ML20083J628

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Expresses Concern Re Intent & Direction of NRC Reexam of Current Emergency Planning Regulations.Safety Stds Need Strengthening
ML20083J628
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/28/1983
From: Delbello A
NEW YORK, STATE OF
To: Palladino N
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20083J622 List:
References
NUDOCS 8401050316
Download: ML20083J628 (2)


Text

-~

y -' -

3, ,

, .I Q1. 5 W-E.do- II

" , ' ^ '

y' T&.T

=::.,e

.j '

,P -Yr -

i .*g. 4 e

. S, -

._.~.

.*A*E.e I;rw~en<

r r . c t o r w t . . c .' t '. < < - G - 'C 4 O r-A. , #. c. N .- < t fr i a

.: Ot.et...o

=::c;. .

+

"u-Hovember 26, 1952 Mr. Nunzio Palladino Chairman Nuclear Regulatory Con::ission

  • dashington, D.C. -

Dear Mr. Palladinct .

You are Thank you foraware certainly your response of our great to my letter of Neverber 4.

~

highest standar68 on nuclear safety. concern It is ourfor hope assuring the that your staf f recon:nendations enhance and improve and Commission actions will serve to these safety standardsrather and protective than reduce the effectiveness of meas.ures.

regarding In addition, possibleitchanges is our hope in M.R.C. that in the future, inforn.ation regulations does not have to be received through news rcports; but that a syster. cf ec-runica t l'^

can be set up with those of us cirectly involved.

We will be prepared to test the school component of 1:cv Y o r 'r.' s compensating plan for Rockland County as soon as discussiens v2th school superintendents are completed, and their recom: .endarsens are.adoquately incorporated into the plan. Bowevor, b sed on statements by H.R.C. Com= tis sione r Gilinsky that you, s ch a i rm.m ,

feel emergency and based on the preparedness requirements are " excessive",

l'.R.C. 's history of not fully enforcing its own off-site safety regulations at Indian Point, I rcrain concerned with the intent and direction the N.R.C. has anbarhed upon in its 're-examination' of current regulations.

of the I would therefore ask that you advise rne as soon as 9o98114" time-frame you cite in your letter. you envision f or the re-exanination procest- -

Specifically, what is the shortest ti""

  • in which a regulatory change could take place ? Because you did  ;

not state in your letter whether reductions to currer.t eme rce nM standards are a realistic possibility, please advise : c as to nether this is the case. Scar in mind that Rochland Count y e t t i s . ,1, are current 1v undertakin

  • a detailed process of orecarina M 31 8401050316 831230 f h "l); d y F-OM .

PDR ADOCK 05000247 F PDR

(

.{\

~

! =..a= GEf

~

2 -

Sir . Nunzio Palladino .

emergency' plans, based upcn current standards. Toy preparations we tray wish to make for a full scale, four-county exercise in the Spring, 1984, will be potentially subject to your rergulatory actions .

Again, it is our' sincere hope that the end of your regulatory re-examination process will result in a strengtbening rather than weakening of our nuclear safety standards.

Sincerely, -

Alfred B. DelBello -

Lieutenant Governor DJT/af w,..

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ -