W3P83-3289, Forwards Independent Safety Engineering Group Review of NRC Concerns & Harstead Engineering Assoc Rept, Analysis of Cracks & Water Seepage in Foundation Mat, in Response to NRC

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Independent Safety Engineering Group Review of NRC Concerns & Harstead Engineering Assoc Rept, Analysis of Cracks & Water Seepage in Foundation Mat, in Response to NRC
ML20078D567
Person / Time
Site: Waterford Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 09/29/1983
From: Cain J
LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To: Deyoung R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
Shared Package
ML20078D572 List:
References
W3P83-3289, NUDOCS 8310040559
Download: ML20078D567 (2)


Text

- _______ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Louisiama , memmmem1 . 0. eOx _o POWER & LlGHT / NEW OALEANG. LOUGANA 70100 . FSO 9 5G5 "D4 MIDDLE SOUTH UTIUTIES SYSTEM September 29, 1983 JM. CAIN Pre 3ident and Chief Executive Oflicer

  • W3P83-3289 Richard C. DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 SUB.iECT: Waterford 3 SES Docket !!o. 50-382

REFERENCE:

NRC Letter Dated August 4, 1983

Dear Mr. DeYoung:

Enclosed for your review is the report prepared by LP&L's Independent Safety Engineering Group (ISEC) covering the action plan outlined in our submittal of September 1, 1983.

I would like to point out that the liarstead Engineering Associates (HEA) re-port is their initial report covering an assessment of the concrete cracking and water scepage problems. A second report covering the design adequacy of the basemat is scheduled to be issued by HEA on October 15, 1983. The delay in issuing this section of the report is due to HEA performing independent calculations on the basemat design.

The LP6L Safety Review Committee (SRC) has reviewed the approach taken by ISEG for addressing the concerns of your letter of August 4,1983; and agrees that the approach represents a reasonable method to address the concerns. In making this judgment, the SRC has reviewed the enclosed report and discussed it with members of ISEG.

As you will recall from our meeting of August 25, 1983, you suggested that LP6L look at as much as possibic in addressing the issues contained in your letter of August 4, 1983. The ISEG action plan submitted to you on September 1, 1983 was broader in scope than we had propcsed in the meeting. In addition to the action plan, ISEG walked down four safety related systems, provided an evaluation of the American Bridge issue, and increased the LP&L Q.A. system status reviews by two.

0310040539 830929 PDR ADOCK 05000392 W&  ;

A PDR I

Richard C. DeYoung Page 2 W3P83-3289 Please call if you wish to discuss the report, or if you have uny questions.

Sincerely, h J.M. Cain JMC/RFB/pp Enclosure cc: E. Blake, W.M. Stevenson, J.T. Collins, G.L. Constable I