ML20012C042

Forwards Questionnaire in Response to Generic Ltr 90-01, Request for Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory Impact Survey. Results Not Reflective of Particular Calendar Yr

ML20012C042
Person / Time
Site:	Waterford
Issue date:	03/12/1990
From:	Burski R LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
GL-90-01, GL-90-1, W3P90-0262, W3P90-262, NUDOCS 9003200007
Download: ML20012C042 (11)

Text

pm -

L

, /t f Louisiana Power & Light Company .

e. ~~~ . -

317 Baronne Street -

?" P. O. Box 60340 Now Ortoans LA 70160 0340-Td 504 595 2805 R. F. Burski Nucioar Safety & Flogulatory Affairs-Managor W3P90-0262 A4.05 ,

QA 6 March 12, 1990 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk

-Washington, D.C. 20555

Subject:

Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38 NRC Generic Letter No. 90-01 Request For Voluntary Participation in NRC Regulatory Impact Survey

' Gentlemen:

LP&L was pleased to participate in the 1989 Regulatory Impact Survey and

,. hopes the information provided to the NRC staff is useful in its review of the NRC's. regulatory practices. :LP&L, asLis everyone associated with nuclear power, is always interested in enhancing the safe operation of

! nuclear: power plants and is encouraged by these NRC initiatives.

Likewise LP&L 1s pleased:to complete the questionnaire prcyided in Generic-Letter 90-01. The:information provided in the attached questionnaires is- '

based on a review of inspection records over the past several years and

, interviews with key plant personnel. The results were then averaged and therefore are'not reflective of a particular calendar year.

.Should you have any questions about the information provided, please feel '

free to contact me or L.W. Laughlin at (504) 464-3499.

Very truly yours, 9

'RFB/LWL/ssf-Attachments cc: . Messrs. R.D. Martin, NRC Region IV F.J. Hebdon. NRC-NRR D.L. Wigginton, NRC-NRR

.E.L. Blake (

W.M. Stevenson p\

NRC Resident Inspectors Office

• ei 9003200007 900312 PDR r" i P ADOCK 05000382 "

An Entergy Coinpany PDC .

1 s

.. {

NRC Regulatory Impact Survey ,

Questionnaire sheet .

l l

Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: Mac Team Inspections 1.

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity Conducted? Two Team Inspections per year.

3. Operations / Construction areas covered:

1

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how-long) , Team inspections typically consist of 6 inspectors who are onsite for two weeks.

l 1

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described'in Item #1.

Manhours

a. Plant Department Heads 4% (numberinvolved) 4 333

b. . Plant Manager 3% 62

c. Corporate Department Heads *NA (numberinvolved) NA NA

d. Corporate Vice Presidents <i% (numberinvolved) 1 21 l

e. Chief Nuclear Officer <1% 21 l l

f. Managers and Supervisors 5% (number involved) 8 832

• All departments within Nuclear Operations were considered to be plant site personnel. LP&L defined " corporate" as outside the Nuclear Operations department.

y ,,

1 NRC Reeulatory Impact Survey Questionnaire sheet l

1.. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: other NRc inspections

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Average of 33 inspections per year l

1

3. . Operations / Construction areas covered: l 1

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) The vast majority of NRC Inspections consist of two inspectors who are onsite for one week. The NRC Monthly Resident Inspections typically consist of two resident inspectors who perform continuous inspections that-are ,

broken down into 4 or 6 weeks reporting intervals. However, the cummulative overage is two inspectors per inspection who are onsite for two weeks.

5. Approximatepercentageoftotaltime-(onanannual-basis)whichthe following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item fl.

, Manhours

a. Plant Department Heads ,1gt (numberinvolved) 9 2995

b. Plant Manager 1st 312

c. Corporate Department Heads

• NA (numberinvolved)

NA NA I

d. Corporate Vice Presidents 4% (numberinvolved) 1 83

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 2% 40 l

j f. Managers and Supervisors 18% (number involved) 25 9360 1

I

• All departments within Nuclear Operations were considered to be plant

, site personnel. LP&L defined " corporate" as outside the Nuclear

( Operations department.

