ML18004B600

Requests NRC Look at Problems Cited in 861017 2.206 Petition Re Insp of Placements of Alleged Violations

ML18004B600
Person / Time
Site:	Harris
Issue date:	11/11/1986
From:	Katz S COALITION FOR ALTERNATIVES TO SHEARON HARRIS
To:	Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
2.206, NUDOCS 8611210113
Download: ML18004B600 (5)

Text

RFQUL*TY INFGRNATIGN DISTRISUTIGIYSTFN IRIDS)

ACCESSION NBR: 8611210113 DQC. DATE: 86/11/11 NOTARIZED: NQ DOCKET ¹ FACIL: 50-400 Sheav on Hav v is Nuc leav Power Plant. Unit i. Car olina 05000400 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION KATZz S. P. Coalition fov Alternatives to Sheav on Havris RECIP. NANE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DENTONp H, R, Of f i c e of Nuc I eav'eactor Regul at i ont Direc tov' p ost 851 125

SUBJECT:

Requests NRC look at pv oblems cited in 861017 2. 206 petition v e insp of placements of alleged viiolations.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: YE03D COPIES RECEIVED: LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: Request fov NRR Action (e. g. 2. 206 Petitions) Zc Related Corv espondenc NOTES: App 1 i cati on fov p ev mi 0 v eneu!a 1 +i led. 05000400 REC IP IENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NANE LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAl'1E LTTR ENCL PWR-A PD2 LA 'PWR-A PD2 PD BUCKLEY, B 01 INTERNAL: EDO/ACB ELD/HDSi NRR DIR REC FIL EXTERNAL: LPDR 03 NRC PDR 02 NSIC 05 TOTAL NU}')BER QF COPIES REQUIRED'TTR 11 ENCL

u w I

! tp It j Rc 1

$ Jw 'Cw l W!4 II I I 11 twti CC II CC 1

!Cr' I

I 1 ~ (I ~ I f.I 1

1'3

) j,'f I I ') ll WWJJ

))'g I'W Q ) IW 0 If/

'"i

~ ~

j;,I'; WJ" Q qP$ g~w

i":, .:',,) (ill'"(t Wgwll g,C

< .';" >> . '","39, 9 . " !I'c!f$ ., 1J'>

P'"i H~:"w' JW &'ipw "! <"" PW'J .W W tt'O*W 1 Ij ll! ~

Ht!

)Qt!l'i W3 W!W 1 gw~ ~W'!~llJJ) 1 iw I

1 Wj FWw WJ~

Coalition Sr Alternatives to Sharon Harris November ll, 1986 237 NcCauley Street Chapel Hi 1 1, NC 27514

,(919) 967-6812 Hr. Harold R. Denton, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

Dear Nr. Denton,

As you know, on October 17, 1986, CASH and Wells Eddleman filed a 10 CFR 2.206 Show Cause Peti ti on with NRR. Per conversation with NRC Region II it has come to our attention that as of Friday November 7, 1986, no affirmative action has been taken to visually inspect the placements of the alleged violations. Except for the fact that NRR m ade a determination that the allegations were not "safety significant" and subsequent issuance of the low-power

-license, no other action has been undertaken by the NRC during the intervening three week period.

Let us state for the record, that the allegations con-tained in 'the CASH/Eddleman 2.206 Petition are specific (the al-legations contain placement slumbers of particular components at the plant) and are safety related (the allegations involve particular

$ gpp~f% Gf "F4 buildings which are involved in ~$ prsmary and secondary coolant sy s te ms).

In light of C.P.R L's recent violations, SEE: 50-400/

86-65, concerning unauthorized work in the very areas from which CASH/Eddleman's allegations arise (specifically electrical conduits,

, 8611210113 QDRs gDOCK 8&iiii 05000400, i

'DR '

and cable trays, concrete re airs, and structrual and ahnger repairs); to suppose that C.P.8 L. will make. efforts to correct and document over the existence of such problems is highly prob-able.

Is it the practice of NRR to delay in the examination of allegations, particularly where. specific placement numbers have been cited in the al leging petition, for more than three weeks from the date of fi ling? if such is 'the case, then some revision of NRR's inspections procedures may be necessary; and if such is not the case, then why not take a look at the probl'ems cited in the Show Cause Petition?

We look forward to a timely response, Sincerely, teve P. Katz CASH Legal Committ e

t