ML20214Q127

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
FOIA Request for Records Re Investigation of Allegations, Complaints or Arguments Presented to Nrc,Nrr or Inspector Auditor by P Mirriello
ML20214Q127
Person / Time
Site: Harris Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/03/1986
From: Katz S
COALITION FOR ALTERNATIVES TO SHEARON HARRIS
To: Grimsley D
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
References
FOIA-86-793 NUDOCS 8612040527
Download: ML20214Q127 (3)


Text

,

g I C, aAsSaHe Sheaninllarris Coalition for ljovetter 3 1956 Alternalises to dteven F. f.atz 5

CASH Legal Committee 237 McCauley St.

Utapel n111, dv e ryi*

(919) 929-1870 Donnie Grimsley Division of Rules and Records Office of Administration US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REOUES_T Q.Ac 'd H~Jz-2(o

Dear Mr. Grimsley,

Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 522, et. seq.),

the Coalition for Alternatives to Shearon Harris (CASH),

Eddleman, pro.se., requests copies of any, and Wells information, including but not limited to and all, NRC records and notes, records, letters, memorana, drafts, miniutes, diaries, summaries, interview reports, procedures, instructions, engineering $1ans, drawings, flies, graphs,

charts, handwritten notes
studies, data sheets interum and final reports, status repor,ts, and any and all reco,rds relevent to and or generated in response to:

1.

The investigation of allagations, complaints or arguments present-ed to the NRC, NRR, or the 10, by Ms. Patty Mirriello.

Particelarly the investigation, which we understand is considered closed by the IO, of the multiple affidavits presented by Ms. Mirriello concerning:

harrasment, intimidation and blacklisting, by CP&L or a.

it's agents at the Shearon Harris and Brunswick Nuclear Fower Flants.

b.

documents related tothe inservice inspection process at the Shearon Harris Plant.

documents related to Ms. Mirriello's personel radiation c.

records while employed by CP&L or it's agents.

2.

The CASH /Eddleman Erief, filed with the Commission on Oct6ber 6, 1986, and documentation concerning:

Remedial action, additions, modifications either contemplat-a.

I ed or taken by Carolina Power and Loght Co, the State of North Carolina, the varrious Counties and other quasi-Sovern mental entities involved in the planning for or participation in the Emergency Preparedness Plan (evacuation plan) for the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Flant, since the Full Scale Exercise of the plan in May of 1985; or, b.

changes in the "on-sight prepared ness"for the SHNPP.

3 NRC investigation of incidences, allagations taken by the NRC, CP&L or it's agents in response, or remedial ~ action to the discharge of CP&L or agents employees and subsequent Department of Labor investigationsi Apex: 362-4717

  • Cary: 828 0088,832 8558
  • Chapel 11i11: 942 1112, 967-6812, 9684567 Durham: 68.!.5209,683 3209
  • llillsboru: 732 8245
  • Pitt3tmru: 542-4144
  • Raleigh: 8284088 8612040527 861103 PDR FOIA KATZ86-793 PDR

s

'in particular the McWeeney and VanEeck D.O.L. claims and subsequent administrative actions, orders and appeals. investigations, 4

Provide the above requested documentation concerning the CASH /

Eddlemen 2.206 Show Cause Petition filed with the Director of Reactor Regulation on October.17,1966 which relates to:

and any and all documentation generated QA/QC arEuments contained therein a.

Wrongful discharge of employees as; stated in the arguments b.

contained therrin; and, informantion concernin5 arEuments and allagations c.

concernin5 the investigation of placement numbers and procedures from the confidential informant.

1

.y,

_,.__.--,_._,_...,.y__

...m,

<'(

o n our opinion, it is appropriate in this case that search charges be waived, pursuant to 5 USC 522(a)(4)( A),"...because furnishing the information can be considered as primarily benefiting the general public".

CASH is a non-profit organization serving it's local mem-ters and.the public at large in the effort to assure that full public participation be had in the NRC's licensing and reEulatory pro-cess.

For any documents or portions of d6cuments which you may deny due to specific FOIA Exceptions, please provide an index describinE and doc-unentin5 the portions withheld, and a justification for claiming such an Exception as required by Vaughn v Rosen, 454 F.2d E20 (D.C.Cir,1983)c We are lookin5 forwpod to your prompt reply.

Sincerely, d4 W

4

' Steve [P'.katz CASH Legal Commit ee

.s