NRC Regulatory impact Survey l Questionnaire sheet  ;

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: INPO Evaluations / Visits l I

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? IMPO Plant Evaluation every 18 monthe

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: --

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long)

Simulator Evaluation: 3 evaluators for 1 week every 18 months Site Evaluation: 17 evaluators for 2 weeks every 18 months S. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item fl.

l Manhours

a. Plant Department Heads 5% (numberinvolved) 7 728

b. Plant Manager 4% 80

c. Corporate Department Heads *NA (numberinv0lyed) NA NA

(. d. Corporate Vice Presidents 3% (numberinvolved) 1 63

e. Chief Nuclear Officer 2% 42

f. Managers and Supervisors 6% (number involved) 25 3100

• All departments within Nuclear Operations were considered to be plant site personnel. LP&L defined " corporate" as outside the Nuclear Operations department.  ;

1

.--- .. .- . .. .~ . - -.- - - . . - - . . .-_ -- .

1

]

NRC Regulatory Imoact Survey .I Questionnaire sheet j l

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: ANI Insurers 1

l 2, Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how.often l 1s this activity Conducted? a) Resident Inspector conducts on-Roina audit, b) Pump & Valve Program audited 4 times per year. c) ANSI ,

I N626 activity is audited 2 times per year.

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: a) Daily audits involve all activities associated with ASME Section XI. b) Puup & Valve Program i audits involve the activities and execution of the Proernn. c) AN'11 i N626 audits involve activities required by-ASME Section XI.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) a) nally audie by resident inspector. b) Punp & Valve audits are conducted by l resident inspector. c) ANSI N626 audits involve the resident inspector and a supervisory in s r.e c t o r .

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the I

following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1.

Manhours

a. Plant Department Heads 5% (numberinvolved) 1 104 i

b. Plant Manager 1% 21

c. Corporate Department Heads *NA (number involved) NA NA

d. Corporate Vice Presidents <1% (numberinvolved) 1 <21

e. . Chief Nuclear Officer <1% <21

f. Managers and Supervisors 7% (number involved) 2 291 ,

I l

• All departments within Nuclear Operations were considered to be plant i site personnel. LP&L defined " corporate" as outside the Nuclear I Operations department.

. i NRC Regulatory Impact Survey i Questionnaire sheet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: EPA Compliance Inspection

2. Based on actual e::perience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Twice since 1986

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: NPDES Perrait Coupliance

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) I inspector onsite for 1 dav ner insnectinn

• 5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item fl.

Manhours

a. Plant Department Heads 2%

(number involved)- 2 83

b. Plant Manager 1% 21

c. Corporate Department Heads ** 1% (numberinvolved) 1 21

d. Corporate Vice Presidents <1%

(numberinvolved) 1 <21

e. Chief Nuclear Officer a <21

f. Managers and Supervisors 3% (number involved) 2 125 l

• Inspections conducted on irregular basis, percentages are based on average time spent assuming one inspection per calendar year.

• • All departments within Nuc1 car Operations were considered to be plant site personnel. LP&L defined " corporate" as outside the Nuclear Operations department.

i NRC Regulatory Imonet Survey Questionnaire 5heet

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: OSHA a

l

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often  !

is this activity conducted? Activity is conducted on an irreRular basis.  !

Operations / Construction areas covered: Formal activity usually occurs 3.

i as a result of a couplaint and involvement is directly proportional to severity of allegation.

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) Activity is specific to the scope and severity of each individual allegation.

P c 5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item #1. .

Manhours

a. Plant Department Heads 3% (numberinvolved) 1 62

b. Plant Manager 1% 21

c. Corporate Department Heads 1% (number involved) 1 21

d. Corporate Vice Presidents <1% (numberinvolved) 1 <21 e.. Chief Nuclear Officer <1% <21

f. Managers and Supervisors 5% (number involved) 1 104

• Inspections conducted on irregular basis. Percentages are based on average time spent assuming one inspection per calendar year.

