. policy statement comments favorably time to time ask individual licensees to The Commission should then work with upon the EEI Fuldelines developed by i provide such infonnstion as the the indostry to develop guidance on the industry, those guidelines are l Commission may need to assess , what are the essential elements of an optional, not mandatory.%e utilities program adequacy, adequate fitness for duty pmgram.Dere can, therefore, pick and choose among ,
i
e e
Fedecal Registee / Vol. 51, NA 149 / M ndry. August 4.1986 / Notices 279 3 hV the'various elements and decide For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ondents: Dese whether to include them in their tamde W. zach. ir, Description forma describe oft Reske rights and e programs. Moreover, the eel guidelines Chairmon. responsibilities of the SBA. a lender.
themselves are quite general in nature.
(FR Doc. 86-17497 Filed 6-1-86 s 45 am) and the investor when the guaranteed and are subject to varying muses ecos renc-m portion of a loan is sold.
interpretations. Absent further guidance Anrual Responses: 3.200 on what is an acceptable fitness fpr duty Annasl Burden flours: 12.000 program. the utilities can and probably Type oMequat: Extension will adopt widely differing approaches SMALt. BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION on such elements as chemical testing
Title:
Profile of Score / ACE Volunteer Agency information Collection with intemational trade experience cnd offsite drug use. Not all approaches Activities Form no. SBA 1202 cre likely to be acceptable.The .
Frequency: On occasion Commission should not wait until18 Actiosc Notice of reporting requirementa submitted for review. Description of Respondents:Information months from now, when all the utilities le collected by SCORE / ACE chapters cre supposed to have their programs in sucessAsm Under the provisions of the pl:ce, to let the industry know whether when new members loin the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. organization,if theyhave the Commission agrees with what they Chapter 35). agencies are required to international trade experience.
have done.The Commission and the submit proposed reporting and Annual Responses: 500 industry ought to decide now which recordkeeping requirements to OMB for Annual Burden Hours: 34 clements are absolutely essential to an review and approval, and to publish a Type of Request: Extension cdequate program, and then everyone notice in the Federal Register notifying
Title:
Financial assistance request to will be working from a common base of the public that the agency has made participate in Intemational Trade enderstanding. such a submission. Exhibition or mission The Commission and the industry DATE: Comments should be submitted . Form no. SBA 1309 thruld also establish the specific criteria within 21 days of this publication in the Frequency: On occasion
- against which individuallicensee Federal Register. If you intend to Description of Respondents:De
. programs will be evaluated so that the comment but cannot prepare comments information requested is necessary for ground rules for evaluating programs Promptly. please advise the OMB - - SBA to evaluate a firm's eligibility to cnd for monitoring progress will be in Reviewer and the Agency Clearance .-Teceive a grartt or financial assistance pl:ce before the 18 month monitoring, Officer before the deadline. to participate in an international trade .
period begins. Absent suchJuldelines. It Copies: Copin of fonns, request for exhibition or mission.
is difficult to see how INPO and NRC clearance (S.F. 83s), supporting Annual Responses:100 ctaff reviews of these programs will statements. instructions, and other . Annual Burden Hours:175 provide any meaningfulinsights as to documents submitted to OMB for review Type of Request: Extension their adequacy, may be obtained from the Agency
Title:
Client Export File the ud e n dv ^ "
e r d to O Rev " E "" " " *i "
cnsure that all utilities meet at least a .
Description of Respondents: %is minimum set of standards.1 believe the N N NAmm CMAR informaHon is neensary in orda to C:mmission should issued a rule and Agency Clearance Officer: Richard identify the firm's needs and is used sh uld establish guidance,in Virachero. Small Business to create a program of export cooperation with the industry, on just Administration.1441 L Street. NW., development for the small business cxactly what are the essential elements Room 200, WsWngton DC 2006, requunng coundng in MtunaW cf a fitness for duty program. Telephone:(202) 653-8538 trade.
The additional views of the OMB Reviewer: Patricia Aronsson Annual Responses: 5.000 ccmmission follow: Office ofInformation and Regulatory Annual Burden Hours:850 Affairs. Office of Management and Type of Requer.t: Extension The Commission does not share Budget. New Executive Office Ccmmissioner Asselstine e great -
Title:
Personal Financial Sta tement Building. Washington DC 20503 Form no. SBA 413 concern about the legally non. binding Telephone:(202) 395-7231 character of the policy statement per se. Frequency: On occasion Thr Commission s hands are not tied if
Title:
Executive Qualifications Description of Respondents:This it finds inadequate compliance with Questionnaire information is used to assist the Frequency: On occasion Agency in determining the financial straight forward end explicit policy guidelines.The Atomic Energy Act Description of Respondents: This strength of an individual for a loan or information is requested from loan guaranteed by SDA.
c:nfers broad authority for the applicants for SES positions to assist Annual Responses: 78.500 C:mmission to take prompt enforcement in evaluating qualifications for a Annual Burden Hours: 76.500 action should any licensee facility. in vacancy.'
the Commission's judgment, not be Type of Request: Revision Annual Responses: 400
Title:
Inquiry Record cperated in a manner that protects the Annual Burden Hours:400 Form no. SBA 149 public health and safety. A policy Type of Request: Extennion st:tzment, at this juncture, offers the Frequency: On occasion quici est means to achieve the end we
Title:
Secondary Participation Cuaranty Description of Respondents: This cfi desire. and Certification Agreement and information is required at the time of Request for Certification interview so that the applicant can D: led at Washmston. DC. this 30th day of Form nos. SDA 1085.1066 luty 198a. communicate the loan needs to Frequency: On occasion agency, and to determine the size and J
_ - _ . __ . _ . ._ . __.