• • All departments within Nuclear Operations were considered to be plant site personnel. LP&L defined " corporate" as outside the Nucicar Operations department.

_ - - _ _ ._ - . - . ~

.1- .

. i.

~

NRC Regulatory lapact Survey Questionnaire sheet l Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: por 1.

1

)

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often ]

is this activity conducted? None I

3. . Operations / Construction areas covered: None

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) None

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item fl.

Manhours

a. Plant Department Heads --

(numberinvolved) -- --

b. Plant Manager -- --

l c. Corporate Department Heads --

(numberinvolved) -- --

d. Corporate Vice Presidents --

(numberinvolved) -- --

e. Chief Nuclear Officer -- __

f. Managers and Supervisors --

(number involved) -- --

I I

NRC Regulatory impact Survey  !

o.eitionnair. sneet i I

l

1. Type of inspection, audit or evaluation: State and Local Authorities (

l

' - LA Department of Environmental Quality

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conducted? Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, Water Pollution Control Division, conducts approximately one inspection per year.

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: The subject of the inspection is NPDES (National Pollutant Discharne Elinination Systen). .

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) one inspector is involved for one day per each inspection.

• 5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and '

in response to the activity described in Item #1.

l Manhours

a. Plant Department Heads 2% (numberinvolved) 2 83

b. Plant Manager 1% 21

c. Corporate Department Heads **1% (numberinvolved) 1 21

d. Corporate Vice Presidents <1% (numberinvolved) 1 <21

e. Chief Nuclear Officer (1% <21

f. Managers and Supervisors 3% (number involved) 2 125

• Inspections conducced on irregular basis. Percentages are based on average time spent assuming one inspection per calendar year.

• • All departments within haclear Operations were considered to be plant site personnel. LP&L defined " corporate" as outside the Nuclear Operations departnent.

,, . 4 NRC Reevlatory Impact Survey  ;

Questionnaire 5heet NRC-Required QA Audits l

1. ~ Type of inspection, audit or evaluation:

l l

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often )

is this activity conducted? Approximately 25 audits per year

.l

3. Operations / Construction areas covered: --

]

l

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 2-3 auditors for periods of 2-3 weeks f s

S. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in Item fl.

Manhoura ,[

a. Plant Department Heads 2% (numberinvolved) 8 333

b. Plant Manager 2% 42

c. Corporate Department Heads a (numberinvolved) NA NA

d. Corporate Vice Presidents <1% (numberinvolved) 1 <21

e. Chief Nuclear Officer <1% <21

f. Managers and Supervisors 2% (number involved) 7 291

• All departments within Nuclear Operations were considered to be plant site personnel. LP&L defined " corporate" as outside the Nuclear Operations department.

1 i

1

s NRC Reeulatory impact Survey guestuonnaire 5heet

1. Type of inspection, audit er evaluation: Self-Assessments (INPO.

SSFIs. etc.)

2. Based on actual experience over the past several years, about how often is this activity conductedt a) SSPI Self Assessment, b) INPO Self Assessment, and c) Performance in Excellence Self Assessment as needed Operations / Construction areas covered: a) SSFI Self Assessment-System 3.

Functional Inspection, b) INPO Self Assessment-Organizations associated with INPO Plant Evaluations, and c) Performance in Excellence-Maintenance, Operations, Engineering

4. Extent of the activity (how many people, for how long) 3 assessors for 2 weeks

5. Approximate percentage of total time (on an annual basis) which the following managers must spend in direct involvement before, during, and in response to the activity described in item #1.

Manhours

a. Plant Department Heads 3% (numberinvolved) 5 312

b. Plant Manager <1% <21

c. Corporate Department Heads *NA (number involved) NA NA_

d. Corporate Vice Presidents <1% (numberinvolved) 1 <21

e. Chief Nuclear Officer <lt <21

f. Managers and Supervisors 3% (number involved) 5 312

• All departraents within Nuclear Operations were considered to be plant site personnel. LP&L defined " corporate" as outside the Nucicar Operations departraent.

___ ____ ._ _ _ _ _ _ _